Association of the IRF5 risk haplotype with high serum interferon‐α activity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients

• Published in: Arthritis and rheumatism 2008-08, Vol.58 (8), p.2481-2487
• Main Authors: Niewold, Timothy B., Kelly, Jennifer A., Flesch, Marie H., Espinoza, Luis R., Harley, John B., Crow, Mary K.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic - blood; Case-Control Studies; DNA - immunology; Genetic Predisposition to Disease - genetics; Genotype; Haplotypes - genetics; Humans; Interferon Regulatory Factors - genetics; Interferon-alpha - blood; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - blood; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - genetics; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - immunology; RNA-Binding Proteins - immunology
• ISSN: 0004-3591; 1529-0131
• DOI: 10.1002/art.23613

Objective A haplotype of the interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) gene has been associated with the risk of developing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and our previous studies have demonstrated that high levels of serum interferon‐α (IFNα) activity are a heritable risk factor for SLE. The aim of this study was to determine whether the IRF5 SLE risk haplotype mediates the risk of SLE by predisposing patients to the development of high levels of serum IFNα activity. Methods IFNα levels in 199 SLE patients of European and Hispanic ancestry were measured with a sensitive functional reporter cell assay. The rs2004640, rs3807306, rs10488631, and rs2280714 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in IRF5 were genotyped in these patients. Haplotypes were categorized as SLE risk, neutral, or protective based on published data. Results SLE patients with risk/risk and risk/neutral IRF5 genotypes had higher serum IFNα activity than did those with protective/protective and neutral/protective genotypes (P = 0.025). This differential effect of IRF5 genotype on serum IFNα levels was driven largely by SLE patients who were positive for either anti–RNA binding protein (anti‐RBP) or anti–double‐stranded DNA (anti‐dsDNA) autoantibodies (P = 0.012 for risk/risk or risk/neutral versus protective/protective or neutral/protective). The rs3807306 genotype was independently associated with high serum IFNα in this autoantibody group. We found no difference in IFNα activity according to IRF5 genotype in patients lacking either type of autoantibody or in patients positive for both classes of autoantibody. Conclusion The IRF5 SLE risk haplotype is associated with higher serum IFNα activity in SLE patients, and this effect is most prominent in patients positive for either anti‐RBP or anti‐dsDNA autoantibodies. This study demonstrates the biologic relevance of the SLE risk haplotype of IRF5 at the protein level.