Loading…

Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms

Abstract Objectives: To compare the efficacy of antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treating mild to moderate depression in general practice. To determine whether the outcomes were similar for patients with randomly allocated treatment and those expressing a treatment preference. Design...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ 2001-03, Vol.322 (7289), p.772-775
Main Authors: Chilvers, Clair, Dewey, Michael, Fielding, Katherine, Gretton, Virginia, Miller, Paul, Palmer, Ben, Weller, David, Churchill, Richard, Williams, Idris, Bedi, Navjot, Duggan, Conor, Lee, Alan, Harrison, Glynn
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b446t-569831f6cad5a9c13854c158990d4322bf5680d67dc015caed6cdbd662ea653b3
cites
container_end_page 775
container_issue 7289
container_start_page 772
container_title BMJ
container_volume 322
creator Chilvers, Clair
Dewey, Michael
Fielding, Katherine
Gretton, Virginia
Miller, Paul
Palmer, Ben
Weller, David
Churchill, Richard
Williams, Idris
Bedi, Navjot
Duggan, Conor
Lee, Alan
Harrison, Glynn
description Abstract Objectives: To compare the efficacy of antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treating mild to moderate depression in general practice. To determine whether the outcomes were similar for patients with randomly allocated treatment and those expressing a treatment preference. Design: Randomised controlled trial, with patient preference arms. Follow up at 8 weeks and 12 months and abstraction of GP case notes. Setting: 31 general practices in Trent region. Participants: Patients aged 18–70 who met research diagnostic criteria for major depression; 103 patients were randomised and 220 patients were recruited to the preference arms. Main outcome measures: Difference in mean Beck depression inventory score; time to remission; global outcome assessed by a psychiatrist using all data sources; and research diagnostic criteria. Results: At 12 months there was no difference between the mean Beck scores in the randomised arms. Combining the randomised and patient preference groups, the difference in Beck scores was 0.4 (95% confidence interval −2.7 to 3.5). Patients choosing counselling did better than those randomised to it (mean difference in Beck score 4.6, 0.0 to 9.2). There was no difference in the psychiatrist's overall assessment of outcome between any of the groups. 221/265 (83%) of participants with a known outcome had a remission. Median time to remission was shorter in the group randomised to antidepressants than the other three groups (2 months v 3 months). 33/221 (15%) patients had a relapse. Conclusions: Generic counselling seems to be as effective as antidepressant treatment for mild to moderate depressive illness, although patients receiving antidepressants may recover more quickly. General practitioners should allow patients to have their preferred treatment. What is already known on this topic Antidepressants and specific psychological interventions are effective in major depression. Generic counselling has not previously been compared with antidepressants in primary care What this study adds 12 months after starting treatment, generic counselling is as effective as antidepressants Patients treated with antidepressants may recover more quickly Given a choice, more patients opt for counselling Patients who choose counselling may benefit more than those with no strong preference
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmj.322.7289.772
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_30555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25466606</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25466606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b446t-569831f6cad5a9c13854c158990d4322bf5680d67dc015caed6cdbd662ea653b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEoqPSPRuQJSQ2VQY7jh9BbKoRr6qUTWFrObYz9TCxBzuB8iP4z9wo0fDYsLLk852rc-4tiscErwmh_EXb79a0qtaiks1aiOpesSI1lyWTlN4vVrhhTSkJlSfFWc47jHFFhWw4e1icEFLJSvJ6Vfy8CIO37pBczjoMyKZxm5EOFm1dcMkbZOIYstvvfdiiLiY0JKeH3gEbO9TrHXwtfh8D8gEdku91-oGMTu4lSjAr9j47C06v9-i7H27RQQ9-GgG-ziUXjEM69flR8aDT--zOlve0-PTm9c3mXXn18e37zcVV2dY1H0rGG0lJx422TDcGOrLaECabBtsaVtJ2jEtsubAGE2a0s9zY1nJeOc0Zbelp8Wqeexjb3lkDUZLeqyW5itqrv5Xgb9U2flMUM8bA_nyxp_h1dHlQUNDAjnRwccxKCEwElRjAZ_-AuzimANUUEUJwLLmsgMIzZVLMGTZyDEKwmk6t4NQKeqnp1DB9sjz9s8Bvw3JYAJ7MwC4PMR31itWcc8xBL2fd58HdHXWdviguqGDq-vNGNZeX4ub6g1Qb4M9nfory33i_AIzJz1c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777608682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>BMJ Publishing</source><creator>Chilvers, Clair ; Dewey, Michael ; Fielding, Katherine ; Gretton, Virginia ; Miller, Paul ; Palmer, Ben ; Weller, David ; Churchill, Richard ; Williams, Idris ; Bedi, Navjot ; Duggan, Conor ; Lee, Alan ; Harrison, Glynn</creator><creatorcontrib>Chilvers, Clair ; Dewey, Michael ; Fielding, Katherine ; Gretton, Virginia ; Miller, Paul ; Palmer, Ben ; Weller, David ; Churchill, Richard ; Williams, Idris ; Bedi, Navjot ; Duggan, Conor ; Lee, Alan ; Harrison, Glynn ; Counselling versus Antidepressants in Primary