Loading…
A fruit in the hand or two in the bush? Divergent risk preferences in chimpanzees and bonobos
Human and non-human animals tend to avoid risky prospects. If such patterns of economic choice are adaptive, risk preferences should reflect the typical decision-making environments faced by organisms. However, this approach has not been widely used to examine the risk sensitivity in closely related...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biology letters (2005) 2008-06, Vol.4 (3), p.246-249 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-510d6fd7a568d1bf03e9e2538d59dbf9ef7826a6bd08ec5bd968f0c56558b3373 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-510d6fd7a568d1bf03e9e2538d59dbf9ef7826a6bd08ec5bd968f0c56558b3373 |
container_end_page | 249 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 246 |
container_title | Biology letters (2005) |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Heilbronner, Sarah R Rosati, Alexandra G Stevens, Jeffrey R Hare, Brian Hauser, Marc D |
description | Human and non-human animals tend to avoid risky prospects. If such patterns of economic choice are adaptive, risk preferences should reflect the typical decision-making environments faced by organisms. However, this approach has not been widely used to examine the risk sensitivity in closely related species with different ecologies. Here, we experimentally examined risk-sensitive behaviour in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), closely related species whose distinct ecologies are thought to be the major selective force shaping their unique behavioural repertoires. Because chimpanzees exploit riskier food sources in the wild, we predicted that they would exhibit greater tolerance for risk in choices about food. Results confirmed this prediction: chimpanzees significantly preferred the risky option, whereas bonobos preferred the fixed option. These results provide a relatively rare example of risk-prone behaviour in the context of gains and show how ecological pressures can sculpt economic decision making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0081 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2610056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20679597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-510d6fd7a568d1bf03e9e2538d59dbf9ef7826a6bd08ec5bd968f0c56558b3373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUktv1DAYjBCIlsKVI8qJW7Z2HD_CAdSWp7QCCcpDSOiTnTgbt9l4sZ0t21-Po2wXCqIcLPuzZ-Ybe5wkDzGaYVSKQ-dVN8sRErM48K1kH_OiyErKv9zerRneS-55f4YQ4RzRu8keFoQVBNH95NtR2rjBhNT0aWh12sq-Tq1Lw4W92lKDb5-lz81au4XuQ-qMP09XTjfa6b7SfsRVrVmuZH-pYzkqKNtbZf395E4jO68fbOeD5OPLF6cnr7P5u1dvTo7mWcULETKKUc2amkvKRI1Vg4gudU6JqGlZq6bUDRc5k0zVSOiKqrpkokEVZZQKRQgnB8nTSXc1qKWuq2jTyQ5Wziyl24CVBq6f9KaFhV1DzjBClEWBx1sBZ78P2gdYGl_prpO9toMHVmJOCkL-C8wR4yUtR0uzCVg56318rZ0bjGCMDsboYIwOxugi4dHvd_gF32YVAXICOLuJj2kro8MGzuzg-ljC-w_H83VhCCBBMGJRksGlWU1tCjDeDxrIH13_NkFu6vFP69nEMj7oHzvn0p0D44RT-CQKOCaf35LiFMPXiD-c8K1ZtBfGabjWLhbK2E6HEH0TyIsxnyc3MkY_le1DjPeKA83QxS9QN-QnomD_cg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20679597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A fruit in the hand or two in the bush? Divergent risk preferences in chimpanzees and bonobos</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Heilbronner, Sarah R ; Rosati, Alexandra G ; Stevens, Jeffrey R ; Hare, Brian ; Hauser, Marc D</creator><creatorcontrib>Heilbronner, Sarah R ; Rosati, Alexandra G ; Stevens, Jeffrey R ; Hare, Brian ; Hauser, Marc D</creatorcontrib><description>Human and non-human animals tend to avoid risky prospects. If such patterns of economic choice are adaptive, risk preferences should reflect the typical decision-making environments faced by organisms. However, this approach has not been widely used to examine the risk sensitivity in closely related species with different ecologies. Here, we experimentally examined risk-sensitive behaviour in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), closely related species whose distinct ecologies are thought to be the major selective force shaping their unique behavioural repertoires. Because chimpanzees exploit riskier food sources in the wild, we predicted that they would exhibit greater tolerance for risk in choices