Loading…
FES-biofeedback versus intensive pelvic floor muscle exercise for the prevention and treatment of genuine stress incontinence
We undertook this work to compare the treatment efficacies and the changes of quality of life after pelvic floor muscle (PFM) exercise and the functional electrical stimulation (FES)-biofeedback treatment, both of which are being widely used as conservative treatment methods for female urinary incon...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of Korean medical science 2000-06, Vol.15 (3), p.303-308 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-51948434e9622b36289dbf7bd33ccd2a67363a54ec7a2c7f9fc2aced6dd83cca3 |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 308 |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 303 |
| container_title | Journal of Korean medical science |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Sung, M S Hong, J Y Choi, Y H Baik, S H Yoon, H |
| description | We undertook this work to compare the treatment efficacies and the changes of quality of life after pelvic floor muscle (PFM) exercise and the functional electrical stimulation (FES)-biofeedback treatment, both of which are being widely used as conservative treatment methods for female urinary incontinence. We randomly selected 60 female incontinence patients who visited our department and divided them evenly into two groups. They were treated for a period of 6 weeks. The subjective changes in the severity of incontinence and discomfort in daily and social life were measured using a translated version of the questionnaire by Jackson. Objective changes of pelvic muscle contraction force were measured using a perineometer. Pre- and post-treatment maximal pelvic floor muscle contractile (PMC) pressure and changes in the severity of urinary incontinence and discomfort of the two groups showed statistically significant differences (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3346/jkms.2000.15.3.303 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3054629</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71235415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-51948434e9622b36289dbf7bd33ccd2a67363a54ec7a2c7f9fc2aced6dd83cca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1q3TAQhUVpaX7aF-iiaNWdXUlj2damUELSBgJZpF0LWR4lSmzpVrJNssi7V5cbSrqa4cw3ZwYOIZ84qwGa9uv9w5xrwRiruayhBgZvyDGXqq9akN3b0jPOq15Bc0ROcr5nTEgp4D054qxXUnVwTJ4vzm-qwUeHOA7GPtANU14z9WHBkP2GdIfT5i11U4yJzmu2E1J8xGR9RuqKttwVKOGGYfExUBNGuiQ0y1wEGh29xbD6gDQXNe-dbSxkwGDxA3nnzJTx40s9Jb8vzn-d_ayurn9cnn2_qiyofqkkV03fQIOqFWKAVvRqHFw3jADWjsK0HbRgZIO2M8J2TjkrjMWxHce-EAZOybeD724dZhxt-SyZSe-Sn0160tF4_f8k-Dt9GzcNTDatUMXgy4tBin9WzIuefbY4TSZgXLPuuADZcFlAcQBtijkndP-OcKb3qel9anqfmuZSQ7kAZenz6_derRxigr-x-ZmB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71235415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>FES-biofeedback versus intensive pelvic floor muscle exercise for the prevention and treatment of genuine stress incontinence</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sung, M S ; Hong, J Y ; Choi, Y H ; Baik, S H ; Yoon, H</creator><creatorcontrib>Sung, M S ; Hong, J Y ; Choi, Y H ; Baik, S H ; Yoon, H</creatorcontrib><description>We undertook this work to compare the treatment efficacies and the changes of quality of life after pelvic floor muscle (PFM) exercise and the functional electrical stimulation (FES)-biofeedback treatment, both of which are being widely used as conservative treatment methods for female urinary incontinence. We randomly selected 60 female incontinence patients who visited our department and divided them evenly into two groups. They were treated for a period of 6 weeks. The subjective changes in the severity of incontinence and discomfort in daily and social life were measured using a translated version of the questionnaire by Jackson. Objective changes of pelvic muscle contraction force were measured using a perineometer. Pre- and post-treatment maximal pelvic floor muscle contractile (PMC) pressure and changes in the severity of urinary incontinence and discomfort of the two groups showed statistically significant differences (p<0.001). In particular the FES-biofeedback group showed significantly increased maximal PMC pressure and a decreased severity of urinary incontinence and discomfort compared to the intensive PFM exercise group (p<0.001). In conclusion, FES-biofeedback proved more effective than simple PFM exercise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1011-8934</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1598-6357</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2000.15.3.303</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10895973</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): Korean Academy of Medical Sciences</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Biofeedback, Psychology ; Exercise Therapy - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Muscle Contraction ; Muscles ; Pelvic Floor ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - prevention & control ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - psychology ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - therapy</subject><ispartof>Journal of Korean medical science, 2000-06, Vol.15 (3), p.303-308</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-51948434e9622b36289dbf7bd33ccd2a67363a54ec7a2c7f9fc2aced6dd83cca3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3054629/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3054629/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10895973$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sung, M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, J Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Y H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baik, S H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, H</creatorcontrib><title>FES-biofeedback versus intensive pelvic floor muscle exercise for the prevention and treatment of genuine stress incontinence</title><title>Journal of Korean medical science</title><addtitle>J Korean Med Sci</addtitle><description>We undertook this work to compare the treatment efficacies and the changes of quality of life after pelvic floor muscle (PFM) exercise and the functional electrical stimulation (FES)-biofeedback treatment, both of which are being widely used as conservative treatment methods for female urinary incontinence. We randomly selected 60 female incontinence patients who visited our department and divided them evenly into two groups. They were treated for a period of 6 weeks. The subjective changes in the severity of incontinence and discomfort in daily and social life were measured using a translated version of the questionnaire by Jackson. Objective changes of pelvic muscle contraction force were measured using a perineometer. Pre- and post-treatment maximal pelvic floor muscle contractile (PMC) pressure and changes in the severity of urinary incontinence and discomfort of the two groups showed statistically significant differences (p<0.001). In particular the FES-biofeedback group showed significantly increased maximal PMC pressure and a decreased severity of urinary incontinence and discomfort compared to the intensive PFM exercise group (p<0.001). In conclusion, FES-biofeedback proved more effective than simple PFM exercise.