Estimating implant survival in the presence of competing risks

• Published in: International orthopaedics 2011-02, Vol.35 (2), p.151-155
• Main Authors: Biau, David J., Hamadouche, Moussa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Data Interpretation, Statistical; Equipment Failure Analysis - methods; Equipment Failure Analysis - statistics & numerical data; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Paper; Orthopedics; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Failure; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors
• ISSN: 0341-2695; 1432-5195
• DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1097-2

In medical research, commonly, one is interested in the time to the occurence of a particular event, such as the revision of an implant, and the analysis of these data is referred to as survival analysis. However, for some patients, the event is not observed and their observations are censored. These censored observations are particular to survival data and require specific methods for estimation. The Kaplan and Meier method is a popular method to estimate the probability of being free of the event over time and it is now widely applied in orthopaedics such as to report implant survival. However, one of the assumptions underlying the Kaplan-Meier estimator implies that patients whose observations are censored have the same risk of occurrence of the event than patients remaining in the study. However, because the revision of an implant cannot occur after a patient dies, and that dead patients have their observations censored in the Kaplan-Meier method, another setting must be considered. In the sequel we will demonstrate the inadequacy of the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate implant survival and detail the cumulative incidence estimator.