Loading…
The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review
BACKGROUND The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in high-risk women is unclear, as several different diagnostic approaches have been applied to different groups of patients. This review aims to evaluate the prevalence of such anomalies in unselected populations and in women with infertility...
Saved in:
Published in: | Human reproduction update 2011-11, Vol.17 (6), p.761-771 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-638c736f8057582a31a670ce1619529dda2d88752b1a63915dbd470a2564794a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-638c736f8057582a31a670ce1619529dda2d88752b1a63915dbd470a2564794a3 |
container_end_page | 771 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 761 |
container_title | Human reproduction update |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Chan, Y.Y. Jayaprakasan, K. Zamora, J. Thornton, J.G. Raine-Fenning, N. Coomarasamy, A. |
description | BACKGROUND
The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in high-risk women is unclear, as several different diagnostic approaches have been applied to different groups of patients. This review aims to evaluate the prevalence of such anomalies in unselected populations and in women with infertility, including those undergoing IVF treatment, women with a history of miscarriage, women with infertility and recurrent miscarriage combined, and women with a history of preterm delivery.
METHODS
Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane register were performed. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Studies were grouped into those that used 'optimal' and 'suboptimal' tests for uterine anomalies. Meta-analyses were performed to establish the prevalence of uterine anomalies and their subtypes within the various populations.
RESULTS
We identified 94 observational studies comprising 89 861 women. The prevalence of uterine anomalies diagnosed by optimal tests was 5.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5-8.5] in the unselected population, 8.0% (95% CI, 5.3-12) in infertile women, 13.3% (95% CI, 8.9-20.0) in those with a history of miscarriage and 24.5% (95% CI, 18.3-32.8) in those with miscarriage and infertility. Arcuate uterus is most common in the unselected population (3.9%; 95% CI, 2.1-7.1), and its prevalence is not increased in high-risk groups. In contrast, septate uterus is the most common anomaly in high-risk populations.
CONCLUSIONS
Women with a history of miscarriage or miscarriage and infertility have higher prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies compared with the unselected population. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/humupd/dmr028 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3191936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humupd/dmr028</oup_id><sourcerecordid>898506150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-638c736f8057582a31a670ce1619529dda2d88752b1a63915dbd470a2564794a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtrFjEUhoNYbK0u3Up2uhmbTCaXcSGU4qVQcFPXIV9yvm9iM8mYTCr9941MLbrqKpfz8JwXXoTeUPKBkpGdTXWuiztzcya9eoZO6CBI1zMxPm93xnk3SCWO0ctSfhJCBVXyBTruqSRcSnKCbq4nwEuGWxMgWsBpj22KB4h-NQHXFbKPgE1MswkeCvYR11gggF3BtX-HJ3-YuuzLDV7SUoNZfYrlIza43JUV5va2uPk9_H6FjvYmFHj9cJ6iH18-X198666-f728OL_q7KD42gmmrGRir1pErnrDqBGSWGjhR96PzpneKSV5v2sDNlLudm6QxPRcDHIcDDtFnzbvUnczOAtxzSboJfvZ5DudjNf_T6Kf9CHdakZHOjLRBO8eBDn9qlBWPftiIQQTIdWi1ag4EZSTRnYbaXMqJcP-cQsl-k8_eutHb_00_u2_0R7pv4U04P0GpLo84boHN4SeLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>898506150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Chan, Y.Y. ; Jayaprakasan, K. ; Zamora, J. ; Thornton, J.G. ; Raine-Fenning, N. ; Coomarasamy, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Y.Y. ; Jayaprakasan, K. ; Zamora, J. ; Thornton, J.G. ; Raine-Fenning, N. ; Coomarasamy, A.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND
The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in high-risk women is unclear, as several different diagnostic approaches have been applied to different groups of patients. This review aims to evaluate the prevalence of such anomalies in unselected populations and in women with infertility, including those undergoing IVF treatment, women with a history of miscarriage, women with infertility and recurrent miscarriage combined, and women with a history of preterm delivery.
METHODS
Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane register were performed. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Studies were grouped into those that used 'optimal' and 'suboptimal' tests for uterine anomalies. Meta-analyses were performed to establish the prevalence of uterine anomalies and their subtypes within the various populations.
RESULTS
We identified 94 observational studies comprising 89 861 women. The prevalence of uterine anomalies diagnosed by optimal tests was 5.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5-8.5] in the unselected population, 8.0% (95% CI, 5.3-12) in infertile women, 13.3% (95% CI, 8.9-20.0) in those with a history of miscarriage and 24.5% (95% CI, 18.3-32.8) in those with miscarriage and infertility. Arcuate uterus is most common in the unselected population (3.9%; 95% CI, 2.1-7.1), and its prevalence is not increased in high-risk groups. In contrast, septate uterus is the most common anomaly in high-risk populations.
CONCLUSIONS
Women with a history of miscarriage or miscarriage and infertility have higher prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies compared with the unselected population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-4786</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2369</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21705770</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infertility, Female - epidemiology ; Infertility, Female - etiology ; Pregnancy ; Premature Birth - etiology ; Prevalence ; Reviews ; Risk Factors ; Urogenital Abnormalities - complications ; Urogenital Abnormalities - diagnosis ; Urogenital Abnormalities - epidemiology ; Uterus - abnormalities</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction update, 2011-11, Vol.17 (6), p.761-771</ispartof><rights>The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-638c736f8057582a31a670ce1619529dda2d88752b1a63915dbd470a2564794a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-638c736f8057582a31a670ce1619529dda2d88752b1a63915dbd470a2564794a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27898,27899</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21705770$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Y.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayaprakasan, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamora, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raine-Fenning, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coomarasamy, A.</creatorcontrib><title>The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review</title><title>Human reproduction update</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod Update</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND
The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in high-risk women is unclear, as several different diagnostic approaches have been applied to different groups of patients. This review aims to evaluate the prevalence of such anomalies in unselected populations and in women with infertility, including those undergoing IVF treatment, women with a history of miscarriage, women with infertility and recurrent miscarriage combined, and women with a history of preterm delivery.
