Loading…
Bilateral Oophorectomy in Relation to Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Confounding by Nonmalignant Indications for Surgery?
Bilateral oophorectomy is often performed during hysterectomy for benign conditions and can reduce breast cancer risk by 20%-50% when performed at younger ages. Accuracy of estimating the decrease in breast cancer risk associated with bilateral oophorectomy could be affected by common conditions tha...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of epidemiology 2011-05, Vol.173 (10), p.1111-1120 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-3fe3aa88b126fb5ad1f20f0199534a44225e8665842d00dac2913d0f8239eaa3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-3fe3aa88b126fb5ad1f20f0199534a44225e8665842d00dac2913d0f8239eaa3 |
container_end_page | 1120 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1111 |
container_title | American journal of epidemiology |
container_volume | 173 |
creator | NICHOLS, Hazel B VISVANATHAN, Kala NEWCOMB, Polly A HAMPTON, John M EGAN, Kathleen M TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy |
description | Bilateral oophorectomy is often performed during hysterectomy for benign conditions and can reduce breast cancer risk by 20%-50% when performed at younger ages. Accuracy of estimating the decrease in breast cancer risk associated with bilateral oophorectomy could be affected by common conditions that lead to surgery, such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis. The authors examined the potential for confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery on breast cancer risk estimates in a population-based case-control study of invasive breast cancer newly diagnosed in 1992-1995. Breast cancer cases (N = 4,935) aged 50-79 years were identified from Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire tumor registries; similarly aged controls (N = 5,111) were selected from driver's license and Medicare lists. Reproductive and medical history was obtained from structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with multivariate logistic regression. Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy at age ≤ 40 years had significantly reduced odds of breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.90) compared with women with intact ovaries and uterus. Effect estimates were virtually unchanged after adjustment for uterine fibroids or endometriosis history. Results indicate that breast cancer risk reductions conferred by bilateral oophorectomy are not strongly confounded by failure to account for nonmalignant indications for surgery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/aje/kwq510 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3105288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2364078141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-3fe3aa88b126fb5ad1f20f0199534a44225e8665842d00dac2913d0f8239eaa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModq3e-AMkCCIIY08-JjvxQrGLH4VipfY-nJ1JttnOJNtkRtk7f7qpu9aPG68COU9e8p6HkMcMXjLQ4gjX9ujq23XN4A6ZMTlXleK1uktmAMArzRU_IA9yXgMwpmu4Tw44kwKY5jPy_dj3ONqEPT2Lm8uYbDvGYUt9oOe2THwMdIz03OcrGh39HPM42BA3OOXy5DhZzCNdYGhtekUXMbg4hc6HFV1u6acYBuz9KmAY6Um5bn_mZepiol-mtLJp--Yhueewz_bR_jwkF-_fXSw-VqdnH04Wb0-rthZ8rISzArFplowrt6yxY46DKx10LSRKyXltG6XqRvIOoMOWayY6cA0X2iKKQ_J6F7uZloPtWhvG0tlskh8wbU1Eb_6eBH9pVvGrEQxq3jQl4Pk-IMXryebRDD63tu8x2Dhl02jNajHX4v-kkloBCF7Ip_-Q6zilUNZQIK0ESHkT92IHtSnmnKy7_TQDc-PfFP9m57_AT_6seYv-El6AZ3sAc4u9S0Wdz785WfY1h7n4AS80u0Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>869630443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bilateral Oophorectomy in Relation to Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Confounding by Nonmalignant Indications for Surgery?</title><source>Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)</source><creator>NICHOLS, Hazel B ; VISVANATHAN, Kala ; NEWCOMB, Polly A ; HAMPTON, John M ; EGAN, Kathleen M ; TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda ; TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy</creator><creatorcontrib>NICHOLS, Hazel B ; VISVANATHAN, Kala ; NEWCOMB, Polly A ; HAMPTON, John M ; EGAN, Kathleen M ; TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda ; TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy</creatorcontrib><description>Bilateral oophorectomy is often performed during hysterectomy for benign conditions and can reduce breast cancer risk by 20%-50% when performed at younger ages. Accuracy of estimating the decrease in breast cancer risk associated with bilateral oophorectomy could be affected by common conditions that lead to surgery, such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis. The authors examined the potential for confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery on breast cancer risk estimates in a population-based case-control study of invasive breast cancer newly diagnosed in 1992-1995. Breast cancer cases (N = 4,935) aged 50-79 years were identified from Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire tumor registries; similarly aged controls (N = 5,111) were selected from driver's license and Medicare lists. Reproductive and medical history was obtained from structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with multivariate logistic regression. Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy at age ≤ 40 years had significantly reduced odds of breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.90) compared with women with intact ovaries and uterus. Effect estimates were virtually unchanged after adjustment for uterine fibroids or endometriosis history. Results indicate that breast cancer risk reductions conferred by bilateral oophorectomy are not strongly confounded by failure to account for nonmalignant indications for surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-6256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq510</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21430192</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJEPAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Case-Control Studies ; Confidence Intervals ; Endometriosis ; Endometriosis - epidemiology ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; Fibroids ; General aspects ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Leiomyoma - epidemiology ; Logistic Models ; Mammary gland diseases ; Massachusetts - epidemiology ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; New Hampshire - epidemiology ; Non tumoral diseases ; Odds Ratio ; Ovariectomy ; Practice of Epidemiology ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Risk Factors ; Tumors ; Wisconsin - epidemiology ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>American journal of epidemiology, 2011-05, Vol.173 (10), p.1111-1120</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) May 15, 2011</rights><rights>American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-3fe3aa88b126fb5ad1f20f0199534a44225e8665842d00dac2913d0f8239eaa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-3fe3aa88b126fb5ad1f20f0199534a44225e8665842d00dac2913d0f8239eaa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24239707$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21430192$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NICHOLS, Hazel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VISVANATHAN, Kala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEWCOMB, Polly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAMPTON, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EGAN, Kathleen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy</creatorcontrib><title>Bilateral Oophorectomy in Relation to Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Confounding by Nonmalignant Indications for Surgery?</title><title>American journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Bilateral oophorectomy is often performed during hysterectomy for benign conditions and can reduce breast cancer risk by 20%-50% when performed at younger ages. Accuracy of estimating the decrease in breast cancer risk associated with bilateral oophorectomy could be affected by common conditions that lead to surgery, such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis. The authors examined the potential for confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery on breast cancer risk estimates in a population-based case-control study of invasive breast cancer newly diagnosed in 1992-1995. Breast cancer cases (N = 4,935) aged 50-79 years were identified from Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire tumor registries; similarly aged controls (N = 5,111) were selected from driver's license and Medicare lists. Reproductive and medical history was obtained from structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with multivariate logistic regression. Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy at age ≤ 40 years had significantly reduced odds of breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.90) compared with women with intact ovaries and uterus. Effect estimates were virtually unchanged after adjustment for uterine fibroids or endometriosis history. Results indicate that breast cancer risk reductions conferred by bilateral oophorectomy are not strongly confounded by failure to account for nonmalignant indications for surgery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Endometriosis</subject><subject>Endometriosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>Fibroids</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Leiomyoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Massachusetts - epidemiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>New Hampshire - epidemiology</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Ovariectomy</subject><subject>Practice of Epidemiology</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Wisconsin - epidemiology</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0002-9262</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModq3e-AMkCCIIY08-JjvxQrGLH4VipfY-nJ1JttnOJNtkRtk7f7qpu9aPG68COU9e8p6HkMcMXjLQ4gjX9ujq23XN4A6ZMTlXleK1uktmAMArzRU_IA9yXgMwpmu4Tw44kwKY5jPy_dj3ONqEPT2Lm8uYbDvGYUt9oOe2THwMdIz03OcrGh39HPM42BA3OOXy5DhZzCNdYGhtekUXMbg4hc6HFV1u6acYBuz9KmAY6Um5bn_mZepiol-mtLJp--Yhueewz_bR_jwkF-_fXSw-VqdnH04Wb0-rthZ8rISzArFplowrt6yxY46DKx10LSRKyXltG6XqRvIOoMOWayY6cA0X2iKKQ_J6F7uZloPtWhvG0tlskh8wbU1Eb_6eBH9pVvGrEQxq3jQl4Pk-IMXryebRDD63tu8x2Dhl02jNajHX4v-kkloBCF7Ip_-Q6zilUNZQIK0ESHkT92IHtSnmnKy7_TQDc-PfFP9m57_AT_6seYv-El6AZ3sAc4u9S0Wdz785WfY1h7n4AS80u0Y</recordid><startdate>20110515</startdate><enddate>20110515</enddate><creator>NICHOLS, Hazel B</creator><creator>VISVANATHAN, Kala</creator><creator>NEWCOMB, Polly A</creator><creator>HAMPTON, John M</creator><creator>EGAN, Kathleen M</creator><creator>TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda</creator><creator>TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110515</creationdate><title>Bilateral Oophorectomy in Relation to Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Confounding by Nonmalignant Indications for Surgery?