Loading…
Accuracy of high‐resolution in vivo micro magnetic resonance imaging for measurements of microstructural and mechanical properties of human distal tibial bone
Micro magnetic resonance imaging (µMRI) is an in vivo imaging method that permits 3D quantification of cortical and trabecular bone microstructure. µMR images can also be used for building microstructural finite element (µFE) models to assess bone stiffness, which highly correlates with bone's...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of bone and mineral research 2010-09, Vol.25 (9), p.2039-2050 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Micro magnetic resonance imaging (µMRI) is an in vivo imaging method that permits 3D quantification of cortical and trabecular bone microstructure. µMR images can also be used for building microstructural finite element (µFE) models to assess bone stiffness, which highly correlates with bone's resistance to fractures. In order for µMRI‐based microstructural and µFE analyses to become standard clinical tools for assessing bone quality, validation with a current gold standard, namely, high‐resolution micro computed tomography (µCT), is required. Microstructural measurements of 25 human cadaveric distal tibias were performed for the registered µMR and µCT images, respectively. Next, whole bone stiffness, trabecular bone stiffness, and elastic moduli of cubic subvolumes of trabecular bone in both µMR and µCT images were determined by voxel‐based µFE analysis. The bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb.N*), trabecular spacing (Tb.Sp*), cortical thickness (Ct.Th), and structure model index (SMI) based on µMRI showed strong correlations with µCT measurements (r2 = 0.67 to 0.97), and bone surface‐to‐volume ratio (BS/BV), connectivity density (Conn.D), and degree of anisotropy (DA) had significant but moderate correlations (r2 = 0.33 to 0.51). Each of these measurements also contributed to one or many of the µFE‐predicted mechanical properties. However, model‐independent trabecular thickness (Tb.Th*) based on µMRI had no correlation with the µCT measurement and did not contribute to any mechanical measurement. Furthermore, the whole bone and trabecular bone stiffness based on µMRI were highly correlated with those of µCT images (r2 = 0.86 and 0.96), suggesting that µMRI‐based µFE analyses can directly and accurately quantify whole bone mechanical competence. In contrast, the elastic moduli of the µMRI trabecular bone subvolume had significant but only moderate correlations with their gold standards (r2 = 0.40 to 0.58). We conclude that most microstructural and mechanical properties of the distal tibia can be derived efficiently from µMR images and can provide additional information regarding bone quality. © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0884-0431 1523-4681 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jbmr.92 |