Loading…

Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in Aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling

► Broca’s aphasic participants showed larger rhyme competition effects than controls. ► Wernicke’s aphasic participants had larger cohort competition effects than controls. ► Rhyme and cohort effects were negatively correlated for aphasic participants. ► TRACE simulations tested several theoretical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain and language 2011-05, Vol.117 (2), p.53-68
Main Authors: Mirman, Daniel, Yee, Eiling, Blumstein, Sheila E., Magnuson, James S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-f36b8e0fb2a0b21f60273cc6be9cc46e5d9ca25a6581455a78b9d1aef4caf9583
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-f36b8e0fb2a0b21f60273cc6be9cc46e5d9ca25a6581455a78b9d1aef4caf9583
container_end_page 68
container_issue 2
container_start_page 53
container_title Brain and language
container_volume 117
creator Mirman, Daniel
Yee, Eiling
Blumstein, Sheila E.
Magnuson, James S.
description ► Broca’s aphasic participants showed larger rhyme competition effects than controls. ► Wernicke’s aphasic participants had larger cohort competition effects than controls. ► Rhyme and cohort effects were negatively correlated for aphasic participants. ► TRACE simulations tested several theoretical accounts of behavioral data. ► Response selection was the only one that could account for all behavioral data. We used eye-tracking to investigate lexical processing in aphasic participants by examining the fixation time course for rhyme (e.g., carrot– parrot) and cohort (e.g., beaker– beetle) competitors. Broca’s aphasic participants exhibited larger rhyme competition effects than age-matched controls. A re-analysis of previously reported data ( Yee, Blumstein, & Sedivy, 2008) confirmed that Wernicke’s aphasic participants exhibited larger cohort competition effects. Individual-level analyses revealed a negative correlation between rhyme and cohort competition effect size across both groups of aphasic participants. Computational model simulations were performed to examine which of several accounts of lexical processing deficits in aphasia might account for the observed effects. Simulation results revealed that slower deactivation of lexical competitors could account for increased cohort competition in Wernicke’s aphasic participants; auditory perceptual impairment could account for increased rhyme competition in Broca’s aphasic participants; and a perturbation of a parameter controlling selection among competing alternatives could account for both patterns, as well as the correlation between the effects. In light of these simulation results, we discuss theoretical accounts that have the potential to explain the dynamics of spoken word recognition in aphasia and the possible roles of anterior and posterior brain regions in lexical processing and cognitive control.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.01.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3076537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ922462</ericid><els_id>S0093934X11000162</els_id><sourcerecordid>876235609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-f36b8e0fb2a0b21f60273cc6be9cc46e5d9ca25a6581455a78b9d1aef4caf9583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl2LEzEUhoMobq3-AkVyI3ozNZl8zIygsCxdP1jwZgXvQiZz0qY7k9RkWtl_b2Zbq96sEMjFec7Le857EHpOyYISKt9uFq32Xb8oCaULkh_hD9CMkoYUJRXiIZoR0rCiYfz7GXqS0oZkkNf0MTorKatoxdkM-es1hOgg4WBx2oYb8PhniB2OYMLKu9EFjzuwzrgxYefx-Xatk9Pv8HLvOvAGsI1hwHALxRi1uXF-hbMtbMKw3Y166tc9HkIHfS49RY-s7hM8O_5z9O1yeX3xqbj6-vHzxflVoUVTjYVlsq2B2LbUpC2plaSsmDGyhcYYLkF0jdGl0FLUlAuhq7ptOqrBcqNtI2o2Rx8OuttdO0BnwGdzvdpGN-h4q4J26t-Kd2u1CnvFSCUFq7LA66NADD92kEY1uGSg77WHsEuqrmTJhMwL_i8pS0JkFs3km3vJnCqRjaBsQtkBNTGkFMGerFMycVJt1F36akpfkfwIz10v_5761PM77gy8OgI6Gd3bqL1x6Q_HKeOET-t7ceAgOnMqL780Zcnz3HP0_ljOEe4dRJWMm26hc_lsRtUFd6_PX02Q2gg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1010695133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in Aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling</title><source>Elsevier</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Mirman, Daniel ; Yee, Eiling ; Blumstein, Sheila E. ; Magnuson, James S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mirman, Daniel ; Yee, Eiling ; Blumstein, Sheila E. ; Magnuson, James S.</creatorcontrib><description>► Broca’s aphasic participants showed larger rhyme competition effects than controls. ► Wernicke’s aphasic participants had larger cohort competition effects than controls. ► Rhyme and cohort effects were negatively correlated for aphasic participants. ► TRACE simulations tested several theoretical accounts of behavioral data. ► Response selection was the only one that could account for all behavioral data. We used eye-tracking to investigate lexical processing in aphasic participants by examining the fixation time course for rhyme (e.g., carrot– parrot) and cohort (e.g., beaker– beetle) competitors. Broca’s aphasic participants exhibited larger rhyme competition effects than age-matched controls. A re-analysis of previously reported data ( Yee, Blumstein, &amp; Sedivy, 2008) confirmed that Wernicke’s aphasic participants exhibited larger cohort competition effects. Individual-level analyses revealed a negative correlation between rhyme and cohort competition effect size across both groups of aphasic participants. Computational model simulations were performed to examine which of several accounts of lexical processing deficits in aphasia might account for the observed effects. Simulation results revealed that slower deactivation of lexical competitors could account for increased cohort competition in Wernicke’s aphasic participants; auditory perceptual impairment could account for increased rhyme competition in Broca’s aphasic participants; and a perturbation of a parameter controlling selection among competing alternatives could account for both patterns, as well as the correlation between the effects. In light of these simulation results, we discuss theoretical accounts that have the potential to explain the dynamics of spoken word recognition in aphasia and the possible roles of anterior and posterior brain regions in lexical processing and cognitive control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-934X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.01.