Loading…

Long-Term Outcomes in Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Comparative Analysis

Theoretical advantages exist of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) over high-flux hemodialysis (HD), but outcome data are scarce. Our objective was to compare outcomes between these modalities. We studied 858 incident patients in our incremental high-flux HD and online HDF program during an 18-yr period...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2009-12, Vol.4 (12), p.1944-1953
Main Authors: Vilar, Enric, Fry, Andrew C, Wellsted, David, Tattersall, James E, Greenwood, Roger N, Farrington, Ken
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-214436b0ab8d4fca1b0f5609484012261b2fb65120094a58b9f39a9db103f49b3
container_end_page 1953
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1944
container_title Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology
container_volume 4
creator Vilar, Enric
Fry, Andrew C
Wellsted, David
Tattersall, James E
Greenwood, Roger N
Farrington, Ken
description Theoretical advantages exist of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) over high-flux hemodialysis (HD), but outcome data are scarce. Our objective was to compare outcomes between these modalities. We studied 858 incident patients in our incremental high-flux HD and online HDF program during an 18-yr period. We compared outcomes, including survival, in those who were treated predominantly with HDF (>50% sessions) and those with high-flux HD. Survival comparisons used a Cox model taking into account the time-varying proportion of time spent on HDF. All data were prospectively collected. A total of 152,043 sessions were delivered as HDF and 291,222 as high-flux HD. A total of 232 (27%) patients were treated predominantly with HDF and 626 (73%) with high-flux HD. Total Kt/V, serum albumin, erythropoietin resistance index, and BP were similar in both groups up to 5 yr after HD initiation. Intradialytic hypotension was less frequent in the predominant HDF group. Predominant HDF treatment was associated with a reduced risk for death after correction for confounding variables. In a second Cox model, proportion of time spent on HDF predicted survival, such that patients who were treated solely by HDF would have a hazard for death of 0.66 compared with those who solely used high-flux HD. We found no benefits of HDF over high-flux HD with respect to anemia management, nutrition, mineral metabolism, and BP control. The mortality benefit associated with HDF requires confirmation in large randomized, controlled trials. These data may contribute to their design.
doi_str_mv 10.2215/CJN.05560809
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2798875</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19820129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-214436b0ab8d4fca1b0f5609484012261b2fb65120094a58b9f39a9db103f49b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM9PwjAUxxujEURvnk2PHhy2XTtWDyZkEdEQuWDirWm3Fkq2jqyA8t9bMvDH6TXvfd633_cF4BqjPiGY3Wevb33EWIJSxE9AFzPGIo7Yx-nPm-IOuPB-iRClMWHnoIN5ShAmvAvkpHbzaKabCk4367yutIfWwakrrdNwrKu6sNLYct3Ita0dlK6AYztfRKNy83Wclztv_QMcwqyuVnJPbjUcurZ_Cc6MLL2-OtQeeB89zbJxNJk-v2TDSZTHMVtHBAdziUJSpQU1ucQKmXAUpykNTkmCFTEqYZig0JMsVdzEXPJCYRQbylXcA4-t7mqjKl3k2gXPpVg1tpLNTtTSiv8TZxdiXm8FGfA0HbAgcNcK5E3tfaPNzy5GYh-1CFGLY9QBv_n73y98yDYAty2wCHl92kYLX8myDDgR-VJ6RwUmAQ93fwN3EIh7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-Term Outcomes in Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Comparative Analysis</title><source>American Society of Nephrology</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Vilar, Enric ; Fry, Andrew C ; Wellsted, David ; Tattersall, James E ; Greenwood, Roger N ; Farrington, Ken</creator><creatorcontrib>Vilar, Enric ; Fry, Andrew C ; Wellsted, David ; Tattersall, James E ; Greenwood, Roger N ; Farrington, Ken</creatorcontrib><description>Theoretical advantages exist of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) over high-flux hemodialysis (HD), but outcome data are scarce. Our objective was to compare outcomes between these modalities. We studied 858 incident patients in our incremental high-flux HD and online HDF program during an 18-yr period. We compared outcomes, including survival, in those who were treated predominantly with HDF (&gt;50% sessions) and those with high-flux HD. Survival comparisons used a Cox model taking into account the time-varying proportion of time spent on HDF. All data were prospectively collected. A total of 152,043 sessions were delivered as HDF and 291,222 as high-flux HD. A total of 232 (27%) patients were treated predominantly with HDF and 626 (73%) with high-flux HD. Total Kt/V, serum albumin, erythropoietin resistance index, and BP were similar in both groups up to 5 yr after HD initiation. Intradialytic hypotension was less frequent in the predominant HDF group. Predominant HDF treatment was associated with a reduced risk for death after correction for confounding variables. In a second Cox model, proportion of time spent on HDF predicted survival, such that patients who were treated solely by HDF would have a hazard for death of 0.66 compared with those who solely used high-flux HD. We found no benefits of HDF over high-flux HD with respect to anemia management, nutrition, mineral metabolism, and BP control. The mortality benefit associated with HDF requires confirmation in large randomized, controlled trials. These data may contribute to their