Loading…
Long-Term Outcomes in Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Comparative Analysis
Theoretical advantages exist of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) over high-flux hemodialysis (HD), but outcome data are scarce. Our objective was to compare outcomes between these modalities. We studied 858 incident patients in our incremental high-flux HD and online HDF program during an 18-yr period...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2009-12, Vol.4 (12), p.1944-1953 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-214436b0ab8d4fca1b0f5609484012261b2fb65120094a58b9f39a9db103f49b3 |
container_end_page | 1953 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1944 |
container_title | Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Vilar, Enric Fry, Andrew C Wellsted, David Tattersall, James E Greenwood, Roger N Farrington, Ken |
description | Theoretical advantages exist of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) over high-flux hemodialysis (HD), but outcome data are scarce. Our objective was to compare outcomes between these modalities.
We studied 858 incident patients in our incremental high-flux HD and online HDF program during an 18-yr period. We compared outcomes, including survival, in those who were treated predominantly with HDF (>50% sessions) and those with high-flux HD. Survival comparisons used a Cox model taking into account the time-varying proportion of time spent on HDF. All data were prospectively collected.
A total of 152,043 sessions were delivered as HDF and 291,222 as high-flux HD. A total of 232 (27%) patients were treated predominantly with HDF and 626 (73%) with high-flux HD. Total Kt/V, serum albumin, erythropoietin resistance index, and BP were similar in both groups up to 5 yr after HD initiation. Intradialytic hypotension was less frequent in the predominant HDF group. Predominant HDF treatment was associated with a reduced risk for death after correction for confounding variables. In a second Cox model, proportion of time spent on HDF predicted survival, such that patients who were treated solely by HDF would have a hazard for death of 0.66 compared with those who solely used high-flux HD.
We found no benefits of HDF over high-flux HD with respect to anemia management, nutrition, mineral metabolism, and BP control. The mortality benefit associated with HDF requires confirmation in large randomized, controlled trials. These data may contribute to their design. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2215/CJN.05560809 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2798875</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19820129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-214436b0ab8d4fca1b0f5609484012261b2fb65120094a58b9f39a9db103f49b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM9PwjAUxxujEURvnk2PHhy2XTtWDyZkEdEQuWDirWm3Fkq2jqyA8t9bMvDH6TXvfd633_cF4BqjPiGY3Wevb33EWIJSxE9AFzPGIo7Yx-nPm-IOuPB-iRClMWHnoIN5ShAmvAvkpHbzaKabCk4367yutIfWwakrrdNwrKu6sNLYct3Ita0dlK6AYztfRKNy83Wclztv_QMcwqyuVnJPbjUcurZ_Cc6MLL2-OtQeeB89zbJxNJk-v2TDSZTHMVtHBAdziUJSpQU1ucQKmXAUpykNTkmCFTEqYZig0JMsVdzEXPJCYRQbylXcA4-t7mqjKl3k2gXPpVg1tpLNTtTSiv8TZxdiXm8FGfA0HbAgcNcK5E3tfaPNzy5GYh-1CFGLY9QBv_n73y98yDYAty2wCHl92kYLX8myDDgR-VJ6RwUmAQ93fwN3EIh7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-Term Outcomes in Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Comparative Analysis</title><source>American Society of Nephrology</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Vilar, Enric ; Fry, Andrew C ; Wellsted, David ; Tattersall, James E ; Greenwood, Roger N ; Farrington, Ken</creator><creatorcontrib>Vilar, Enric ; Fry, Andrew C ; Wellsted, David ; Tattersall, James E ; Greenwood, Roger N ; Farrington, Ken</creatorcontrib><description>Theoretical advantages exist of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) over high-flux hemodialysis (HD), but outcome data are scarce. Our objective was to compare outcomes between these modalities.
We studied 858 incident patients in our incremental high-flux HD and online HDF program during an 18-yr period. We compared outcomes, including survival, in those who were treated predominantly with HDF (>50% sessions) and those with high-flux HD. Survival comparisons used a Cox model taking into account the time-varying proportion of time spent on HDF. All data were prospectively collected.
