Loading…

Trends in Follow-up and Preventive Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors

Background As cancer patients transition from treatment to survivorship, the responsibility of primary care providers (PCPs) versus oncology specialists is unclear. Objectives To explore (1) physician types (PCPs versus oncology specialists) survivors visit during survivorship year 1, (2) preventive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2008-03, Vol.23 (3), p.254-259
Main Authors: Snyder, Claire F., Earle, Craig C., Herbert, Robert J., Neville, Bridget A., Blackford, Amanda L., Frick, Kevin D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-33c505ee2a44055bf05ec1608ff52c47e6b8a9336b14b4359fbae69c9826369c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-33c505ee2a44055bf05ec1608ff52c47e6b8a9336b14b4359fbae69c9826369c3
container_end_page 259
container_issue 3
container_start_page 254
container_title Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM
container_volume 23
creator Snyder, Claire F.
Earle, Craig C.
Herbert, Robert J.
Neville, Bridget A.
Blackford, Amanda L.
Frick, Kevin D.
description Background As cancer patients transition from treatment to survivorship, the responsibility of primary care providers (PCPs) versus oncology specialists is unclear. Objectives To explore (1) physician types (PCPs versus oncology specialists) survivors visit during survivorship year 1, (2) preventive care received, (3) how preventive care receipt relates to physician types visited, and (4) trends in physician types visited and preventive care received over time. Design Retrospective cross-sectional study of 5 cohorts of cancer survivors in survivorship year 1. Subjects Twenty thousand sixty-eight survivors diagnosed with stage 1–3 colorectal cancer between 1997 and 2001. Measurements Using the SEER-Medicare database, we assessed the mean number of visits to different physician types, the percentage of survivors receiving preventive services, how receipt of preventive services related to physician types visited, and trends over time in physician visits and preventive care. Results There was a trend over time of increased visits to all physician types, which was statistically significant for oncology specialists and other physicians ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11606-007-0497-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2359475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2395250951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-33c505ee2a44055bf05ec1608ff52c47e6b8a9336b14b4359fbae69c9826369c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9rFDEQx4Mo9lr9A3yRRbBv0fze7ItQDluFgoL1OWRzs3VLLjkntyv-92a9o1XBp5nJfPLNdzKEvODsDWesfVs4N8zQmlKmupbqR2TFtdCU1-oxWTFrFbWtVCfktJQ7xrgUwj4lJ9zyrlXarMjVDULalGZMzWWOMf-g067xadN8Rpgh7ccZmrVHaIaMzTrHjBD2PtazFACbLxPO45yxPCNPBh8LPD_GM_L18v3N-gO9_nT1cX1xTUO1tKdSBs00gPBKMa37oRahDmGHQYugWjC99Z2UpueqV1J3Q-_BdKGzwsga5Rl5d9DdTf0WNqFaRB_dDsetx58u-9H93UnjN3ebZyeqmGp1FTg_CmD-PkHZu-1YAsToE-SpuJZJJthv8NU_4F2eMNXhnG21sVoqWyF-gALmUhCGeyecuWVH7rAjt6TLjtwi_PLPER5uHJdSgddHwJfg44D1r8dyz4nqT1mzCIkDV2or3QI-OPz_678AFtWpCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>875685348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in Follow-up and Preventive Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Snyder, Claire F. ; Earle, Craig C. ; Herbert, Robert J. ; Neville, Bridget A. ; Blackford, Amanda L. ; Frick, Kevin D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Claire F. ; Earle, Craig C. ; Herbert, Robert J. ; Neville, Bridget A. ; Blackford, Amanda L. ; Frick, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><description>Background As cancer patients transition from treatment to survivorship, the responsibility of primary care providers (PCPs) versus oncology specialists is unclear. Objectives To explore (1) physician types (PCPs versus oncology specialists) survivors visit during survivorship year 1, (2) preventive care received, (3) how preventive care receipt relates to physician types visited, and (4) trends in physician types visited and preventive care received over time. Design Retrospective cross-sectional study of 5 cohorts of cancer survivors in survivorship year 1. Subjects Twenty thousand sixty-eight survivors diagnosed with stage 1–3 colorectal cancer between 1997 and 2001. Measurements Using the SEER-Medicare database, we assessed the mean number of visits to different physician types, the percentage of survivors receiving preventive services, how receipt of preventive services related to physician types visited, and trends over time in physician visits and preventive care. Results There was a trend over time of increased visits to all physician types, which was statistically significant for oncology specialists and other physicians ( p  &lt; .001) but not PCPs. The percentage of survivors receiving preventive services remained relatively stable across the 5 cohorts, except for an increase in bone densitometry ( p  &lt; .05). Survivors who visited both a PCP and oncology specialist were most likely to receive each preventive care service ( p  &lt; .05). Conclusions Oncology specialist follow-up in survivorship year 1 is intensifying over time. Survivors not being followed-up by both PCPs and oncology specialists were less likely to receive preventive care. Clarifying