Loading…

The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing

While a core function of the working memory (WM) system is the active maintenance of behaviorally relevant sensory representations, it is also critical that distracting stimuli are appropriately ignored. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the role of domain-general WM resources...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neuropsychologia 2009-06, Vol.47 (7), p.1637-1646
Main Authors: Rissman, Jesse, Gazzaley, Adam, D’Esposito, Mark
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c649t-3510effe835b59e9a386c47a027c958c64edab7ebc0d474cf6752b5c99dd31bc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c649t-3510effe835b59e9a386c47a027c958c64edab7ebc0d474cf6752b5c99dd31bc3
container_end_page 1646
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1637
container_title Neuropsychologia
container_volume 47
creator Rissman, Jesse
Gazzaley, Adam
D’Esposito, Mark
description While a core function of the working memory (WM) system is the active maintenance of behaviorally relevant sensory representations, it is also critical that distracting stimuli are appropriately ignored. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the role of domain-general WM resources in the top-down attentional modulation of task-relevant and irrelevant visual representations. In our dual-task paradigm, each trial began with the auditory presentation of six random (high load) or sequentially ordered (low load) digits. Next, two relevant visual stimuli (e.g., faces), presented amongst two temporally interspersed visual distractors (e.g., scenes), were to be encoded and maintained across a 7-s delay interval, after which memory for the relevant images and digits was probed. When taxed by high load digit maintenance, participants exhibited impaired performance on the visual WM task and a selective failure to attenuate the neural processing of task-irrelevant scene stimuli. The over-processing of distractor scenes under high load was indexed by elevated encoding activity in a scene-selective region-of-interest relative to low load and passive viewing control conditions, as well as by improved long-term recognition memory for these items. In contrast, the load manipulation did not affect participants’ ability to upregulate activity in this region when scenes were task-relevant. These results highlight the critical role of domain-general WM resources in the goal-directed regulation of distractor processing. Moreover, the consequences of increased WM load in young adults closely resemble the effects of cognitive aging on distractor filtering [Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., & D’Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nature Neuroscience 8, 1298–1300], suggesting the possibility of a common underlying mechanism.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.036
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2701233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ859513</ericid><els_id>S0028393209000517</els_id><sourcerecordid>67175248</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c649t-3510effe835b59e9a386c47a027c958c64edab7ebc0d474cf6752b5c99dd31bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEokPhDRDKhu4S_BMn9gYJVYWCKrEpEjvLsW9mPCR2sJOp5u1x1GgK3ZSVJd_vHJ-r4yy7wKjECNcf9qWDOfgxHvXO935rVUkQEiXCJaL1s2yDeUMLynD1PNsgRHhBBSVn2asY9wihihH-MjvDgoqGM77Jft7uIIeuAz3lvsudd8XBxln1-Z0Pv6zb5gMMPhzz3iuTe5dPfiyMv3P54M3cq8mmuyRcRWPwGmJMutfZi071Ed6s53n24_PV7eV1cfP9y9fLTzeFrisxLUnR8jynrGUChKK81lWjEGm0YDxBYFTbQKuRqZpKd3XDSMu0EMZQ3Gp6nn289x3ndgCjwU1B9XIMdlDhKL2y8t-Jszu59QdJGoQJpcngYjUI_vcMcZKDjRr6Xjnwc5R1g9OTFX8STD1wRCr0EEkHH2OA7pQGI7m0KPfycYuLWkiEZWoxGbz7e6cH-VpbAt6vgIpa9V1QTtt44ghmpGZ04d7ecxCsPo2vvnEmGF5Wv17HqaCDhSCjtuA0GBvSh5DG2_-N_AfnL9Il</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20080240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Rissman, Jesse ; Gazzaley, Adam ; D’Esposito, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Rissman, Jesse ; Gazzaley, Adam ; D’Esposito, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>While a core function of the working memory (WM) system is the active maintenance of behaviorally relevant sensory representations, it is also critical that distracting stimuli are appropriately ignored. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the role of domain-general WM resources in the top-down attentional modulation of task-relevant and irrelevant visual representations. In our dual-task paradigm, each trial began with the auditory presentation of six random (high load) or sequentially ordered (low load) digits. Next, two relevant visual stimuli (e.g., faces), presented amongst two temporally interspersed visual distractors (e.g., scenes), were to be encoded and maintained across a 7-s delay interval, after which memory for the relevant images and digits was probed. When taxed by high load digit maintenance, participants exhibited impaired performance on the visual WM task and a selective failure to attenuate the neural processing of task-irrelevant scene stimuli. The over-processing of distractor scenes under high load was indexed by elevated encoding activity in a scene-selective region-of-interest relative to low load and passive viewing control conditions, as well as by improved long-term recognition memory for these items. In contrast, the load manipulation did not affect participants’ ability to upregulate activity in this region when scenes were task-relevant. These results highlight the critical role of domain-general WM resources in the goal-directed regulation