Loading…

A fruit in the hand or two in the bush? Divergent risk preferences in chimpanzees and bonobos

Human and non-human animals tend to avoid risky prospects. If such patterns of economic choice are adaptive, risk preferences should reflect the typical decision-making environments faced by organisms. However, this approach has not been widely used to examine the risk sensitivity in closely related...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biology letters (2005) 2008-06, Vol.4 (3), p.246-249
Main Authors: Heilbronner, Sarah R, Rosati, Alexandra G, Stevens, Jeffrey R, Hare, Brian, Hauser, Marc D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-510d6fd7a568d1bf03e9e2538d59dbf9ef7826a6bd08ec5bd968f0c56558b3373
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-510d6fd7a568d1bf03e9e2538d59dbf9ef7826a6bd08ec5bd968f0c56558b3373
container_end_page 249
container_issue 3
container_start_page 246
container_title Biology letters (2005)
container_volume 4
creator Heilbronner, Sarah R
Rosati, Alexandra G
Stevens, Jeffrey R
Hare, Brian
Hauser, Marc D
description Human and non-human animals tend to avoid risky prospects. If such patterns of economic choice are adaptive, risk preferences should reflect the typical decision-making environments faced by organisms. However, this approach has not been widely used to examine the risk sensitivity in closely related species with different ecologies. Here, we experimentally examined risk-sensitive behaviour in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), closely related species whose distinct ecologies are thought to be the major selective force shaping their unique behavioural repertoires. Because chimpanzees exploit riskier food sources in the wild, we predicted that they would exhibit greater tolerance for risk in choices about food. Results confirmed this prediction: chimpanzees significantly preferred the risky option, whereas bonobos preferred the fixed option. These results provide a relatively rare example of risk-prone behaviour in the context of gains and show how ecological pressures can sculpt economic decision making.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0081
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2610056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20679597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-510d6fd7a568d1bf03e9e2538d59dbf9ef7826a6bd08ec5bd968f0c56558b3373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUktv1DAYjBCIlsKVI8qJW7Z2HD_CAdSWp7QCCcpDSOiTnTgbt9l4sZ0t21-Po2wXCqIcLPuzZ-Ybe5wkDzGaYVSKQ-dVN8sRErM48K1kH_OiyErKv9zerRneS-55f4YQ4RzRu8keFoQVBNH95NtR2rjBhNT0aWh12sq-Tq1Lw4W92lKDb5-lz81au4XuQ-qMP09XTjfa6b7SfsRVrVmuZH-pYzkqKNtbZf395E4jO68fbOeD5OPLF6cnr7P5u1dvTo7mWcULETKKUc2amkvKRI1Vg4gudU6JqGlZq6bUDRc5k0zVSOiKqrpkokEVZZQKRQgnB8nTSXc1qKWuq2jTyQ5Wziyl24CVBq6f9KaFhV1DzjBClEWBx1sBZ78P2gdYGl_prpO9toMHVmJOCkL-C8wR4yUtR0uzCVg56318rZ0bjGCMDsboYIwOxugi4dHvd_gF32YVAXICOLuJj2kro8MGzuzg-ljC-w_H83VhCCBBMGJRksGlWU1tCjDeDxrIH13_NkFu6vFP69nEMj7oHzvn0p0D44RT-CQKOCaf35LiFMPXiD-c8K1ZtBfGabjWLhbK2E6HEH0TyIsxnyc3MkY_le1DjPeKA83QxS9QN-QnomD_cg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20679597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A fruit in the hand or two in the bush? Divergent risk preferences in chimpanzees and bonobos</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read &amp; Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Heilbronner, Sarah R ; Rosati, Alexandra G ; Stevens, Jeffrey R ; Hare, Brian ; Hauser, Marc D</creator><creatorcontrib>Heilbronner, Sarah R ; Rosati, Alexandra G ; Stevens, Jeffrey R ; Hare, Brian ; Hauser, Marc D</creatorcontrib><description>Human and non-human animals tend to avoid risky prospects. If such patterns of economic choice are adaptive, risk preferences should reflect the typical decision-making environments faced by organisms. However, this approach has not been widely used to examine the risk sensitivity in closely related species with different ecologies. Here, we experimentally examined risk-sensitive behaviour in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), closely related species whose distinct ecologies are thought to be the major selective force shaping their unique behavioural repertoires. Because chimpanzees exploit riskier food sources