Loading…

Mutagenic Analysis of Cox11 of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: Insights into the Assembly of CuB of Cytochrome c Oxidase

The Cu(I) chaperone Cox11 is required for the insertion of CuB into cytochrome c oxidase (CcO) of mitochondria and many bacteria, including Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Exploration of the copper binding stoichiometry of R. sphaeroides Cox11 led to the finding that an apparent tetramer of both mitochondr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biochemistry (Easton) 2010-07, Vol.49 (27), p.5651-5661
Main Authors: Thompson, Audie K, Smith, Daniel, Gray, Jimmy, Carr, Heather S, Liu, Aimin, Winge, Dennis R, Hosler, Jonathan P
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 5661
container_issue 27
container_start_page 5651
container_title Biochemistry (Easton)
container_volume 49
creator Thompson, Audie K
Smith, Daniel
Gray, Jimmy
Carr, Heather S
Liu, Aimin
Winge, Dennis R
Hosler, Jonathan P
description The Cu(I) chaperone Cox11 is required for the insertion of CuB into cytochrome c oxidase (CcO) of mitochondria and many bacteria, including Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Exploration of the copper binding stoichiometry of R. sphaeroides Cox11 led to the finding that an apparent tetramer of both mitochondrial and bacterial Cox11 binds more copper than the sum of the dimers, providing another example of the flexibility of copper binding by Cu(I)−S clusters. Site-directed mutagenesis has been used to identify components of Cox11 that are not required for copper binding but are absolutely required for the assembly of CuB, including conserved Cys-35 and Lys-123. In contrast to earlier proposals, Cys-35 is not required for dimerization of Cox11 or for copper binding. These findings, and the location of Cys-35 at the C-terminus of the predicted transmembrane helix and thereby close to the surface of the membrane, allow a proposal that Cys-35 is involved in the transfer of copper from the Cu(I) cluster of Cox11 to the CuB ligands His-333 and His-334 during the folding of CcO subunit I. Lys-123 is located near the Cu(I) cluster of Cox11, in an area otherwise devoid of charged residues. From the analysis of several Cox11 mutants, including K123E, -L, and -R, we conclude that a previous proposal that Lys-123 provides charge balance for the stabilization of the Cu(I) cluster is unlikely to account for its absolute requirement for Cox11 function. Rather, consideration of the properties of Lys-123 and the apparent specificity of Cox11 suggest that Lys-123 plays a role in the interaction of Cox11 with its target.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/bi1003876
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2994652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>c367358614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1906-dfe5333049f759a245ee1042960f65094e81823d539382ac26b8ae549aab43d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK0e_Ad78Rid_UqzHoRa_ChUCqLnZZJsmi1JtmZTaf-9aSuCp3eGYR5mHkKuGdwy4OwudQxAJOP4hAyZ4hBJrdUpGQJAHHEdw4BchLDqWwljeU4GHBSXMU-G5Ott0-HSNi6jkwarXXCB-oJO_ZaxffFe-tynmHW2pWFdom29y224p7MmuGXZBeqaztOutHQSgq3TanfY3zweYtf5rGx9bWlGF1uXY7CX5KzAKtir3xyRz-enj-lrNF-8zKaTeYRM92fnhVVCCJC6GCuNXCprGcj9N0WsQEubsISLXAktEo4Zj9MErZIaMZUiBzEiD0fuepPWNs9s07VYmXXramx3xqMz_yeNK83SfxuutYwV7wE3RwBmwaz8pu39BMPA7J2bP-fiB3hCcnE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mutagenic Analysis of Cox11 of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: Insights into the Assembly of CuB of Cytochrome c Oxidase</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Thompson, Audie K ; Smith, Daniel ; Gray, Jimmy ; Carr, Heather S ; Liu, Aimin ; Winge, Dennis R ; Hosler, Jonathan P</creator><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Audie K ; Smith, Daniel ; Gray, Jimmy ; Carr, Heather S ; Liu, Aimin ; Winge, Dennis R ; Hosler, Jonathan P</creatorcontrib><description>The Cu(I) chaperone Cox11 is required for the insertion of CuB into cytochrome c oxidase (CcO) of mitochondria and many bacteria, including Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Exploration of the copper binding stoichiometry of R. sphaeroides Cox11 led to the finding that an apparent tetramer of both mitochondrial and bacterial Cox11 binds more copper than the sum of the dimers, providing another example of the flexibility of copper binding by Cu(I)−S clusters. Site-directed mutagenesis has been used to identify