Loading…

Bilateral Oophorectomy in Relation to Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Confounding by Nonmalignant Indications for Surgery?

Bilateral oophorectomy is often performed during hysterectomy for benign conditions and can reduce breast cancer risk by 20%-50% when performed at younger ages. Accuracy of estimating the decrease in breast cancer risk associated with bilateral oophorectomy could be affected by common conditions tha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of epidemiology 2011-05, Vol.173 (10), p.1111-1120
Main Authors: NICHOLS, Hazel B, VISVANATHAN, Kala, NEWCOMB, Polly A, HAMPTON, John M, EGAN, Kathleen M, TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda, TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-3fe3aa88b126fb5ad1f20f0199534a44225e8665842d00dac2913d0f8239eaa3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-3fe3aa88b126fb5ad1f20f0199534a44225e8665842d00dac2913d0f8239eaa3
container_end_page 1120
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1111
container_title American journal of epidemiology
container_volume 173
creator NICHOLS, Hazel B
VISVANATHAN, Kala
NEWCOMB, Polly A
HAMPTON, John M
EGAN, Kathleen M
TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda
TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy
description Bilateral oophorectomy is often performed during hysterectomy for benign conditions and can reduce breast cancer risk by 20%-50% when performed at younger ages. Accuracy of estimating the decrease in breast cancer risk associated with bilateral oophorectomy could be affected by common conditions that lead to surgery, such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis. The authors examined the potential for confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery on breast cancer risk estimates in a population-based case-control study of invasive breast cancer newly diagnosed in 1992-1995. Breast cancer cases (N = 4,935) aged 50-79 years were identified from Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire tumor registries; similarly aged controls (N = 5,111) were selected from driver's license and Medicare lists. Reproductive and medical history was obtained from structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with multivariate logistic regression. Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy at age ≤ 40 years had significantly reduced odds of breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.90) compared with women with intact ovaries and uterus. Effect estimates were virtually unchanged after adjustment for uterine fibroids or endometriosis history. Results indicate that breast cancer risk reductions conferred by bilateral oophorectomy are not strongly confounded by failure to account for nonmalignant indications for surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/aje/kwq510
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3105288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2364078141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-3fe3aa88b126fb5ad1f20f0199534a44225e8665842d00dac2913d0f8239eaa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModq3e-AMkCCIIY08-JjvxQrGLH4VipfY-nJ1JttnOJNtkRtk7f7qpu9aPG68COU9e8p6HkMcMXjLQ4gjX9ujq23XN4A6ZMTlXleK1uktmAMArzRU_IA9yXgMwpmu4Tw44kwKY5jPy_dj3ONqEPT2Lm8uYbDvGYUt9oOe2THwMdIz03OcrGh39HPM42BA3OOXy5DhZzCNdYGhtekUXMbg4hc6HFV1u6acYBuz9KmAY6Um5bn_mZepiol-mtLJp--Yhueewz_bR_jwkF-_fXSw-VqdnH04Wb0-rthZ8rISzArFplowrt6yxY46DKx10LSRKyXltG6XqRvIOoMOWayY6cA0X2iKKQ_J6F7uZloPtWhvG0tlskh8wbU1Eb_6eBH9pVvGrEQxq3jQl4Pk-IMXryebRDD63tu8x2Dhl02jNajHX4v-kkloBCF7Ip_-Q6zilUNZQIK0ESHkT92IHtSnmnKy7_TQDc-PfFP9m57_AT_6seYv-El6AZ3sAc4u9S0Wdz785WfY1h7n4AS80u0Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>869630443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bilateral Oophorectomy in Relation to Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Confounding by Nonmalignant Indications for Surgery?</title><source>Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)</source><creator>NICHOLS, Hazel B ; VISVANATHAN, Kala ; NEWCOMB, Polly A ; HAMPTON, John M ; EGAN, Kathleen M ; TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda ; TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy</creator><creatorcontrib>NICHOLS, Hazel B ; VISVANATHAN, Kala ; NEWCOMB, Polly A ; HAMPTON, John M ; EGAN, Kathleen M ; TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda ; TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy</creatorcontrib><description>Bilateral oophorectomy is often performed during hysterectomy for benign conditions and can reduce breast cancer risk by 20%-50% when performed at younger ages. Accuracy of estimating the decrease in breast cancer risk associated with bilateral oophorectomy could be affected by common conditions that lead to surgery, such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis. The authors examined the potential for confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery on breast cancer risk estimates in a population-based case-control study of invasive breast cancer newly diagnosed in 1992-1995. Breast cancer cases (N = 4,935) aged 50-79 years were identified from Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire tumor registries; similarly aged controls (N = 5,111) were selected from driver's license and Medicare lists. Reproductive and medical history was obtained from structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with multivariate logistic regression. Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy at age ≤ 40 years had significantly reduced odds of breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.90) compared with women with intact ovaries and uterus. Effect estimates were virtually unchanged after adjustment for uterine fibroids or endometriosis history. Results indicate that breast cancer risk reductions conferred by bilateral oophorectomy are not strongly confounded by failure to account for nonmalignant indications for surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-6256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq510</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21430192</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJEPAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Case-Control Studies ; Confidence Intervals ; Endometriosis ; Endometriosis - epidemiology ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; Fibroids ; General aspects ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Leiomyoma - epidemiology ; Logistic Models ; Mammary gland diseases ; Massachusetts - epidemiology ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; New Hampshire - epidemiology ; Non tumoral diseases ; Odds Ratio ; Ovariectomy ; Practice of Epidemiology ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Risk Factors ; Tumors ; Wisconsin - epidemiology ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>American journal of epidemiology, 2011-05, Vol.173 (10), p.1111-1120</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) May 15, 2011</rights><rights>American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-3fe3aa88b126fb5ad1f20f0199534a44225e8665842d00dac2913d0f8239eaa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-3fe3aa88b126fb5ad1f20f0199534a44225e8665842d00dac2913d0f8239eaa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24239707$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21430192$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NICHOLS, Hazel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VISVANATHAN, Kala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEWCOMB, Polly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAMPTON, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EGAN, Kathleen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy</creatorcontrib><title>Bilateral Oophorectomy in Relation to Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Confounding by Nonmalignant Indications for Surgery?</title><title>American journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Bilateral oophorectomy is often performed during hysterectomy for benign conditions and can reduce breast cancer risk by 20%-50% when performed at younger ages. Accuracy of estimating the decrease in breast cancer risk associated with bilateral oophorectomy could be affected by common conditions that lead to surgery, such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis. The authors examined the potential for confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery on breast cancer risk estimates in a population-based case-control study of invasive breast cancer newly diagnosed in 1992-1995. Breast cancer cases (N = 4,935) aged 50-79 years were identified from Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire tumor registries; similarly aged controls (N = 5,111) were selected from driver's license and Medicare lists. Reproductive and medical history was obtained from structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with multivariate logistic regression. Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy at age ≤ 40 years had significantly reduced odds of breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.90) compared with women with intact ovaries and uterus. Effect estimates were virtually unchanged after adjustment for uterine fibroids or endometriosis history. Results indicate that breast cancer risk reductions conferred by bilateral oophorectomy are not strongly confounded by failure to account for nonmalignant indications for surgery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Endometriosis</subject><subject>Endometriosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>Fibroids</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Leiomyoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Massachusetts - epidemiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>New Hampshire - epidemiology</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Ovariectomy</subject><subject>Practice of Epidemiology</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Wisconsin - epidemiology</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0002-9262</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModq3e-AMkCCIIY08-JjvxQrGLH4VipfY-nJ1JttnOJNtkRtk7f7qpu9aPG68COU9e8p6HkMcMXjLQ4gjX9ujq23XN4A6ZMTlXleK1uktmAMArzRU_IA9yXgMwpmu4Tw44kwKY5jPy_dj3ONqEPT2Lm8uYbDvGYUt9oOe2THwMdIz03OcrGh39HPM42BA3OOXy5DhZzCNdYGhtekUXMbg4hc6HFV1u6acYBuz9KmAY6Um5bn_mZepiol-mtLJp--Yhueewz_bR_jwkF-_fXSw-VqdnH04Wb0-rthZ8rISzArFplowrt6yxY46DKx10LSRKyXltG6XqRvIOoMOWayY6cA0X2iKKQ_J6F7uZloPtWhvG0tlskh8wbU1Eb_6eBH9pVvGrEQxq3jQl4Pk-IMXryebRDD63tu8x2Dhl02jNajHX4v-kkloBCF7Ip_-Q6zilUNZQIK0ESHkT92IHtSnmnKy7_TQDc-PfFP9m57_AT_6seYv-El6AZ3sAc4u9S0Wdz785WfY1h7n4AS80u0Y</recordid><startdate>20110515</startdate><enddate>20110515</enddate><creator>NICHOLS, Hazel B</creator><creator>VISVANATHAN, Kala</creator><creator>NEWCOMB, Polly A</creator><creator>HAMPTON, John M</creator><creator>EGAN, Kathleen M</creator><creator>TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda</creator><creator>TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110515</creationdate><title>Bilateral Oophorectomy in Relation to Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Confounding by Nonmalignant Indications for Surgery?