Loading…
Evidence for Direct Retrieval of Relative Quantity Information in a Quantity Judgment Task: Decimals, Integers, and the Role of Physical Similarity
Participants' reaction times (RTs) in numerical judgment tasks in which one must determine which of 2 numbers is greater generally follow a monotonically decreasing function of the numerical distance between the two presented numbers. Here, I present 3 experiments in which the relative influenc...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2010-11, Vol.36 (6), p.1389-1398 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-25af4dc9662b76bb7e9afe49784686e3d43fb0e3fb35d6d04d99792fafaf12bb3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1398 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1389 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Cohen, Dale J |
description | Participants' reaction times (RTs) in numerical judgment tasks in which one must determine which of 2 numbers is greater generally follow a monotonically decreasing function of the numerical distance between the two presented numbers. Here, I present 3 experiments in which the relative influences of numerical distance and physical similarity are assessed in just such a task using integers and decimals as stimuli. The data reveal that numerical distance is the primary feature controlling participants' RTs when integers are presented. However, the physical similarity between the decade place of the standard and the probe is the primary feature controlling participants' RTs when decimals are presented. I conclude that the unique qualities of decimals do not lend themselves to share the place-coding representation of integers, thus a direct retrieval mechanism for judging the relative quantity of decimals has developed. (Contains 4 tables, 5 figures and 5 footnotes.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0020212 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2970732</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ931860</ericid><sourcerecordid>763259107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-25af4dc9662b76bb7e9afe49784686e3d43fb0e3fb35d6d04d99792fafaf12bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt1u0zAUxy0EYl1B4gEQspAmuKDgjyS2uUBCW4FNk4AxriPHOWm9Jc6wk0p9Dl6YU7XrgAuwJX-d3_n72OcQ8oSz15xJ9cYyJpjg4h6ZcCPNjAud3ycTJpSeKWnkATlM6YptmtQPyYFgmmVCiwn5OV_5GoID2vSRnvgIbqAXMEQPK9vSvsFNawe_Avp1tGHww5qeBmQ7POwD9YHaO8vZWC86CAO9tOn6LT0B5zvbplfoMsACIq5sqOmwBHrRt7CR_7JcJ-_wqm--862NKPOIPGjQCx7v5in5_mF-efxpdv754-nx-_OZy5keZiK3TVY7UxSiUkVVKTC2gcwonRW6AFlnsqkY4CDzuqhZVhujjGgsdi6qSk7Ju63uzVh1UDsMPNq2vIkYdFyXvfXln5bgl-WiX5XCKKakQIEXO4HY_xghDWXnk4O2tQH6MZVaS8xKrth_SVUIoSXnEsnnf5FX_RgD_kOpeW4wb4z_C1KFFLnhGN-UvNxCLvYpRWj2L-Os3JRNeVs2iD77_Sf24G2dIHC0A2zCZDXRBufTHScLnWteIPd0y0H0bm-enxnJdcHkL2fp0-E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>763259107</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence for Direct Retrieval of Relative Quantity Information in a Quantity Judgment Task: Decimals, Integers, and the Role of Physical Similarity</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Cohen, Dale J</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Dale J</creatorcontrib><description>Participants' reaction times (RTs) in numerical judgment tasks in which one must determine which of 2 numbers is greater generally follow a monotonically decreasing function of the numerical distance between the two presented numbers. Here, I present 3 experiments in which the relative influences of numerical distance and physical similarity are assessed in just such a task using integers and decimals as stimuli. The data reveal that numerical distance is the primary feature controlling participants' RTs when integers are presented. However, the physical similarity between the decade place of the standard and the probe is the primary feature controlling participants' RTs when decimals are presented. I conclude that the unique qualities of decimals do not lend themselves to share the place-coding representation of integers, thus a direct retrieval mechanism for judging the relative quantity of decimals has developed. (Contains 4 tables, 5 figures and 5 footnotes.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0020212</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20804282</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Arithmetic ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Cognitive Processes ; Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology ; Evidence ; Experimental Psychology ; Experiments ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Information processing ; Information Retrieval ; Judgment ; Judgment - physiology ; Learning ; Male ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Education ; Mathematics Instruction ; Mental Recall - physiology ; Miscellaneous ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Numbers ; Numbers (Numerals) ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychophysics ; Reaction Time ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Regression Analysis ; Students ; Task Analysis ; Thinking Skills ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2010-11, Vol.36 (6), p.1389-1398</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved</rights><rights>2010, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Nov 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-25af4dc9662b76bb7e9afe49784686e3d43fb0e3fb35d6d04d99792fafaf12bb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ931860$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23685816$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20804282$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Dale J</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence for Direct Retrieval of Relative Quantity Information in a Quantity Judgment Task: Decimals, Integers, and the Role of Physical Similarity</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Participants' reaction times (RTs) in numerical judgment tasks in which one must determine which of 2 numbers is greater generally follow a monotonically decreasing function of the numerical distance between the two presented numbers. Here, I present 3 experiments in which the relative influences of numerical distance and physical similarity are assessed in just such a task using integers and decimals as stimuli. The data reveal that numerical distance is the primary feature controlling participants' RTs when integers are presented. However, the physical similarity between the decade place of the standard and the probe is the primary feature controlling participants' RTs when decimals are presented. I conclude that the unique qualities of decimals do not lend themselves to share the place-coding representation of integers, thus a direct retrieval mechanism for judging the relative quantity of decimals has developed. (Contains 4 tables, 5 figures and 5 footnotes.)