Loading…
Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms
Abstract Objectives: To compare the efficacy of antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treating mild to moderate depression in general practice. To determine whether the outcomes were similar for patients with randomly allocated treatment and those expressing a treatment preference. Design...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMJ 2001-03, Vol.322 (7289), p.772-775 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b446t-569831f6cad5a9c13854c158990d4322bf5680d67dc015caed6cdbd662ea653b3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 775 |
container_issue | 7289 |
container_start_page | 772 |
container_title | BMJ |
container_volume | 322 |
creator | Chilvers, Clair Dewey, Michael Fielding, Katherine Gretton, Virginia Miller, Paul Palmer, Ben Weller, David Churchill, Richard Williams, Idris Bedi, Navjot Duggan, Conor Lee, Alan Harrison, Glynn |
description | Abstract Objectives: To compare the efficacy of antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treating mild to moderate depression in general practice. To determine whether the outcomes were similar for patients with randomly allocated treatment and those expressing a treatment preference. Design: Randomised controlled trial, with patient preference arms. Follow up at 8 weeks and 12 months and abstraction of GP case notes. Setting: 31 general practices in Trent region. Participants: Patients aged 18–70 who met research diagnostic criteria for major depression; 103 patients were randomised and 220 patients were recruited to the preference arms. Main outcome measures: Difference in mean Beck depression inventory score; time to remission; global outcome assessed by a psychiatrist using all data sources; and research diagnostic criteria. Results: At 12 months there was no difference between the mean Beck scores in the randomised arms. Combining the randomised and patient preference groups, the difference in Beck scores was 0.4 (95% confidence interval −2.7 to 3.5). Patients choosing counselling did better than those randomised to it (mean difference in Beck score 4.6, 0.0 to 9.2). There was no difference in the psychiatrist's overall assessment of outcome between any of the groups. 221/265 (83%) of participants with a known outcome had a remission. Median time to remission was shorter in the group randomised to antidepressants than the other three groups (2 months v 3 months). 33/221 (15%) patients had a relapse. Conclusions: Generic counselling seems to be as effective as antidepressant treatment for mild to moderate depressive illness, although patients receiving antidepressants may recover more quickly. General practitioners should allow patients to have their preferred treatment. What is already known on this topic Antidepressants and specific psychological interventions are effective in major depression. Generic counselling has not previously been compared with antidepressants in primary care What this study adds 12 months after starting treatment, generic counselling is as effective as antidepressants Patients treated with antidepressants may recover more quickly Given a choice, more patients opt for counselling Patients who choose counselling may benefit more than those with no strong preference |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.322.7289.772 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_30555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25466606</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25466606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b446t-569831f6cad5a9c13854c158990d4322bf5680d67dc015caed6cdbd662ea653b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEoqPSPRuQJSQ2VQY7jh9BbKoRr6qUTWFrObYz9TCxBzuB8iP4z9wo0fDYsLLk852rc-4tiscErwmh_EXb79a0qtaiks1aiOpesSI1lyWTlN4vVrhhTSkJlSfFWc47jHFFhWw4e1icEFLJSvJ6Vfy8CIO37pBczjoMyKZxm5EOFm1dcMkbZOIYstvvfdiiLiY0JKeH3gEbO9TrHXwtfh8D8gEdku91-oGMTu4lSjAr9j47C06v9-i7H27RQQ9-GgG-ziUXjEM69flR8aDT--zOlve0-PTm9c3mXXn18e37zcVV2dY1H0rGG0lJx422TDcGOrLaECabBtsaVtJ2jEtsubAGE2a0s9zY1nJeOc0Zbelp8Wqeexjb3lkDUZLeqyW5itqrv5Xgb9U2flMUM8bA_nyxp_h1dHlQUNDAjnRwccxKCEwElRjAZ_-AuzimANUUEUJwLLmsgMIzZVLMGTZyDEKwmk6t4NQKeqnp1DB9sjz9s8Bvw3JYAJ7MwC4PMR31itWcc8xBL2fd58HdHXWdviguqGDq-vNGNZeX4ub6g1Qb4M9nfory33i_AIzJz1c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777608682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>BMJ Publishing</source><creator>Chilvers, Clair ; Dewey, Michael ; Fielding, Katherine ; Gretton, Virginia ; Miller, Paul ; Palmer, Ben ; Weller, David ; Churchill, Richard ; Williams, Idris ; Bedi, Navjot ; Duggan, Conor ; Lee, Alan ; Harrison, Glynn</creator><creatorcontrib>Chilvers, Clair ; Dewey, Michael ; Fielding, Katherine ; Gretton, Virginia ; Miller, Paul ; Palmer, Ben ; Weller, David ; Churchill, Richard ; Williams, Idris ; Bedi, Navjot ; Duggan, Conor ; Lee, Alan ; Harrison, Glynn ; Counselling versus Antidepressants in Primary Care Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives: To compare the efficacy of antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treating mild to moderate depression in general practice. To determine whether the outcomes were similar for patients with randomly allocated treatment and those expressing a treatment preference. Design: Randomised controlled trial, with patient preference arms. Follow up at 8 weeks and 12 months and abstraction of GP case notes. Setting: 31 general practices in Trent region. Participants: Patients aged 18–70 who met research diagnostic criteria for major depression; 103 patients were randomised and 220 patients were recruited to the preference arms. Main outcome measures: Difference in mean Beck depression inventory score; time to remission; global outcome assessed by a psychiatrist using all data sources; and research diagnostic criteria. Results: At 12 months there was no difference between the mean Beck scores in the randomised arms. Combining the randomised and patient preference groups, the difference in Beck scores was 0.4 (95% confidence interval −2.7 to 3.5). Patients choosing counselling did better than those randomised to it (mean difference in Beck score 4.6, 0.0 to 9.2). There was no difference in the psychiatrist's overall assessment of outcome between any of the groups. 221/265 (83%) of participants with a known outcome had a remission. Median time to remission was shorter in the group randomised to antidepressants than the other three groups (2 months v 3 months). 33/221 (15%) patients had a relapse. Conclusions: Generic counselling seems to be as effective as antidepressant treatment for mild to moderate depressive illness, although patients receiving antidepressants may recover more quickly. General practitioners should allow patients to have their preferred treatment. What is already known on this topic Antidepressants and specific psychological interventions are effective in major depression. Generic counselling has not previously been compared with antidepressants in primary care What this study adds 12 months after starting treatment, generic counselling is as effective as antidepressants Patients treated with antidepressants may recover more quickly Given a choice, more patients opt for counselling Patients who choose counselling may benefit more than those with no strong preference</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7289.772</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11282864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antidepressants ; Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Depressive Disorder - drug therapy ; Depressive Disorder - therapy ; Depressive disorders ; Disease remission ; Experimentation ; Family Practice ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Forensic psychiatry ; General practice ; Health care outcome assessment ; Humans ; Major depressive disorder ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patient Selection ; Primary Care ; Primary health care ; Psychotherapy - methods ; Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 2001-03, Vol.322 (7289), p.772-775</ispartof><rights>2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 BMJ</rights><rights>Copyright: 2001 (c) 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2001, BMJ 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b446t-569831f6cad5a9c13854c158990d4322bf5680d67dc015caed6cdbd662ea653b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/322/7289/772.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/322/7289/772.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,230,314,780,784,885,3194,27924,27925,58238,58471,77594,77595</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11282864$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chilvers, Clair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewey, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fielding, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gretton, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Churchill, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Idris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedi, Navjot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duggan, Conor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Glynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Counselling versus Antidepressants in Primary Care Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms</title><title>BMJ</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives: To compare the efficacy of antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treating mild to moderate depression in general practice. To determine whether the outcomes were similar for patients with randomly allocated treatment and those expressing a treatment preference. Design: Randomised controlled trial, with patient preference arms. Follow up at 8 weeks and 12 months and abstraction of GP case notes. Setting: 31 general practices in Trent region. Participants: Patients aged 18–70 who met research diagnostic criteria for major depression; 103 patients were randomised and 220 patients were recruited to the preference arms. Main outcome measures: Difference in mean Beck depression inventory score; time to remission; global outcome assessed by a psychiatrist using all data sources; and research diagnostic criteria. Results: At 12 months there was no difference between the mean Beck scores in the randomised arms. Combining the randomised and patient preference groups, the difference in Beck scores was 0.4 (95% confidence interval −2.7 to 3.5). Patients choosing counselling did better than those randomised to it (mean difference in Beck score 4.6, 0.0 to 9.2). There was no difference in the psychiatrist's overall assessment of outcome between any of the groups. 