</title><author>NICHOLS, Hazel B ; VISVANATHAN, Kala ; NEWCOMB, Polly A ; HAMPTON, John M ; EGAN, Kathleen M ; TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda ; TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-3fe3aa88b126fb5ad1f20f0199534a44225e8665842d00dac2913d0f8239eaa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Endometriosis</topic><topic>Endometriosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>Fibroids</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Leiomyoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Massachusetts - epidemiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>New Hampshire - epidemiology</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Ovariectomy</topic><topic>Practice of Epidemiology</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Wisconsin - epidemiology</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NICHOLS, Hazel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VISVANATHAN, Kala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEWCOMB, Polly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAMPTON, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EGAN, Kathleen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NICHOLS, Hazel B</au><au>VISVANATHAN, Kala</au><au>NEWCOMB, Polly A</au><au>HAMPTON, John M</au><au>EGAN, Kathleen M</au><au>TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda</au><au>TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bilateral Oophorectomy in Relation to Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Confounding by Nonmalignant Indications for Surgery?</atitle><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2011-05-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>173</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1111</spage><epage>1120</epage><pages>1111-1120</pages><issn>0002-9262</issn><eissn>1476-6256</eissn><coden>AJEPAS</coden><abstract>Bilateral oophorectomy is often performed during hysterectomy for benign conditions and can reduce breast cancer risk by 20%-50% when performed at younger ages. Accuracy of estimating the decrease in breast cancer risk associated with bilateral oophorectomy could be affected by common conditions that lead to surgery, such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis. The authors examined the potential for confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery on breast cancer risk estimates in a population-based case-control study of invasive breast cancer newly diagnosed in 1992-1995. Breast cancer cases (N = 4,935) aged 50-79 years were identified from Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire tumor registries; similarly aged controls (N = 5,111) were selected from driver's license and Medicare lists. Reproductive and medical history was obtained from structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with multivariate logistic regression. Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy at age ≤ 40 years had significantly reduced odds of breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.90) compared with women with intact ovaries and uterus. Effect estimates were virtually unchanged after adjustment for uterine fibroids or endometriosis history. Results indicate that breast cancer risk reductions conferred by bilateral oophorectomy are not strongly confounded by failure to account for nonmalignant indications for surgery.</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>21430192</pmid><doi>10.1093/aje/kwq510</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9262
ispartof American journal of epidemiology, 2011-05, Vol.173 (10), p.1111-1120
issn 0002-9262
1476-6256
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3105288
source Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology
Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control
Case-Control Studies
Confidence Intervals
Endometriosis
Endometriosis - epidemiology
Epidemiology
Female
Female genital diseases
Fibroids
General aspects
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Hysterectomy
Leiomyoma - epidemiology
Logistic Models
Mammary gland diseases
Massachusetts - epidemiology
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
New Hampshire - epidemiology
Non tumoral diseases
Odds Ratio
Ovariectomy
Practice of Epidemiology
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Risk Factors
Tumors
Wisconsin - epidemiology
Womens health
title Bilateral Oophorectomy in Relation to Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Confounding by Nonmalignant Indications for Surgery?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A25%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bilateral%20Oophorectomy%20in%20Relation%20to%20Risk%20of%20Postmenopausal%20Breast%20Cancer:%20Confounding%20by%20Nonmalignant%20Indications%20for%20Surgery?&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=NICHOLS,%20Hazel%20B&rft.date=2011-05-15&rft.volume=173&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1111&rft.epage=1120&rft.pages=1111-1120&rft.issn=0002-9262&rft.eissn=1476-6256&rft.coden=AJEPAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/aje/kwq510&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2364078141%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-3fe3aa88b126fb5ad1f20f0199534a44225e8665842d00dac2913d0f8239eaa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=869630443&rft_id=info:pmid/21430192&rfr_iscdi=true