Loading…

A comparison of the binding of urinary calcium oxalate monohydrate and dihydrate crystals to human kidney cells in urine

OBJECTIVE To compare the binding kinetics of urinary calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) and dihydrate (COD) crystals to human kidney (HK‐2) cells in ultra‐filtered (UF), and centrifuged and filtered (CF) human urine; and to quantify the binding of COM and COD crystals to cultured HK‐2 cells in UF and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJU international 2010-12, Vol.106 (11), p.1768-1774
Main Authors: Wang, Tingting, Thurgood, Lauren A., Grover, Phulwinder K., Ryall, Rosemary L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5358-1f3a083ab42daad30db75784317f1474d86220e625333c4e23e5b6a5918dfbdf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5358-1f3a083ab42daad30db75784317f1474d86220e625333c4e23e5b6a5918dfbdf3
container_end_page 1774
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1768
container_title BJU international
container_volume 106
creator Wang, Tingting
Thurgood, Lauren A.
Grover, Phulwinder K.
Ryall, Rosemary L.
description OBJECTIVE To compare the binding kinetics of urinary calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) and dihydrate (COD) crystals to human kidney (HK‐2) cells in ultra‐filtered (UF), and centrifuged and filtered (CF) human urine; and to quantify the binding of COM and COD crystals to cultured HK‐2 cells in UF and CF urine samples collected from different individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS Urine was collected from healthy subjects, pooled, centrifuged and filtered. 14C‐oxalate‐labelled COM and COD crystals were precipitated from the urine by adding oxalate after adjustment of two aliquots of the urine to 2 and 8 mm Ca2+, respectively. For the kinetic study, the crystals were incubated with HK‐2 cells for up to 120 min in pooled CF urine adjusted to 2 and 8 mm Ca2+. Identical experiments were also carried out in UF urine samples collected from the same individuals. For the quantitative study, the same radioactively labelled COM and COD crystals were incubated with HK‐2 cells for 50 min in separate CF and UF urines collected from eight healthy individuals at the native Ca2+ concentrations of the urines. Field emission electron microscopy and Fourier transform‐infrared spectroscopy were used to confirm crystal morphology. RESULTS COM and COD crystals generally bound more strongly at 8 mm than at 2 mm Ca2+. The kinetic binding curves of COM were smooth, while those of COD were consistently biphasic, suggesting that the two crystal types induce different cellular metabolic responses: HK‐2 cells crystals appear to possess a transitory mechanism for detaching COD, but not COM crystals. In UF urine, COM binding was significantly greater than that of COD at 2 mm Ca2+, but at 8 mm Ca2+ the binding of COD was greater at early and late time points. COD also bound significantly more strongly at early time points in CF urine at both 2 and 8 mm Ca2+. In both CF and UF urine, there was no difference between the binding affinity of urinary COM and COD crystals. CONCLUSION Binding of both COM and COD crystals to cultured human renal epithelial cells is influenced by urinary macromolecules and ambient Ca2+ concentration. HK‐2 cells appear to possess a mechanism for the rapid detachment of bound COD crystals, making it difficult to show any unambiguous overall difference between the binding affinity of COM and COD crystals.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09258.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2902589</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>954605716</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5358-1f3a083ab42daad30db75784317f1474d86220e625333c4e23e5b6a5918dfbdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0Eou3CX0C-IE67-DOJDyC1FQWqSr1QiZs1iZ2ul8Re7AR2_z1O96Nwor54ZvzMqxm_CGFKFjSf96sFFYWYC0q-LxjJVaKYrBabZ-j0-PD8EBNVnKCzlFaE5EIhX6ITRhgnvGKnaHOOm9CvIboUPA4tHpYW184b5--ndIzOQ9ziBrrGjT0OG-hgsLgPPiy3Jk4xeIONO2RN3KYBuoSHgJdjDx7_cMbbLGG7XHX-QdO-Qi_aTNnX-3uG7q4-fbv8Mr-5_fz18vxm3kguqzltOZCKQy2YATCcmLqUZSU4LVsqSmGqgjFiCyY5542wjFtZFyAVrUxbm5bP0Med7nqse2sa64cInV5H1-e9dACn_33xbqnvwy_NFMl_qrLAu71ADD9HmwbduzTtAt6GMWklRUFkSYv_kqVSpSKEiUxWO7KJIaVo2-M8lOjJYb3Sk3l6MlJPDusHh_Umt775e59j48HSDLzdA5Cya20E37j0yPGsyzM6Qx923G_X2e2TB9AX13dTxP8AdJTEVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>799790024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of the binding of urinary calcium oxalate monohydrate and dihydrate crystals to human kidney cells in urine</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Wang, Tingting ; Thurgood, Lauren A. ; Grover, Phulwinder K. ; Ryall, Rosemary L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tingting ; Thurgood, Lauren A. ; Grover, Phulwinder K. ; Ryall, Rosemary L.