Ethics and governance of global health inequalities

• Published in: Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 2006-11, Vol.60 (11), p.998-1003
• Main Author: Ruger, J P
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Delivery of Health Care; Disadvantaged groups; Ethics; Ethics, Medical; Global Health; Health disparities; Health Policy; Humanitarianism; Humans; International Cooperation; Medical sciences; Miscellaneous; Moral Obligations; Nation states; Politics; Principles; Public health. Hygiene; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine; Resource Allocation; Responsibilities; Self interest; Socioeconomic Factors; Theory and Methods
• ISSN: 0143-005X; 1470-2738
• DOI: 10.1136/jech.2005.041947

Background: A world divided by health inequalities poses ethical challenges for global health. International and national responses to health disparities must be rooted in ethical values about health and its distribution; this is because ethical claims have the power to motivate, delineate principles, duties and responsibilities, and hold global and national actors morally responsible for achieving common goals. Theories of justice are necessary to define duties and obligations of institutions and actors in reducing inequalities. The problem is the lack of a moral framework for solving problems of global health justice. Aim: To study why global health inequalities are morally troubling, why efforts to reduce them are morally justified, how they should be measured and evaluated; how much priority disadvantaged groups should receive; and to delineate roles and responsibilities of national and international actors and institutions. Discussion and conclusions: Duties and obligations of international and state actors in reducing global health inequalities are outlined. The ethical principles endorsed include the intrinsic value of health to well-being and equal respect for all human life, the importance of health for individual and collective agency, the concept of a shortfall from the health status of a reference group, and the need for a disproportionate effort to help disadvantaged groups. This approach does not seek to find ways in which global and national actors address global health inequalities by virtue of their self-interest, national interest, collective security or humanitarian assistance. It endorses the more robust concept of “human flourishing” and the desire to live in a world where all people have the capability to be healthy. Unlike cosmopolitan theory, this approach places the role of the nation-state in the forefront with primary, though not sole, moral responsibility. Rather shared health governance is essential for delivering health equity on a global scale.