Loading…

Toward Quantitative Small Animal Pinhole SPECT: Assessment of Quantitation Accuracy Prior to Image Compensations

Purpose We assessed the quantitation accuracy of small animal pinhole single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) under the current preclinical settings, where image compensations are not routinely applied. Procedures The effects of several common image-degrading factors and imaging parameter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular imaging and biology 2009-05, Vol.11 (3), p.195-203
Main Authors: Chen, Chia-Lin, Wang, Yuchuan, Lee, Jason J. S., Tsui, Benjamin M. W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-f2a2c9d35762df02febbd863c9a2e1ff49411bcc066fa9a1ea2d3388edd2b6003
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-f2a2c9d35762df02febbd863c9a2e1ff49411bcc066fa9a1ea2d3388edd2b6003
container_end_page 203
container_issue 3
container_start_page 195
container_title Molecular imaging and biology
container_volume 11
creator Chen, Chia-Lin
Wang, Yuchuan
Lee, Jason J. S.
Tsui, Benjamin M. W.
description Purpose We assessed the quantitation accuracy of small animal pinhole single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) under the current preclinical settings, where image compensations are not routinely applied. Procedures The effects of several common image-degrading factors and imaging parameters on quantitation accuracy were evaluated using Monte-Carlo simulation methods. Typical preclinical imaging configurations were modeled, and quantitative analyses were performed based on image reconstructions without compensating for attenuation, scatter, and limited system resolution. Results Using mouse-sized phantom studies as examples, attenuation effects alone degraded quantitation accuracy by up to −18% (Tc-99m or In-111) or −41% (I-125). The inclusion of scatter effects changed the above numbers to −12% (Tc-99m or In-111) and −21% (I-125), respectively, indicating the significance of scatter in quantitative I-125 imaging. Region-of-interest (ROI) definitions have greater impacts on regional quantitation accuracy for small sphere sources as compared to attenuation and scatter effects. For the same ROI, SPECT acquisitions using pinhole apertures of different sizes could significantly affect the outcome, whereas the use of different radii-of-rotation yielded negligible differences in quantitation accuracy for the imaging configurations simulated. Conclusions We have systematically quantified the influence of several factors affecting the quantitation accuracy of small animal pinhole SPECT. In order to consistently achieve accurate quantitation within 5% of the truth, comprehensive image compensation methods are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11307-008-0181-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3085830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67202758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-f2a2c9d35762df02febbd863c9a2e1ff49411bcc066fa9a1ea2d3388edd2b6003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFklFrFDEQx4MotlY_gC8SFHxbnUl2k6wPwnFUWyh44vkcstnsdctucia7lX57c72jrULxaULmN_9kZv6EvEb4gADyY0LkIAsAVQAqLOAJOUYloGAA7Gk-V1wUKDg7Ii9SugJAiYw_J0dYQ6l4KY7Jdh1-m9jS77PxUz-Zqb929MdohoEufJ8jXfX-Mgz5cnW6XH-ii5RcSqPzEw3dg7Lg6cLaORp7Q1exD5FOgZ6PZuPoMoxb59MtlF6SZ50Zknt1iCfk55fT9fKsuPj29Xy5uChsxcRUdMwwW7e8koK1HbDONU2rBLe1YQ67rqxLxMZaEKIztUFnWMu5Uq5tWSMA-An5vNfdzs3oWps_HM2gtzE3FW90ML3-O-P7S70J15qDqhTfCbw_CMTwa3Zp0mOfrBsG412YkxaSAZMZ_R_IQEBZ3oLv_gGvwhx9noJmUklWybygTL19lALEvNqyzhDuIRtDStF1d40h6J039N4bOntD77yhdw29eTiR-4qDGTLA9kDKKb9x8f7lx1X_AAvPxTo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201120049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward Quantitative Small Animal Pinhole SPECT: Assessment of Quantitation Accuracy Prior to Image Compensations</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Chen, Chia-Lin ; Wang, Yuchuan ; Lee, Jason J. S. ; Tsui, Benjamin M. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chia-Lin ; Wang, Yuchuan ; Lee, Jason J. S. ; Tsui, Benjamin M. W.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose We assessed the quantitation accuracy of small animal pinhole single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) under the current preclinical settings, where image compensations are not routinely applied. Procedures The effects of several common image-degrading factors and imaging parameters on quantitation accuracy were evaluated using Monte-Carlo simulation methods. Typical preclinical imaging configurations were modeled, and quantitative analyses were performed based on image reconstructions without compensating for attenuation, scatter, and limited system resolution. Results Using mouse-sized phantom studies as examples, attenuation effects alone degraded quantitation accuracy by up to −18% (Tc-99m or In-111) or −41% (I-125). The inclusion of scatter effects changed the above numbers to −12% (Tc-99m or In-111) and −21% (I-125), respectively, indicating the significance of scatter in quantitative I-125 imaging. Region-of-interest (ROI) definitions have greater impacts on regional quantitation accuracy for small sphere sources as compared to attenuation and scatter effects. For