The Influence of a Suction Device on Fixation of a Cemented Cup using RSA

• Published in: Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2009-03, Vol.467 (3), p.792-798
• Main Authors: Timperley, A. John, Whitehouse, Sarah L., Hourigan, Patrick G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation; Biological and medical sciences; Bone Cements - therapeutic use; Conservative Orthopedics; Diseases of the osteoarticular system; Equipment Design; Female; Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging; Hip Joint - physiopathology; Hip Joint - surgery; Humans; Ilium - diagnostic imaging; Ilium - physiopathology; Ilium - surgery; Male; Medical sciences; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Original; Original Article; Orthopedics; Osteoarthritis, Hip - complications; Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnostic imaging; Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative - etiology; Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Range of Motion, Articular; Recovery of Function; Sports Medicine; Suction - instrumentation; Surgery; Surgical Orthopedics; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0009-921X; 1528-1132
• DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0574-z

The quality of technique used at the time of socket cementation is crucial in ensuring a durable long-term result of the implant. We asked whether a new instrument, an aspirator retractor introduced into the wing of the ilium before socket preparation and cementation, would enhance cement fixation as defined by RSA and radiographic examination. We randomized 38 patients into two groups. The surgical technique was identical between the groups with the exception of the use of the aspirator retractor. Patients were followed clinically and with radiostereometry at a minimum of 2 years. We compared gross radiographic appearances, including the depth of penetration of cement and the incidence of postoperative and 2-year radiolucent lines. There was no difference in proximal migration between the two groups. No improvement of fixation was proven from the measured translations and rotations of the socket in the suction group. We found no difference in the number or extent of radiolucent lines or the depth of cement penetration when the iliac suction device was used in conjunction with contemporary cementing techniques. Although the data suggest no short-term advantage in this small study, we will continue to follow these patients presuming there will be improved outcomes in the longer term and since the device provides an easier method of obtaining adequate fixation, especially if technical difficulties are encountered during the pressurization procedure.