Loading…
Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research
Socioeconomic status (SES) is frequently implicated as a contributor to the disparate health observed among racial/ ethnic minorities, women and elderly populations. Findings from studies that examine the role of SES and health disparities, however, have provided inconsistent results. This is due in...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the National Medical Association 2007-09, Vol.99 (9), p.1013-1023 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1023 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1013 |
container_title | Journal of the National Medical Association |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | SHAVERS, Vickie L |
description | Socioeconomic status (SES) is frequently implicated as a contributor to the disparate health observed among racial/ ethnic minorities, women and elderly populations. Findings from studies that examine the role of SES and health disparities, however, have provided inconsistent results. This is due in part to the: 1) lack of precision and reliability of measures; 2) difficulty with the collection of individual SES data; 3) the dynamic nature of SES over a lifetime; 4) the classification of women, children, retired and unemployed persons; 5) lack of or poor correlation between individual SES measures; and 6) and inaccurate or misleading interpretation of study results. Choosing the best variable or approach for measuring SES is dependent in part on its relevance to the population and outcomes under study. Many of the commonly used compositional and contextual SES measures are limited in terms of their usefulness for examining the effect of SES on outcomes in analyses of data that include population subgroups known to experience health disparities. This article describes SES measures, strengths and limitations of specific approaches and methodological issues related to the analysis and interpretation of studies that examine SES and health disparities. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2575866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68339062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p321t-477068918f8b1badf2f56658eba470f22a474b3813e97ae0cb746e796f0603033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLxDAUhYMozjj6F6QIuivk1Tw2goovGHGj65JmbpwMbVOTVvDfG3B8rs7ifHyce3fQnGjOSi4020VzjKkstVB8hg5S2mCMla6qfTQjUhNGCJmjywcwaYrQQT8WwRUpWB_Ahj503hZpNOOUCt8XazDtuC5WPg0m-tFDKiIkMNGuD9GeM22Co20u0PPN9dPVXbl8vL2_uliWA6NkLLmUWChNlFMNaczKUVcJUSloDJfYUZqDN0wRBloawLaRXIDUwmGBGWZsgc4_vcPUdLCyeXE0bT1E35n4Xgfj679N79f1S3iraSUrJUQWnG0FMbxOkMa688lC25oewpRqoRjTWNAMnvwDN2GKfT6upoTjigjGM3T8e873jq_fZuB0C5hkTeui6a1PP5zGioqs-gAO0oOj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214051634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>SHAVERS, Vickie L</creator><creatorcontrib>SHAVERS, Vickie L</creatorcontrib><description>Socioeconomic status (SES) is frequently implicated as a contributor to the disparate health observed among racial/ ethnic minorities, women and elderly populations. Findings from studies that examine the role of SES and health disparities, however, have provided inconsistent results. This is due in part to the: 1) lack of precision and reliability of measures; 2) difficulty with the collection of individual SES data; 3) the dynamic nature of SES over a lifetime; 4) the classification of women, children, retired and unemployed persons; 5) lack of or poor correlation between individual SES measures; and 6) and inaccurate or misleading interpretation of study results. Choosing the best variable or approach for measuring SES is dependent in part on its relevance to the population and outcomes under study. Many of the commonly used compositional and contextual SES measures are limited in terms of their usefulness for examining the effect of SES on outcomes in analyses of data that include population subgroups known to experience health disparities. This article describes SES measures, strengths and limitations of specific approaches and methodological issues related to the analysis and interpretation of studies that examine SES and health disparities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-9684</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4693</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17913111</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMAAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thorofare, NJ: Slack</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Continental Population Groups ; Delivery of Health Care - economics ; Delivery of Health Care - ethics ; Ethnic Groups ; Female ; General aspects ; Health Services Accessibility - economics ; Health Services Accessibility - ethics ; Health Services Research - methods ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Minority Groups ; Miscellaneous ; Poverty ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Social Class ; Social Justice ; Socioeconomic Factors ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of the National Medical Association, 2007-09, Vol.99 (9), p.1013-1023</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright National Medical Association Sep 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2575866/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2575866/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19082616$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17913111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SHAVERS, Vickie L</creatorcontrib><title>Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research</title><title>Journal of the National Medical Association</title><addtitle>J Natl Med Assoc</addtitle><description>Socioeconomic status (SES) is frequently implicated as a contributor to the disparate health observed among racial/ ethnic minorities, women and elderly populations. Findings from studies that examine the role of SES and health disparities, however, have provided inconsistent results. This is due in part to the: 1) lack of precision and reliability of measures; 2) difficulty with the collection of individual SES data; 3) the dynamic nature of SES over a lifetime; 4) the classification of women, children, retired and unemployed persons; 5) lack of or poor correlation between individual SES measures; and 6) and inaccurate or misleading interpretation of study results. Choosing the best variable or approach for measuring SES is dependent in part on its relevance to the population and outcomes under study. Many of the commonly used compositional and contextual SES measures are limited in terms of their usefulness for examining the effect of SES on outcomes in analyses of data that include population subgroups known to experience health disparities. This article describes SES measures, strengths and limitations of specific approaches and methodological issues related to the analysis and interpretation of studies that examine SES and health disparities.