Loading…
The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing
While a core function of the working memory (WM) system is the active maintenance of behaviorally relevant sensory representations, it is also critical that distracting stimuli are appropriately ignored. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the role of domain-general WM resources...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neuropsychologia 2009-06, Vol.47 (7), p.1637-1646 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c649t-3510effe835b59e9a386c47a027c958c64edab7ebc0d474cf6752b5c99dd31bc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c649t-3510effe835b59e9a386c47a027c958c64edab7ebc0d474cf6752b5c99dd31bc3 |
container_end_page | 1646 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1637 |
container_title | Neuropsychologia |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Rissman, Jesse Gazzaley, Adam D’Esposito, Mark |
description | While a core function of the working memory (WM) system is the active maintenance of behaviorally relevant sensory representations, it is also critical that distracting stimuli are appropriately ignored. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the role of domain-general WM resources in the top-down attentional modulation of task-relevant and irrelevant visual representations. In our dual-task paradigm, each trial began with the auditory presentation of six random (high load) or sequentially ordered (low load) digits. Next, two relevant visual stimuli (e.g., faces), presented amongst two temporally interspersed visual distractors (e.g., scenes), were to be encoded and maintained across a 7-s delay interval, after which memory for the relevant images and digits was probed. When taxed by high load digit maintenance, participants exhibited impaired performance on the visual WM task and a selective failure to attenuate the neural processing of task-irrelevant scene stimuli. The over-processing of distractor scenes under high load was indexed by elevated encoding activity in a scene-selective region-of-interest relative to low load and passive viewing control conditions, as well as by improved long-term recognition memory for these items. In contrast, the load manipulation did not affect participants’ ability to upregulate activity in this region when scenes were task-relevant. These results highlight the critical role of domain-general WM resources in the goal-directed regulation of distractor processing. Moreover, the consequences of increased WM load in young adults closely resemble the effects of cognitive aging on distractor filtering [Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., & D’Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging.
Nature Neuroscience 8, 1298–1300], suggesting the possibility of a common underlying mechanism. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.036 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2701233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ859513</ericid><els_id>S0028393209000517</els_id><sourcerecordid>67175248</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c649t-3510effe835b59e9a386c47a027c958c64edab7ebc0d474cf6752b5c99dd31bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEokPhDRDKhu4S_BMn9gYJVYWCKrEpEjvLsW9mPCR2sJOp5u1x1GgK3ZSVJd_vHJ-r4yy7wKjECNcf9qWDOfgxHvXO935rVUkQEiXCJaL1s2yDeUMLynD1PNsgRHhBBSVn2asY9wihihH-MjvDgoqGM77Jft7uIIeuAz3lvsudd8XBxln1-Z0Pv6zb5gMMPhzz3iuTe5dPfiyMv3P54M3cq8mmuyRcRWPwGmJMutfZi071Ed6s53n24_PV7eV1cfP9y9fLTzeFrisxLUnR8jynrGUChKK81lWjEGm0YDxBYFTbQKuRqZpKd3XDSMu0EMZQ3Gp6nn289x3ndgCjwU1B9XIMdlDhKL2y8t-Jszu59QdJGoQJpcngYjUI_vcMcZKDjRr6Xjnwc5R1g9OTFX8STD1wRCr0EEkHH2OA7pQGI7m0KPfycYuLWkiEZWoxGbz7e6cH-VpbAt6vgIpa9V1QTtt44ghmpGZ04d7ecxCsPo2vvnEmGF5Wv17HqaCDhSCjtuA0GBvSh5DG2_-N_AfnL9Il</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20080240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Rissman, Jesse ; Gazzaley, Adam ; D’Esposito, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Rissman, Jesse ; Gazzaley, Adam ; D’Esposito, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>While a core function of the working memory (WM) system is the active maintenance of behaviorally relevant sensory representations, it is also critical that distracting stimuli are appropriately ignored. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the role of domain-general WM resources in the top-down attentional modulation of task-relevant and irrelevant visual representations. In our dual-task paradigm, each trial began with the auditory presentation of six random (high load) or sequentially ordered (low load) digits. Next, two relevant visual stimuli (e.g., faces), presented amongst two temporally interspersed visual distractors (e.g., scenes), were to be encoded and maintained across a 7-s delay interval, after which memory for the relevant images and digits was probed. When taxed by high load digit maintenance, participants exhibited impaired performance on the visual WM task and a selective failure to attenuate the neural processing of task-irrelevant scene stimuli. The over-processing of distractor scenes under high load was indexed by elevated encoding activity in a scene-selective region-of-interest relative to low load and passive viewing control conditions, as well as by improved long-term recognition memory for these items. In contrast, the load manipulation did not affect participants’ ability to upregulate activity in this region when scenes were task-relevant. These results highlight the critical role of domain-general WM resources in the goal-directed regulation of distractor processing. Moreover, the consequences of increased WM load in young adults closely resemble the effects of cognitive aging on distractor filtering [Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., & D’Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging.