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE To compare the binding kinetics of urinary calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) and dihydrate (COD) crystals to human kidney (HK‐2) cells in ultra‐filtered (UF), and centrifuged and filtered (CF) human urine; and to quantify the binding of COM and COD crystals to cultured HK‐2 cells in UF and CF urine samples collected from different individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS Urine was collected from healthy subjects, pooled, centrifuged and filtered. 14C‐oxalate‐labelled COM and COD crystals were precipitated from the urine by adding oxalate after adjustment of two aliquots of the urine to 2 and 8 mm Ca2+, respectively. For the kinetic study, the crystals were incubated with HK‐2 cells for up to 120 min in pooled CF urine adjusted to 2 and 8 mm Ca2+. Identical experiments were also carried out in UF urine samples collected from the same individuals. For the quantitative study, the same radioactively labelled COM and COD crystals were incubated with HK‐2 cells for 50 min in separate CF and UF urines collected from eight healthy individuals at the native Ca2+ concentrations of the urines. Field emission electron microscopy and Fourier transform‐infrared spectroscopy were used to confirm crystal morphology. RESULTS COM and COD crystals generally bound more strongly at 8 mm than at 2 mm Ca2+. The kinetic binding curves of COM were smooth, while those of COD were consistently biphasic, suggesting that the two crystal types induce different cellular metabolic responses: HK‐2 cells crystals appear to possess a transitory mechanism for detaching COD, but not COM crystals. In UF urine, COM binding was significantly greater than that of COD at 2 mm Ca2+, but at 8 mm Ca2+ the binding of COD was greater at early and late time points. COD also bound significantly more strongly at early time points in CF urine at both 2 and 8 mm Ca2+. In both CF and UF urine, there was no difference between the binding affinity of urinary COM and COD crystals. CONCLUSION Binding of both COM and COD crystals to cultured human renal epithelial cells is influenced by urinary macromolecules and ambient Ca2+ concentration. HK‐2 cells appear to possess a mechanism for the rapid detachment of bound COD crystals, making it difficult to show any unambiguous overall difference between the binding affinity of COM and COD crystals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09258.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20230382</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Calcium Oxalate - metabolism ; Calcium Oxalate - urine ; calcium oxalate dihydrate ; calcium oxalate monohydrate ; Cells, Cultured ; crystal attachment ; Crystallization ; Epithelial Cells ; HK‐2 cells ; Humans ; Kidney - cytology ; Kidney - metabolism ; Medical sciences ; Microscopy, Electron ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2010-12, Vol.106 (11), p.1768-1774</ispartof><rights>2010 THE AUTHORS. JOURNAL COMPILATION © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010 THE AUTHORS. JOURNAL COMPILATION © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5358-1f3a083ab42daad30db75784317f1474d86220e625333c4e23e5b6a5918dfbdf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5358-1f3a083ab42daad30db75784317f1474d86220e625333c4e23e5b6a5918dfbdf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23464330$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20230382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tingting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurgood, Lauren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grover, Phulwinder K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryall, Rosemary L.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of the binding of urinary calcium oxalate monohydrate and dihydrate crystals to human kidney cells in urine</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE To compare the binding kinetics of urinary calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) and dihydrate (COD) crystals to human kidney (HK‐2) cells in ultra‐filtered (UF), and centrifuged and filtered (CF) human urine; and to quantify the binding of COM and COD crystals to cultured HK‐2 cells in UF and CF urine samples collected from different individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS Urine was collected from healthy subjects, pooled, centrifuged and filtered. 