the same ROI, SPECT acquisitions using pinhole apertures of different sizes could significantly affect the outcome, whereas the use of different radii-of-rotation yielded negligible differences in quantitation accuracy for the imaging configurations simulated. Conclusions We have systematically quantified the influence of several factors affecting the quantitation accuracy of small animal pinhole SPECT. In order to consistently achieve accurate quantitation within 5% of the truth, comprehensive image compensation methods are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1536-1632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1860-2002</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11307-008-0181-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19048346</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Animals ; Attenuation ; Computed tomography ; Configurations ; Emission analysis ; Image degradation ; Image reconstruction ; Imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mice ; Monte Carlo Method ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Photon emission ; Pinholes ; Quantitation ; Radiology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Article ; Scattering ; Single photon emission computed tomography ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - standards</subject><ispartof>Molecular imaging and biology, 2009-05, Vol.11 (3), p.195-203</ispartof><rights>Academy of Molecular Imaging 2008</rights><rights>Academy of Molecular Imaging 2009</rights><rights>Academy of Molecular Imaging 2008.</rights><rights>Academy of Molecular Imaging, 2008 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-f2a2c9d35762df02febbd863c9a2e1ff49411bcc066fa9a1ea2d3388edd2b6003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-f2a2c9d35762df02febbd863c9a2e1ff49411bcc066fa9a1ea2d3388edd2b6003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19048346$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chia-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yuchuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jason J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsui, Benjamin M. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Toward Quantitative Small Animal Pinhole SPECT: Assessment of Quantitation Accuracy Prior to Image Compensations</title><title>Molecular imaging and biology</title><addtitle>Mol Imaging Biol</addtitle><addtitle>Mol Imaging Biol</addtitle><description>Purpose We assessed the quantitation accuracy of small animal pinhole single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) under the current preclinical settings, where image compensations are not routinely applied. Procedures The effects of several common image-degrading factors and imaging parameters on quantitation accuracy were evaluated using Monte-Carlo simulation methods. Typical preclinical imaging configurations were modeled, and quantitative analyses were performed based on image reconstructions without compensating for attenuation, scatter, and limited system resolution. Results Using mouse-sized phantom studies as examples, attenuation effects alone degraded quantitation accuracy by up to −18% (Tc-99m or In-111) or −41% (I-125). The inclusion of scatter effects changed the above numbers to −12% (Tc-99m or In-111) and −21% (I-125), respectively, indicating the significance of scatter in quantitative I-125 imaging. Region-of-interest (ROI) definitions have greater impacts on regional quantitation accuracy for small sphere sources as compared to attenuation and scatter effects. For the same ROI, SPECT acquisitions using pinhole apertures of different sizes could significantly affect the outcome, whereas the use of different radii-of-rotation yielded negligible differences in quantitation accuracy for the imaging configurations simulated. Conclusions We have systematically quantified the influence of several factors affecting the quantitation accuracy of small animal pinhole SPECT. In order to consistently achieve accurate quantitation within 5% of the truth, comprehensive image compensation methods are needed.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Attenuation</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Image degradation</subject><subject>Image reconstruction</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Photon emission</subject><subject>Pinholes</subject><subject>Quantitation</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Scattering</subject><subject>Single photon emission computed tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - standards</subject><issn>1536-1632</issn><issn>1860-2002</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFklFrFDEQx4MotlY_gC8SFHxbnUl2k6wPwnFUWyh44vkcstnsdctucia7lX57c72jrULxaULmN_9kZv6EvEb4gADyY0LkIAsAVQAqLOAJOUYloGAA7Gk-V1wUKDg7Ii9SugJAiYw_J0dYQ6l4KY7Jdh1-m9jS77PxUz-Zqb929MdohoEufJ8jXfX-Mgz5cnW6XH-ii5RcSqPzEw3dg7Lg6cLaORp7Q1exD5FOgZ6PZuPoMoxb59MtlF6SZ50Zknt1iCfk55fT9fKsuPj29Xy5uChsxcRUdMwwW7e8koK1HbDONU2rBLe1YQ67rqxLxMZaEKIztUFnWMu5Uq5tWSMA-An5vNfdzs3oWps_HM2gtzE3FW90ML3-O-P7S70J15qDqhTfCbw_CMTwa3Zp0mOfrBsG412YkxaSAZMZ_R_IQEBZ3oLv_gGvwhx9noJmUklWybygTL19lALEvNqyzhDuIRtDStF1d40h6J039N4bOntD77yhdw29eTiR-4qDGTLA9kDKKb9x8f7lx1X_AAvPxTo</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Chen, Chia-Lin</creator><creator>Wang, Yuchuan</creator><creator>Lee, Jason J. S.