Loading…

Fast-track rehabilitation program vs conventional care after colorectal resection: A randomized clinical trial

AIM To compare the fast-track rehabilitation program and conventional care for patients after resection of colorectal cancer. METHODS: One hundred and six consecutive patients who underwent fast-track rehabilitation program were encouraged to have early oral feeding and movement for early discharge,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2011-02, Vol.17 (5), p.671-676
Main Authors: Wang, Gang, Jiang, Zhi-Wei, Xu, Jing, Gong, Jian-Feng, Bao, Yang, Xie, Li-Fei, Li, Jie-Shou
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:AIM To compare the fast-track rehabilitation program and conventional care for patients after resection of colorectal cancer. METHODS: One hundred and six consecutive patients who underwent fast-track rehabilitation program were encouraged to have early oral feeding and movement for early discharge, while 104 consecutive patients un- derwent conventional care after resection of colorectal cancer. Their gastrointestinal functions, postoperative complications and hospital stay time were recorded. RESULTS: The restoration time of gastrointestinal func- tions in the patients was significantly faster after fast- track rehabilitation program than after conventional care (2.1 d vs 3.2 d, P 〈 0.01). The percentage of patients who developed complications was significantly lower 30 d after fast-track rehabilitation program than afterconventional care (13.2% vs 26.9%, P 〈 0.05). Also, the percentage of patients who had general complica- tions was significantly lower 30 d after fast-track reha- bilitation program than after conventional care (6.6% vs 15.4%, P 〈 0.05). The postoperative hospital stay time of the patients was shorter after fast-track rehabilitation program than after conventional care (5 d vs 7 d, P 〈 0.01). No significant difference was observed in the re- admission rate 30 d after fast-track rehabilitation pro- gram and conventional care (3.8% vs 8.7%). CONCLUSION: The fast-track rehabilitation program can significantly decrease the complications and shorten the time of postoperative hospital stay of patients after resection colorectal cancer.
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v17.i5.671