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Biofeedback, Psychology</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - prevention & control</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - psychology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - therapy</subject><issn>1011-8934</issn><issn>1598-6357</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc1q3TAQhUVpaX7aF-iiaNWdXUlj2damUELSBgJZpF0LWR4lSmzpVrJNssi7V5cbSrqa4cw3ZwYOIZ84qwGa9uv9w5xrwRiruayhBgZvyDGXqq9akN3b0jPOq15Bc0ROcr5nTEgp4D054qxXUnVwTJ4vzm-qwUeHOA7GPtANU14z9WHBkP2GdIfT5i11U4yJzmu2E1J8xGR9RuqKttwVKOGGYfExUBNGuiQ0y1wEGh29xbD6gDQXNe-dbSxkwGDxA3nnzJTx40s9Jb8vzn-d_ayurn9cnn2_qiyofqkkV03fQIOqFWKAVvRqHFw3jADWjsK0HbRgZIO2M8J2TjkrjMWxHce-EAZOybeD724dZhxt-SyZSe-Sn0160tF4_f8k-Dt9GzcNTDatUMXgy4tBin9WzIuefbY4TSZgXLPuuADZcFlAcQBtijkndP-OcKb3qel9anqfmuZSQ7kAZenz6_derRxigr-x-ZmB</recordid><startdate>20000601</startdate><enddate>20000601</enddate><creator>Sung, M S</creator><creator>Hong, J Y</creator><creator>Choi, Y H</creator><creator>Baik, S H</creator><creator>Yoon, H</creator><general>Korean Academy of Medical Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000601</creationdate><title>FES-biofeedback versus intensive pelvic floor muscle exercise for the prevention and treatment of genuine stress incontinence</title><author>Sung, M S ; Hong, J Y ; Choi, Y H ; Baik, S H ; Yoon, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-51948434e9622b36289dbf7bd33ccd2a67363a54ec7a2c7f9fc2aced6dd83cca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Biofeedback, Psychology</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - prevention & control</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - psychology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sung, M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, J Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Y H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baik, S H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Korean medical science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sung, M S</au><au>Hong, J Y</au><au>Choi, Y H</au><au>Baik, S H</au><au>Yoon, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FES-biofeedback versus intensive pelvic floor muscle exercise for the prevention and treatment of genuine stress incontinence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Korean medical science</jtitle><addtitle>J Korean Med Sci</addtitle><date>2000-06-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>303-308</pages><issn>1011-8934</issn><eissn>1598-6357</eissn><abstract>We undertook this work to compare the treatment efficacies and the changes of quality of life after pelvic floor muscle (PFM) exercise and the functional electrical stimulation (FES)-biofeedback treatment, both of which are being widely used as conservative treatment methods for female urinary incontinence. We randomly selected 60 female incontinence patients who visited our department and divided them evenly into two groups. They were treated for a period of 6 weeks. The subjective changes in the severity of incontinence and discomfort in daily and social life were measured using a translated version of the questionnaire by Jackson. Objective changes of pelvic muscle contraction force were measured using a perineometer. Pre- and post-treatment maximal pelvic floor muscle contractile (PMC) pressure and changes in the severity of urinary incontinence and discomfort of the two groups showed statistically significant differences (p<0.001). In particular the FES-biofeedback group showed significantly increased maximal PMC pressure and a decreased severity of urinary incontinence and discomfort compared to the intensive PFM exercise group (p<0.001). In conclusion, FES-biofeedback proved more effective than simple PFM exercise.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>Korean Academy of Medical Sciences</pub><pmid>10895973</pmid><doi>10.3346/jkms.2000.15.3.303</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1011-8934 |
| ispartof | Journal of Korean medical science, 2000-06, Vol.15 (3), p.303-308 |
| issn | 1011-8934 1598-6357 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3054629 |
| source | PubMed Central |
| subjects | Activities of Daily Living Biofeedback, Psychology Exercise Therapy - methods Female Humans Muscle Contraction Muscles Pelvic Floor Treatment Outcome Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology Urinary Incontinence, Stress - prevention & control Urinary Incontinence, Stress - psychology Urinary Incontinence, Stress - therapy |
| title | FES-biofeedback versus intensive pelvic floor muscle exercise for the prevention and treatment of genuine stress incontinence |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A17%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FES-biofeedback%20versus%20intensive%20pelvic%20floor%20muscle%20exercise%20for%20the%20prevention%20and%20treatment%20of%20genuine%20stress%20incontinence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Korean%20medical%20science&rft.au=Sung,%20M%20S&rft.date=2000-06-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=303-308&rft.issn=1011-8934&rft.eissn=1598-6357&rft_id=info:doi/10.3346/jkms.2000.15.3.303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71235415%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-51948434e9622b36289dbf7bd33ccd2a67363a54ec7a2c7f9fc2aced6dd83cca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71235415&rft_id=info:pmid/10895973&rfr_iscdi=true |