Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults)

• Published in: Journal of memory and language 2008-02, Vol.58 (2), p.574-608
• Main Authors: Snedeker, Jesse, Yuan, Sylvia
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adults; Biological and medical sciences; Child; Child development; Children & youth; Children’s language comprehension; Cognition & reasoning; Cognitive Psychology; Cues; Decision making; Developmental psychology; Experiments; Eye movements; Figurative Language; Form Classes (Languages); Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Information processing; Information Sources; Language Processing; Modularity; Nouns; Online Systems; Parsing; Prosody; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Resistance (Psychology); Sentence Structure; Sentences; Suprasegmentals; Syntactic ambiguity resolution; Verbal communication; Young Children
• ISSN: 0749-596X; 1096-0821
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.001

Prior studies of ambiguity resolution in young children have found that children rely heavily on lexical information but persistently fail to use referential constraints in online parsing [Trueswell, J.C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N.M., & Logrip, M.L, (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73, 89–134; Snedeker, J. & Trueswell, J. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49(3), 238–299]. This pattern is consistent with either a modular parsing system driven by stored lexical information or an interactive system which has yet to acquire low-validity referential constraints. In two experiments we explored whether children could use a third constraint—prosody—to resolve globally ambiguous prepositional-phrase attachments (“You can feel the frog with the feather”). Four to six-year-olds and adults were tested using the visual world paradigm. In both groups the fixation patterns were influenced by lexical cues by around 200 ms after the onset of the critical PP-object noun (“feather”). In adults the prosody manipulation had an effect in this early time window. In children the effect of prosody was delayed by approximately 500 ms. The effects of lexical and prosodic cues were roughly additive: prosody influenced the interpretation of utterances with strong lexical cues and lexical information had an effect on utterances with strong prosodic cues. We conclude that young children, like adults, can rapidly use both of these information sources to resolve structural ambiguities.