Loading…
Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in Aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling
► Broca’s aphasic participants showed larger rhyme competition effects than controls. ► Wernicke’s aphasic participants had larger cohort competition effects than controls. ► Rhyme and cohort effects were negatively correlated for aphasic participants. ► TRACE simulations tested several theoretical...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brain and language 2011-05, Vol.117 (2), p.53-68 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-f36b8e0fb2a0b21f60273cc6be9cc46e5d9ca25a6581455a78b9d1aef4caf9583 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-f36b8e0fb2a0b21f60273cc6be9cc46e5d9ca25a6581455a78b9d1aef4caf9583 |
container_end_page | 68 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 53 |
container_title | Brain and language |
container_volume | 117 |
creator | Mirman, Daniel Yee, Eiling Blumstein, Sheila E. Magnuson, James S. |
description | ► Broca’s aphasic participants showed larger rhyme competition effects than controls. ► Wernicke’s aphasic participants had larger cohort competition effects than controls. ► Rhyme and cohort effects were negatively correlated for aphasic participants. ► TRACE simulations tested several theoretical accounts of behavioral data. ► Response selection was the only one that could account for all behavioral data.
We used eye-tracking to investigate lexical processing in aphasic participants by examining the fixation time course for rhyme (e.g.,
carrot–
parrot) and cohort (e.g.,
beaker–
beetle) competitors. Broca’s aphasic participants exhibited larger rhyme competition effects than age-matched controls. A re-analysis of previously reported data (
Yee, Blumstein, & Sedivy, 2008) confirmed that Wernicke’s aphasic participants exhibited larger cohort competition effects. Individual-level analyses revealed a negative correlation between rhyme and cohort competition effect size across both groups of aphasic participants. Computational model simulations were performed to examine which of several accounts of lexical processing deficits in aphasia might account for the observed effects. Simulation results revealed that slower deactivation of lexical competitors could account for increased cohort competition in Wernicke’s aphasic participants; auditory perceptual impairment could account for increased rhyme competition in Broca’s aphasic participants; and a perturbation of a parameter controlling selection among competing alternatives could account for both patterns, as well as the correlation between the effects. In light of these simulation results, we discuss theoretical accounts that have the potential to explain the dynamics of spoken word recognition in aphasia and the possible roles of anterior and posterior brain regions in lexical processing and cognitive control. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.01.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3076537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ922462</ericid><els_id>S0093934X11000162</els_id><sourcerecordid>876235609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-f36b8e0fb2a0b21f60273cc6be9cc46e5d9ca25a6581455a78b9d1aef4caf9583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl2LEzEUhoMobq3-AkVyI3ozNZl8zIygsCxdP1jwZgXvQiZz0qY7k9RkWtl_b2Zbq96sEMjFec7Le857EHpOyYISKt9uFq32Xb8oCaULkh_hD9CMkoYUJRXiIZoR0rCiYfz7GXqS0oZkkNf0MTorKatoxdkM-es1hOgg4WBx2oYb8PhniB2OYMLKu9EFjzuwzrgxYefx-Xatk9Pv8HLvOvAGsI1hwHALxRi1uXF-hbMtbMKw3Y166tc9HkIHfS49RY-s7hM8O_5z9O1yeX3xqbj6-vHzxflVoUVTjYVlsq2B2LbUpC2plaSsmDGyhcYYLkF0jdGl0FLUlAuhq7ptOqrBcqNtI2o2Rx8OuttdO0BnwGdzvdpGN-h4q4J26t-Kd2u1CnvFSCUFq7LA66NADD92kEY1uGSg77WHsEuqrmTJhMwL_i8pS0JkFs3km3vJnCqRjaBsQtkBNTGkFMGerFMycVJt1F36akpfkfwIz10v_5761PM77gy8OgI6Gd3bqL1x6Q_HKeOET-t7ceAgOnMqL780Zcnz3HP0_ljOEe4dRJWMm26hc_lsRtUFd6_PX02Q2gg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1010695133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in Aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling</title><source>Elsevier</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Mirman, Daniel ; Yee, Eiling ; Blumstein, Sheila E. ; Magnuson, James S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mirman, Daniel ; Yee, Eiling ; Blumstein, Sheila E. ; Magnuson, James S.</creatorcontrib><description>► Broca’s aphasic participants showed larger rhyme competition effects than controls. ► Wernicke’s aphasic participants had larger cohort competition effects than controls. ► Rhyme and cohort effects were negatively correlated for aphasic participants. ► TRACE simulations tested several theoretical accounts of behavioral data. ► Response selection was the only one that could account for all behavioral data.
