Loading…

Characterizing Response to Elemental Unit of Acoustic Imaging Noise: An fMRI Study

Acoustic imaging noise produced during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies can hinder auditory fMRI research analysis by altering the properties of the acquired time-series data. Acoustic imaging noise can be especially confounding when estimating the time course of the hemodynamic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering 2009-07, Vol.56 (7), p.1919-1928
Main Authors: Tamer, Gregory G., Luh, Wen-Ming, Talavage, Thomas M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c602t-83db2eeeeee00ae1de666ea9b0948b31884d62dae7fdeca9d331f64623ccf2113
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c602t-83db2eeeeee00ae1de666ea9b0948b31884d62dae7fdeca9d331f64623ccf2113
container_end_page 1928
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1919
container_title IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering
container_volume 56
creator Tamer, Gregory G.
Luh, Wen-Ming
Talavage, Thomas M.
description Acoustic imaging noise produced during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies can hinder auditory fMRI research analysis by altering the properties of the acquired time-series data. Acoustic imaging noise can be especially confounding when estimating the time course of the hemodynamic response (HDR) in auditory event-related fMRI (fMRI) experiments. This study is motivated by the desire to establish a baseline function that can serve not only as a comparison to other quantities of acoustic imaging noise for determining how detrimental is one's experimental noise, but also as a foundation for a model that compensates for the response to acoustic imaging noise. Therefore, the amplitude and spatial extent of the HDR to the elemental unit of acoustic imaging noise (i.e., a single ping) associated with echoplanar acquisition were characterized and modeled. Results from this fMRI study at 1.5 T indicate that the group-averaged HDR in left and right auditory cortex to acoustic imaging noise (duration of 46 ms) has an estimated peak magnitude of 0.29% (right) to 0.48% (left) signal change from baseline, peaks between 3 and 5 s after stimulus presentation, and returns to baseline and remains within the noise range approximately 8 s after stimulus presentation.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TBME.2009.2016573
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2845537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4801990</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2291643291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c602t-83db2eeeeee00ae1de666ea9b0948b31884d62dae7fdeca9d331f64623ccf2113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhi0EomngByAkZHEALls8_lqbA1KIAkRqQQrt2XK83tTVZp2udyuVX4-XROXj0Ppgy5pnRjPvvAi9AHICQPT7809nixNKiM4XSFGyR2gCQqiCCgaP0YQQUIWmmh-h45Su8pcrLp-iI9CMcF6WE7SaX9rOut534WdoN3jl0y62yeM-4kXjt77tbYMv2tDjWOOZi0Pqg8PLrd2M-LcYkv-AZy2uz1ZL_KMfqttn6Eltm-SfH94puvi8OJ9_LU6_f1nOZ6eFk4T2hWLVmvrfhxDrofJSSm_1mmiu1gyU4pWklfVlXXlndcUY1JJLypyrKQCboo_7urthvfWVy612tjG7Lmxtd2uiDebfSBsuzSbeGKq4EKzMBd4eCnTxevCpN9uQnG8a2_o8p1GyLLmgMJJv7iVZ1lUDqAdBCpTTvKKHQaKYoJpk8N29IMgSGGMi6zJFr_9Dr-LQtXkHRgmphBZ6VA32kOtiSp2v7wQDYkZXmdFVZnSVObgq57z6W-k_GQcbZeDlHgh5m3dhrgjoPMIv4aXQDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>856859591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterizing Response to Elemental Unit of Acoustic Imaging Noise: An fMRI Study</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Tamer, Gregory G. ; Luh, Wen-Ming ; Talavage, Thomas M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tamer, Gregory G. ; Luh, Wen-Ming ; Talavage, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><description>Acoustic imaging noise produced during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies can hinder auditory fMRI research analysis by altering the properties of the acquired time-series data. Acoustic imaging noise can be especially confounding when estimating the time course of the hemodynamic response (HDR) in auditory event-related fMRI (fMRI) experiments. This study is motivated by the desire to establish a baseline function that can serve not only as a comparison to other quantities of acoustic imaging noise for determining how detrimental is one's experimental noise, but also as a foundation for a model that compensates for the response to acoustic imaging noise. Therefore, the amplitude and spatial extent of the HDR to the elemental unit of acoustic imaging noise (i.e., a single ping) associated with echoplanar acquisition were characterized and modeled. Results from this fMRI study at 1.5 T indicate that the group-averaged HDR in left and right auditory cortex to acoustic imaging noise (duration of 46 ms) has an estimated peak magnitude of 0.29% (right) to 0.48% (left) signal change from baseline, peaks between 3 and 5 s after stimulus presentation, and returns to baseline and remains within the noise