221/265 (83%) of participants with a known outcome had a remission. Median time to remission was shorter in the group randomised to antidepressants than the other three groups (2 months v 3 months). 33/221 (15%) patients had a relapse. Conclusions: Generic counselling seems to be as effective as antidepressant treatment for mild to moderate depressive illness, although patients receiving antidepressants may recover more quickly. General practitioners should allow patients to have their preferred treatment. What is already known on this topic Antidepressants and specific psychological interventions are effective in major depression. Generic counselling has not previously been compared with antidepressants in primary care What this study adds 12 months after starting treatment, generic counselling is as effective as antidepressants Patients treated with antidepressants may recover more quickly Given a choice, more patients opt for counselling Patients who choose counselling may benefit more than those with no strong preference</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antidepressants</subject><subject>Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - drug therapy</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - therapy</subject><subject>Depressive disorders</subject><subject>Disease remission</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Family Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Forensic psychiatry</subject><subject>General practice</subject><subject>Health care outcome assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Major depressive disorder</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Primary Care</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Psychotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEoqPSPRuQJSQ2VQY7jh9BbKoRr6qUTWFrObYz9TCxBzuB8iP4z9wo0fDYsLLk852rc-4tiscErwmh_EXb79a0qtaiks1aiOpesSI1lyWTlN4vVrhhTSkJlSfFWc47jHFFhWw4e1icEFLJSvJ6Vfy8CIO37pBczjoMyKZxm5EOFm1dcMkbZOIYstvvfdiiLiY0JKeH3gEbO9TrHXwtfh8D8gEdku91-oGMTu4lSjAr9j47C06v9-i7H27RQQ9-GgG-ziUXjEM69flR8aDT--zOlve0-PTm9c3mXXn18e37zcVV2dY1H0rGG0lJx422TDcGOrLaECabBtsaVtJ2jEtsubAGE2a0s9zY1nJeOc0Zbelp8Wqeexjb3lkDUZLeqyW5itqrv5Xgb9U2flMUM8bA_nyxp_h1dHlQUNDAjnRwccxKCEwElRjAZ_-AuzimANUUEUJwLLmsgMIzZVLMGTZyDEKwmk6t4NQKeqnp1DB9sjz9s8Bvw3JYAJ7MwC4PMR31itWcc8xBL2fd58HdHXWdviguqGDq-vNGNZeX4ub6g1Qb4M9nfory33i_AIzJz1c</recordid><startdate>20010331</startdate><enddate>20010331</enddate><creator>Chilvers, Clair</creator><creator>Dewey, Michael</creator><creator>Fielding, Katherine</creator><creator>Gretton, Virginia</creator><creator>Miller, Paul</creator><creator>Palmer, Ben</creator><creator>Weller, David</creator><creator>Churchill, Richard</creator><creator>Williams, Idris</creator><creator>Bedi, Navjot</creator><creator>Duggan, Conor</creator><creator>Lee, Alan</creator><creator>Harrison, Glynn</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010331</creationdate><title>Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms</title><author>Chilvers, Clair ; Dewey, Michael ; Fielding, Katherine ; Gretton, Virginia ; Miller, Paul ; Palmer, Ben ; Weller, David ; Churchill, Richard ; Williams, Idris ; Bedi, Navjot ; Duggan, Conor ; Lee, Alan ; Harrison, Glynn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b446t-569831f6cad5a9c13854c158990d4322bf5680d67dc015caed6cdbd662ea653b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antidepressants</topic><topic>Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - drug therapy</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - therapy</topic><topic>Depressive disorders</topic><topic>Disease remission</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Family Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Forensic psychiatry</topic><topic>General practice</topic><topic>Health care outcome assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Major depressive disorder</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Primary Care</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Psychotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chilvers, Clair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewey, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fielding, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gretton, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Churchill, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Idris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedi, Navjot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duggan, Conor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Glynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Counselling