Care Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives: To compare the efficacy of antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treating mild to moderate depression in general practice. To determine whether the outcomes were similar for patients with randomly allocated treatment and those expressing a treatment preference. Design: Randomised controlled trial, with patient preference arms. Follow up at 8 weeks and 12 months and abstraction of GP case notes. Setting: 31 general practices in Trent region. Participants: Patients aged 18–70 who met research diagnostic criteria for major depression; 103 patients were randomised and 220 patients were recruited to the preference arms. Main outcome measures: Difference in mean Beck depression inventory score; time to remission; global outcome assessed by a psychiatrist using all data sources; and research diagnostic criteria. Results: At 12 months there was no difference between the mean Beck scores in the randomised arms. Combining the randomised and patient preference groups, the difference in Beck scores was 0.4 (95% confidence interval −2.7 to 3.5). Patients choosing counselling did better than those randomised to it (mean difference in Beck score 4.6, 0.0 to 9.2). There was no difference in the psychiatrist's overall assessment of outcome between any of the groups. 221/265 (83%) of participants with a known outcome had a remission. Median time to remission was shorter in the group randomised to antidepressants than the other three groups (2 months v 3 months). 33/221 (15%) patients had a relapse. Conclusions: Generic counselling seems to be as effective as antidepressant treatment for mild to moderate depressive illness, although patients receiving antidepressants may recover more quickly. General practitioners should allow patients to have their preferred treatment. What is already known on this topic Antidepressants and specific psychological interventions are effective in major depression. Generic counselling has not previously been compared with antidepressants in primary care What this study adds 12 months after starting treatment, generic counselling is as effective as antidepressants Patients treated with antidepressants may recover more quickly Given a choice, more patients opt for counselling Patients who choose counselling may benefit more than those with no strong preference</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7289.772</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11282864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antidepressants ; Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Depressive Disorder - drug therapy ; Depressive Disorder - therapy ; Depressive disorders ; Disease remission ; Experimentation ; Family Practice ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Forensic psychiatry ; General practice ; Health care outcome assessment ; Humans ; Major depressive disorder ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patient Selection ; Primary Care ; Primary health care ; Psychotherapy - methods ; Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 2001-03, Vol.322 (7289), p.772-775</ispartof><rights>2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 BMJ</rights><rights>Copyright: 2001 (c) 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2001, BMJ 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b446t-569831f6cad5a9c13854c158990d4322bf5680d67dc015caed6cdbd662ea653b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/322/7289/772.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/322/7289/772.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,230,314,780,784,885,3194,27924,27925,58238,58471,77594,77595</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11282864$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chilvers, Clair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewey, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fielding, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gretton, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Churchill, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Idris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedi, Navjot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duggan, Conor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Glynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Counselling versus Antidepressants in Primary Care Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms</title><title>BMJ</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives: To compare the efficacy of antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treating mild to moderate depression in general practice. To determine whether the outcomes were similar for patients with randomly allocated treatment and those expressing a treatment preference. Design: Randomised controlled trial, with patient preference arms. Follow up at 8 weeks and 12 months and abstraction of GP case notes. Setting: 31 general practices in Trent region. Participants: Patients aged 18–70 who met research diagnostic criteria for major depression; 103 patients were randomised and 220 patients were recruited to the preference arms. Main outcome measures: Difference in mean Beck depression inventory score; time to remission; global outcome assessed by a psychiatrist using all data sources; and research diagnostic criteria. Results: At 12 months there was no difference between the mean Beck scores in the randomised arms. Combining the randomised and patient preference groups, the difference in Beck scores was 0.4 (95% confidence interval −2.7 to 3.5). Patients choosing counselling did better than those randomised to it (mean difference in Beck score 4.6, 0.0 to 9.2). There was no difference in the psychiatrist's overall assessment of outcome between any of the groups. 