Loading…

Feasibility of targeted early detection for melanoma: a population-based screening study

The feasibility of targeted screening for cutaneous malignant melanoma in the UK using a postal questionnaire and invitation to screening by a consultant dermatologist was investigated in a population based cross-sectional survey. A total of 1600 people aged 25–69 years, stratified by the social dep...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of cancer 2000-05, Vol.82 (9), p.1605-1609
Main Authors: Melia, J, Harland, C, Moss, S, Eiser, J R, Pendry, L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 1609
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1605
container_title British journal of cancer
container_volume 82
creator Melia, J
Harland, C
Moss, S
Eiser, J R
Pendry, L
description The feasibility of targeted screening for cutaneous malignant melanoma in the UK using a postal questionnaire and invitation to screening by a consultant dermatologist was investigated in a population based cross-sectional survey. A total of 1600 people aged 25–69 years, stratified by the social deprivation score of wards within one general practice, were randomly selected from a population of 8000.1227 (77%) returned the questionnaire and 896 (56%) attended the screening clinic. Uptake was lower for men ( P < 0.001), those aged under 50 ( P < 0.001), people from deprived areas ( P < 0.001) and skin types III and IV (men only, P < 0.001). Twenty per cent of women and 10% of men felt nervous about attending the clinic, but only 4% were worried by the questionnaire. The level of agreement between the self- and dermatologist’s assessments of risk factors was best for hair colour (Kappa = 0.67, sensitivity 73% and specificity 98%). People tended to under-report their level of risk. Over 95% knew about at least one major sign, but 54% reported incorrect signs of melanoma. Targeted screening for melanoma in the UK will be hampered by difficulties in accurately identifying the target population. Strategies to improve skin self-awareness rather than screening should be developed and evaluated. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign
doi_str_mv 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1183
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2363392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1008686161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-n380t-7047bbdc77ec12f47a7070de75f85e95d9a1e0f38563d8f639ee50a06c41aad13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1v1DAQtRCILoUrN1CEELe0_kjiuAckVFFAqsQFJG7WxJ4sXiX2YjtI--9x2KUFTvb4vXl-M4-Q54xeMNo2l8MumAtOaSlZLx6QDWsFr1nP5UOyKc-yporTM_IkpV0pFe3lY3LGqOyVFHxDvt0gJDe4yeVDFcYqQ9xiRlshxOlQ2XI32QVfjSFWM07gwwxXFVT7sF8mWKF6gFQakomI3vltlfJiD0_JoxGmhM9O5zn5evP-y_XH-vbzh0_X725rL3qaa0kbOQzWSImG8bGRIKmkFmU79i2q1ipgSEfRt52w_dgJhdhSoJ1pGIBl4py8Perul2FGa9DnCJPeRzdDPOgATv-LePddb8NPzUUnhOJF4M1JIIYfC6asZ5cMTmVUDEvSkjEqZN8V4qv_iLuwRF-GK1plt03XrHZe_m3nzsefjRfC6xMBkoFpjOCNS_c8UUS4KrTLIy0VxG8x3n_GqF6j12v0eo1er9GXjhfHDg95iXin2HXqN_4LZASqaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230004641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of targeted early detection for melanoma: a population-based screening study</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Melia, J ; Harland, C ; Moss, S ; Eiser, J R ; Pendry, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Melia, J ; Harland, C ; Moss, S ; Eiser, J R ; Pendry, L</creatorcontrib><description>The feasibility of targeted screening for cutaneous malignant melanoma in the UK using a postal questionnaire and invitation to screening by a consultant dermatologist was investigated in a population based cross-sectional survey. A total of 1600 people aged 25–69 years, stratified by the social deprivation score of wards within one general practice, were randomly selected from a population of 8000.1227 (77%) returned the questionnaire and 896 (56%) attended the screening clinic. Uptake was lower for men ( P &lt; 0.001), those aged under 50 ( P &lt; 0.001), people from deprived areas ( P &lt; 0.001) and skin types III and IV (men only, P &lt; 0.001). Twenty per cent of women and 10% of men felt nervous about attending the clinic, but only 4% were worried by the questionnaire. The level of agreement between the self- and dermatologist’s assessments of risk factors was best for hair colour (Kappa = 0.67, sensitivity 73% and specificity 98%). People tended to under-report their level of risk. Over 95% knew about at least one major sign, but 54% reported incorrect signs of melanoma. Targeted screening for melanoma in the UK will be hampered by difficulties in accurately identifying the target population. Strategies to improve skin self-awareness rather than screening should be developed and evaluated. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1183</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10789732</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJCAAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cancer Research ; Dermatology ; Drug Resistance ; Epidemiology ; Feasibility ; Feasibility Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Melanoma ; Melanoma - diagnosis ; Melanoma - epidemiology ; Middle Aged ; Molecular Medicine ; Oncology ; Population Surveillance ; Questionnaires ; Regular ; regular-article ; Risk factors ; Self evaluation ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Skin cancer ; Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Skin Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><ispartof>British journal of cancer, 2000-05, Vol.82 (9), p.1605-1609</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2000</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group May 2000</rights><rights>Copyright © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign 2000 Cancer Research Campaign</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363392/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363392/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1341329$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10789732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melia, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harland, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eiser, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendry, L</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of targeted early detection for melanoma: a population-based screening study</title><title>British journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><description>The feasibility of targeted screening for cutaneous malignant melanoma in the UK using a postal questionnaire and invitation to screening by a consultant dermatologist was investigated in a population based cross-sectional survey. A total of 1600 people aged 25–69 years, stratified