in the wild, we predicted that they would exhibit greater tolerance for risk in choices about food. Results confirmed this prediction: chimpanzees significantly preferred the risky option, whereas bonobos preferred the fixed option. These results provide a relatively rare example of risk-prone behaviour in the context of gains and show how ecological pressures can sculpt economic decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-9561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-957X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0081</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18364305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Animal Behaviour ; Animals ; Appetitive Behavior - physiology ; Bonobos ; Chimpanzees ; Decision Making ; Female ; Male ; Pan paniscus ; Pan paniscus - physiology ; Pan troglodytes ; Pan troglodytes - physiology ; Risk ; Risk-Taking ; Species Specificity</subject><ispartof>Biology letters (2005), 2008-06, Vol.4 (3), p.246-249</ispartof><rights>2008 The Royal Society</rights><rights>2008 The Royal Society 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-510d6fd7a568d1bf03e9e2538d59dbf9ef7826a6bd08ec5bd968f0c56558b3373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-510d6fd7a568d1bf03e9e2538d59dbf9ef7826a6bd08ec5bd968f0c56558b3373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2610056/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2610056/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18364305$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heilbronner, Sarah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosati, Alexandra G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hare, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauser, Marc D</creatorcontrib><title>A fruit in the hand or two in the bush? Divergent risk preferences in chimpanzees and bonobos</title><title>Biology letters (2005)</title><addtitle>BIOL LETT</addtitle><description>Human and non-human animals tend to avoid risky prospects. If such patterns of economic choice are adaptive, risk preferences should reflect the typical decision-making environments faced by organisms. However, this approach has not been widely used to examine the risk sensitivity in closely related species with different ecologies. Here, we experimentally examined risk-sensitive behaviour in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), closely related species whose distinct ecologies are thought to be the major selective force shaping their unique behavioural repertoires. Because chimpanzees exploit riskier food sources in the wild, we predicted that they would exhibit greater tolerance for risk in choices about food. Results confirmed this prediction: chimpanzees significantly preferred the risky option, whereas bonobos preferred the fixed option. These results provide a relatively rare example of risk-prone behaviour in the context of gains and show how ecological pressures can sculpt economic decision making.</description><subject>Animal Behaviour</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appetitive Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Bonobos</subject><subject>Chimpanzees</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pan paniscus</subject><subject>Pan paniscus - physiology</subject><subject>Pan troglodytes</subject><subject>Pan troglodytes - physiology</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><issn>1744-9561</issn><issn>1744-957X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUktv1DAYjBCIlsKVI8qJW7Z2HD_CAdSWp7QCCcpDSOiTnTgbt9l4sZ0t21-Po2wXCqIcLPuzZ-Ybe5wkDzGaYVSKQ-dVN8sRErM48K1kH_OiyErKv9zerRneS-55f4YQ4RzRu8keFoQVBNH95NtR2rjBhNT0aWh12sq-Tq1Lw4W92lKDb5-lz81au4XuQ-qMP09XTjfa6b7SfsRVrVmuZH-pYzkqKNtbZf395E4jO68fbOeD5OPLF6cnr7P5u1dvTo7mWcULETKKUc2amkvKRI1Vg4gudU6JqGlZq6bUDRc5k0zVSOiKqrpkokEVZZQKRQgnB8nTSXc1qKWuq2jTyQ5Wziyl24CVBq6f9KaFhV1DzjBClEWBx1sBZ78P2gdYGl_prpO9toMHVmJOCkL-C8wR4yUtR0uzCVg56318rZ0bjGCMDsboYIwOxugi4dHvd_gF32YVAXICOLuJj2kro8MGzuzg-ljC-w_H83VhCCBBMGJRksGlWU1tCjDeDxrIH13_NkFu6vFP69nEMj7oHzvn0p0D44RT-CQKOCaf35LiFMPXiD-c8K1ZtBfGabjWLhbK2E6HEH0TyIsxnyc3MkY_le1DjPeKA83QxS9QN-QnomD_cg</recordid><startdate>20080623</startdate><enddate>20080623</enddate><creator>Heilbronner, Sarah R</creator><creator>Rosati, Alexandra