versus Antidepressants in Primary Care Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chilvers, Clair</au><au>Dewey, Michael</au><au>Fielding, Katherine</au><au>Gretton, Virginia</au><au>Miller, Paul</au><au>Palmer, Ben</au><au>Weller, David</au><au>Churchill, Richard</au><au>Williams, Idris</au><au>Bedi, Navjot</au><au>Duggan, Conor</au><au>Lee, Alan</au><au>Harrison, Glynn</au><aucorp>Counselling versus Antidepressants in Primary Care Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2001-03-31</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>322</volume><issue>7289</issue><spage>772</spage><epage>775</epage><pages>772-775</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives: To compare the efficacy of antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treating mild to moderate depression in general practice. To determine whether the outcomes were similar for patients with randomly allocated treatment and those expressing a treatment preference. Design: Randomised controlled trial, with patient preference arms. Follow up at 8 weeks and 12 months and abstraction of GP case notes. Setting: 31 general practices in Trent region. Participants: Patients aged 18–70 who met research diagnostic criteria for major depression; 103 patients were randomised and 220 patients were recruited to the preference arms. Main outcome measures: Difference in mean Beck depression inventory score; time to remission; global outcome assessed by a psychiatrist using all data sources; and research diagnostic criteria. Results: At 12 months there was no difference between the mean Beck scores in the randomised arms. Combining the randomised and patient preference groups, the difference in Beck scores was 0.4 (95% confidence interval −2.7 to 3.5). Patients choosing counselling did better than those randomised to it (mean difference in Beck score 4.6, 0.0 to 9.2). There was no difference in the psychiatrist's overall assessment of outcome between any of the groups. 221/265 (83%) of participants with a known outcome had a remission. Median time to remission was shorter in the group randomised to antidepressants than the other three groups (2 months v 3 months). 33/221 (15%) patients had a relapse. Conclusions: Generic counselling seems to be as effective as antidepressant treatment for mild to moderate depressive illness, although patients receiving antidepressants may recover more quickly. General practitioners should allow patients to have their preferred treatment. What is already known on this topic Antidepressants and specific psychological interventions are effective in major depression. Generic counselling has not previously been compared with antidepressants in primary care What this study adds 12 months after starting treatment, generic counselling is as effective as antidepressants Patients treated with antidepressants may recover more quickly Given a choice, more patients opt for counselling Patients who choose counselling may benefit more than those with no strong preference</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>11282864</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.322.7289.772</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8138 |
ispartof | BMJ, 2001-03, Vol.322 (7289), p.772-775 |
issn | 0959-8138 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_30555 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; BMJ Publishing |
subjects | Adult Aged Antidepressants Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use Depressive Disorder - drug therapy Depressive Disorder - therapy Depressive disorders Disease remission Experimentation Family Practice Female Follow-Up Studies Forensic psychiatry General practice Health care outcome assessment Humans Major depressive disorder Male Middle Aged Patient Satisfaction Patient Selection Primary Care Primary health care Psychotherapy - methods Questionnaires Treatment Outcome |
title | Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A43%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antidepressant%20drugs%20and%20generic%20counselling%20for%20treatment%20of%20major%20depression%20in%20primary%20care:%20randomised%20trial%20with%20patient%20preference%20arms&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Chilvers,%20Clair&rft.aucorp=Counselling%20versus%20Antidepressants%20in%20Primary%20Care%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2001-03-31&rft.volume=322&rft.issue=7289&rft.spage=772&rft.epage=775&rft.pages=772-775&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.322.7289.772&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E25466606%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b446t-569831f6cad5a9c13854c158990d4322bf5680d67dc015caed6cdbd662ea653b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777608682&rft_id=info:pmid/11282864&rft_jstor_id=25466606&rfr_iscdi=true |