range approximately 8 s after stimulus presentation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2016573</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19304477</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEBEAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Acoustic imaging ; Acoustic noise ; Acoustic Stimulation - adverse effects ; Acoustics ; Adult ; Amplitudes ; Auditory Cortex - physiology ; auditory system ; biomedical image processing ; Brain Mapping ; Cortexes ; Female ; Foundations ; Hemodynamic responses ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Image analysis ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Magnetic analysis ; Magnetic noise ; Magnetic properties ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Marketing ; Mathematical models ; modeling ; Models, Neurological ; Models, Statistical ; Noise ; Noise level ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Time series analysis</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering, 2009-07, Vol.56 (7), p.1919-1928</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c602t-83db2eeeeee00ae1de666ea9b0948b31884d62dae7fdeca9d331f64623ccf2113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c602t-83db2eeeeee00ae1de666ea9b0948b31884d62dae7fdeca9d331f64623ccf2113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4801990$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19304477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tamer, Gregory G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luh, Wen-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talavage, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><title>Characterizing Response to Elemental Unit of Acoustic Imaging Noise: An fMRI Study</title><title>IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering</title><addtitle>TBME</addtitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Biomed Eng</addtitle><description>Acoustic imaging noise produced during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies can hinder auditory fMRI research analysis by altering the properties of the acquired time-series data. Acoustic imaging noise can be especially confounding when estimating the time course of the hemodynamic response (HDR) in auditory event-related fMRI (fMRI) experiments. This study is motivated by the desire to establish a baseline function that can serve not only as a comparison to other quantities of acoustic imaging noise for determining how detrimental is one's experimental noise, but also as a foundation for a model that compensates for the response to acoustic imaging noise. Therefore, the amplitude and spatial extent of the HDR to the elemental unit of acoustic imaging noise (i.e., a single ping) associated with echoplanar acquisition were characterized and modeled. Results from this fMRI study at 1.5 T indicate that the group-averaged HDR in left and right auditory cortex to acoustic imaging noise (duration of 46 ms) has an estimated peak magnitude of 0.29% (right) to 0.48% (left) signal change from baseline, peaks between 3 and 5 s after stimulus presentation, and returns to baseline and remains within the noise range approximately 8 s after stimulus presentation.</description><subject>Acoustic imaging</subject><subject>Acoustic noise</subject><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amplitudes</subject><subject>Auditory Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>auditory system</subject><subject>biomedical image processing</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Cortexes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foundations</subject><subject>Hemodynamic responses</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic analysis</subject><subject>Magnetic noise</subject><subject>Magnetic properties</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>modeling</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Noise level</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Time series analysis</subject><issn>0018-9294</issn><issn>1558-2531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhi0EomngByAkZHEALls8_lqbA1KIAkRqQQrt2XK83tTVZp2udyuVX4-XROXj0Ppgy5pnRjPvvAi9AHICQPT7809nixNKiM4XSFGyR2gCQqiCCgaP0YQQUIWmmh-h45Su8pcrLp-iI9CMcF6WE7SaX9rOut534WdoN3jl0y62yeM-4kXjt77tbYMv2tDjWOOZi0Pqg8PLrd2M-LcYkv-AZy2uz1ZL_KMfqttn6Eltm-SfH94puvi8OJ9_LU6_f1nOZ6eFk4T2hWLVmvrfhxDrofJSSm_1mmiu1gyU4pWklfVlXXlndcUY1JJLypyrKQCboo_7urthvfWVy612tjG7Lmxtd2uiDebfSBsuzSbeGKq4EKzMBd4eCnTxevCpN9uQnG8a2_o8p1GyLLmgMJJv7iVZ1lUDqAdBCpTTvKKHQaKYoJpk8N29IMgSGGMi6zJFr_9Dr-LQtXkHRgmphBZ6VA32kOtiSp2v7wQDYkZXmdFVZnSVObgq57z6W-k_GQcbZeDlHgh5m3dhrgjoPMIv4aXQDA</recordid><startdate>20090701</startdate><enddate>20090701</enddate><creator>Tamer, Gregory G.