A summary of mortality and incidence of cancer in men from the United Kingdom who participated in the United Kingdom's atmospheric nuclear weapon tests and experimental programmes

• Published in: BMJ 1988-01, Vol.296 (6618), p.332-338
• Main Authors: Darby, S C, Kendall, G M, Fell, T P, O'Hagan, J A, Muirhead, C R, Ennis, J R, Ball, A M, Dennis, J A, Doll, R
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cancer; Causes of death; Death; Environmental Exposure; Humans; Leukemia; Leukemia, Radiation-Induced - epidemiology; Leukemia, Radiation-Induced - etiology; Leukemia, Radiation-Induced - mortality; Male; Mortality; Multiple myeloma; Multiple Myeloma - epidemiology; Multiple Myeloma - etiology; Multiple Myeloma - mortality; Neoplasia; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - epidemiology; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - mortality; Nuclear Warfare; Papers and Short Reports; Participant observation; Radiation Dosage; Radiology; Risk Factors; Smoking - adverse effects; United Kingdom; Weapons
• ISSN: 0267-0623; 0959-8138; 1468-5833
• DOI: 10.1136/bmj.296.6618.332

Altogether 22 347 men who participated in the United Kingdom's atmospheric nuclear weapon tests and experimental programmes in Australia and the Pacific Ocean between 1952 and 1967 were identified from the archives of the Ministry of Defence and followed up. Their mortality and incidence of cancer were compared with those in 22 326 matched controls selected from the same archives. The risk of mortality in the participants relative to that in the controls was 1·01 for all causes and 0·96 for all neoplasms. Thirty eight causes of death were examined separately. Significant differences in mortality were found for leukaemia, multiple myeloma, and other injury and poisoning, with higher rates in the participants, and for cancers of the prostate and kidney and chronic bronchitis, with higher rates in the controls. The mortality from leukaemia and multiple myeloma in the participants was slightly greater than would have been expected from national values (standardised mortality ratios of 113 and 111, respectively), but in the controls it was substantially lower (standardised mortality ratios of 32 and 0, respectively). Examination of the rates of leukaemia and multiple myeloma in groups of participants showed very little difference between groups characterised by recorded doses of external radiation or type of test participation and failed to indicate any specific hazard. Evidence obtained from participants who reported themselves voluntarily (or were reported by relatives or friends) suggested that 17% of participants may have been omitted from the main study group but that any resulting bias was small. Most of the differences observed between the participants and controls were interpreted as due to chance, but some may be due to differences in smoking habits. Participation in the test programme did not seem, in itself, to have caused any detectable effect on the participants' expectation of life, apart from possibly causing small risks of developing leukaemia and multiple myeloma.