We used eye-tracking to investigate lexical processing in aphasic participants by examining the fixation time course for rhyme (e.g.,
carrot–
parrot) and cohort (e.g.,
beaker–
beetle) competitors. Broca’s aphasic participants exhibited larger rhyme competition effects than age-matched controls. A re-analysis of previously reported data (
Yee, Blumstein, & Sedivy, 2008) confirmed that Wernicke’s aphasic participants exhibited larger cohort competition effects. Individual-level analyses revealed a negative correlation between rhyme and cohort competition effect size across both groups of aphasic participants. Computational model simulations were performed to examine which of several accounts of lexical processing deficits in aphasia might account for the observed effects. Simulation results revealed that slower deactivation of lexical competitors could account for increased cohort competition in Wernicke’s aphasic participants; auditory perceptual impairment could account for increased rhyme competition in Broca’s aphasic participants; and a perturbation of a parameter controlling selection among competing alternatives could account for both patterns, as well as the correlation between the effects. In light of these simulation results, we discuss theoretical accounts that have the potential to explain the dynamics of spoken word recognition in aphasia and the possible roles of anterior and posterior brain regions in lexical processing and cognitive control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-934X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.01.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21371743</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRLGAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Aged ; Aphasia ; Aphasia - physiopathology ; Aphasia - psychology ; Auditory Perception ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain Hemisphere Functions ; Competition ; Computational Linguistics ; Computational models ; Control Groups ; Correlation ; Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes ; Effect Size ; Eye Movement Measurements ; Eye Movements ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Eye-tracking ; Female ; Growth curve analysis ; Humans ; Language and communication disorders ; Language Processing ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Models, Theoretical ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Oral Language ; Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology ; Perceptual Impairments ; Psychological Theory ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Recognition (Psychology) - physiology ; Rhyme ; Simulation ; Speech Perception - physiology ; Spoken word recognition ; Vocabulary ; Word Recognition ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Brain and language, 2011-05, Vol.117 (2), p.53-68</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-f36b8e0fb2a0b21f60273cc6be9cc46e5d9ca25a6581455a78b9d1aef4caf9583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-f36b8e0fb2a0b21f60273cc6be9cc46e5d9ca25a6581455a78b9d1aef4caf9583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,31270</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ922462$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24134048$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21371743$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mirman, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Eiling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumstein, Sheila E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnuson, James S.</creatorcontrib><title>Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in Aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling</title><title>Brain and language</title><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><description>► Broca’s aphasic participants showed larger rhyme competition effects than controls. ► Wernicke’s aphasic participants had larger cohort competition effects than controls. ► Rhyme and cohort effects were negatively correlated for aphasic participants. ► TRACE simulations tested several theoretical accounts of behavioral data. ► Response selection was the only one that could account for all behavioral data.
We used eye-tracking to investigate lexical processing in aphasic participants by examining the fixation time course for rhyme (e.g.,
carrot–
parrot) and cohort (e.g.,
beaker–
beetle) competitors. Broca’s aphasic participants exhibited larger rhyme competition effects than age-matched controls. A re-analysis of previously reported data (
Yee, Blumstein, & Sedivy, 2008) confirmed that Wernicke’s aphasic participants exhibited larger cohort competition effects. Individual-level analyses revealed a negative correlation between rhyme and cohort competition effect size across both groups of aphasic participants. Computational model simulations were performed to examine which of several accounts of lexical processing deficits in aphasia might account for the observed effects. Simulation results revealed that slower deactivation of lexical competitors could account for increased cohort competition in Wernicke’s aphasic participants; auditory perceptual impairment could account for increased rhyme competition in Broca’s aphasic participants; and a perturbation of a parameter controlling selection among competing alternatives could account for both patterns, as well as the correlation between the effects. In light of these simulation results, we discuss theoretical accounts that have the potential to explain the dynamics of spoken word recognition in aphasia and the possible roles of anterior and posterior brain regions in lexical processing and cognitive control.</description><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aphasia</subject><subject>Aphasia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aphasia - psychology</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain Hemisphere Functions</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Computational Linguistics</subject><subject>Computational models</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Eye Movement Measurements</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Eye-tracking</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Growth curve analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language and communication disorders</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Perceptual Impairments</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Rhyme</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Speech Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Spoken word recognition</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0093-934X</issn><issn>1090-2155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl2LEzEUhoMobq3-AkVyI3ozNZl8zIygsCxdP1jwZgXvQiZz0qY7k9RkWtl_b2Zbq96sEMjFec7Le857EHpOyYISKt9uFq32Xb8oCaULkh_hD9CMkoYUJRXiIZoR0rCiYfz7GXqS0oZkkNf0MTorKatoxdkM-es1hOgg4WBx2oYb8PhniB2OYMLKu9EFjzuwzrgxYefx-Xatk9Pv8HLvOvAGsI1hwHALxRi1uXF-hbMtbMKw3Y166tc9HkIHfS49RY-s7hM8O_5z9O1yeX3xqbj6-vHzxflVoUVTjYVlsq2B2LbUpC2plaSsmDGyhcYYLkF0jdGl0FLUlAuhq7ptOqrBcqNtI2o2Rx8OuttdO0BnwGdzvdpGN-h4q4J26t-Kd2u1CnvFSCUFq7LA66NADD92kEY1uGSg77WHsEuqrmTJhMwL_i8pS0JkFs3km3vJnCqRjaBsQtkBNTGkFMGerFMycVJt1F36akpfkfwIz10v_5761PM77gy8OgI6Gd3bqL1x6Q_HKeOET-t7ceAgOnMqL780Zcnz3HP0_ljOEe4dRJWMm26hc_lsRtUFd6_PX02Q2gg</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Mirman, Daniel</creator><creator>Yee, Eiling</creator><creator>Blumstein, Sheila E.