Loading…

Randomized study to compare valsartan +/- HCTZ versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ strategies to maximize blood pressure control

Delays in achieving blood pressure (BP) control may increase morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension. Thus, deciding which antihypertensive agent to use and at what dosage, in addition to determining when to initiate combination therapy and which agents to combine, is important for ach...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vascular health and risk management 2009-01, Vol.5, p.883-892
Main Authors: Zappe, Dion, Papst, Cheraz Cherif, Ferber, Philippe
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-eef074c6b190f0179597b9775ee4868931172648ec79acdba1154c9dad3b07723
cites
container_end_page 892
container_issue
container_start_page 883
container_title Vascular health and risk management
container_volume 5
creator Zappe, Dion
Papst, Cheraz Cherif
Ferber, Philippe
description Delays in achieving blood pressure (BP) control may increase morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension. Thus, deciding which antihypertensive agent to use and at what dosage, in addition to determining when to initiate combination therapy and which agents to combine, is important for achieving BP control. This randomized, double-blind, 14-week study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of various doses of valsartan +/- hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ for maximizing BP control in 1,285 patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Patients with stage 1 hypertension and naïve to antihypertensive therapy (33.9%) started valsartan 160 mg or amlodipine 5 mg. Treatment-naïve patients with stage 2 hypertension (13.5%) or those uncontrolled on current antihypertensive monotherapy (52.6%) started valsartan 160 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg or amlodipine 10 mg. At weeks 4, 8, and 11, patients not achieving BP control were up-titrated (maximum: valsartan 320 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, amlodipine 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg). At study end, 78.8% of patients on valsartan +/- HCTZ were controlled (BP
doi_str_mv 10.2147/vhrm.s8062
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2773747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2222951965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-eef074c6b190f0179597b9775ee4868931172648ec79acdba1154c9dad3b07723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtP3DAUhS1UBBS64QdUlrprFcZOHD82lapR6SBRVeK16MZy7DsQlMTBTlLor8fDjBjwxta9535XxwehY0pOcsrEbLoL7UmUhOc76IBSIbOcMPnhzXsffYzxnpCSS0L30D5VUknO2AH6d2E659v6Pzgch9E94cFj69veBMCTaaIJg-nwt1mGF_Orv3iCEMeITdt4V_d1B9tWHIIZ4LaGuGK05rFeYXHVeO9wHyDGMTGt74bgmyO0u0x0-LS5D9H16c-r-SI7__PrbP7jPLOMqCEDWBLBLK-oIktChSqVqJQQJQCTXKoiWcw5k2CFMtZVhtKSWeWMKyoiRF4cou9rbj9WLTgLabtpdB_q1oQn7U2t33e6-k7f-knnQhSCiQSYrQHOT_Di4t3wtpo-TRec0zTxZbMy-IcR4qDv_Ri65FLn6aiSKl4m1de1ygYfY4DlK5YSvYpV3ywufuvLVaxJ_Pmti610k2PxDKpUoJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2222951965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomized study to compare valsartan +/- HCTZ versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ strategies to maximize blood pressure control</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><creator>Zappe, Dion ; Papst, Cheraz Cherif ; Ferber, Philippe</creator><creatorcontrib>Zappe, Dion ; Papst, Cheraz Cherif ; Ferber, Philippe ; PROMPT Investigators</creatorcontrib><description>Delays in achieving blood pressure (BP) control may increase morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension. Thus, deciding which antihypertensive agent to use and at what dosage, in addition to determining when to initiate combination therapy and which agents to combine, is important for achieving BP control. This randomized, double-blind, 14-week study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of various doses of valsartan +/- hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ for maximizing BP control in 1,285 patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Patients with stage 1 hypertension and naïve to antihypertensive therapy (33.9%) started valsartan 160 mg or amlodipine 5 mg. Treatment-naïve patients with stage 2 hypertension (13.5%) or those uncontrolled on current antihypertensive monotherapy (52.6%) started valsartan 160 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg or amlodipine 10 mg. At weeks 4, 8, and 11, patients not achieving BP control were up-titrated (maximum: valsartan 320 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, amlodipine 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg). At study end, 78.8% of patients on valsartan +/- HCTZ were controlled (BP &lt;140/90 mmHg) and still on study medication versus 67.8% on amlodipine +/- HCTZ (P &lt; 0.0001). Amlodipine-treated patients had a higher incidence of peripheral edema (22.4% vs 2.2%) and associated discontinuations (7.3% vs &lt;1%). Initiating therapy earlier with valsartan/HCTZ, rather than titrating monotherapy to its maximum dose before adding a second agent, was superior to amlodipine monotherapy or amlodipine +/- HCTZ for achieving BP control, and avoided excessive treatment adjustments and maintained tolerability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1178-2048</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1176-6344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1178-2048</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2147/vhrm.s8062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19898644</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand: Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Amlodipine - adverse effects ; Amlodipine - therapeutic use ; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers - adverse effects ; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers - therapeutic use ; Antihypertensive Agents - adverse effects ; Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use ; Antihypertensives ; Blood pressure ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Calcium Channel Blockers - adverse effects ; Calcium Channel Blockers - therapeutic use ; combination therapy ; Diuretics ; Diuretics - adverse effects ; Diuretics - therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; efficacy ; Europe ; Female ; Humans ; hydrochlorothiazide ; Hydrochlorothiazide - adverse effects ; Hydrochlorothiazide - therapeutic use ; Hypertension ; Hypertension - drug therapy ; Hypertension - physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original Research ; South America ; Tetrazoles - adverse effects ; Tetrazoles - therapeutic use ; Time Factors ; titration ; tolerability ; Treatment Outcome ; Valine - adverse effects ; Valine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Valine - therapeutic use ; Valsartan</subject><ispartof>Vascular health and risk management, 2009-01, Vol.5, p.883-892</ispartof><rights>2009. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2009 Zappe et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-eef074c6b190f0179597b9775ee4868931172648ec79acdba1154c9dad3b07723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2222951965/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2222951965?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19898644$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zappe, Dion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papst, Cheraz Cherif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferber, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PROMPT Investigators</creatorcontrib><title>Randomized study to compare valsartan +/- HCTZ versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ strategies to maximize blood pressure control</title><title>Vascular health and risk management</title><addtitle>Vasc Health Risk Manag</addtitle><description>Delays in achieving blood pressure (BP) control may increase morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension. Thus, deciding which antihypertensive agent to use and at what dosage, in addition to determining when to initiate combination therapy and which agents to combine, is important for achieving BP control. This randomized, double-blind, 14-week study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of various doses of valsartan +/- hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ for maximizing BP control in 1,285 patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Patients with stage 1 hypertension and naïve to antihypertensive therapy (33.9%) started valsartan 160 mg or amlodipine 5 mg. Treatment-naïve patients with stage 2 hypertension (13.5%) or those uncontrolled on current antihypertensive monotherapy (52.6%) started valsartan 160 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg or amlodipine 10 mg. At weeks 4, 8, and 11, patients not achieving BP control were up-titrated (maximum: valsartan 320 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, amlodipine 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg). At study end, 78.8% of patients on valsartan +/- HCTZ were controlled (BP &lt;140/90 mmHg) and still on study medication versus 67.8% on amlodipine +/- HCTZ (P &lt; 0.0001). Amlodipine-treated patients had a higher incidence of peripheral edema (22.4% vs 2.2%) and associated discontinuations (7.3% vs &lt;1%). Initiating therapy earlier with valsartan/HCTZ, rather than titrating monotherapy to its maximum dose before adding a second agent, was superior to amlodipine monotherapy or amlodipine +/- HCTZ for achieving BP control, and avoided excessive treatment adjustments and maintained tolerability.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Amlodipine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Amlodipine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers - adverse effects</subject><subject>Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antihypertensives</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Calcium Channel Blockers - adverse effects</subject><subject>Calcium Channel Blockers - therapeutic use</subject><subject>combination therapy</subject><subject>Diuretics</subject><subject>Diuretics - adverse effects</subject><subject>Diuretics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>efficacy</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hydrochlorothiazide</subject><subject>Hydrochlorothiazide - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hydrochlorothiazide - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Hypertension - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hypertension - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>South America</subject><subject>Tetrazoles - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tetrazoles - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>titration</subject><subject>tolerability</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Valine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Valine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Valine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Valsartan</subject><issn>1178-2048</issn><issn>1176-6344</issn><issn>1178-2048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtP3DAUhS1UBBS64QdUlrprFcZOHD82lapR6SBRVeK16MZy7DsQlMTBTlLor8fDjBjwxta9535XxwehY0pOcsrEbLoL7UmUhOc76IBSIbOcMPnhzXsffYzxnpCSS0L30D5VUknO2AH6d2E659v6Pzgch9E94cFj69veBMCTaaIJg-nwt1mGF_Orv3iCEMeITdt4V_d1B9tWHIIZ4LaGuGK05rFeYXHVeO9wHyDGMTGt74bgmyO0u0x0-LS5D9H16c-r-SI7__PrbP7jPLOMqCEDWBLBLK-oIktChSqVqJQQJQCTXKoiWcw5k2CFMtZVhtKSWeWMKyoiRF4cou9rbj9WLTgLabtpdB_q1oQn7U2t33e6-k7f-knnQhSCiQSYrQHOT_Di4t3wtpo-TRec0zTxZbMy-IcR4qDv_Ri65FLn6aiSKl4m1de1ygYfY4DlK5YSvYpV3ywufuvLVaxJ_Pmti610k2PxDKpUoJA</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Zappe, Dion</creator><creator>Papst, Cheraz Cherif</creator><creator>Ferber, Philippe</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Dove Press</general><general>Dove Medical Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Randomized study to compare valsartan +/- HCTZ versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ strategies to maximize blood pressure control</title><author>Zappe, Dion ; Papst, Cheraz Cherif ; Ferber, Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-eef074c6b190f0179597b9775ee4868931172648ec79acdba1154c9dad3b07723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Amlodipine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Amlodipine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers - adverse effects</topic><topic>Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antihypertensives</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Calcium