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Continental Population Groups</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - economics</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - ethics</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - economics</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - ethics</subject><subject>Health Services Research - methods</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minority Groups</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Social Justice</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0027-9684</issn><issn>1943-4693</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEtLxDAUhYMozjj6F6QIuivk1Tw2goovGHGj65JmbpwMbVOTVvDfG3B8rs7ifHyce3fQnGjOSi4020VzjKkstVB8hg5S2mCMla6qfTQjUhNGCJmjywcwaYrQQT8WwRUpWB_Ahj503hZpNOOUCt8XazDtuC5WPg0m-tFDKiIkMNGuD9GeM22Co20u0PPN9dPVXbl8vL2_uliWA6NkLLmUWChNlFMNaczKUVcJUSloDJfYUZqDN0wRBloawLaRXIDUwmGBGWZsgc4_vcPUdLCyeXE0bT1E35n4Xgfj679N79f1S3iraSUrJUQWnG0FMbxOkMa688lC25oewpRqoRjTWNAMnvwDN2GKfT6upoTjigjGM3T8e873jq_fZuB0C5hkTeui6a1PP5zGioqs-gAO0oOj</recordid><startdate>20070901</startdate><enddate>20070901</enddate><creator>SHAVERS, Vickie L</creator><general>Slack</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>National Medical Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070901</creationdate><title>Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research</title><author>SHAVERS, Vickie L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p321t-477068918f8b1badf2f56658eba470f22a474b3813e97ae0cb746e796f0603033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Continental Population Groups</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - economics</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - ethics</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - economics</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - ethics</topic><topic>Health Services Research - methods</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minority Groups</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Social Justice</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SHAVERS, Vickie L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the National Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SHAVERS, Vickie L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the National Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Natl Med Assoc</addtitle><date>2007-09-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1013</spage><epage>1023</epage><pages>1013-1023</pages><issn>0027-9684</issn><eissn>1943-4693</eissn><coden>JNMAAE</coden><abstract>Socioeconomic status (SES) is frequently implicated as a contributor to the disparate health observed among racial/ ethnic minorities, women and elderly populations. Findings from studies that examine the role of SES and health disparities, however, have provided inconsistent results. This is due in part to the: 1) lack of precision and reliability of measures; 2) difficulty with the collection of individual SES data; 3) the dynamic nature of SES over a lifetime; 4) the classification of women, children, retired and unemployed persons; 5) lack of or poor correlation between individual SES measures; and 6) and inaccurate or misleading interpretation of study results. Choosing the best variable or approach for measuring SES is dependent in part on its relevance to the population and outcomes under study. Many of the commonly used compositional and contextual SES measures are limited in terms of their usefulness for examining the effect of SES on outcomes in analyses of data that include population subgroups known to experience health disparities. This article describes SES measures, strengths and limitations of specific approaches and methodological issues related to the analysis and interpretation of studies that examine SES and health disparities.</abstract><cop>Thorofare, NJ</cop><pub>Slack</pub><pmid>17913111</pmid><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-9684 |
ispartof | Journal of the National Medical Association, 2007-09, Vol.99 (9), p.1013-1023 |
issn | 0027-9684 1943-4693 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2575866 |
source | PubMed Central(OpenAccess) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Biological and medical sciences Continental Population Groups Delivery of Health Care - economics Delivery of Health Care - ethics Ethnic Groups Female General aspects Health Services Accessibility - economics Health Services Accessibility - ethics Health Services Research - methods Health Status Indicators Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Minority Groups Miscellaneous Poverty Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Social Class Social Justice Socioeconomic Factors United States |
title | Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A36%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurement%20of%20socioeconomic%20status%20in%20health%20disparities%20research&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20National%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=SHAVERS,%20Vickie%20L&rft.date=2007-09-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1013&rft.epage=1023&rft.pages=1013-1023&rft.issn=0027-9684&rft.eissn=1943-4693&rft.coden=JNMAAE&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68339062%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p321t-477068918f8b1badf2f56658eba470f22a474b3813e97ae0cb746e796f0603033%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214051634&rft_id=info:pmid/17913111&rfr_iscdi=true |