by the social deprivation score of wards within one general practice, were randomly selected from a population of 8000.1227 (77%) returned the questionnaire and 896 (56%) attended the screening clinic. Uptake was lower for men ( P &lt; 0.001), those aged under 50 ( P &lt; 0.001), people from deprived areas ( P &lt; 0.001) and skin types III and IV (men only, P &lt; 0.001). Twenty per cent of women and 10% of men felt nervous about attending the clinic, but only 4% were worried by the questionnaire. The level of agreement between the self- and dermatologist’s assessments of risk factors was best for hair colour (Kappa = 0.67, sensitivity 73% and specificity 98%). People tended to under-report their level of risk. Over 95% knew about at least one major sign, but 54% reported incorrect signs of melanoma. Targeted screening for melanoma in the UK will be hampered by difficulties in accurately identifying the target population. Strategies to improve skin self-awareness rather than screening should be developed and evaluated. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Drug Resistance</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Melanoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Melanoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Molecular Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regular</subject><subject>regular-article</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Skin cancer</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><issn>0007-0920</issn><issn>1532-1827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUU1v1DAQtRCILoUrN1CEELe0_kjiuAckVFFAqsQFJG7WxJ4sXiX2YjtI--9x2KUFTvb4vXl-M4-Q54xeMNo2l8MumAtOaSlZLx6QDWsFr1nP5UOyKc-yporTM_IkpV0pFe3lY3LGqOyVFHxDvt0gJDe4yeVDFcYqQ9xiRlshxOlQ2XI32QVfjSFWM07gwwxXFVT7sF8mWKF6gFQakomI3vltlfJiD0_JoxGmhM9O5zn5evP-y_XH-vbzh0_X725rL3qaa0kbOQzWSImG8bGRIKmkFmU79i2q1ipgSEfRt52w_dgJhdhSoJ1pGIBl4py8Perul2FGa9DnCJPeRzdDPOgATv-LePddb8NPzUUnhOJF4M1JIIYfC6asZ5cMTmVUDEvSkjEqZN8V4qv_iLuwRF-GK1plt03XrHZe_m3nzsefjRfC6xMBkoFpjOCNS_c8UUS4KrTLIy0VxG8x3n_GqF6j12v0eo1er9GXjhfHDg95iXin2HXqN_4LZASqaA</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Melia, J</creator><creator>Harland, C</creator><creator>Moss, S</creator><creator>Eiser, J R</creator><creator>Pendry, L</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>Feasibility of targeted early detection for melanoma: a population-based screening study</title><author>Melia, J ; Harland, C ; Moss, S ; Eiser, J R ; Pendry, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-n380t-7047bbdc77ec12f47a7070de75f85e95d9a1e0f38563d8f639ee50a06c41aad13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Drug Resistance</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Melanoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Melanoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Molecular Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regular</topic><topic>regular-article</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Skin cancer</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melia, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harland, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eiser, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendry, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melia, J</au><au>Harland, C</au><au>Moss, S</au><au>Eiser, J R</au><au>Pendry, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of targeted early detection for melanoma: a population-based screening study</atitle><jtitle>British journal of cancer</jtitle><stitle>Br J Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1605</spage><epage>1609</epage><pages>1605-1609</pages><issn>0007-0920</issn><eissn>1532-1827</eissn><coden>BJCAAI</coden><abstract>The feasibility of targeted screening for cutaneous malignant melanoma in the UK using a postal questionnaire and invitation to screening by a consultant dermatologist was investigated in a population based cross-sectional survey. A total of 1600 people aged 25–69 years, stratified by the social deprivation score of wards within one general practice, were randomly selected from a population of 8000.1227 (77%) returned the questionnaire and 896 (56%) attended the screening clinic. Uptake was lower for men ( P &lt; 0.001), those aged under 50 ( P &lt; 0.001), people from deprived areas ( P &lt; 0.001) and skin types III and IV (men only, P &lt; 0.001). Twenty per cent of women and 10% of men felt nervous about attending the clinic, but only 4% were worried by the questionnaire. The level of agreement between the self- and dermatologist’s assessments of risk factors was best for hair colour (Kappa = 0.67, sensitivity 73% and specificity 98%). People tended to under-report their level of risk. Over 95% knew about at least one major sign, but 54% reported incorrect signs of melanoma. Targeted screening for melanoma in the UK will be hampered by difficulties in accurately identifying the target population. Strategies to improve skin self-awareness rather than screening should be developed and evaluated. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>10789732</pmid><doi>10.1054/bjoc.2000.1183</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0920
ispartof British journal of cancer, 2000-05, Vol.82 (9), p.1605-1609
issn 0007-0920
1532-1827
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2363392
source PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Cancer Research
Dermatology
Drug Resistance
Epidemiology
Feasibility
Feasibility Studies
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
Medical research
Medical sciences
Melanoma
Melanoma - diagnosis
Melanoma - epidemiology
Middle Aged
Molecular Medicine
Oncology
Population Surveillance
Questionnaires
Regular
regular-article
Risk factors
Self evaluation
Sensitivity and Specificity
Skin cancer
Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis
Skin Neoplasms - epidemiology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions
title Feasibility of targeted early detection for melanoma: a population-based screening study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A16%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20targeted%20early%20detection%20for%20melanoma:%20a%20population-based%20screening%20study&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Melia,%20J&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1605&rft.epage=1609&rft.pages=1605-1609&rft.issn=0007-0920&rft.eissn=1532-1827&rft.coden=BJCAAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1183&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1008686161%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-n380t-7047bbdc77ec12f47a7070de75f85e95d9a1e0f38563d8f639ee50a06c41aad13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230004641&rft_id=info:pmid/10789732&rfr_iscdi=true