14C‐oxalate‐labelled COM and COD crystals were precipitated from the urine by adding oxalate after adjustment of two aliquots of the urine to 2 and 8 mm Ca2+, respectively. For the kinetic study, the crystals were incubated with HK‐2 cells for up to 120 min in pooled CF urine adjusted to 2 and 8 mm Ca2+. Identical experiments were also carried out in UF urine samples collected from the same individuals. For the quantitative study, the same radioactively labelled COM and COD crystals were incubated with HK‐2 cells for 50 min in separate CF and UF urines collected from eight healthy individuals at the native Ca2+ concentrations of the urines. Field emission electron microscopy and Fourier transform‐infrared spectroscopy were used to confirm crystal morphology. RESULTS COM and COD crystals generally bound more strongly at 8 mm than at 2 mm Ca2+. The kinetic binding curves of COM were smooth, while those of COD were consistently biphasic, suggesting that the two crystal types induce different cellular metabolic responses: HK‐2 cells crystals appear to possess a transitory mechanism for detaching COD, but not COM crystals. In UF urine, COM binding was significantly greater than that of COD at 2 mm Ca2+, but at 8 mm Ca2+ the binding of COD was greater at early and late time points. COD also bound significantly more strongly at early time points in CF urine at both 2 and 8 mm Ca2+. In both CF and UF urine, there was no difference between the binding affinity of urinary COM and COD crystals. CONCLUSION Binding of both COM and COD crystals to cultured human renal epithelial cells is influenced by urinary macromolecules and ambient Ca2+ concentration. HK‐2 cells appear to possess a mechanism for the rapid detachment of bound COD crystals, making it difficult to show any unambiguous overall difference between the binding affinity of COM and COD crystals.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Calcium Oxalate - metabolism</subject><subject>Calcium Oxalate - urine</subject><subject>calcium oxalate dihydrate</subject><subject>calcium oxalate monohydrate</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>crystal attachment</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>Epithelial Cells</subject><subject>HK‐2 cells</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney - cytology</subject><subject>Kidney - metabolism</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0Eou3CX0C-IE67-DOJDyC1FQWqSr1QiZs1iZ2ul8Re7AR2_z1O96Nwor54ZvzMqxm_CGFKFjSf96sFFYWYC0q-LxjJVaKYrBabZ-j0-PD8EBNVnKCzlFaE5EIhX6ITRhgnvGKnaHOOm9CvIboUPA4tHpYW184b5--ndIzOQ9ziBrrGjT0OG-hgsLgPPiy3Jk4xeIONO2RN3KYBuoSHgJdjDx7_cMbbLGG7XHX-QdO-Qi_aTNnX-3uG7q4-fbv8Mr-5_fz18vxm3kguqzltOZCKQy2YATCcmLqUZSU4LVsqSmGqgjFiCyY5542wjFtZFyAVrUxbm5bP0Med7nqse2sa64cInV5H1-e9dACn_33xbqnvwy_NFMl_qrLAu71ADD9HmwbduzTtAt6GMWklRUFkSYv_kqVSpSKEiUxWO7KJIaVo2-M8lOjJYb3Sk3l6MlJPDusHh_Umt775e59j48HSDLzdA5Cya20E37j0yPGsyzM6Qx923G_X2e2TB9AX13dTxP8AdJTEVQ</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Wang, Tingting</creator><creator>Thurgood, Lauren A.</creator><creator>Grover, Phulwinder K.</creator><creator>Ryall, Rosemary L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>A comparison of the binding of urinary calcium oxalate monohydrate and dihydrate crystals to human kidney cells in urine</title><author>Wang, Tingting ; Thurgood, Lauren A. ; Grover, Phulwinder K. ; Ryall, Rosemary L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5358-1f3a083ab42daad30db75784317f1474d86220e625333c4e23e5b6a5918dfbdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Calcium Oxalate - metabolism</topic><topic>Calcium Oxalate - urine</topic><topic>calcium oxalate dihydrate</topic><topic>calcium oxalate monohydrate</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>crystal attachment</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>Epithelial Cells</topic><topic>HK‐2 cells</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney - cytology</topic><topic>Kidney - metabolism</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tingting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurgood, Lauren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grover, Phulwinder K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryall, Rosemary L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Tingting</au><au>Thurgood, Lauren A.