of distractor processing. Moreover, the consequences of increased WM load in young adults closely resemble the effects of cognitive aging on distractor filtering [Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., &amp; D’Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nature Neuroscience 8, 1298–1300], suggesting the possibility of a common underlying mechanism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19397858</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NUPSA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aging (Individuals) ; Anatomical correlates of behavior ; Auditory Stimuli ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive Processes ; Diagnostic Tests ; Distraction ; Dual task ; Female ; Filtering ; fMRI ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Learning. Memory ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Maintenance ; Male ; Memory ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Oxygen - blood ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Perception ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Recognition (Psychology) - physiology ; Selective attention ; Sequential Approach ; Short Term Memory ; Suppression ; Task Analysis ; Time Factors ; Vision ; Visual Cortex - blood supply ; Visual Cortex - physiology ; Visual Pathways - blood supply ; Visual Pathways - physiology ; Visual Stimuli ; Young Adult ; Young Adults</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 2009-06, Vol.47 (7), p.1637-1646</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c649t-3510effe835b59e9a386c47a027c958c64edab7ebc0d474cf6752b5c99dd31bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c649t-3510effe835b59e9a386c47a027c958c64edab7ebc0d474cf6752b5c99dd31bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ859513$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21526538$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19397858$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rissman, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazzaley, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Esposito, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>While a core function of the working memory (WM) system is the active maintenance of behaviorally relevant sensory representations, it is also critical that distracting stimuli are appropriately ignored. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the role of domain-general WM resources in the top-down attentional modulation of task-relevant and irrelevant visual representations. In our dual-task paradigm, each trial began with the auditory presentation of six random (high load) or sequentially ordered (low load) digits. Next, two relevant visual stimuli (e.g., faces), presented amongst two temporally interspersed visual distractors (e.g., scenes), were to be encoded and maintained across a 7-s delay interval, after which memory for the relevant images and digits was probed. When taxed by high load digit maintenance, participants exhibited impaired performance on the visual WM task and a selective failure to attenuate the neural processing of task-irrelevant scene stimuli. The over-processing of distractor scenes under high load was indexed by elevated encoding activity in a scene-selective region-of-interest relative to low load and passive viewing control conditions, as well as by improved long-term recognition memory for these items. In contrast, the load manipulation did not affect participants’ ability to upregulate activity in this region when scenes were task-relevant. These results highlight the critical role of domain-general WM resources in the goal-directed regulation of distractor processing. Moreover, the consequences of increased WM load in young adults closely resemble the effects of cognitive aging on distractor filtering [Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., &amp; D’Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nature Neuroscience 8, 1298–1300], suggesting the possibility of a common underlying mechanism.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aging (Individuals)</subject><subject>Anatomical correlates of behavior</subject><subject>Auditory Stimuli</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests</subject><subject>Distraction</subject><subject>Dual task</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Filtering</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Oxygen - blood</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Selective attention</subject><subject>Sequential Approach</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Suppression</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Cortex - blood supply</subject><subject>Visual Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Pathways - blood supply</subject><subject>Visual Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young Adults</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEokPhDRDKhu4S_BMn9gYJVYWCKrEpEjvLsW9mPCR2sJOp5u1x1GgK3ZSVJd_vHJ-r4yy7wKjECNcf9qWDOfgxHvXO935rVUkQEiXCJaL1s2yDeUMLynD1PNsgRHhBBSVn2asY9wihihH-MjvDgoqGM77Jft7uIIeuAz3lvsudd8XBxln1-Z0Pv6zb5gMMPhzz3iuTe5dPfiyMv3P54M3cq8mmuyRcRWPwGmJMutfZi071Ed6s53n24_PV7eV1cfP9y9fLTzeFrisxLUnR8jynrGUChKK81lWjEGm0YDxBYFTbQKuRqZpKd3XDSMu0EMZQ3Gp6nn289x3ndgCjwU1B9XIMdlDhKL2y8t-Jszu59QdJGoQJpcngYjUI_vcMcZKDjRr6Xjnwc5R1g9OTFX8STD1wRCr0EEkHH2OA7pQGI7m0KPfycYuLWkiEZWoxGbz7e6cH-VpbAt6vgIpa9V1QTtt44ghmpGZ04d7ecxCsPo2vvnEmGF5Wv17HqaCDhSCjtuA0GBvSh5DG2_-N_AfnL9Il</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Rissman, Jesse</creator><creator>Gazzaley, Adam</creator><creator>D’Esposito, Mark</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing</title><author>Rissman, Jesse ; Gazzaley, Adam ; D’Esposito, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c649t-3510effe835b59e9a386c47a027c958c64edab7ebc0d474cf6752b5c99dd31bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aging (Individuals)</topic><topic>Anatomical correlates of behavior</topic><topic>Auditory Stimuli</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests</topic><topic>Distraction</topic><topic>Dual task</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Filtering</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Oxygen - blood</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Selective attention</topic><topic>Sequential Approach</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Suppression</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Cortex - blood supply</topic><topic>Visual Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Pathways - blood supply</topic><topic>Visual Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young Adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rissman, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazzaley, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Esposito, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rissman, Jesse</au><au>Gazzaley, Adam</au><au>D’Esposito, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ859513</ericid><atitle>The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1637</spage><epage>1646</epage><pages>1637-1646</pages><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><coden>NUPSA6</coden><abstract>While a core function of the working memory (WM) system is the active maintenance of behaviorally relevant sensory representations, it is also critical that distracting stimuli are appropriately ignored. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the role of domain-general WM resources in the top-down attentional modulation of task-relevant and irrelevant visual representations. In our dual-task paradigm, each trial began with the auditory presentation of six random (high load) or sequentially ordered (low load) digits. Next, two relevant visual stimuli (e.g., faces), presented amongst two temporally interspersed visual distractors (e.g., scenes), were to be encoded and maintained across a 7-s delay interval, after which memory for the relevant images and digits was probed. When taxed by high load digit maintenance, participants exhibited impaired performance on the visual WM task and a selective failure to attenuate the neural processing of task-irrelevant scene stimuli. The over-processing of distractor scenes under high load was indexed by elevated encoding activity in a scene-selective region-of-interest relative to low load and passive viewing control conditions, as well as by improved long-term recognition memory for these items. In contrast, the load manipulation did not affect participants’ ability to upregulate activity in this region when scenes were task-relevant. These results highlight the critical role of domain-general WM resources in the goal-directed regulation of distractor processing. Moreover, the consequences of increased WM load in young adults closely resemble the effects of cognitive aging on distractor filtering [Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., &amp; D’Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nature Neuroscience 8, 1298–1300], suggesting the possibility of a common underlying mechanism.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19397858</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.036</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-3932
ispartof Neuropsychologia, 2009-06, Vol.47 (7), p.1637-1646
issn 0028-3932
1873-3514
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2701233
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; ERIC
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aging (Individuals)
Anatomical correlates of behavior
Auditory Stimuli
Behavioral psychophysiology
Biological and medical sciences
Cognitive Processes
Diagnostic Tests
Distraction
Dual task
Female
Filtering
fMRI
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Learning. Memory
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Maintenance
Male
Memory
Memory, Short-Term - physiology
Neuropsychological Tests
Oxygen - blood
Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology
Perception
Photic Stimulation - methods
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reaction Time - physiology
Recognition (Psychology)
Recognition (Psychology) - physiology
Selective attention
Sequential Approach
Short Term Memory
Suppression
Task Analysis
Time Factors
Vision
Visual Cortex - blood supply
Visual Cortex - physiology
Visual Pathways - blood supply
Visual Pathways - physiology
Visual Stimuli
Young Adult
Young Adults
title The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A08%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20non-visual%20working%20memory%20load%20on%20top-down%20modulation%20of%20visual%20processing&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Rissman,%20Jesse&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1637&rft.epage=1646&rft.pages=1637-1646&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft.coden=NUPSA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67175248%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c649t-3510effe835b59e9a386c47a027c958c64edab7ebc0d474cf6752b5c99dd31bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20080240&rft_id=info:pmid/19397858&rft_ericid=EJ859513&rfr_iscdi=true