Loading…
Feasibility of targeted early detection for melanoma: a population-based screening study
The feasibility of targeted screening for cutaneous malignant melanoma in the UK using a postal questionnaire and invitation to screening by a consultant dermatologist was investigated in a population based cross-sectional survey. A total of 1600 people aged 25–69 years, stratified by the social dep...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of cancer 2000-05, Vol.82 (9), p.1605-1609 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1609 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1605 |
container_title | British journal of cancer |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Melia, J Harland, C Moss, S Eiser, J R Pendry, L |
description | The feasibility of targeted screening for cutaneous malignant melanoma in the UK using a postal questionnaire and invitation to screening by a consultant dermatologist was investigated in a population based cross-sectional survey. A total of 1600 people aged 25–69 years, stratified by the social deprivation score of wards within one general practice, were randomly selected from a population of 8000.1227 (77%) returned the questionnaire and 896 (56%) attended the screening clinic. Uptake was lower for men (
P
< 0.001), those aged under 50 (
P
< 0.001), people from deprived areas (
P
< 0.001) and skin types III and IV (men only,
P
< 0.001). Twenty per cent of women and 10% of men felt nervous about attending the clinic, but only 4% were worried by the questionnaire. The level of agreement between the self- and dermatologist’s assessments of risk factors was best for hair colour (Kappa = 0.67, sensitivity 73% and specificity 98%). People tended to under-report their level of risk. Over 95% knew about at least one major sign, but 54% reported incorrect signs of melanoma. Targeted screening for melanoma in the UK will be hampered by difficulties in accurately identifying the target population. Strategies to improve skin self-awareness rather than screening should be developed and evaluated. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign |
doi_str_mv | 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1183 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2363392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1008686161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-n380t-7047bbdc77ec12f47a7070de75f85e95d9a1e0f38563d8f639ee50a06c41aad13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1v1DAQtRCILoUrN1CEELe0_kjiuAckVFFAqsQFJG7WxJ4sXiX2YjtI--9x2KUFTvb4vXl-M4-Q54xeMNo2l8MumAtOaSlZLx6QDWsFr1nP5UOyKc-yporTM_IkpV0pFe3lY3LGqOyVFHxDvt0gJDe4yeVDFcYqQ9xiRlshxOlQ2XI32QVfjSFWM07gwwxXFVT7sF8mWKF6gFQakomI3vltlfJiD0_JoxGmhM9O5zn5evP-y_XH-vbzh0_X725rL3qaa0kbOQzWSImG8bGRIKmkFmU79i2q1ipgSEfRt52w_dgJhdhSoJ1pGIBl4py8Perul2FGa9DnCJPeRzdDPOgATv-LePddb8NPzUUnhOJF4M1JIIYfC6asZ5cMTmVUDEvSkjEqZN8V4qv_iLuwRF-GK1plt03XrHZe_m3nzsefjRfC6xMBkoFpjOCNS_c8UUS4KrTLIy0VxG8x3n_GqF6j12v0eo1er9GXjhfHDg95iXin2HXqN_4LZASqaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230004641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of targeted early detection for melanoma: a population-based screening study</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Melia, J ; Harland, C ; Moss, S ; Eiser, J R ; Pendry, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Melia, J ; Harland, C ; Moss, S ; Eiser, J R ; Pendry, L</creatorcontrib><description>The feasibility of targeted screening for cutaneous malignant melanoma in the UK using a postal questionnaire and invitation to screening by a consultant dermatologist was investigated in a population based cross-sectional survey. A total of 1600 people aged 25–69 years, stratified by the social deprivation score of wards within one general practice, were randomly selected from a population of 8000.1227 (77%) returned the questionnaire and 896 (56%) attended the screening clinic. Uptake was lower for men (
P
< 0.001), those aged under 50 (
P
< 0.001), people from deprived areas (
P
< 0.001) and skin types III and IV (men only,
P
< 0.001). Twenty per cent of women and 10% of men felt nervous about attending the clinic, but only 4% were worried by the questionnaire. The level of agreement between the self- and dermatologist’s assessments of risk factors was best for hair colour (Kappa = 0.67, sensitivity 73% and specificity 98%). People tended to under-report their level of risk. Over 95% knew about at least one major sign, but 54% reported incorrect signs of melanoma. Targeted screening for melanoma in the UK will be hampered by difficulties in accurately identifying the target population. Strategies to improve skin self-awareness rather than screening should be developed and evaluated. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1183</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10789732</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJCAAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cancer Research ; Dermatology ; Drug Resistance ; Epidemiology ; Feasibility ; Feasibility Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Melanoma ; Melanoma - diagnosis ; Melanoma - epidemiology ; Middle Aged ; Molecular Medicine ; Oncology ; Population Surveillance ; Questionnaires ; Regular ; regular-article ; Risk factors ; Self evaluation ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Skin cancer ; Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Skin Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><ispartof>British journal of cancer, 2000-05, Vol.82 (9), p.1605-1609</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2000</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group May 2000</rights><rights>Copyright © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign 2000 Cancer Research Campaign</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363392/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363392/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1341329$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10789732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melia, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harland, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eiser, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendry, L</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of targeted early detection for melanoma: a population-based screening study</title><title>British journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><description>The feasibility of targeted screening for cutaneous malignant melanoma in the UK using a postal questionnaire and invitation to screening by a consultant dermatologist was investigated in a population based cross-sectional survey. A total of 1600 people aged 25–69 years, stratified by the social deprivation score of wards within one general practice, were randomly selected from a population of 8000.1227 (77%) returned the questionnaire and 896 (56%) attended the screening clinic. Uptake was lower for men (