about food. Results confirmed this prediction: chimpanzees significantly preferred the risky option, whereas bonobos preferred the fixed option. These results provide a relatively rare example of risk-prone behaviour in the context of gains and show how ecological pressures can sculpt economic decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-9561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-957X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0081</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18364305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Animal Behaviour ; Animals ; Appetitive Behavior - physiology ; Bonobos ; Chimpanzees ; Decision Making ; Female ; Male ; Pan paniscus ; Pan paniscus - physiology ; Pan troglodytes ; Pan troglodytes - physiology ; Risk ; Risk-Taking ; Species Specificity</subject><ispartof>Biology letters (2005), 2008-06, Vol.4 (3), p.246-249</ispartof><rights>2008 The Royal Society</rights><rights>2008 The Royal Society 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-510d6fd7a568d1bf03e9e2538d59dbf9ef7826a6bd08ec5bd968f0c56558b3373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-510d6fd7a568d1bf03e9e2538d59dbf9ef7826a6bd08ec5bd968f0c56558b3373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2610056/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2610056/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18364305$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heilbronner, Sarah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosati, Alexandra G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hare, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauser, Marc D</creatorcontrib><title>A fruit in the hand or two in the bush? Divergent risk preferences in chimpanzees and bonobos</title><title>Biology letters (2005)</title><addtitle>BIOL LETT</addtitle><description>Human and non-human animals tend to avoid risky prospects. If such patterns of economic choice are adaptive, risk preferences should reflect the typical decision-making environments faced by organisms. However, this approach has not been widely used to examine the risk sensitivity in closely related species with different ecologies. Here, we experimentally examined risk-sensitive behaviour in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), closely related species whose distinct ecologies are thought to be the major selective force shaping their unique behavioural repertoires. Because chimpanzees exploit riskier food sources in the wild, we predicted that they would exhibit greater tolerance for risk in choices about food. Results confirmed this prediction: chimpanzees significantly preferred the risky option, whereas bonobos preferred the fixed option. These results provide a relatively rare example of risk-prone behaviour in the context of gains and show how ecological pressures can sculpt economic decision making.</description><subject>Animal Behaviour</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appetitive Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Bonobos</subject><subject>Chimpanzees</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pan paniscus</subject><subject>Pan paniscus - physiology</subject><subject>Pan troglodytes</subject><subject>Pan troglodytes - physiology</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><issn>1744-9561</issn><issn>1744-957X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUktv1DAYjBCIlsKVI8qJW7Z2HD_CAdSWp7QCCcpDSOiTnTgbt9l4sZ0t21-Po2wXCqIcLPuzZ-Ybe5wkDzGaYVSKQ-dVN8sRErM48K1kH_OiyErKv9zerRneS-55f4YQ4RzRu8keFoQVBNH95NtR2rjBhNT0aWh12sq-Tq1Lw4W92lKDb5-lz81au4XuQ-qMP09XTjfa6b7SfsRVrVmuZH-pYzkqKNtbZf395E4jO68fbOeD5OPLF6cnr7P5u1dvTo7mWcULETKKUc2amkvKRI1Vg4gudU6JqGlZq6bUDRc5k0zVSOiKqrpkokEVZZQKRQgnB8nTSXc1qKWuq2jTyQ5Wziyl24CVBq6f9KaFhV1DzjBClEWBx1sBZ78P2gdYGl_prpO9toMHVmJOCkL-C8wR4yUtR0uzCVg56318rZ0bjGCMDsboYIwOxugi4dHvd_gF32YVAXICOLuJj2kro8MGzuzg-ljC-w_H83VhCCBBMGJRksGlWU1tCjDeDxrIH13_NkFu6vFP69nEMj7oHzvn0p0D44RT-CQKOCaf35LiFMPXiD-c8K1ZtBfGabjWLhbK2E6HEH0TyIsxnyc3MkY_le1DjPeKA83QxS9QN-QnomD_cg</recordid><startdate>20080623</startdate><enddate>20080623</enddate><creator>Heilbronner, Sarah R</creator><creator>Rosati, Alexandra G</creator><creator>Stevens, Jeffrey