221/265 (83%) of participants with a known outcome had a remission. Median time to remission was shorter in the group randomised to antidepressants than the other three groups (2 months v 3 months). 33/221 (15%) patients had a relapse. Conclusions: Generic counselling seems to be as effective as antidepressant treatment for mild to moderate depressive illness, although patients receiving antidepressants may recover more quickly. General practitioners should allow patients to have their preferred treatment. What is already known on this topic Antidepressants and specific psychological interventions are effective in major depression. Generic counselling has not previously been compared with antidepressants in primary care What this study adds 12 months after starting treatment, generic counselling is as effective as antidepressants Patients treated with antidepressants may recover more quickly Given a choice, more patients opt for counselling Patients who choose counselling may benefit more than those with no strong preference</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antidepressants</subject><subject>Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - drug therapy</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - therapy</subject><subject>Depressive disorders</subject><subject>Disease remission</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Family Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Forensic psychiatry</subject><subject>General practice</subject><subject>Health care outcome assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Major depressive disorder</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Primary Care</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Psychotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEoqPSPRuQJSQ2VQY7jh9BbKoRr6qUTWFrObYz9TCxBzuB8iP4z9wo0fDYsLLk852rc-4tiscErwmh_EXb79a0qtaiks1aiOpesSI1lyWTlN4vVrhhTSkJlSfFWc47jHFFhWw4e1icEFLJSvJ6Vfy8CIO37pBczjoMyKZxm5EOFm1dcMkbZOIYstvvfdiiLiY0JKeH3gEbO9TrHXwtfh8D8gEdku91-oGMTu4lSjAr9j47C06v9-i7H27RQQ9-GgG-ziUXjEM69flR8aDT--zOlve0-PTm9c3mXXn18e37zcVV2dY1H0rGG0lJx422TDcGOrLaECabBtsaVtJ2jEtsubAGE2a0s9zY1nJeOc0Zbelp8Wqeexjb3lkDUZLeqyW5itqrv5Xgb9U2flMUM8bA_nyxp_h1dHlQUNDAjnRwccxKCEwElRjAZ_-AuzimANUUEUJwLLmsgMIzZVLMGTZyDEKwmk6t4NQKeqnp1DB9sjz9s8Bvw3JYAJ7MwC4PMR31itWcc8xBL2fd58HdHXWdviguqGDq-vNGNZeX4ub6g1Qb4M9nfory33i_AIzJz1c</recordid><startdate>20010331</startdate><enddate>20010331</enddate><creator>Chilvers, Clair</creator><creator>Dewey, Michael</creator><creator>Fielding, Katherine</creator><creator>Gretton, Virginia</creator><creator>Miller, Paul</creator><creator>Palmer, Ben</creator><creator>Weller, David</creator><creator>Churchill, Richard</creator><creator>Williams, Idris</creator><creator>Bedi, Navjot</creator><creator>Duggan, Conor</creator><creator>Lee, Alan</creator><creator>Harrison, Glynn</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010331</creationdate><title>Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms</title><author>Chilvers, Clair ; Dewey, Michael ; Fielding, Katherine ; Gretton, Virginia ; Miller, Paul ; Palmer, Ben ; Weller, David ; Churchill, Richard ; Williams, Idris ; Bedi, Navjot ; Duggan, Conor ; Lee, Alan ; Harrison, Glynn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b446t-569831f6cad5a9c13854c158990d4322bf5680d67dc015caed6cdbd662ea653b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antidepressants</topic><topic>Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - drug therapy</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - therapy</topic><topic>Depressive disorders</topic><topic>Disease remission</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Family Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Forensic psychiatry</topic><topic>General practice</topic><topic>Health care outcome assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Major depressive disorder</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Primary Care</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Psychotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chilvers, Clair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewey, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fielding, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gretton, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Churchill, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Idris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedi, Navjot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duggan, Conor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Glynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Counselling