</au><au>Grover, Phulwinder K.</au><au>Ryall, Rosemary L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of the binding of urinary calcium oxalate monohydrate and dihydrate crystals to human kidney cells in urine</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1768</spage><epage>1774</epage><pages>1768-1774</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE To compare the binding kinetics of urinary calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) and dihydrate (COD) crystals to human kidney (HK‐2) cells in ultra‐filtered (UF), and centrifuged and filtered (CF) human urine; and to quantify the binding of COM and COD crystals to cultured HK‐2 cells in UF and CF urine samples collected from different individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS Urine was collected from healthy subjects, pooled, centrifuged and filtered. 14C‐oxalate‐labelled COM and COD crystals were precipitated from the urine by adding oxalate after adjustment of two aliquots of the urine to 2 and 8 mm Ca2+, respectively. For the kinetic study, the crystals were incubated with HK‐2 cells for up to 120 min in pooled CF urine adjusted to 2 and 8 mm Ca2+. Identical experiments were also carried out in UF urine samples collected from the same individuals. For the quantitative study, the same radioactively labelled COM and COD crystals were incubated with HK‐2 cells for 50 min in separate CF and UF urines collected from eight healthy individuals at the native Ca2+ concentrations of the urines. Field emission electron microscopy and Fourier transform‐infrared spectroscopy were used to confirm crystal morphology. RESULTS COM and COD crystals generally bound more strongly at 8 mm than at 2 mm Ca2+. The kinetic binding curves of COM were smooth, while those of COD were consistently biphasic, suggesting that the two crystal types induce different cellular metabolic responses: HK‐2 cells crystals appear to possess a transitory mechanism for detaching COD, but not COM crystals. In UF urine, COM binding was significantly greater than that of COD at 2 mm Ca2+, but at 8 mm Ca2+ the binding of COD was greater at early and late time points. COD also bound significantly more strongly at early time points in CF urine at both 2 and 8 mm Ca2+. In both CF and UF urine, there was no difference between the binding affinity of urinary COM and COD crystals. CONCLUSION Binding of both COM and COD crystals to cultured human renal epithelial cells is influenced by urinary macromolecules and ambient Ca2+ concentration. HK‐2 cells appear to possess a mechanism for the rapid detachment of bound COD crystals, making it difficult to show any unambiguous overall difference between the binding affinity of COM and COD crystals.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20230382</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09258.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-4096
ispartof BJU international, 2010-12, Vol.106 (11), p.1768-1774
issn 1464-4096
1464-410X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2902589
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Calcium Oxalate - metabolism
Calcium Oxalate - urine
calcium oxalate dihydrate
calcium oxalate monohydrate
Cells, Cultured
crystal attachment
Crystallization
Epithelial Cells
HK‐2 cells
Humans
Kidney - cytology
Kidney - metabolism
Medical sciences
Microscopy, Electron
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared
title A comparison of the binding of urinary calcium oxalate monohydrate and dihydrate crystals to human kidney cells in urine
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A57%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20the%20binding%20of%20urinary%20calcium%20oxalate%20monohydrate%20and%20dihydrate%20crystals%20to%20human%20kidney%20cells%20in%20urine&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=Wang,%20Tingting&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1768&rft.epage=1774&rft.pages=1768-1774&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09258.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E954605716%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5358-1f3a083ab42daad30db75784317f1474d86220e625333c4e23e5b6a5918dfbdf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=799790024&rft_id=info:pmid/20230382&rfr_iscdi=true