A total of 152,043 sessions were delivered as HDF and 291,222 as high-flux HD. A total of 232 (27%) patients were treated predominantly with HDF and 626 (73%) with high-flux HD. Total Kt/V, serum albumin, erythropoietin resistance index, and BP were similar in both groups up to 5 yr after HD initiation. Intradialytic hypotension was less frequent in the predominant HDF group. Predominant HDF treatment was associated with a reduced risk for death after correction for confounding variables. In a second Cox model, proportion of time spent on HDF predicted survival, such that patients who were treated solely by HDF would have a hazard for death of 0.66 compared with those who solely used high-flux HD.
We found no benefits of HDF over high-flux HD with respect to anemia management, nutrition, mineral metabolism, and BP control. The mortality benefit associated with HDF requires confirmation in large randomized, controlled trials. These data may contribute to their design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1555-9041</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-905X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2215/CJN.05560809</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19820129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Nephrology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anemia - drug therapy ; Calcium - blood ; Erythropoietin - therapeutic use ; Female ; Hemodiafiltration - adverse effects ; Hemodiafiltration - methods ; Hemodiafiltration - mortality ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Biological ; Nutrition Assessment ; Original ; Parathyroid Hormone - blood ; Phosphates - blood ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Renal Dialysis - adverse effects ; Renal Dialysis - methods ; Renal Dialysis - mortality ; Retrospective Studies ; Serum Albumin - metabolism ; Treatment Outcome ; Water-Electrolyte Balance</subject><ispartof>Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009-12, Vol.4 (12), p.1944-1953</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Nephrology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-214436b0ab8d4fca1b0f5609484012261b2fb65120094a58b9f39a9db103f49b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2798875/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2798875/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4009,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19820129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vilar, Enric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fry, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wellsted, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tattersall, James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Roger N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrington, Ken</creatorcontrib><title>Long-Term Outcomes in Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Comparative Analysis</title><title>Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology</title><addtitle>Clin J Am Soc Nephrol</addtitle><description>Theoretical advantages exist of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) over high-flux hemodialysis (HD), but outcome data are scarce. Our objective was to compare outcomes between these modalities.
We studied 858 incident patients in our incremental high-flux HD and online HDF program during an 18-yr period. We compared outcomes, including survival, in those who were treated predominantly with HDF (>50% sessions) and those with high-flux HD. Survival comparisons used a Cox model taking into account the time-varying proportion of time spent on HDF. All data were prospectively collected.
A total of 152,043 sessions were delivered as HDF and 291,222 as high-flux HD. A total of 232 (27%) patients were treated predominantly with HDF and 626 (73%) with high-flux HD. Total Kt/V, serum albumin, erythropoietin resistance index, and BP were similar in both groups up to 5 yr after HD initiation. Intradialytic hypotension was less frequent in the predominant HDF group. Predominant HDF treatment was associated with a reduced risk for death after correction for confounding variables. In a second Cox model, proportion of time spent on HDF predicted survival, such that patients who were treated solely by HDF would have a hazard for death of 0.66 compared with those who solely used high-flux HD.
We found no benefits of HDF over high-flux HD with respect to anemia management, nutrition, mineral metabolism, and BP control. The mortality benefit associated with HDF requires confirmation in large randomized, controlled trials. These data may contribute to their design.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anemia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Calcium - blood</subject><subject>Erythropoietin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemodiafiltration - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hemodiafiltration - methods</subject><subject>Hemodiafiltration - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Nutrition Assessment</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Parathyroid Hormone - blood</subject><subject>Phosphates - blood</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - methods</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - mortality</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Serum Albumin - metabolism</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Water-Electrolyte Balance</subject><issn>1555-9041</issn><issn>1555-905X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM9PwjAUxxujEURvnk2PHhy2XTtWDyZkEdEQuWDirWm3Fkq2jqyA8t9bMvDH6TXvfd633_cF4BqjPiGY3Wevb33EWIJSxE9AFzPGIo7Yx-nPm-IOuPB-iRClMWHnoIN5ShAmvAvkpHbzaKabCk4367yutIfWwakrrdNwrKu6sNLYct3Ita0dlK6AYztfRKNy83Wclztv_QMcwqyuVnJPbjUcurZ_Cc6MLL2-OtQeeB89zbJxNJk-v2TDSZTHMVtHBAdziUJSpQU1ucQKmXAUpykNTkmCFTEqYZig0JMsVdzEXPJCYRQbylXcA4-t7mqjKl3k2gXPpVg1tpLNTtTSiv8TZxdiXm8FGfA0HbAgcNcK5E3tfaPNzy5GYh-1CFGLY9QBv_n73y98yDYAty2wCHl92kYLX8myDDgR-VJ6RwUmAQ93fwN3EIh7</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Vilar, Enric</creator><creator>Fry, Andrew