design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1555-9041</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-905X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2215/CJN.05560809</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19820129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Nephrology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anemia - drug therapy ; Calcium - blood ; Erythropoietin - therapeutic use ; Female ; Hemodiafiltration - adverse effects ; Hemodiafiltration - methods ; Hemodiafiltration - mortality ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Biological ; Nutrition Assessment ; Original ; Parathyroid Hormone - blood ; Phosphates - blood ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Renal Dialysis - adverse effects ; Renal Dialysis - methods ; Renal Dialysis - mortality ; Retrospective Studies ; Serum Albumin - metabolism ; Treatment Outcome ; Water-Electrolyte Balance</subject><ispartof>Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009-12, Vol.4 (12), p.1944-1953</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Nephrology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-214436b0ab8d4fca1b0f5609484012261b2fb65120094a58b9f39a9db103f49b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2798875/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2798875/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4009,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19820129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vilar, Enric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fry, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wellsted, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tattersall, James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Roger N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrington, Ken</creatorcontrib><title>Long-Term Outcomes in Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Comparative Analysis</title><title>Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology</title><addtitle>Clin J Am Soc Nephrol</addtitle><description>Theoretical advantages exist of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) over high-flux hemodialysis (HD), but outcome data are scarce. Our objective was to compare outcomes between these modalities. We studied 858 incident patients in our incremental high-flux HD and online HDF program during an 18-yr period. We compared outcomes, including survival, in those who were treated predominantly with HDF (&gt;50% sessions) and those with high-flux HD. Survival comparisons used a Cox model taking into account the time-varying proportion of time spent on HDF. All data were prospectively collected. A total of 152,043 sessions were delivered as HDF and 291,222 as high-flux HD. A total of 232 (27%) patients were treated predominantly with HDF and 626 (73%) with high-flux HD. Total Kt/V, serum albumin, erythropoietin resistance index, and BP were similar in both groups up to 5 yr after HD initiation. Intradialytic hypotension was less frequent in the predominant HDF group. Predominant HDF treatment was associated with a reduced risk for death after correction for confounding variables. In a second Cox model, proportion of time spent on HDF predicted survival, such that patients who were treated solely by HDF would have a hazard for death of 0.66 compared with those who solely used high-flux HD. We found no benefits of HDF over high-flux HD with respect to anemia management, nutrition, mineral metabolism, and BP control. The mortality benefit associated with HDF requires confirmation in large randomized, controlled trials. These data may contribute to their design.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anemia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Calcium - blood</subject><subject>Erythropoietin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemodiafiltration - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hemodiafiltration - methods</subject><subject>Hemodiafiltration - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Nutrition Assessment</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Parathyroid Hormone - blood</subject><subject>Phosphates - blood</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - methods</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - mortality</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Serum Albumin - metabolism</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Water-Electrolyte Balance</subject><issn>1555-9041</issn><issn>1555-905X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM9PwjAUxxujEURvnk2PHhy2XTtWDyZkEdEQuWDirWm3Fkq2jqyA8t9bMvDH6TXvfd633_cF4BqjPiGY3Wevb33EWIJSxE9AFzPGIo7Yx-nPm-IOuPB-iRClMWHnoIN5ShAmvAvkpHbzaKabCk4367yutIfWwakrrdNwrKu6sNLYct3Ita0dlK6AYztfRKNy83Wclztv_QMcwqyuVnJPbjUcurZ_Cc6MLL2-OtQeeB89zbJxNJk-v2TDSZTHMVtHBAdziUJSpQU1ucQKmXAUpykNTkmCFTEqYZig0JMsVdzEXPJCYRQbylXcA4-t7mqjKl3k2gXPpVg1tpLNTtTSiv8TZxdiXm8FGfA0HbAgcNcK5E3tfaPNzy5GYh-1CFGLY9QBv_n73y98yDYAty2wCHl92kYLX8myDDgR-VJ6RwUmAQ93fwN3EIh7</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Vilar, Enric</creator><creator>Fry, Andrew C</creator><creator>Wellsted, David</creator><creator>Tattersall, James E</creator><creator>Greenwood, Roger N</creator><creator>Farrington, Ken</creator><general>American Society of Nephrology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>Long-Term Outcomes in Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Comparative