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21371743</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRLGAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Aged ; Aphasia ; Aphasia - physiopathology ; Aphasia - psychology ; Auditory Perception ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain Hemisphere Functions ; Competition ; Computational Linguistics ; Computational models ; Control Groups ; Correlation ; Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes ; Effect Size ; Eye Movement Measurements ; Eye Movements ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Eye-tracking ; Female ; Growth curve analysis ; Humans ; Language and communication disorders ; Language Processing ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Models, Theoretical ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Oral Language ; Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology ; Perceptual Impairments ; Psychological Theory ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Recognition (Psychology) - physiology ; Rhyme ; Simulation ; Speech Perception - physiology ; Spoken word recognition ; Vocabulary ; Word Recognition ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Brain and language, 2011-05, Vol.117 (2), p.53-68</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-f36b8e0fb2a0b21f60273cc6be9cc46e5d9ca25a6581455a78b9d1aef4caf9583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-f36b8e0fb2a0b21f60273cc6be9cc46e5d9ca25a6581455a78b9d1aef4caf9583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,31270</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ922462$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24134048$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21371743$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mirman, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Eiling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumstein, Sheila E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnuson, James S.</creatorcontrib><title>Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in Aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling</title><title>Brain and language</title><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><description>► Broca’s aphasic participants showed larger rhyme competition effects than controls. ► Wernicke’s aphasic participants had larger cohort competition effects than controls. ► Rhyme and cohort effects were negatively correlated for aphasic participants. ► TRACE simulations tested several theoretical accounts of behavioral data. ► Response selection was the only one that could account for all behavioral data. We used eye-tracking to investigate lexical processing in aphasic participants by examining the fixation time course for rhyme (e.g., carrot– parrot) and cohort (e.g., beaker– beetle) competitors. Broca’s aphasic participants exhibited larger rhyme competition effects than age-matched controls. A re-analysis of previously reported data ( Yee, Blumstein, &amp; Sedivy, 2008) confirmed that Wernicke’s aphasic participants exhibited larger cohort competition effects. Individual-level analyses revealed a negative correlation between rhyme and cohort competition effect size across both groups of aphasic participants. Computational model simulations were performed to examine which of several accounts of lexical processing deficits in aphasia might account for the observed effects. Simulation results revealed that slower deactivation of lexical competitors could account for increased cohort competition in Wernicke’s aphasic participants; auditory perceptual impairment could account for increased rhyme competition in Broca’s aphasic participants; and a perturbation of a parameter controlling selection among competing alternatives could account for both patterns, as well as the correlation between the effects. In light of these simulation results, we discuss theoretical accounts that have the potential to explain the dynamics of spoken word recognition in aphasia and the possible roles of anterior and posterior brain regions in lexical processing and cognitive control.</description><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aphasia</subject><subject>Aphasia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aphasia - psychology</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain Hemisphere Functions</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Computational Linguistics</subject><subject>Computational models</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Eye Movement Measurements</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Eye-tracking</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Growth curve analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language and communication disorders</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Perceptual Impairments</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Rhyme</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Speech Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Spoken word recognition</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0093-934X</issn><issn>1090-2155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl2LEzEUhoMobq3-AkVyI3ozNZl8zIygsCxdP1jwZgXvQiZz0qY7k9RkWtl_b2Zbq96sEMjFec7Le857EHpOyYISKt9uFq32Xb8oCaULkh_hD9CMkoYUJRXiIZoR0rCiYfz7GXqS0oZkkNf0MTorKatoxdkM-es1hOgg4WBx2oYb8PhniB2OYMLKu9EFjzuwzrgxYefx-Xatk9Pv8HLvOvAGsI1hwHALxRi1uXF-hbMtbMKw3Y166tc9HkIHfS49RY-s7hM8O_5z9O1yeX3xqbj6-vHzxflVoUVTjYVlsq2B2LbUpC2plaSsmDGyhcYYLkF0jdGl0FLUlAuhq7ptOqrBcqNtI2o2Rx8OuttdO0BnwGdzvdpGN-h4q4J26t-Kd2u1CnvFSCUFq7LA66NADD92kEY1uGSg77WHsEuqrmTJhMwL_i8pS0JkFs3km3vJnCqRjaBsQtkBNTGkFMGerFMycVJt1F36akpfkfwIz10v_5761PM77gy8OgI6Gd3bqL1x6Q_HKeOET-t7ceAgOnMqL780Zcnz3HP0_ljOEe4dRJWMm26hc_lsRtUFd6_PX02Q2gg</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Mirman, Daniel</creator><creator>Yee, Eiling</creator><creator>Blumstein, Sheila E.