versus Antidepressants in Primary Care Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chilvers, Clair</au><au>Dewey, Michael</au><au>Fielding, Katherine</au><au>Gretton, Virginia</au><au>Miller, Paul</au><au>Palmer, Ben</au><au>Weller, David</au><au>Churchill, Richard</au><au>Williams, Idris</au><au>Bedi, Navjot</au><au>Duggan, Conor</au><au>Lee, Alan</au><au>Harrison, Glynn</au><aucorp>Counselling versus Antidepressants in Primary Care Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2001-03-31</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>322</volume><issue>7289</issue><spage>772</spage><epage>775</epage><pages>772-775</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives: To compare the efficacy of antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treating mild to moderate depression in general practice. To determine whether the outcomes were similar for patients with randomly allocated treatment and those expressing a treatment preference. Design: Randomised controlled trial, with patient preference arms. Follow up at 8 weeks and 12 months and abstraction of GP case notes. Setting: 31 general practices in Trent region. Participants: Patients aged 18–70 who met research diagnostic criteria for major depression; 103 patients were randomised and 220 patients were recruited to the preference arms. Main outcome measures: Difference in mean Beck depression inventory score; time to remission; global outcome assessed by a psychiatrist using all data sources; and research diagnostic criteria. Results: At 12 months there was no difference between the mean Beck scores in the randomised arms. Combining the randomised and patient preference groups, the difference in Beck scores was 0.4 (95% confidence interval −2.7 to 3.5). Patients choosing counselling did better than those randomised to it (mean difference in Beck score 4.6, 0.0 to 9.2). There was no difference in the psychiatrist's overall assessment of outcome between any of the groups. 221/265 (83%) of participants with a known outcome had a remission. Median time to remission was shorter in the group randomised to antidepressants than the other three groups (2 months v 3 months). 33/221 (15%) patients had a relapse. Conclusions: Generic counselling seems to be as effective as antidepressant treatment for mild to moderate depressive illness, although patients receiving antidepressants may recover more quickly. General practitioners should allow patients to have their preferred treatment. What is already known on this topic Antidepressants and specific psychological interventions are effective in major depression. Generic counselling has not previously been compared with antidepressants in primary care What this study adds 12 months after starting treatment, generic counselling is as effective as antidepressants Patients treated with antidepressants may recover more quickly Given a choice, more patients opt for counselling Patients who choose counselling may benefit more than those with no strong preference</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>11282864</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.322.7289.772</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8138
ispartof BMJ, 2001-03, Vol.322 (7289), p.772-775
issn 0959-8138
1468-5833
1756-1833
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_30555
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; BMJ Publishing
subjects Adult
Aged
Antidepressants
Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use
Depressive Disorder - drug therapy
Depressive Disorder - therapy
Depressive disorders
Disease remission
Experimentation
Family Practice
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Forensic psychiatry
General practice
Health care outcome assessment
Humans
Major depressive disorder
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Patient Selection
Primary Care
Primary health care
Psychotherapy - methods
Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
title Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A43%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antidepressant%20drugs%20and%20generic%20counselling%20for%20treatment%20of%20major%20depression%20in%20primary%20care:%20randomised%20trial%20with%20patient%20preference%20arms&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Chilvers,%20Clair&rft.aucorp=Counselling%20versus%20Antidepressants%20in%20Primary%20Care%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2001-03-31&rft.volume=322&rft.issue=7289&rft.spage=772&rft.epage=775&rft.pages=772-775&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.322.7289.772&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E25466606%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b446t-569831f6cad5a9c13854c158990d4322bf5680d67dc015caed6cdbd662ea653b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777608682&rft_id=info:pmid/11282864&rft_jstor_id=25466606&rfr_iscdi=true