Loading…
The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control
There is growing interest regarding the role of the right inferior frontal gyrus (RIFG) during a particular form of executive control referred to as response inhibition. However, tasks used to examine neural activity at the point of response inhibition have rarely controlled for the potentially conf...
Saved in:
Published in: | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2010-04, Vol.50 (3), p.1313-1319 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-747a1df65f8cb05c43e33caf249780911ade0ef07922e8d4a6a6441456dd6843 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-747a1df65f8cb05c43e33caf249780911ade0ef07922e8d4a6a6441456dd6843 |
container_end_page | 1319 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1313 |
container_title | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Hampshire, Adam Chamberlain, Samuel R. Monti, Martin M. Duncan, John Owen, Adrian M. |
description | There is growing interest regarding the role of the right inferior frontal gyrus (RIFG) during a particular form of executive control referred to as response inhibition. However, tasks used to examine neural activity at the point of response inhibition have rarely controlled for the potentially confounding effects of attentional demand. In particular, it is unclear whether the RIFG is specifically involved in inhibitory control, or is involved more generally in the detection of salient or task relevant cues. The current fMRI study sought to clarify the role of the RIFG in executive control by holding the stimulus conditions of one of the most popular response inhibition tasks–the Stop Signal Task–constant, whilst varying the response that was required on reception of the stop signal cue. Our results reveal that the RIFG is recruited when important cues are detected, regardless of whether that detection is followed by the inhibition of a motor response, the generation of a motor response, or no external response at all. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.109 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2845804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811909013986</els_id><sourcerecordid>3388755281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-747a1df65f8cb05c43e33caf249780911ade0ef07922e8d4a6a6441456dd6843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vGyEQhlHVqkmT_oVqpR56WheWj4UeKjVR01aK1Bx8RxgGG2sNKbCR8u_Lykn6cckFBuaZl2FehDqCVwQT8XG_ijDnFA5mC6sBY7UiQ8uoF-i0rbxXfBxeLjGnvSREnaA3pexxAwmTr9FJK-GC8PEU3ax30OU0QZd8V5c4bHe1C9FDDil3PqdYzdRt7_NcPrX7XdiEGlLsTHSdqRXicmqEbWATOkevvJkKvH3Yz9D66uv68nt__fPbj8sv170VXNV-ZKMhzgvupd1gbhkFSq3xA1OjbG0S4wCDx6MaBpCOGWEEY4Rx4ZyQjJ6hz0fZ23lzAGdbG9lM-ja3meR7nUzQ_2Zi2OltutODZFziReDDg0BOv2YoVR9CsTBNJkKaix4ZVxQPRD5PUkokV3gh3_9H7tOc23CKJpwpRYlgolHySNmcSsngn7omWC_26r3-Y69e7NVkaBnVSt_9_eunwkc_G3BxBKCN_i5A1sUGiBZcyGCrdik8_8pvE7G8Ww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1549931646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hampshire, Adam ; Chamberlain, Samuel R. ; Monti, Martin M. ; Duncan, John ; Owen, Adrian M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hampshire, Adam ; Chamberlain, Samuel R. ; Monti, Martin M. ; Duncan, John ; Owen, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><description>There is growing interest regarding the role of the right inferior frontal gyrus (RIFG) during a particular form of executive control referred to as response inhibition. However, tasks used to examine neural activity at the point of response inhibition have rarely controlled for the potentially confounding effects of attentional demand. In particular, it is unclear whether the RIFG is specifically involved in inhibitory control, or is involved more generally in the detection of salient or task relevant cues. The current fMRI study sought to clarify the role of the RIFG in executive control by holding the stimulus conditions of one of the most popular response inhibition tasks–the Stop Signal Task–constant, whilst varying the response that was required on reception of the stop signal cue. Our results reveal that the RIFG is recruited when important cues are detected, regardless of whether that detection is followed by the inhibition of a motor response, the generation of a motor response, or no external response at all.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.109</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20056157</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Attention - physiology ; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ; Brain - physiology ; Cues ; Executive Function - physiology ; Frontal Lobe - physiology ; Functional Laterality ; Humans ; Hyperactivity ; Hypotheses ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Motor Activity - physiology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2010-04, Vol.50 (3), p.1313-1319</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Apr 15, 2010</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc. 2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-747a1df65f8cb05c43e33caf249780911ade0ef07922e8d4a6a6441456dd6843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-747a1df65f8cb05c43e33caf249780911ade0ef07922e8d4a6a6441456dd6843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20056157$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hampshire, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, Samuel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monti, Martin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><title>The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>There is growing interest regarding the role of the right inferior frontal gyrus (RIFG) during a particular