</creator><creator>Magnuson, James S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in Aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling</title><author>Mirman, Daniel ; Yee, Eiling ; Blumstein, Sheila E. ; Magnuson, James S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-f36b8e0fb2a0b21f60273cc6be9cc46e5d9ca25a6581455a78b9d1aef4caf9583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aphasia</topic><topic>Aphasia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aphasia - psychology</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain Hemisphere Functions</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Computational Linguistics</topic><topic>Computational models</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Eye Movement Measurements</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Eye-tracking</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Growth curve analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language and communication disorders</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Perceptual Impairments</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Rhyme</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Speech Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Spoken word recognition</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mirman, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Eiling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumstein, Sheila E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnuson, James S.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mirman, Daniel</au><au>Yee, Eiling</au><au>Blumstein, Sheila E.</au><au>Magnuson, James S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ922462</ericid><atitle>Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in Aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling</atitle><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>53-68</pages><issn>0093-934X</issn><eissn>1090-2155</eissn><coden>BRLGAZ</coden><abstract>► Broca’s aphasic participants showed larger rhyme competition effects than controls. ► Wernicke’s aphasic participants had larger cohort competition effects than controls. ► Rhyme and cohort effects were negatively correlated for aphasic participants. ► TRACE simulations tested several theoretical accounts of behavioral data. ► Response selection was the only one that could account for all behavioral data. We used eye-tracking to investigate lexical processing in aphasic participants by examining the fixation time course for rhyme (e.g., carrot– parrot) and cohort (e.g., beaker– beetle) competitors. Broca’s aphasic participants exhibited larger rhyme competition effects than age-matched controls. A re-analysis of previously reported data ( Yee, Blumstein, &amp; Sedivy, 2008) confirmed that Wernicke’s aphasic participants exhibited larger cohort competition effects. Individual-level analyses revealed a negative correlation between rhyme and cohort competition effect size across both groups of aphasic participants. Computational model simulations were performed to examine which of several accounts of lexical processing deficits in aphasia might account for the observed effects. Simulation results revealed that slower deactivation of lexical competitors could account for increased cohort competition in Wernicke’s aphasic participants; auditory perceptual impairment could account for increased rhyme competition in Broca’s aphasic participants; and a perturbation of a parameter controlling selection among competing alternatives could account for both patterns, as well as the correlation between the effects. In light of these simulation results, we discuss theoretical accounts that have the potential to explain the dynamics of spoken word recognition in aphasia and the possible roles of anterior and posterior brain regions in lexical processing and cognitive control.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21371743</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bandl.2011.01.004</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-934X
ispartof Brain and language, 2011-05, Vol.117 (2), p.53-68
issn 0093-934X
1090-2155
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3076537
source Elsevier; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Aged
Aphasia
Aphasia - physiopathology
Aphasia - psychology
Auditory Perception
Biological and medical sciences
Brain Hemisphere Functions
Competition
Computational Linguistics
Computational models
Control Groups
Correlation
Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes
Effect Size
Eye Movement Measurements
Eye Movements
Eye Movements - physiology
Eye-tracking
Female
Growth curve analysis
Humans
Language and communication disorders
Language Processing
Male
Medical sciences
Models, Theoretical
Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)
Neurology
Neuropsychological Tests
Oral Language
Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology
Perceptual Impairments
Psychological Theory
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Reaction Time - physiology
Recognition (Psychology) - physiology
Rhyme
Simulation
Speech Perception - physiology
Spoken word recognition
Vocabulary
Word Recognition
Young Adult
title Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in Aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A31%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theories%20of%20spoken%20word%20recognition%20deficits%20in%20Aphasia:%20Evidence%20from%20eye-tracking%20and%20computational%20modeling&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20language&rft.au=Mirman,%20Daniel&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=53-68&rft.issn=0093-934X&rft.eissn=1090-2155&rft.coden=BRLGAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.01.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E876235609%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-f36b8e0fb2a0b21f60273cc6be9cc46e5d9ca25a6581455a78b9d1aef4caf9583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1010695133&rft_id=info:pmid/21371743&rft_ericid=EJ922462&rfr_iscdi=true