Analysis</title><author>Vilar, Enric ; Fry, Andrew C ; Wellsted, David ; Tattersall, James E ; Greenwood, Roger N ; Farrington, Ken</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-214436b0ab8d4fca1b0f5609484012261b2fb65120094a58b9f39a9db103f49b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anemia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Calcium - blood</topic><topic>Erythropoietin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemodiafiltration - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hemodiafiltration - methods</topic><topic>Hemodiafiltration - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Nutrition Assessment</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Parathyroid Hormone - blood</topic><topic>Phosphates - blood</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - methods</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - mortality</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Serum Albumin - metabolism</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Water-Electrolyte Balance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vilar, Enric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fry, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wellsted, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tattersall, James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Roger N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrington, Ken</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vilar, Enric</au><au>Fry, Andrew C</au><au>Wellsted, David</au><au>Tattersall, James E</au><au>Greenwood, Roger N</au><au>Farrington, Ken</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-Term Outcomes in Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Comparative Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin J Am Soc Nephrol</addtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1944</spage><epage>1953</epage><pages>1944-1953</pages><issn>1555-9041</issn><eissn>1555-905X</eissn><abstract>Theoretical advantages exist of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) over high-flux hemodialysis (HD), but outcome data are scarce. Our objective was to compare outcomes between these modalities. We studied 858 incident patients in our incremental high-flux HD and online HDF program during an 18-yr period. We compared outcomes, including survival, in those who were treated predominantly with HDF (&gt;50% sessions) and those with high-flux HD. Survival comparisons used a Cox model taking into account the time-varying proportion of time spent on HDF. All data were prospectively collected. A total of 152,043 sessions were delivered as HDF and 291,222 as high-flux HD. A total of 232 (27%) patients were treated predominantly with HDF and 626 (73%) with high-flux HD. Total Kt/V, serum albumin, erythropoietin resistance index, and BP were similar in both groups up to 5 yr after HD initiation. Intradialytic hypotension was less frequent in the predominant HDF group. Predominant HDF treatment was associated with a reduced risk for death after correction for confounding variables. In a second Cox model, proportion of time spent on HDF predicted survival, such that patients who were treated solely by HDF would have a hazard for death of 0.66 compared with those who solely used high-flux HD. We found no benefits of HDF over high-flux HD with respect to anemia management, nutrition, mineral metabolism, and BP control. The mortality benefit associated with HDF requires confirmation in large randomized, controlled trials. These data may contribute to their design.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Nephrology</pub><pmid>19820129</pmid><doi>10.2215/CJN.05560809</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1555-9041
ispartof Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009-12, Vol.4 (12), p.1944-1953
issn 1555-9041
1555-905X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2798875
source American Society of Nephrology; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Anemia - drug therapy
Calcium - blood
Erythropoietin - therapeutic use
Female
Hemodiafiltration - adverse effects
Hemodiafiltration - methods
Hemodiafiltration - mortality
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality
Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Biological
Nutrition Assessment
Original
Parathyroid Hormone - blood
Phosphates - blood
Proportional Hazards Models
Renal Dialysis - adverse effects
Renal Dialysis - methods
Renal Dialysis - mortality
Retrospective Studies
Serum Albumin - metabolism
Treatment Outcome
Water-Electrolyte Balance
title Long-Term Outcomes in Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Comparative Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A46%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-Term%20Outcomes%20in%20Online%20Hemodiafiltration%20and%20High-Flux%20Hemodialysis:%20A%20Comparative%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Society%20of%20Nephrology&rft.au=Vilar,%20Enric&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1944&rft.epage=1953&rft.pages=1944-1953&rft.issn=1555-9041&rft.eissn=1555-905X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2215/CJN.05560809&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E19820129%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-214436b0ab8d4fca1b0f5609484012261b2fb65120094a58b9f39a9db103f49b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/19820129&rfr_iscdi=true