R</creator><creator>Hare, Brian</creator><creator>Hauser, Marc D</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080623</creationdate><title>A fruit in the hand or two in the bush? Divergent risk preferences in chimpanzees and bonobos</title><author>Heilbronner, Sarah R ; Rosati, Alexandra G ; Stevens, Jeffrey R ; Hare, Brian ; Hauser, Marc D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-510d6fd7a568d1bf03e9e2538d59dbf9ef7826a6bd08ec5bd968f0c56558b3373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animal Behaviour</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appetitive Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Bonobos</topic><topic>Chimpanzees</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pan paniscus</topic><topic>Pan paniscus - physiology</topic><topic>Pan troglodytes</topic><topic>Pan troglodytes - physiology</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heilbronner, Sarah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosati, Alexandra G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hare, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauser, Marc D</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biology letters (2005)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heilbronner, Sarah R</au><au>Rosati, Alexandra G</au><au>Stevens, Jeffrey R</au><au>Hare, Brian</au><au>Hauser, Marc D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A fruit in the hand or two in the bush? Divergent risk preferences in chimpanzees and bonobos</atitle><jtitle>Biology letters (2005)</jtitle><addtitle>BIOL LETT</addtitle><date>2008-06-23</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>246-249</pages><issn>1744-9561</issn><eissn>1744-957X</eissn><abstract>Human and non-human animals tend to avoid risky prospects. If such patterns of economic choice are adaptive, risk preferences should reflect the typical decision-making environments faced by organisms. However, this approach has not been widely used to examine the risk sensitivity in closely related species with different ecologies. Here, we experimentally examined risk-sensitive behaviour in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), closely related species whose distinct ecologies are thought to be the major selective force shaping their unique behavioural repertoires. Because chimpanzees exploit riskier food sources in the wild, we predicted that they would exhibit greater tolerance for risk in choices about food. Results confirmed this prediction: chimpanzees significantly preferred the risky option, whereas bonobos preferred the fixed option. These results provide a relatively rare example of risk-prone behaviour in the context of gains and show how ecological pressures can sculpt economic decision making.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>18364305</pmid><doi>10.1098/rsbl.2008.0081</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1744-9561 |
ispartof | Biology letters (2005), 2008-06, Vol.4 (3), p.246-249 |
issn | 1744-9561 1744-957X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2610056 |
source | PubMed Central; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list) |
subjects | Animal Behaviour Animals Appetitive Behavior - physiology Bonobos Chimpanzees Decision Making Female Male Pan paniscus Pan paniscus - physiology Pan troglodytes Pan troglodytes - physiology Risk Risk-Taking Species Specificity |
title | A fruit in the hand or two in the bush? Divergent risk preferences in chimpanzees and bonobos |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T05%3A20%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20fruit%20in%20the%20hand%20or%20two%20in%20the%20bush?%20Divergent%20risk%20preferences%20in%20chimpanzees%20and%20bonobos&rft.jtitle=Biology%20letters%20(2005)&rft.au=Heilbronner,%20Sarah%20R&rft.date=2008-06-23&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=246-249&rft.issn=1744-9561&rft.eissn=1744-957X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0081&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E20679597%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-510d6fd7a568d1bf03e9e2538d59dbf9ef7826a6bd08ec5bd968f0c56558b3373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20679597&rft_id=info:pmid/18364305&rfr_iscdi=true |