Loading…

Medical and nursing staff highly value clinical pharmacists in the emergency department

Despite the potential impact that emergency pharmacist (EPh) programmes could have on medication safety and quality of care in the emergency department (ED), very few programmes exist. This descriptive survey study aimed to assess staff perceptions of an EPh programme. A random sample of medical and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Emergency medicine journal : EMJ 2007-10, Vol.24 (10), p.716-718
Main Authors: Fairbanks, Rollin J, Hildebrand, James M, Kolstee, Karen E, Schneider, Sandra M, Shah, Manish N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b524t-24214ca510eee7ab09297d726bd657fb32a1f7b1d02e58351157e484ece572443
cites
container_end_page 718
container_issue 10
container_start_page 716
container_title Emergency medicine journal : EMJ
container_volume 24
creator Fairbanks, Rollin J
Hildebrand, James M
Kolstee, Karen E
Schneider, Sandra M
Shah, Manish N
description Despite the potential impact that emergency pharmacist (EPh) programmes could have on medication safety and quality of care in the emergency department (ED), very few programmes exist. This descriptive survey study aimed to assess staff perceptions of an EPh programme. A random sample of medical and nursing staff in an academic medical centre ED with a dedicated EPh programme received a 26-item survey (82% return rate). 99% of respondents felt the EPh improves quality of care, 96% feel they are an integral part of the team, and 93% had consulted the EPh at least a few times during their last five shifts. Staff felt that the EPh should be available for consults, attend resuscitations, and check orders. This study reinforced the value of many specific duties of the EPh programme and found that doctors and nurses overwhelmingly favour the presence of an EPh in the ED, frequently seek their advice, and feel they improve quality of care. Staff acceptance is clearly not a barrier to implementation of this programme.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/emj.2006.044313
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2658441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>764340731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b524t-24214ca510eee7ab09297d726bd657fb32a1f7b1d02e58351157e484ece572443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc-L1DAUx4so7rp69iYBQUHo7MvvzmVBBleFUS-rgpeQtq_TjG06Ju3i_Pdm7DD-OOgpgffJ972XT5Y9prCglKtL7LcLBqAWIASn_E52ToVmOTDK757uIM-yBzFuAahciuJ-dkb1EijT4jz7_A5rV9mOWF8TP4Xo_IbE0TYNad2m7fbk1nYTkqpz_ie3a23obeXiGInzZGyRYI9hg77akxp3Now9-vFhdq-xXcRHx_Mi-3j96mb1Jl9_eP129XKdl5KJMWeCUVFZSQERtS1hyZa61kyVtZK6KTmztNElrYGhLLikVGoUhcAKpWZp54vsas7dTWWPdZVaB9uZXXC9DXszWGf-rHjXms1wa5iShRA0BTw_BoTh24RxNL2LFXad9ThM0WgluADND-Szf5Kq4KzgSiXw6V_gdpiCT99gqC4AYAkcEnU5U1UYYgzYnIamYA5yTZJrDnLNLDe9ePL7rr_4o80E5DOQ7OD3U92Gr0ZprqV5_2llbtaSXbMvwrDEv5j5MnX6X_cfF6y7_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780009030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Medical and nursing staff highly value clinical pharmacists in the emergency department</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><creator>Fairbanks, Rollin J ; Hildebrand, James M ; Kolstee, Karen E ; Schneider, Sandra M ; Shah, Manish N</creator><creatorcontrib>Fairbanks, Rollin J ; Hildebrand, James M ; Kolstee, Karen E ; Schneider, Sandra M ; Shah, Manish N</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the potential impact that emergency pharmacist (EPh) programmes could have on medication safety and quality of care in the emergency department (ED), very few programmes exist. This descriptive survey study aimed to assess staff perceptions of an EPh programme. A random sample of medical and nursing staff in an academic medical centre ED with a dedicated EPh programme received a 26-item survey (82% return rate). 99% of respondents felt the EPh improves quality of care, 96% feel they are an integral part of the team, and 93% had consulted the EPh at least a few times during their last five shifts. Staff felt that the EPh should be available for consults, attend resuscitations, and check orders. This study reinforced the value of many specific duties of the EPh programme and found that doctors and nurses overwhelmingly favour the presence of an EPh in the ED, frequently seek their advice, and feel they improve quality of care. Staff acceptance is clearly not a barrier to implementation of this programme.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-0205</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-0213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/emj.2006.044313</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17901274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the British Association for Accident &amp; Emergency Medicine</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Confidence intervals ; Drug stores ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Emergency Nursing - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Emergency Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration ; Health Care Surveys ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Patient Care Team - organization &amp; administration ; Patient education ; Patient safety ; Pharmacy Service, Hospital ; Professional Role ; Quality of Health Care ; Short Report ; Studies ; United States</subject><ispartof>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2007-10, Vol.24 (10), p.716-718</ispartof><rights>2007 Emergency Medicine Journal</rights><rights>Copyright: 2007 2007 Emergency Medicine Journal</rights><rights>Copyright ©2007 Emergency Medicine Journal.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b524t-24214ca510eee7ab09297d726bd657fb32a1f7b1d02e58351157e484ece572443</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2658441/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2658441/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17901274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fairbanks, Rollin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hildebrand, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolstee, Karen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Sandra M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Manish N</creatorcontrib><title>Medical and nursing staff highly value clinical pharmacists in the emergency department</title><title>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ</title><addtitle>Emerg Med J</addtitle><description>Despite the potential impact that emergency pharmacist (EPh) programmes could have on medication safety and quality of care in the emergency department (ED), very few programmes exist. This descriptive survey study aimed to assess staff perceptions of an EPh programme. A random sample of medical and nursing staff in an academic medical centre ED with a dedicated EPh programme received a 26-item survey (82% return rate). 