Nature Neuroscience 8, 1298–1300], suggesting the possibility of a common underlying mechanism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19397858</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NUPSA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aging (Individuals) ; Anatomical correlates of behavior ; Auditory Stimuli ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive Processes ; Diagnostic Tests ; Distraction ; Dual task ; Female ; Filtering ; fMRI ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Learning. Memory ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Maintenance ; Male ; Memory ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Oxygen - blood ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Perception ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Recognition (Psychology) - physiology ; Selective attention ; Sequential Approach ; Short Term Memory ; Suppression ; Task Analysis ; Time Factors ; Vision ; Visual Cortex - blood supply ; Visual Cortex - physiology ; Visual Pathways - blood supply ; Visual Pathways - physiology ; Visual Stimuli ; Young Adult ; Young Adults</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 2009-06, Vol.47 (7), p.1637-1646</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c649t-3510effe835b59e9a386c47a027c958c64edab7ebc0d474cf6752b5c99dd31bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c649t-3510effe835b59e9a386c47a027c958c64edab7ebc0d474cf6752b5c99dd31bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ859513$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21526538$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19397858$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rissman, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazzaley, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Esposito, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>While a core function of the working memory (WM) system is the active maintenance of behaviorally relevant sensory representations, it is also critical that distracting stimuli are appropriately ignored. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the role of domain-general WM resources in the top-down attentional modulation of task-relevant and irrelevant visual representations. In our dual-task paradigm, each trial began with the auditory presentation of six random (high load) or sequentially ordered (low load) digits. Next, two relevant visual stimuli (e.g., faces), presented amongst two temporally interspersed visual distractors (e.g., scenes), were to be encoded and maintained across a 7-s delay interval, after which memory for the relevant images and digits was probed. When taxed by high load digit maintenance, participants exhibited impaired performance on the visual WM task and a selective failure to attenuate the neural processing of task-irrelevant scene stimuli. The over-processing of distractor scenes under high load was indexed by elevated encoding activity in a scene-selective region-of-interest relative to low load and passive viewing control conditions, as well as by improved long-term recognition memory for these items. In contrast, the load manipulation did not affect participants’ ability to upregulate activity in this region when scenes were task-relevant. These results highlight the critical role of domain-general WM resources in the goal-directed regulation of distractor processing. Moreover, the consequences of increased WM load in young adults closely resemble the effects of cognitive aging on distractor filtering [Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., & D’Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging.