</description><subject>Arithmetic</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Experimental Psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Information Retrieval</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Judgment - physiology</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Mental Recall - physiology</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Numbers</subject><subject>Numbers (Numerals)</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychophysics</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt1u0zAUxy0EYl1B4gEQspAmuKDgjyS2uUBCW4FNk4AxriPHOWm9Jc6wk0p9Dl6YU7XrgAuwJX-d3_n72OcQ8oSz15xJ9cYyJpjg4h6ZcCPNjAud3ycTJpSeKWnkATlM6YptmtQPyYFgmmVCiwn5OV_5GoID2vSRnvgIbqAXMEQPK9vSvsFNawe_Avp1tGHww5qeBmQ7POwD9YHaO8vZWC86CAO9tOn6LT0B5zvbplfoMsACIq5sqOmwBHrRt7CR_7JcJ-_wqm--862NKPOIPGjQCx7v5in5_mF-efxpdv754-nx-_OZy5keZiK3TVY7UxSiUkVVKTC2gcwonRW6AFlnsqkY4CDzuqhZVhujjGgsdi6qSk7Ju63uzVh1UDsMPNq2vIkYdFyXvfXln5bgl-WiX5XCKKakQIEXO4HY_xghDWXnk4O2tQH6MZVaS8xKrth_SVUIoSXnEsnnf5FX_RgD_kOpeW4wb4z_C1KFFLnhGN-UvNxCLvYpRWj2L-Os3JRNeVs2iD77_Sf24G2dIHC0A2zCZDXRBufTHScLnWteIPd0y0H0bm-enxnJdcHkL2fp0-E</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Cohen, Dale J</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>Evidence for Direct Retrieval of Relative Quantity Information in a Quantity Judgment Task: Decimals, Integers, and the Role of Physical Similarity</title><author>Cohen, Dale J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-25af4dc9662b76bb7e9afe49784686e3d43fb0e3fb35d6d04d99792fafaf12bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Arithmetic</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Experimental Psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Information Retrieval</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Judgment - physiology</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Mental Recall - physiology</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Numbers</topic><topic>Numbers (Numerals)</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychophysics</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Dale J</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Dale J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ931860</ericid><atitle>Evidence for Direct Retrieval of Relative Quantity Information in a Quantity Judgment Task: Decimals, Integers, and the Role of Physical Similarity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1389</spage><epage>1398</epage><pages>1389-1398</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>Participants' reaction times (RTs) in numerical judgment tasks in which one must determine which of 2 numbers is greater generally follow a monotonically decreasing function of the numerical distance between the two presented numbers. Here, I present 3 experiments in which the relative influences of numerical distance and physical similarity are assessed in just such a task using integers and decimals as stimuli. The data reveal that numerical distance is the primary feature controlling participants' RTs when integers are presented. However, the physical similarity between the decade place of the standard and the probe is the primary feature controlling participants' RTs when decimals are presented. I conclude that the unique qualities of decimals do not lend themselves to share the place-coding representation of integers, thus a direct retrieval mechanism for judging the relative quantity of decimals has developed. (Contains 4 tables, 5 figures and 5 footnotes.)</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>20804282</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0020212</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2010-11, Vol.36 (6), p.1389-1398 |
issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2970732 |
source | PsycARTICLES; ERIC |
subjects | Arithmetic Biological and medical sciences Cognition Cognition & reasoning Cognition. Intelligence Cognitive Processes Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology Evidence Experimental Psychology Experiments Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Information processing Information Retrieval Judgment Judgment - physiology Learning Male Mathematics Mathematics Education Mathematics Instruction Mental Recall - physiology Miscellaneous Neuropsychological Tests Numbers Numbers (Numerals) Photic Stimulation - methods Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychophysics Reaction Time Reaction Time - physiology Regression Analysis Students Task Analysis Thinking Skills Time Factors |
title | Evidence for Direct Retrieval of Relative Quantity Information in a Quantity Judgment Task: Decimals, Integers, and the Role of Physical Similarity |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A21%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20for%20Direct%20Retrieval%20of%20Relative%20Quantity%20Information%20in%20a%20Quantity%20Judgment%20Task:%20Decimals,%20Integers,%20and%20the%20Role%20of%20Physical%20Similarity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Cohen,%20Dale%20J&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1389&rft.epage=1398&rft.pages=1389-1398&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0020212&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E763259107%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-25af4dc9662b76bb7e9afe49784686e3d43fb0e3fb35d6d04d99792fafaf12bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=763259107&rft_id=info:pmid/20804282&rft_ericid=EJ931860&rfr_iscdi=true |