components of Cox11 that are not required for copper binding but are absolutely required for the assembly of CuB, including conserved Cys-35 and Lys-123. In contrast to earlier proposals, Cys-35 is not required for dimerization of Cox11 or for copper binding. These findings, and the location of Cys-35 at the C-terminus of the predicted transmembrane helix and thereby close to the surface of the membrane, allow a proposal that Cys-35 is involved in the transfer of copper from the Cu(I) cluster of Cox11 to the CuB ligands His-333 and His-334 during the folding of CcO subunit I. Lys-123 is located near the Cu(I) cluster of Cox11, in an area otherwise devoid of charged residues. From the analysis of several Cox11 mutants, including K123E, -L, and -R, we conclude that a previous proposal that Lys-123 provides charge balance for the stabilization of the Cu(I) cluster is unlikely to account for its absolute requirement for Cox11 function. Rather, consideration of the properties of Lys-123 and the apparent specificity of Cox11 suggest that Lys-123 plays a role in the interaction of Cox11 with its target.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-2960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/bi1003876</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20524628</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>Biochemistry (Easton), 2010-07, Vol.49 (27), p.5651-5661</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Audie K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Jimmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Heather S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Aimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winge, Dennis R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosler, Jonathan P</creatorcontrib><title>Mutagenic Analysis of Cox11 of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: Insights into the Assembly of CuB of Cytochrome c Oxidase</title><title>Biochemistry (Easton)</title><addtitle>Biochemistry</addtitle><description>The Cu(I) chaperone Cox11 is required for the insertion of CuB into cytochrome c oxidase (CcO) of mitochondria and many bacteria, including Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Exploration of the copper binding stoichiometry of R. sphaeroides Cox11 led to the finding that an apparent tetramer of both mitochondrial and bacterial Cox11 binds more copper than the sum of the dimers, providing another example of the flexibility of copper binding by Cu(I)−S clusters. Site-directed mutagenesis has been used to identify components of Cox11 that are not required for copper binding but are absolutely required for the assembly of CuB, including conserved Cys-35 and Lys-123. In contrast to earlier proposals, Cys-35 is not required for dimerization of Cox11 or for copper binding. These findings, and the location of Cys-35 at the C-terminus of the predicted transmembrane helix and thereby close to the surface of the membrane, allow a proposal that Cys-35 is involved in the transfer of copper from the Cu(I) cluster of Cox11 to the CuB ligands His-333 and His-334 during the folding of CcO subunit I. Lys-123 is located near the Cu(I) cluster of Cox11, in an area otherwise devoid of charged residues. From the analysis of several Cox11 mutants, including K123E, -L, and -R, we conclude that a previous proposal that Lys-123 provides charge balance for the stabilization of the Cu(I) cluster is unlikely to account for its absolute requirement for Cox11 function. Rather, consideration of the properties of Lys-123 and the apparent specificity of Cox11 suggest that Lys-123 plays a role in the interaction of Cox11 with its target.</description><issn>0006-2960</issn><issn>1520-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK0e_Ad78Rid_UqzHoRa_ChUCqLnZZJsmi1JtmZTaf-9aSuCp3eGYR5mHkKuGdwy4OwudQxAJOP4hAyZ4hBJrdUpGQJAHHEdw4BchLDqWwljeU4GHBSXMU-G5Ott0-HSNi6jkwarXXCB-oJO_ZaxffFe-tynmHW2pWFdom29y224p7MmuGXZBeqaztOutHQSgq3TanfY3zweYtf5rGx9bWlGF1uXY7CX5KzAKtir3xyRz-enj-lrNF-8zKaTeYRM92fnhVVCCJC6GCuNXCprGcj9N0WsQEubsISLXAktEo4Zj9MErZIaMZUiBzEiD0fuepPWNs9s07VYmXXramx3xqMz_yeNK83SfxuutYwV7wE3RwBmwaz8pu39BMPA7J2bP-fiB3hCcnE</recordid><startdate>20100713</startdate><enddate>20100713</enddate><creator>Thompson, Audie K</creator><creator>Smith, Daniel</creator><creator>Gray, Jimmy</creator><creator>Carr, Heather S</creator><creator>Liu, Aimin</creator><creator>Winge, Dennis R</creator><creator>Hosler, Jonathan