the roles of PCPs and oncology specialists during follow-up can improve the quality of care for survivors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0497-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18197456</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Continuity of Patient Care - standards ; Continuity of Patient Care - trends ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; General aspects ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Mammography ; Medical sciences ; Medicare ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention &amp; control ; Oncology ; Original ; Original Article ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Physicians ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Prevention and actions ; Preventive medicine ; Primary care ; Probability ; Prognosis ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Registries ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; SEER Program ; Sex Factors ; Surveillance ; Survivors ; Time Factors ; Trends ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2008-03, Vol.23 (3), p.254-259</ispartof><rights>Society of General Internal Medicine 2007</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Society of General Internal Medicine 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-33c505ee2a44055bf05ec1608ff52c47e6b8a9336b14b4359fbae69c9826369c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-33c505ee2a44055bf05ec1608ff52c47e6b8a9336b14b4359fbae69c9826369c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359475/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359475/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20204865$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18197456$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Claire F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earle, Craig C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neville, Bridget A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackford, Amanda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frick, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in Follow-up and Preventive Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors</title><title>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</title><addtitle>J GEN INTERN MED</addtitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><description>Background As cancer patients transition from treatment to survivorship, the responsibility of primary care providers (PCPs) versus oncology specialists is unclear. Objectives To explore (1) physician types (PCPs versus oncology specialists) survivors visit during survivorship year 1, (2) preventive care received, (3) how preventive care receipt relates to physician types visited, and (4) trends in physician types visited and preventive care received over time. Design Retrospective cross-sectional study of 5 cohorts of cancer survivors in survivorship year 1. Subjects Twenty thousand sixty-eight survivors diagnosed with stage 1–3 colorectal cancer between 1997 and 2001. Measurements Using the SEER-Medicare database, we assessed the mean number of visits to different physician types, the percentage of survivors receiving preventive services, how receipt of preventive services related to physician types visited, and trends over time in physician visits and preventive care. Results There was a trend over time of increased visits to all physician types, which was statistically significant for oncology specialists and other physicians ( p  &lt; .001) but not PCPs. The percentage of survivors receiving preventive services remained relatively stable across the 5 cohorts, except for an increase in bone densitometry ( p  &lt; .05). Survivors who visited both a PCP and oncology specialist were most likely to receive each preventive care service ( p  &lt; .05). Conclusions Oncology specialist follow-up in survivorship year 1 is intensifying over time. Survivors not being followed-up by both PCPs and oncology specialists were less likely to receive preventive care. Clarifying the roles of PCPs and oncology specialists during follow-up can improve the quality of care for survivors.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care - trends</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>SEER Program</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Survivors</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0884-8734</issn><issn>1525-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd9rFDEQx4Mo9lr9A3yRRbBv0fze7ItQDluFgoL1OWRzs3VLLjkntyv-92a9o1XBp5nJfPLNdzKEvODsDWesfVs4N8zQmlKmupbqR2TFtdCU1-oxWTFrFbWtVCfktJQ7xrgUwj4lJ9zyrlXarMjVDULalGZMzWWOMf-g067xadN8Rpgh7ccZmrVHaIaMzTrHjBD2PtazFACbLxPO45yxPCNPBh8LPD_GM_L18v3N-gO9_nT1cX1xTUO1tKdSBs00gPBKMa37oRahDmGHQYugWjC99Z2UpueqV1J3Q-_BdKGzwsga5Rl5d9DdTf0WNqFaRB_dDsetx58u-9H93UnjN3ebZyeqmGp1FTg_CmD-PkHZu-1YAsToE-SpuJZJJthv8NU_4F2eMNXhnG21sVoqWyF-gALmUhCGeyecuWVH7rAjt6TLjtwi_PLPER5uHJdSgddHwJfg44D1r8dyz4nqT1mzCIkDV2or3QI-OPz_678AFtWpCw</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Snyder, Claire F.</creator><creator>Earle, Craig C.</creator><creator>Herbert, Robert J.</creator><creator>Neville, Bridget A.</creator><creator>Blackford, Amanda L.</creator><creator>Frick, Kevin D.