99% of respondents felt the EPh improves quality of care, 96% feel they are an integral part of the team, and 93% had consulted the EPh at least a few times during their last five shifts. Staff felt that the EPh should be available for consults, attend resuscitations, and check orders. This study reinforced the value of many specific duties of the EPh programme and found that doctors and nurses overwhelmingly favour the presence of an EPh in the ED, frequently seek their advice, and feel they improve quality of care. Staff acceptance is clearly not a barrier to implementation of this programme.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Emergency Nursing - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Communication</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient Care Team - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Patient education</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Pharmacy Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Professional Role</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Short Report</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1472-0205</issn><issn>1472-0213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc-L1DAUx4so7rp69iYBQUHo7MvvzmVBBleFUS-rgpeQtq_TjG06Ju3i_Pdm7DD-OOgpgffJ972XT5Y9prCglKtL7LcLBqAWIASn_E52ToVmOTDK757uIM-yBzFuAahciuJ-dkb1EijT4jz7_A5rV9mOWF8TP4Xo_IbE0TYNad2m7fbk1nYTkqpz_ie3a23obeXiGInzZGyRYI9hg77akxp3Now9-vFhdq-xXcRHx_Mi-3j96mb1Jl9_eP129XKdl5KJMWeCUVFZSQERtS1hyZa61kyVtZK6KTmztNElrYGhLLikVGoUhcAKpWZp54vsas7dTWWPdZVaB9uZXXC9DXszWGf-rHjXms1wa5iShRA0BTw_BoTh24RxNL2LFXad9ThM0WgluADND-Szf5Kq4KzgSiXw6V_gdpiCT99gqC4AYAkcEnU5U1UYYgzYnIamYA5yTZJrDnLNLDe9ePL7rr_4o80E5DOQ7OD3U92Gr0ZprqV5_2llbtaSXbMvwrDEv5j5MnX6X_cfF6y7_A</recordid><startdate>200710</startdate><enddate>200710</enddate><creator>Fairbanks, Rollin J</creator><creator>Hildebrand, James M</creator><creator>Kolstee, Karen E</creator><creator>Schneider, Sandra M</creator><creator>Shah, Manish N</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the British Association for Accident &amp; Emergency Medicine</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200710</creationdate><title>Medical and nursing staff highly value clinical pharmacists in the emergency department</title><author>Fairbanks, Rollin J ; Hildebrand, James M ; Kolstee, Karen E ; Schneider, Sandra M ; Shah, Manish N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b524t-24214ca510eee7ab09297d726bd657fb32a1f7b1d02e58351157e484ece572443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Emergency Nursing - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Communication</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient Care Team - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Patient education</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Pharmacy Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Professional Role</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Short Report</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fairbanks, Rollin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hildebrand, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolstee, Karen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Sandra M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Manish N</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fairbanks, Rollin J</au><au>Hildebrand, James M</au><au>Kolstee, Karen E</au><au>Schneider, Sandra M</au><au>Shah, Manish N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Medical and nursing staff highly value clinical pharmacists in the emergency department</atitle><jtitle>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ</jtitle><addtitle>Emerg Med J</addtitle><date>2007-10</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>716</spage><epage>718</epage><pages>716-718</pages><issn>1472-0205</issn><eissn>1472-0213</eissn><abstract>Despite the potential impact that emergency pharmacist (EPh) programmes could have on medication safety and quality of care in the emergency department (ED), very few programmes exist. This descriptive survey study aimed to assess staff perceptions of an EPh programme. A random sample of medical and nursing staff in an academic medical centre ED with a dedicated EPh programme received a 26-item survey (82% return rate). 99% of respondents felt the EPh improves quality of care, 96% feel they are an integral part of the team, and 93% had consulted the EPh at least a few times during their last five shifts. Staff felt that the EPh should be available for consults, attend resuscitations, and check orders. This study reinforced the value of many specific duties of the EPh programme and found that doctors and nurses overwhelmingly favour the presence of an EPh in the ED, frequently seek their advice, and feel they improve quality of care. Staff acceptance is clearly not a barrier to implementation of this programme.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the British Association for Accident &amp; Emergency Medicine</pub><pmid>17901274</pmid><doi>10.1136/emj.2006.044313</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1472-0205
ispartof Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2007-10, Vol.24 (10), p.716-718
issn 1472-0205
1472-0213
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2658441
source PubMed (Medline)
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Confidence intervals
Drug stores
Emergency medical care
Emergency Medicine - statistics & numerical data
Emergency Nursing - statistics & numerical data
Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Interdisciplinary Communication
Nurses
Nursing
Patient Care Team - organization & administration
Patient education
Patient safety
Pharmacy Service, Hospital
Professional Role
Quality of Health Care
Short Report
Studies
United States
title Medical and nursing staff highly value clinical pharmacists in the emergency department
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T17%3A10%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Medical%20and%20nursing%20staff%20highly%20value%20clinical%20pharmacists%20in%20the%20emergency%20department&rft.jtitle=Emergency%20medicine%20journal%20:%20EMJ&rft.au=Fairbanks,%20Rollin%20J&rft.date=2007-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=716&rft.epage=718&rft.pages=716-718&rft.issn=1472-0205&rft.eissn=1472-0213&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/emj.2006.044313&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E764340731%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b524t-24214ca510eee7ab09297d726bd657fb32a1f7b1d02e58351157e484ece572443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780009030&rft_id=info:pmid/17901274&rfr_iscdi=true