</title><author>NICHOLS, Hazel B ; VISVANATHAN, Kala ; NEWCOMB, Polly A ; HAMPTON, John M ; EGAN, Kathleen M ; TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda ; TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-3fe3aa88b126fb5ad1f20f0199534a44225e8665842d00dac2913d0f8239eaa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Endometriosis</topic><topic>Endometriosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>Fibroids</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Leiomyoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Massachusetts - epidemiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>New Hampshire - epidemiology</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Ovariectomy</topic><topic>Practice of Epidemiology</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Wisconsin - epidemiology</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NICHOLS, Hazel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VISVANATHAN, Kala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEWCOMB, Polly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAMPTON, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EGAN, Kathleen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NICHOLS, Hazel B</au><au>VISVANATHAN, Kala</au><au>NEWCOMB, Polly A</au><au>HAMPTON, John M</au><au>EGAN, Kathleen M</au><au>TITUS-ERNSTOFF, Linda</au><au>TRENTHAM-DIETZ, Amy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bilateral Oophorectomy in Relation to Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Confounding by Nonmalignant Indications for Surgery?</atitle><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2011-05-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>173</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1111</spage><epage>1120</epage><pages>1111-1120</pages><issn>0002-9262</issn><eissn>1476-6256</eissn><coden>AJEPAS</coden><abstract>Bilateral oophorectomy is often performed during hysterectomy for benign conditions and can reduce breast cancer risk by 20%-50% when performed at younger ages. Accuracy of estimating the decrease in breast cancer risk associated with bilateral oophorectomy could be affected by common conditions that lead to surgery, such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis. The authors examined the potential for confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery on breast cancer risk estimates in a population-based case-control study of invasive breast cancer newly diagnosed in 1992-1995. Breast cancer cases (N = 4,935) aged 50-79 years were identified from Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire tumor registries; similarly aged controls (N = 5,111) were selected from driver's license and Medicare lists. Reproductive and medical history was obtained from structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with multivariate logistic regression. Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy at age ≤ 40 years had significantly reduced odds of breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.90) compared with women with intact ovaries and uterus. Effect estimates were virtually unchanged after adjustment for uterine fibroids or endometriosis history. Results indicate that breast cancer risk reductions conferred by bilateral oophorectomy are not strongly confounded by failure to account for nonmalignant indications for surgery.</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>21430192</pmid><doi>10.1093/aje/kwq510</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9262 |
ispartof | American journal of epidemiology, 2011-05, Vol.173 (10), p.1111-1120 |
issn | 0002-9262 1476-6256 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3105288 |
source | Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list) |
subjects | Adult Age Factors Aged Biological and medical sciences Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control Case-Control Studies Confidence Intervals Endometriosis Endometriosis - epidemiology Epidemiology Female Female genital diseases Fibroids General aspects Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Hysterectomy Leiomyoma - epidemiology Logistic Models Mammary gland diseases Massachusetts - epidemiology Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous New Hampshire - epidemiology Non tumoral diseases Odds Ratio Ovariectomy Practice of Epidemiology Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Risk Factors Tumors Wisconsin - epidemiology Womens health |
title | Bilateral Oophorectomy in Relation to Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Confounding by Nonmalignant Indications for Surgery? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A25%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bilateral%20Oophorectomy%20in%20Relation%20to%20Risk%20of%20Postmenopausal%20Breast%20Cancer:%20Confounding%20by%20Nonmalignant%20Indications%20for%20Surgery?&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=NICHOLS,%20Hazel%20B&rft.date=2011-05-15&rft.volume=173&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1111&rft.epage=1120&rft.pages=1111-1120&rft.issn=0002-9262&rft.eissn=1476-6256&rft.coden=AJEPAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/aje/kwq510&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2364078141%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-3fe3aa88b126fb5ad1f20f0199534a44225e8665842d00dac2913d0f8239eaa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=869630443&rft_id=info:pmid/21430192&rfr_iscdi=true |