</creator><creator>Magnuson, James S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in Aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling</title><author>Mirman, Daniel ; Yee, Eiling ; Blumstein, Sheila E. ; Magnuson, James S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-f36b8e0fb2a0b21f60273cc6be9cc46e5d9ca25a6581455a78b9d1aef4caf9583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aphasia</topic><topic>Aphasia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aphasia - psychology</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain Hemisphere Functions</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Computational Linguistics</topic><topic>Computational models</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Eye Movement Measurements</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Eye-tracking</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Growth curve analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language and communication disorders</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Perceptual Impairments</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Rhyme</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Speech Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Spoken word recognition</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mirman, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Eiling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumstein, Sheila E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnuson, James S.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mirman, Daniel</au><au>Yee, Eiling</au><au>Blumstein, Sheila E.</au><au>Magnuson, James S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ922462</ericid><atitle>Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in Aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling</atitle><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>53-68</pages><issn>0093-934X</issn><eissn>1090-2155</eissn><coden>BRLGAZ</coden><abstract>► Broca’s aphasic participants showed larger rhyme competition effects than controls. ► Wernicke’s aphasic participants had larger cohort competition effects than controls. ► Rhyme and cohort effects were negatively correlated for aphasic participants. ► TRACE simulations tested several theoretical accounts of behavioral data. ► Response selection was the only one that could account for all behavioral data.
We used eye-tracking to investigate lexical processing in aphasic participants by examining the fixation time course for rhyme (e.g.,
carrot–
parrot) and cohort (e.g.,
beaker–
beetle) competitors. Broca’s aphasic participants exhibited larger rhyme competition effects than age-matched controls. A re-analysis of previously reported data (
Yee, Blumstein, & Sedivy, 2008) confirmed that Wernicke’s aphasic participants exhibited larger cohort competition effects. Individual-level analyses revealed a negative correlation between rhyme and cohort competition effect size across both groups of aphasic participants. Computational model simulations were performed to examine which of several accounts of lexical processing deficits in aphasia might account for the observed effects. Simulation results revealed that slower deactivation of lexical competitors could account for increased cohort competition in Wernicke’s aphasic participants; auditory perceptual impairment could account for increased rhyme competition in Broca’s aphasic participants; and a perturbation of a parameter controlling selection among competing alternatives could account for both patterns, as well as the correlation between the effects. In light of these simulation results, we discuss theoretical accounts that have the potential to explain the dynamics of spoken word recognition in aphasia and the possible roles of anterior and posterior brain regions in lexical processing and cognitive control.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21371743</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bandl.2011.01.004</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0093-934X |
ispartof | Brain and language, 2011-05, Vol.117 (2), p.53-68 |
issn | 0093-934X 1090-2155 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3076537 |
source | Elsevier; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Adult and adolescent clinical studies Aged Aphasia Aphasia - physiopathology Aphasia - psychology Auditory Perception Biological and medical sciences Brain Hemisphere Functions Competition Computational Linguistics Computational models Control Groups Correlation Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes Effect Size Eye Movement Measurements Eye Movements Eye Movements - physiology Eye-tracking Female Growth curve analysis Humans Language and communication disorders Language Processing Male Medical sciences Models, Theoretical Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) Neurology Neuropsychological Tests Oral Language Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology Perceptual Impairments Psychological Theory Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reaction Time - physiology Recognition (Psychology) - physiology Rhyme Simulation Speech Perception - physiology Spoken word recognition Vocabulary Word Recognition Young Adult |
title | Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in Aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A31%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theories%20of%20spoken%20word%20recognition%20deficits%20in%20Aphasia:%20Evidence%20from%20eye-tracking%20and%20computational%20modeling&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20language&rft.au=Mirman,%20Daniel&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=53-68&rft.issn=0093-934X&rft.eissn=1090-2155&rft.coden=BRLGAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.01.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E876235609%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-f36b8e0fb2a0b21f60273cc6be9cc46e5d9ca25a6581455a78b9d1aef4caf9583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1010695133&rft_id=info:pmid/21371743&rft_ericid=EJ922462&rfr_iscdi=true |