P
< 0.001), those aged under 50 (
P
< 0.001), people from deprived areas (
P
< 0.001) and skin types III and IV (men only,
P
< 0.001). Twenty per cent of women and 10% of men felt nervous about attending the clinic, but only 4% were worried by the questionnaire. The level of agreement between the self- and dermatologist’s assessments of risk factors was best for hair colour (Kappa = 0.67, sensitivity 73% and specificity 98%). People tended to under-report their level of risk. Over 95% knew about at least one major sign, but 54% reported incorrect signs of melanoma. Targeted screening for melanoma in the UK will be hampered by difficulties in accurately identifying the target population. Strategies to improve skin self-awareness rather than screening should be developed and evaluated. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Drug Resistance</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Melanoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Melanoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Molecular Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regular</subject><subject>regular-article</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Skin cancer</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><issn>0007-0920</issn><issn>1532-1827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUU1v1DAQtRCILoUrN1CEELe0_kjiuAckVFFAqsQFJG7WxJ4sXiX2YjtI--9x2KUFTvb4vXl-M4-Q54xeMNo2l8MumAtOaSlZLx6QDWsFr1nP5UOyKc-yporTM_IkpV0pFe3lY3LGqOyVFHxDvt0gJDe4yeVDFcYqQ9xiRlshxOlQ2XI32QVfjSFWM07gwwxXFVT7sF8mWKF6gFQakomI3vltlfJiD0_JoxGmhM9O5zn5evP-y_XH-vbzh0_X725rL3qaa0kbOQzWSImG8bGRIKmkFmU79i2q1ipgSEfRt52w_dgJhdhSoJ1pGIBl4py8Perul2FGa9DnCJPeRzdDPOgATv-LePddb8NPzUUnhOJF4M1JIIYfC6asZ5cMTmVUDEvSkjEqZN8V4qv_iLuwRF-GK1plt03XrHZe_m3nzsefjRfC6xMBkoFpjOCNS_c8UUS4KrTLIy0VxG8x3n_GqF6j12v0eo1er9GXjhfHDg95iXin2HXqN_4LZASqaA</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Melia, J</creator><creator>Harland, C</creator><creator>Moss, S</creator><creator>Eiser, J R</creator><creator>Pendry, L</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>Feasibility of targeted early detection for melanoma: a population-based screening study</title><author>Melia, J ; Harland, C ; Moss, S ; Eiser, J R ; Pendry, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-n380t-7047bbdc77ec12f47a7070de75f85e95d9a1e0f38563d8f639ee50a06c41aad13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Drug Resistance</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Melanoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Melanoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Molecular Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regular</topic><topic>regular-article</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Skin cancer</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melia, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harland, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eiser, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendry, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melia, J</au><au>Harland, C</au><au>Moss, S</au><au>Eiser, J R</au><au>Pendry, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of targeted early detection for melanoma: a population-based screening study</atitle><jtitle>British journal of cancer</jtitle><stitle>Br J Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1605</spage><epage>1609</epage><pages>1605-1609</pages><issn>0007-0920</issn><eissn>1532-1827</eissn><coden>BJCAAI</coden><abstract>The feasibility of targeted screening for cutaneous malignant melanoma in the UK using a postal questionnaire and invitation to screening by a consultant dermatologist was investigated in a population based cross-sectional survey. A total of 1600 people aged 25–69 years, stratified by the social deprivation score of wards within one general practice, were randomly selected from a population of 8000.1227 (77%) returned the questionnaire and 896 (56%) attended the screening clinic. Uptake was lower for men (
P
< 0.001), those aged under 50 (
P
< 0.001), people from deprived areas (
P
< 0.001) and skin types III and IV (men only,
P
< 0.001). Twenty per cent of women and 10% of men felt nervous about attending the clinic, but only 4% were worried by the questionnaire. The level of agreement between the self- and dermatologist’s assessments of risk factors was best for hair colour (Kappa = 0.67, sensitivity 73% and specificity 98%). People tended to under-report their level of risk. Over 95% knew about at least one major sign, but 54% reported incorrect signs of melanoma. Targeted screening for melanoma in the UK will be hampered by difficulties in accurately identifying the target population. Strategies to improve skin self-awareness rather than screening should be developed and evaluated. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>10789732</pmid><doi>10.1054/bjoc.2000.1183</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0920 |
ispartof | British journal of cancer, 2000-05, Vol.82 (9), p.1605-1609 |
issn | 0007-0920 1532-1827 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2363392 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cancer Research Dermatology Drug Resistance Epidemiology Feasibility Feasibility Studies Humans Male Mass Screening Medical research Medical sciences Melanoma Melanoma - diagnosis Melanoma - epidemiology Middle Aged Molecular Medicine Oncology Population Surveillance Questionnaires Regular regular-article Risk factors Self evaluation Sensitivity and Specificity Skin cancer Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis Skin Neoplasms - epidemiology Surveys and Questionnaires Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions |
title | Feasibility of targeted early detection for melanoma: a population-based screening study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A16%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20targeted%20early%20detection%20for%20melanoma:%20a%20population-based%20screening%20study&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Melia,%20J&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1605&rft.epage=1609&rft.pages=1605-1609&rft.issn=0007-0920&rft.eissn=1532-1827&rft.coden=BJCAAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1183&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1008686161%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-n380t-7047bbdc77ec12f47a7070de75f85e95d9a1e0f38563d8f639ee50a06c41aad13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230004641&rft_id=info:pmid/10789732&rfr_iscdi=true |