</creator><creator>Luh, Wen-Ming</creator><creator>Talavage, Thomas M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090701</creationdate><title>Characterizing Response to Elemental Unit of Acoustic Imaging Noise: An fMRI Study</title><author>Tamer, Gregory G. ; Luh, Wen-Ming ; Talavage, Thomas M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c602t-83db2eeeeee00ae1de666ea9b0948b31884d62dae7fdeca9d331f64623ccf2113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Acoustic imaging</topic><topic>Acoustic noise</topic><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amplitudes</topic><topic>Auditory Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>auditory system</topic><topic>biomedical image processing</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Cortexes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foundations</topic><topic>Hemodynamic responses</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic analysis</topic><topic>Magnetic noise</topic><topic>Magnetic properties</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>modeling</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Noise level</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Time series analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tamer, Gregory G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luh, Wen-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talavage, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE/IET Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tamer, Gregory G.</au><au>Luh, Wen-Ming</au><au>Talavage, Thomas M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterizing Response to Elemental Unit of Acoustic Imaging Noise: An fMRI Study</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering</jtitle><stitle>TBME</stitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Biomed Eng</addtitle><date>2009-07-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1919</spage><epage>1928</epage><pages>1919-1928</pages><issn>0018-9294</issn><eissn>1558-2531</eissn><coden>IEBEAX</coden><abstract>Acoustic imaging noise produced during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies can hinder auditory fMRI research analysis by altering the properties of the acquired time-series data. Acoustic imaging noise can be especially confounding when estimating the time course of the hemodynamic response (HDR) in auditory event-related fMRI (fMRI) experiments. This study is motivated by the desire to establish a baseline function that can serve not only as a comparison to other quantities of acoustic imaging noise for determining how detrimental is one's experimental noise, but also as a foundation for a model that compensates for the response to acoustic imaging noise. Therefore, the amplitude and spatial extent of the HDR to the elemental unit of acoustic imaging noise (i.e., a single ping) associated with echoplanar acquisition were characterized and modeled. Results from this fMRI study at 1.5 T indicate that the group-averaged HDR in left and right auditory cortex to acoustic imaging noise (duration of 46 ms) has an estimated peak magnitude of 0.29% (right) to 0.48% (left) signal change from baseline, peaks between 3 and 5 s after stimulus presentation, and returns to baseline and remains within the noise range approximately 8 s after stimulus presentation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>19304477</pmid><doi>10.1109/TBME.2009.2016573</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-9294
ispartof IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering, 2009-07, Vol.56 (7), p.1919-1928
issn 0018-9294
1558-2531
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2845537
source IEEE Xplore (Online service)
subjects Acoustic imaging
Acoustic noise
Acoustic Stimulation - adverse effects
Acoustics
Adult
Amplitudes
Auditory Cortex - physiology
auditory system
biomedical image processing
Brain Mapping
Cortexes
Female
Foundations
Hemodynamic responses
Hemodynamics
Humans
Image analysis
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Magnetic analysis
Magnetic noise
Magnetic properties
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Marketing
Mathematical models
modeling
Models, Neurological
Models, Statistical
Noise
Noise level
Phantoms, Imaging
Time series analysis
title Characterizing Response to Elemental Unit of Acoustic Imaging Noise: An fMRI Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A05%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterizing%20Response%20to%20Elemental%20Unit%20of%20Acoustic%20Imaging%20Noise:%20An%20fMRI%20Study&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20biomedical%20engineering&rft.au=Tamer,%20Gregory%20G.&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1919&rft.epage=1928&rft.pages=1919-1928&rft.issn=0018-9294&rft.eissn=1558-2531&rft.coden=IEBEAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TBME.2009.2016573&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2291643291%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c602t-83db2eeeeee00ae1de666ea9b0948b31884d62dae7fdeca9d331f64623ccf2113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=856859591&rft_id=info:pmid/19304477&rft_ieee_id=4801990&rfr_iscdi=true