G</creator><creator>Stevens, Jeffrey R</creator><creator>Hare, Brian</creator><creator>Hauser, Marc D</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080623</creationdate><title>A fruit in the hand or two in the bush? Divergent risk preferences in chimpanzees and bonobos</title><author>Heilbronner, Sarah R ; Rosati, Alexandra G ; Stevens, Jeffrey R ; Hare, Brian ; Hauser, Marc D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-510d6fd7a568d1bf03e9e2538d59dbf9ef7826a6bd08ec5bd968f0c56558b3373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animal Behaviour</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appetitive Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Bonobos</topic><topic>Chimpanzees</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pan paniscus</topic><topic>Pan paniscus - physiology</topic><topic>Pan troglodytes</topic><topic>Pan troglodytes - physiology</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heilbronner, Sarah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosati, Alexandra G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hare, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauser, Marc D</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biology letters (2005)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heilbronner, Sarah R</au><au>Rosati, Alexandra G</au><au>Stevens, Jeffrey R</au><au>Hare, Brian</au><au>Hauser, Marc D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A fruit in the hand or two in the bush? Divergent risk preferences in chimpanzees and bonobos</atitle><jtitle>Biology letters (2005)</jtitle><addtitle>BIOL LETT</addtitle><date>2008-06-23</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>246-249</pages><issn>1744-9561</issn><eissn>1744-957X</eissn><abstract>Human and non-human animals tend to avoid risky prospects. If such patterns of economic choice are adaptive, risk preferences should reflect the typical decision-making environments faced by organisms. However, this approach has not been widely used to examine the risk sensitivity in closely related species with different ecologies. Here, we experimentally examined risk-sensitive behaviour in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), closely related species whose distinct ecologies are thought to be the major selective force shaping their unique behavioural repertoires. Because chimpanzees exploit riskier food sources in the wild, we predicted that they would exhibit greater tolerance for risk in choices about food. Results confirmed this prediction: chimpanzees significantly preferred the risky option, whereas bonobos preferred the fixed option. These results provide a relatively rare example of risk-prone behaviour in the context of gains and show how ecological pressures can sculpt economic decision making.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>18364305</pmid><doi>10.1098/rsbl.2008.0081</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1744-9561
ispartof Biology letters (2005), 2008-06, Vol.4 (3), p.246-249
issn 1744-9561
1744-957X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2610056
source PubMed Central; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)
subjects Animal Behaviour
Animals
Appetitive Behavior - physiology
Bonobos
Chimpanzees
Decision Making
Female
Male
Pan paniscus
Pan paniscus - physiology
Pan troglodytes
Pan troglodytes - physiology
Risk
Risk-Taking
Species Specificity
title A fruit in the hand or two in the bush? Divergent risk preferences in chimpanzees and bonobos
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T05%3A20%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20fruit%20in%20the%20hand%20or%20two%20in%20the%20bush?%20Divergent%20risk%20preferences%20in%20chimpanzees%20and%20bonobos&rft.jtitle=Biology%20letters%20(2005)&rft.au=Heilbronner,%20Sarah%20R&rft.date=2008-06-23&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=246-249&rft.issn=1744-9561&rft.eissn=1744-957X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0081&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E20679597%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-510d6fd7a568d1bf03e9e2538d59dbf9ef7826a6bd08ec5bd968f0c56558b3373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20679597&rft_id=info:pmid/18364305&rfr_iscdi=true