form of executive control referred to as response inhibition. However, tasks used to examine neural activity at the point of response inhibition have rarely controlled for the potentially confounding effects of attentional demand. In particular, it is unclear whether the RIFG is specifically involved in inhibitory control, or is involved more generally in the detection of salient or task relevant cues. The current fMRI study sought to clarify the role of the RIFG in executive control by holding the stimulus conditions of one of the most popular response inhibition tasks–the Stop Signal Task–constant, whilst varying the response that was required on reception of the stop signal cue. Our results reveal that the RIFG is recruited when important cues are detected, regardless of whether that detection is followed by the inhibition of a motor response, the generation of a motor response, or no external response at all.</description><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Executive Function - physiology</subject><subject>Frontal Lobe - physiology</subject><subject>Functional Laterality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperactivity</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Motor Activity - physiology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1vGyEQhlHVqkmT_oVqpR56WheWj4UeKjVR01aK1Bx8RxgGG2sNKbCR8u_Lykn6cckFBuaZl2FehDqCVwQT8XG_ijDnFA5mC6sBY7UiQ8uoF-i0rbxXfBxeLjGnvSREnaA3pexxAwmTr9FJK-GC8PEU3ax30OU0QZd8V5c4bHe1C9FDDil3PqdYzdRt7_NcPrX7XdiEGlLsTHSdqRXicmqEbWATOkevvJkKvH3Yz9D66uv68nt__fPbj8sv170VXNV-ZKMhzgvupd1gbhkFSq3xA1OjbG0S4wCDx6MaBpCOGWEEY4Rx4ZyQjJ6hz0fZ23lzAGdbG9lM-ja3meR7nUzQ_2Zi2OltutODZFziReDDg0BOv2YoVR9CsTBNJkKaix4ZVxQPRD5PUkokV3gh3_9H7tOc23CKJpwpRYlgolHySNmcSsngn7omWC_26r3-Y69e7NVkaBnVSt_9_eunwkc_G3BxBKCN_i5A1sUGiBZcyGCrdik8_8pvE7G8Ww</recordid><startdate>20100415</startdate><enddate>20100415</enddate><creator>Hampshire, Adam</creator><creator>Chamberlain, Samuel R.</creator><creator>Monti, Martin M.</creator><creator>Duncan, John</creator><creator>Owen, Adrian M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100415</creationdate><title>The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control</title><author>Hampshire, Adam ; Chamberlain, Samuel R. ; Monti, Martin M. ; Duncan, John ; Owen, Adrian M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-747a1df65f8cb05c43e33caf249780911ade0ef07922e8d4a6a6441456dd6843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Executive Function - physiology</topic><topic>Frontal Lobe - physiology</topic><topic>Functional Laterality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperactivity</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Motor Activity - physiology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hampshire, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, Samuel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monti, Martin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hampshire, Adam</au><au>Chamberlain, Samuel R.</au><au>Monti, Martin M.</au><au>Duncan, John</au><au>Owen, Adrian M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2010-04-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1313</spage><epage>1319</epage><pages>1313-1319</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>There is growing interest regarding the role of the right inferior frontal gyrus (RIFG) during a particular form of executive control referred to as response inhibition. However, tasks used to examine neural activity at the point of response inhibition have rarely controlled for the potentially confounding effects of attentional demand. In particular, it is unclear whether the RIFG is specifically involved in inhibitory control, or is involved more generally in the detection of salient or task relevant cues. The current fMRI study sought to clarify the role of the RIFG in executive control by holding the stimulus conditions of one of the most popular response inhibition tasks–the Stop Signal Task–constant, whilst varying the response that was required on reception of the stop signal cue. Our results reveal that the RIFG is recruited when important cues are detected, regardless of whether that detection is followed by the inhibition of a motor response, the generation of a motor response, or no external response at all.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20056157</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.109</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-8119 |
ispartof | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2010-04, Vol.50 (3), p.1313-1319 |
issn | 1053-8119 1095-9572 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2845804 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Attention - physiology Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Brain - physiology Cues Executive Function - physiology Frontal Lobe - physiology Functional Laterality Humans Hyperactivity Hypotheses Magnetic Resonance Imaging Motor Activity - physiology Neuropsychological Tests Psychomotor Performance - physiology |
title | The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A43%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20the%20right%20inferior%20frontal%20gyrus:%20inhibition%20and%20attentional%20control&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Hampshire,%20Adam&rft.date=2010-04-15&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1313&rft.epage=1319&rft.pages=1313-1319&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3388755281%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-747a1df65f8cb05c43e33caf249780911ade0ef07922e8d4a6a6441456dd6843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1549931646&rft_id=info:pmid/20056157&rfr_iscdi=true |