C</creator><creator>Wellsted, David</creator><creator>Tattersall, James E</creator><creator>Greenwood, Roger N</creator><creator>Farrington, Ken</creator><general>American Society of Nephrology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>Long-Term Outcomes in Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Comparative Analysis</title><author>Vilar, Enric ; Fry, Andrew C ; Wellsted, David ; Tattersall, James E ; Greenwood, Roger N ; Farrington, Ken</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-214436b0ab8d4fca1b0f5609484012261b2fb65120094a58b9f39a9db103f49b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anemia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Calcium - blood</topic><topic>Erythropoietin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemodiafiltration - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hemodiafiltration - methods</topic><topic>Hemodiafiltration - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Nutrition Assessment</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Parathyroid Hormone - blood</topic><topic>Phosphates - blood</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - methods</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - mortality</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Serum Albumin - metabolism</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Water-Electrolyte Balance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vilar, Enric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fry, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wellsted, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tattersall, James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Roger N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrington, Ken</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vilar, Enric</au><au>Fry, Andrew C</au><au>Wellsted, David</au><au>Tattersall, James E</au><au>Greenwood, Roger N</au><au>Farrington, Ken</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-Term Outcomes in Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Comparative Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin J Am Soc Nephrol</addtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1944</spage><epage>1953</epage><pages>1944-1953</pages><issn>1555-9041</issn><eissn>1555-905X</eissn><abstract>Theoretical advantages exist of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) over high-flux hemodialysis (HD), but outcome data are scarce. Our objective was to compare outcomes between these modalities.
We studied 858 incident patients in our incremental high-flux HD and online HDF program during an 18-yr period. We compared outcomes, including survival, in those who were treated predominantly with HDF (>50% sessions) and those with high-flux HD. Survival comparisons used a Cox model taking into account the time-varying proportion of time spent on HDF. All data were prospectively collected.
A total of 152,043 sessions were delivered as HDF and 291,222 as high-flux HD. A total of 232 (27%) patients were treated predominantly with HDF and 626 (73%) with high-flux HD. Total Kt/V, serum albumin, erythropoietin resistance index, and BP were similar in both groups up to 5 yr after HD initiation. Intradialytic hypotension was less frequent in the predominant HDF group. Predominant HDF treatment was associated with a reduced risk for death after correction for confounding variables. In a second Cox model, proportion of time spent on HDF predicted survival, such that patients who were treated solely by HDF would have a hazard for death of 0.66 compared with those who solely used high-flux HD.
We found no benefits of HDF over high-flux HD with respect to anemia management, nutrition, mineral metabolism, and BP control. The mortality benefit associated with HDF requires confirmation in large randomized, controlled trials. These data may contribute to their design.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Nephrology</pub><pmid>19820129</pmid><doi>10.2215/CJN.05560809</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1555-9041 |
ispartof | Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009-12, Vol.4 (12), p.1944-1953 |
issn | 1555-9041 1555-905X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2798875 |
source | American Society of Nephrology; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Anemia - drug therapy Calcium - blood Erythropoietin - therapeutic use Female Hemodiafiltration - adverse effects Hemodiafiltration - methods Hemodiafiltration - mortality Humans Kaplan-Meier Estimate Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy Male Middle Aged Models, Biological Nutrition Assessment Original Parathyroid Hormone - blood Phosphates - blood Proportional Hazards Models Renal Dialysis - adverse effects Renal Dialysis - methods Renal Dialysis - mortality Retrospective Studies Serum Albumin - metabolism Treatment Outcome Water-Electrolyte Balance |
title | Long-Term Outcomes in Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Comparative Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A46%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-Term%20Outcomes%20in%20Online%20Hemodiafiltration%20and%20High-Flux%20Hemodialysis:%20A%20Comparative%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Society%20of%20Nephrology&rft.au=Vilar,%20Enric&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1944&rft.epage=1953&rft.pages=1944-1953&rft.issn=1555-9041&rft.eissn=1555-905X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2215/CJN.05560809&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E19820129%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-214436b0ab8d4fca1b0f5609484012261b2fb65120094a58b9f39a9db103f49b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/19820129&rfr_iscdi=true |