Does affiliation of physician groups with one another produce higher quality primary care?

• Published in: Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2007-10, Vol.22 (10), p.1385-1392
• Main Authors: FRIEDBERG, Mark W, COLFIN, Kathryn L, PEARSON, Steven D, KLEINMCIN, Ken P, JIE ZHENG, SINGER, Janice A, SCHNEIDER, Eric C
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; General aspects; Group medical practice; Group Practice - organization & administration; Health care delivery; Health Care Surveys; Health Maintenance Organizations - organization & administration; Health participants; Health Planning - organization & administration; Humans; Interdisciplinary Communication; Internal medicine; Male; Massachusetts; Medical sciences; Miscellaneous; Original; Physicians; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends; Primary care; Primary Health Care - organization & administration; Program Evaluation; Public health. Hygiene; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine; Quality Assurance, Health Care; Quality of care
• ISSN: 0884-8734; 1525-1497
• DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0234-0

Recent reports have emphasized the importance of delivery systems in improving health care quality. However, few prior studies have assessed differences in primary care quality between physician groups that differ in size and organizational configuration. We examined whether larger physician group size and affiliation with networks of multiple groups are associated with higher quality of care. We conducted a cross-sectional observational analysis of 132 physician groups (including 4,358 physicians) who delivered primary care services in Massachusetts in 2002. We compared physician groups on performance scores for 12 Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures reflecting processes of adult primary care. Network-affiliated physician groups had higher performance scores than non-affiliated groups for 10 of the 12 HEDIS measures (p < 0.05). There was no consistent relationship between group size and performance scores. Multivariable models including group size, network affiliation, and health plan showed that network-affiliated groups had higher performance scores than non-affiliated groups on 8 of the 12 HEDIS measures (p < 0.05), and larger group size was not associated with higher performance scores. Adjusted differences in the performance scores of network-affiliated and non-affiliated groups ranged from 2% to 15%. For 4 HEDIS measures related to diabetes care, performance score differences between network-affiliated and non-affiliated groups were most apparent among the smallest groups. Physician group affiliation with networks of multiple groups was associated with higher quality, and for measures of diabetes care the quality advantage of network-affiliation was most evident among smaller physician groups.