</creator><creator>Tsui, Benjamin M. W.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Toward Quantitative Small Animal Pinhole SPECT: Assessment of Quantitation Accuracy Prior to Image Compensations</title><author>Chen, Chia-Lin ; Wang, Yuchuan ; Lee, Jason J. S. ; Tsui, Benjamin M. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-f2a2c9d35762df02febbd863c9a2e1ff49411bcc066fa9a1ea2d3388edd2b6003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Attenuation</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Image degradation</topic><topic>Image reconstruction</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Photon emission</topic><topic>Pinholes</topic><topic>Quantitation</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Scattering</topic><topic>Single photon emission computed tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chia-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yuchuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jason J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsui, Benjamin M. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Molecular imaging and biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Chia-Lin</au><au>Wang, Yuchuan</au><au>Lee, Jason J. S.</au><au>Tsui, Benjamin M. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward Quantitative Small Animal Pinhole SPECT: Assessment of Quantitation Accuracy Prior to Image Compensations</atitle><jtitle>Molecular imaging and biology</jtitle><stitle>Mol Imaging Biol</stitle><addtitle>Mol Imaging Biol</addtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>195</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>195-203</pages><issn>1536-1632</issn><eissn>1860-2002</eissn><abstract>Purpose We assessed the quantitation accuracy of small animal pinhole single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) under the current preclinical settings, where image compensations are not routinely applied. Procedures The effects of several common image-degrading factors and imaging parameters on quantitation accuracy were evaluated using Monte-Carlo simulation methods. Typical preclinical imaging configurations were modeled, and quantitative analyses were performed based on image reconstructions without compensating for attenuation, scatter, and limited system resolution. Results Using mouse-sized phantom studies as examples, attenuation effects alone degraded quantitation accuracy by up to −18% (Tc-99m or In-111) or −41% (I-125). The inclusion of scatter effects changed the above numbers to −12% (Tc-99m or In-111) and −21% (I-125), respectively, indicating the significance of scatter in quantitative I-125 imaging. Region-of-interest (ROI) definitions have greater impacts on regional quantitation accuracy for small sphere sources as compared to attenuation and scatter effects. For the same ROI, SPECT acquisitions using pinhole apertures of different sizes could significantly affect the outcome, whereas the use of different radii-of-rotation yielded negligible differences in quantitation accuracy for the imaging configurations simulated. Conclusions We have systematically quantified the influence of several factors affecting the quantitation accuracy of small animal pinhole SPECT. In order to consistently achieve accurate quantitation within 5% of the truth, comprehensive image compensation methods are needed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>19048346</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11307-008-0181-0</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1536-1632
ispartof Molecular imaging and biology, 2009-05, Vol.11 (3), p.195-203
issn 1536-1632
1860-2002
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3085830
source Springer Nature
subjects Accuracy
Animals
Attenuation
Computed tomography
Configurations
Emission analysis
Image degradation
Image reconstruction
Imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mice
Monte Carlo Method
Monte Carlo simulation
Phantoms, Imaging
Photon emission
Pinholes
Quantitation
Radiology
Reproducibility of Results
Research Article
Scattering
Single photon emission computed tomography
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - standards
title Toward Quantitative Small Animal Pinhole SPECT: Assessment of Quantitation Accuracy Prior to Image Compensations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A44%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20Quantitative%20Small%20Animal%20Pinhole%20SPECT:%20Assessment%20of%20Quantitation%20Accuracy%20Prior%20to%20Image%20Compensations&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20imaging%20and%20biology&rft.au=Chen,%20Chia-Lin&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=195-203&rft.issn=1536-1632&rft.eissn=1860-2002&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11307-008-0181-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67202758%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-f2a2c9d35762df02febbd863c9a2e1ff49411bcc066fa9a1ea2d3388edd2b6003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201120049&rft_id=info:pmid/19048346&rfr_iscdi=true