Nature Neuroscience 8, 1298–1300], suggesting the possibility of a common underlying mechanism.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aging (Individuals)</subject><subject>Anatomical correlates of behavior</subject><subject>Auditory Stimuli</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests</subject><subject>Distraction</subject><subject>Dual task</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Filtering</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Oxygen - blood</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Selective attention</subject><subject>Sequential Approach</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Suppression</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Cortex - blood supply</subject><subject>Visual Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Pathways - blood supply</subject><subject>Visual Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young Adults</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEokPhDRDKhu4S_BMn9gYJVYWCKrEpEjvLsW9mPCR2sJOp5u1x1GgK3ZSVJd_vHJ-r4yy7wKjECNcf9qWDOfgxHvXO935rVUkQEiXCJaL1s2yDeUMLynD1PNsgRHhBBSVn2asY9wihihH-MjvDgoqGM77Jft7uIIeuAz3lvsudd8XBxln1-Z0Pv6zb5gMMPhzz3iuTe5dPfiyMv3P54M3cq8mmuyRcRWPwGmJMutfZi071Ed6s53n24_PV7eV1cfP9y9fLTzeFrisxLUnR8jynrGUChKK81lWjEGm0YDxBYFTbQKuRqZpKd3XDSMu0EMZQ3Gp6nn289x3ndgCjwU1B9XIMdlDhKL2y8t-Jszu59QdJGoQJpcngYjUI_vcMcZKDjRr6Xjnwc5R1g9OTFX8STD1wRCr0EEkHH2OA7pQGI7m0KPfycYuLWkiEZWoxGbz7e6cH-VpbAt6vgIpa9V1QTtt44ghmpGZ04d7ecxCsPo2vvnEmGF5Wv17HqaCDhSCjtuA0GBvSh5DG2_-N_AfnL9Il</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Rissman, Jesse</creator><creator>Gazzaley, Adam</creator><creator>D’Esposito, Mark</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing</title><author>Rissman, Jesse ; Gazzaley, Adam ; D’Esposito, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c649t-3510effe835b59e9a386c47a027c958c64edab7ebc0d474cf6752b5c99dd31bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aging (Individuals)</topic><topic>Anatomical correlates of behavior</topic><topic>Auditory Stimuli</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests</topic><topic>Distraction</topic><topic>Dual task</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Filtering</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Oxygen - blood</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Selective attention</topic><topic>Sequential Approach</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Suppression</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Cortex - blood supply</topic><topic>Visual Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Pathways - blood supply</topic><topic>Visual Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young Adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rissman, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazzaley, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Esposito, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rissman, Jesse</au><au>Gazzaley, Adam</au><au>D’Esposito, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ859513</ericid><atitle>The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1637</spage><epage>1646</epage><pages>1637-1646</pages><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><coden>NUPSA6</coden><abstract>While a core function of the working memory (WM) system is the active maintenance of behaviorally relevant sensory representations, it is also critical that distracting stimuli are appropriately ignored. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the role of domain-general WM resources in the top-down attentional modulation of task-relevant and irrelevant visual representations. In our dual-task paradigm, each trial began with the auditory presentation of six random (high load) or sequentially ordered (low load) digits. Next, two relevant visual stimuli (e.g., faces), presented amongst two temporally interspersed visual distractors (e.g., scenes), were to be encoded and maintained across a 7-s delay interval, after which memory for the relevant images and digits was probed. When taxed by high load digit maintenance, participants exhibited impaired performance on the visual WM task and a selective failure to attenuate the neural processing of task-irrelevant scene stimuli. The over-processing of distractor scenes under high load was indexed by elevated encoding activity in a scene-selective region-of-interest relative to low load and passive viewing control conditions, as well as by improved long-term recognition memory for these items. In contrast, the load manipulation did not affect participants’ ability to upregulate activity in this region when scenes were task-relevant. These results highlight the critical role of domain-general WM resources in the goal-directed regulation of distractor processing. Moreover, the consequences of increased WM load in young adults closely resemble the effects of cognitive aging on distractor filtering [Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., & D’Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging.
Nature Neuroscience 8, 1298–1300], suggesting the possibility of a common underlying mechanism.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19397858</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.036</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-3932 |
ispartof | Neuropsychologia, 2009-06, Vol.47 (7), p.1637-1646 |
issn | 0028-3932 1873-3514 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2701233 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; ERIC |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aging (Individuals) Anatomical correlates of behavior Auditory Stimuli Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Cognitive Processes Diagnostic Tests Distraction Dual task Female Filtering fMRI Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Learning. Memory Magnetic Resonance Imaging Maintenance Male Memory Memory, Short-Term - physiology Neuropsychological Tests Oxygen - blood Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Perception Photic Stimulation - methods Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time - physiology Recognition (Psychology) Recognition (Psychology) - physiology Selective attention Sequential Approach Short Term Memory Suppression Task Analysis Time Factors Vision Visual Cortex - blood supply Visual Cortex - physiology Visual Pathways - blood supply Visual Pathways - physiology Visual Stimuli Young Adult Young Adults |
title | The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A08%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20non-visual%20working%20memory%20load%20on%20top-down%20modulation%20of%20visual%20processing&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Rissman,%20Jesse&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1637&rft.epage=1646&rft.pages=1637-1646&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft.coden=NUPSA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67175248%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c649t-3510effe835b59e9a386c47a027c958c64edab7ebc0d474cf6752b5c99dd31bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20080240&rft_id=info:pmid/19397858&rft_ericid=EJ859513&rfr_iscdi=true |