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Trends in Follow-up and Preventive Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors</title><author>Snyder, Claire F. ; Earle, Craig C. ; Herbert, Robert J. ; Neville, Bridget A. ; Blackford, Amanda L. ; Frick, Kevin D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-33c505ee2a44055bf05ec1608ff52c47e6b8a9336b14b4359fbae69c9826369c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care - trends</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>SEER Program</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Survivors</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Claire F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earle, Craig C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neville, Bridget A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackford, Amanda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frick, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snyder, Claire F.</au><au>Earle, Craig C.</au><au>Herbert, Robert J.</au><au>Neville, Bridget A.</au><au>Blackford, Amanda L.</au><au>Frick, Kevin D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in Follow-up and Preventive Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle><stitle>J GEN INTERN MED</stitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>254</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>254-259</pages><issn>0884-8734</issn><eissn>1525-1497</eissn><abstract>Background As cancer patients transition from treatment to survivorship, the responsibility of primary care providers (PCPs) versus oncology specialists is unclear. Objectives To explore (1) physician types (PCPs versus oncology specialists) survivors visit during survivorship year 1, (2) preventive care received, (3) how preventive care receipt relates to physician types visited, and (4) trends in physician types visited and preventive care received over time. Design Retrospective cross-sectional study of 5 cohorts of cancer survivors in survivorship year 1. Subjects Twenty thousand sixty-eight survivors diagnosed with stage 1–3 colorectal cancer between 1997 and 2001. Measurements Using the SEER-Medicare database, we assessed the mean number of visits to different physician types, the percentage of survivors receiving preventive services, how receipt of preventive services related to physician types visited, and trends over time in physician visits and preventive care. Results There was a trend over time of increased visits to all physician types, which was statistically significant for oncology specialists and other physicians ( p  &lt; .001) but not PCPs. The percentage of survivors receiving preventive services remained relatively stable across the 5 cohorts, except for an increase in bone densitometry ( p  &lt; .05). Survivors who visited both a PCP and oncology specialist were most likely to receive each preventive care service ( p  &lt; .05). Conclusions Oncology specialist follow-up in survivorship year 1 is intensifying over time. Survivors not being followed-up by both PCPs and oncology specialists were less likely to receive preventive care. Clarifying the roles of PCPs and oncology specialists during follow-up can improve the quality of care for survivors.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>18197456</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11606-007-0497-5</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-8734
ispartof Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2008-03, Vol.23 (3), p.254-259
issn 0884-8734
1525-1497
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2359475
source Springer Nature; PubMed Central
subjects Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Attitude of Health Personnel
Biological and medical sciences
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality
Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy
Combined Modality Therapy
Continuity of Patient Care - standards
Continuity of Patient Care - trends
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
General aspects
Humans
Internal Medicine
Male
Mammography
Medical sciences
Medicare
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention & control
Oncology
Original
Original Article
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Physicians
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Prevention and actions
Preventive medicine
Primary care
Probability
Prognosis
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
SEER Program
Sex Factors
Surveillance
Survivors
Time Factors
Trends
United States
title Trends in Follow-up and Preventive Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A41%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20Follow-up%20and%20Preventive%20Care%20for%20Colorectal%20Cancer%20Survivors&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20internal%20medicine%20:%20JGIM&rft.au=Snyder,%20Claire%20F.&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=254&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=254-259&rft.issn=0884-8734&rft.eissn=1525-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11606-007-0497-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2395250951%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-33c505ee2a44055bf05ec1608ff52c47e6b8a9336b14b4359fbae69c9826369c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=875685348&rft_id=info:pmid/18197456&rfr_iscdi=true