P</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100713</creationdate><title>Mutagenic Analysis of Cox11 of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: Insights into the Assembly of CuB of Cytochrome c Oxidase</title><author>Thompson, Audie K ; Smith, Daniel ; Gray, Jimmy ; Carr, Heather S ; Liu, Aimin ; Winge, Dennis R ; Hosler, Jonathan P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a1906-dfe5333049f759a245ee1042960f65094e81823d539382ac26b8ae549aab43d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Audie K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Jimmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Heather S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Aimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winge, Dennis R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosler, Jonathan P</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biochemistry (Easton)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thompson, Audie K</au><au>Smith, Daniel</au><au>Gray, Jimmy</au><au>Carr, Heather S</au><au>Liu, Aimin</au><au>Winge, Dennis R</au><au>Hosler, Jonathan P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mutagenic Analysis of Cox11 of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: Insights into the Assembly of CuB of Cytochrome c Oxidase</atitle><jtitle>Biochemistry (Easton)</jtitle><addtitle>Biochemistry</addtitle><date>2010-07-13</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>27</issue><spage>5651</spage><epage>5661</epage><pages>5651-5661</pages><issn>0006-2960</issn><eissn>1520-4995</eissn><abstract>The Cu(I) chaperone Cox11 is required for the insertion of CuB into cytochrome c oxidase (CcO) of mitochondria and many bacteria, including Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Exploration of the copper binding stoichiometry of R. sphaeroides Cox11 led to the finding that an apparent tetramer of both mitochondrial and bacterial Cox11 binds more copper than the sum of the dimers, providing another example of the flexibility of copper binding by Cu(I)−S clusters. Site-directed mutagenesis has been used to identify components of Cox11 that are not required for copper binding but are absolutely required for the assembly of CuB, including conserved Cys-35 and Lys-123. In contrast to earlier proposals, Cys-35 is not required for dimerization of Cox11 or for copper binding. These findings, and the location of Cys-35 at the C-terminus of the predicted transmembrane helix and thereby close to the surface of the membrane, allow a proposal that Cys-35 is involved in the transfer of copper from the Cu(I) cluster of Cox11 to the CuB ligands His-333 and His-334 during the folding of CcO subunit I. Lys-123 is located near the Cu(I) cluster of Cox11, in an area otherwise devoid of charged residues. From the analysis of several Cox11 mutants, including K123E, -L, and -R, we conclude that a previous proposal that Lys-123 provides charge balance for the stabilization of the Cu(I) cluster is unlikely to account for its absolute requirement for Cox11 function. Rather, consideration of the properties of Lys-123 and the apparent specificity of Cox11 suggest that Lys-123 plays a role in the interaction of Cox11 with its target.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>20524628</pmid><doi>10.1021/bi1003876</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-2960
ispartof Biochemistry (Easton), 2010-07, Vol.49 (27), p.5651-5661
issn 0006-2960
1520-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2994652
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
title Mutagenic Analysis of Cox11 of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: Insights into the Assembly of CuB of Cytochrome c Oxidase
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A07%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mutagenic%20Analysis%20of%20Cox11%20of%20Rhodobacter%20sphaeroides:%20Insights%20into%20the%20Assembly%20of%20CuB%20of%20Cytochrome%20c%20Oxidase&rft.jtitle=Biochemistry%20(Easton)&rft.au=Thompson,%20Audie%20K&rft.date=2010-07-13&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=27&rft.spage=5651&rft.epage=5661&rft.pages=5651-5661&rft.issn=0006-2960&rft.eissn=1520-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/bi1003876&rft_dat=%3Cacs_pubme%3Ec367358614%3C/acs_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a1906-dfe5333049f759a245ee1042960f65094e81823d539382ac26b8ae549aab43d03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/20524628&rfr_iscdi=true