Channel Blockers - adverse effects</topic><topic>Calcium Channel Blockers - therapeutic use</topic><topic>combination therapy</topic><topic>Diuretics</topic><topic>Diuretics - adverse effects</topic><topic>Diuretics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>efficacy</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hydrochlorothiazide</topic><topic>Hydrochlorothiazide - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hydrochlorothiazide - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Hypertension - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hypertension - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>South America</topic><topic>Tetrazoles - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tetrazoles - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>titration</topic><topic>tolerability</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Valine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Valine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Valine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Valsartan</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zappe, Dion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papst, Cheraz Cherif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferber, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PROMPT Investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Vascular health and risk management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zappe, Dion</au><au>Papst, Cheraz Cherif</au><au>Ferber, Philippe</au><aucorp>PROMPT Investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomized study to compare valsartan +/- HCTZ versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ strategies to maximize blood pressure control</atitle><jtitle>Vascular health and risk management</jtitle><addtitle>Vasc Health Risk Manag</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>5</volume><spage>883</spage><epage>892</epage><pages>883-892</pages><issn>1178-2048</issn><issn>1176-6344</issn><eissn>1178-2048</eissn><abstract>Delays in achieving blood pressure (BP) control may increase morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension. Thus, deciding which antihypertensive agent to use and at what dosage, in addition to determining when to initiate combination therapy and which agents to combine, is important for achieving BP control. This randomized, double-blind, 14-week study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of various doses of valsartan +/- hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ for maximizing BP control in 1,285 patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Patients with stage 1 hypertension and naïve to antihypertensive therapy (33.9%) started valsartan 160 mg or amlodipine 5 mg. Treatment-naïve patients with stage 2 hypertension (13.5%) or those uncontrolled on current antihypertensive monotherapy (52.6%) started valsartan 160 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg or amlodipine 10 mg. At weeks 4, 8, and 11, patients not achieving BP control were up-titrated (maximum: valsartan 320 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, amlodipine 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg). At study end, 78.8% of patients on valsartan +/- HCTZ were controlled (BP &lt;140/90 mmHg) and still on study medication versus 67.8% on amlodipine +/- HCTZ (P &lt; 0.0001). Amlodipine-treated patients had a higher incidence of peripheral edema (22.4% vs 2.2%) and associated discontinuations (7.3% vs &lt;1%). Initiating therapy earlier with valsartan/HCTZ, rather than titrating monotherapy to its maximum dose before adding a second agent, was superior to amlodipine monotherapy or amlodipine +/- HCTZ for achieving BP control, and avoided excessive treatment adjustments and maintained tolerability.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</pub><pmid>19898644</pmid><doi>10.2147/vhrm.s8062</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1178-2048
ispartof Vascular health and risk management, 2009-01, Vol.5, p.883-892
issn 1178-2048
1176-6344
1178-2048
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2773747
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Taylor & Francis Open Access
subjects Adult
Aged
Amlodipine - adverse effects
Amlodipine - therapeutic use
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers - adverse effects
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers - therapeutic use
Antihypertensive Agents - adverse effects
Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use
Antihypertensives
Blood pressure
Blood Pressure - drug effects
Calcium Channel Blockers - adverse effects
Calcium Channel Blockers - therapeutic use
combination therapy
Diuretics
Diuretics - adverse effects
Diuretics - therapeutic use
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
efficacy
Europe
Female
Humans
hydrochlorothiazide
Hydrochlorothiazide - adverse effects
Hydrochlorothiazide - therapeutic use
Hypertension
Hypertension - drug therapy
Hypertension - physiopathology
Male
Middle Aged
Original Research
South America
Tetrazoles - adverse effects
Tetrazoles - therapeutic use
Time Factors
titration
tolerability
Treatment Outcome
Valine - adverse effects
Valine - analogs & derivatives
Valine - therapeutic use
Valsartan
title Randomized study to compare valsartan +/- HCTZ versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ strategies to maximize blood pressure control
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A40%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized%20study%20to%20compare%20valsartan%20+/-%20HCTZ%20versus%20amlodipine%20+/-%20HCTZ%20strategies%20to%20maximize%20blood%20pressure%20control&rft.jtitle=Vascular%20health%20and%20risk%20management&rft.au=Zappe,%20Dion&rft.aucorp=PROMPT%20Investigators&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=5&rft.spage=883&rft.epage=892&rft.pages=883-892&rft.issn=1178-2048&rft.eissn=1178-2048&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147/vhrm.s8062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2222951965%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-eef074c6b190f0179597b9775ee4868931172648ec79acdba1154c9dad3b07723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2222951965&rft_id=info:pmid/19898644&rfr_iscdi=true