Influence of decortication of the recipient graft bed on graft integration and tissue neoformation in the graft-recipient bed interface

• Published in: European spine journal 2008-05, Vol.17 (5), p.706-714
• Main Authors: Canto, Fabiano R. T., Garcia, Sergio B., Issa, João P. M., Marin, Anderson, Del Bel, Elaine A., Defino, Helton L. A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Bone Regeneration - physiology; Bone Transplantation - methods; Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neurosurgery; Original; Original Article; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Spinal Fusion - methods; Surgical Orthopedics
• ISSN: 0940-6719; 1432-0932
• DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0642-9

The objective of the present study was to assess the influence of decortication of the posterior elements of the vertebra (recipient bed) and the nature of the bone graft (cortical or cancellous bone) on graft integration and bone, cartilage and fiber neoformation in the interface between the vertebral recipient bed and the bone graft. Seventy-two male Wistar rats were divided into four experimental groups according to the presence or absence of decortication of the posterior vertebral elements and the use of a cortical or cancellous bone graft. Group I—the posterior elements were decorticated and cancellous bone used. Group II—the posterior elements were decorticated and cortical graft was used. Group III—the posterior elements were not decorticated and cancellous graft was used. Group IV—the posterior elements were not decorticated and cortical graft was used. The animals were killed 3, 6 and 9 weeks after surgery and the interface between the posterior elements and the bone graft was subjected to histomorphometric evaluation. Mean percent neoformed bone was 40.8% in group I (decortication and cancellous graft), 39.13% in group II (decortication and cortical graft), 6.13% in group III (non-decorticated and cancellous graft), and 9.27% in group IV (non-decorticated and cortical graft) for animals killed at 3 weeks ( P  = 0.0005). For animals killed at 6 weeks, the mean percent was 38.53% for group I, 40.40% for group II, 10.27% for group III, and 7.6% for group IV ( P  = 0.0005), and for animals killed at 9 weeks, the mean was 25.93% for group I, 30.6% for group II, 16.4% for group III, and 18.73% for group IV ( P  = 0.0026). The mean percent neoformed cartilage tissue was 8.36% for group I, 7.46% for group II, 11.1% for group III, and 9.13% for group IV for the animals killed at 3 weeks ( P  = 0.6544); 6.6% for group I, 8.07% for group, 7.47% for group III and 6.13% for group IV ( P  = 0.4889) for animals killed at 6 weeks, and 3.13% for group I, 4.06% for group II, 10.53% for group III and 12.07% for group IV ( P  = 0.0006) for animals killed at 9 weeks. Mean percent neoformed fibrous tissue was 11% for group I, 6.13% for group II, 26.27% for group III and 21.87% for group IV for animals killed at 3 weeks ( P  = 0.0008); 7.67% for group I, 7.1% for group II, 9.8% for group III and 10.4% for group IV ( P  = 0.7880) for animals killed at 6 weeks, and 3.73% for group I, 4.4% for group II, 6.67% for group III and 6.8% for group IV ( P  = 0.0214) for animals