METHODS
Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane register were performed. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Studies were grouped into those that used 'optimal' and 'suboptimal' tests for uterine anomalies. Meta-analyses were performed to establish the prevalence of uterine anomalies and their subtypes within the various populations.
RESULTS
We identified 94 observational studies comprising 89 861 women. The prevalence of uterine anomalies diagnosed by optimal tests was 5.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5-8.5] in the unselected population, 8.0% (95% CI, 5.3-12) in infertile women, 13.3% (95% CI, 8.9-20.0) in those with a history of miscarriage and 24.5% (95% CI, 18.3-32.8) in those with miscarriage and infertility. Arcuate uterus is most common in the unselected population (3.9%; 95% CI, 2.1-7.1), and its prevalence is not increased in high-risk groups. In contrast, septate uterus is the most common anomaly in high-risk populations.
CONCLUSIONS
Women with a history of miscarriage or miscarriage and infertility have higher prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies compared with the unselected population.</description><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - etiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Premature Birth - etiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Urogenital Abnormalities - complications</subject><subject>Urogenital Abnormalities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urogenital Abnormalities - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterus - abnormalities</subject><issn>1355-4786</issn><issn>1460-2369</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtrFjEUhoNYbK0u3Up2uhmbTCaXcSGU4qVQcFPXIV9yvm9iM8mYTCr9941MLbrqKpfz8JwXXoTeUPKBkpGdTXWuiztzcya9eoZO6CBI1zMxPm93xnk3SCWO0ctSfhJCBVXyBTruqSRcSnKCbq4nwEuGWxMgWsBpj22KB4h-NQHXFbKPgE1MswkeCvYR11gggF3BtX-HJ3-YuuzLDV7SUoNZfYrlIza43JUV5va2uPk9_H6FjvYmFHj9cJ6iH18-X198666-f728OL_q7KD42gmmrGRir1pErnrDqBGSWGjhR96PzpneKSV5v2sDNlLudm6QxPRcDHIcDDtFnzbvUnczOAtxzSboJfvZ5DudjNf_T6Kf9CHdakZHOjLRBO8eBDn9qlBWPftiIQQTIdWi1ag4EZSTRnYbaXMqJcP-cQsl-k8_eutHb_00_u2_0R7pv4U04P0GpLo84boHN4SeLw</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Chan, Y.Y.</creator><creator>Jayaprakasan, K.</creator><creator>Zamora, J.</creator><creator>Thornton, J.G.</creator><creator>Raine-Fenning, N.</creator><creator>Coomarasamy, A.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review</title><author>Chan, Y.Y. ; Jayaprakasan, K. ; Zamora, J. ; Thornton, J.G. ; Raine-Fenning, N. ; Coomarasamy, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-638c736f8057582a31a670ce1619529dda2d88752b1a63915dbd470a2564794a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - etiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Premature Birth - etiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Urogenital Abnormalities - complications</topic><topic>Urogenital Abnormalities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urogenital Abnormalities - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterus - abnormalities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Y.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayaprakasan, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamora, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raine-Fenning, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coomarasamy, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction update</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Y.Y.</au><au>Jayaprakasan, K.</au><au>Zamora, J.</au><au>Thornton, J.G.</au><au>Raine-Fenning, N.</au><au>Coomarasamy, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction update</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod Update</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>761</spage><epage>771</epage><pages>761-771</pages><issn>1355-4786</issn><eissn>1460-2369</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND
The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in high-risk women is unclear, as several different diagnostic approaches have been applied to different groups of patients. This review aims to evaluate the prevalence of such anomalies in unselected populations and in women with infertility, including those undergoing IVF treatment, women with a history of miscarriage, women with infertility and recurrent miscarriage combined, and women with a history of preterm delivery.
METHODS
Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane register were performed. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Studies were grouped into those that used 'optimal' and 'suboptimal' tests for uterine anomalies. Meta-analyses were performed to establish the prevalence of uterine anomalies and their subtypes within the various populations.
RESULTS
We identified 94 observational studies comprising 89 861 women. The prevalence of uterine anomalies diagnosed by optimal tests was 5.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5-8.5] in the unselected population, 8.0% (95% CI, 5.3-12) in infertile women, 13.3% (95% CI, 8.9-20.0) in those with a history of miscarriage and 24.5% (95% CI, 18.3-32.8) in those with miscarriage and infertility. Arcuate uterus is most common in the unselected population (3.9%; 95% CI, 2.1-7.1), and its prevalence is not increased in high-risk groups. In contrast, septate uterus is the most common anomaly in high-risk populations.
CONCLUSIONS
Women with a history of miscarriage or miscarriage and infertility have higher prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies compared with the unselected population.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>21705770</pmid><doi>10.1093/humupd/dmr028</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1355-4786 |
ispartof | Human reproduction update, 2011-11, Vol.17 (6), p.761-771 |
issn | 1355-4786 1460-2369 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3191936 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology Female Humans Infant, Newborn Infertility, Female - epidemiology Infertility, Female - etiology Pregnancy Premature Birth - etiology Prevalence Reviews Risk Factors Urogenital Abnormalities - complications Urogenital Abnormalities - diagnosis Urogenital Abnormalities - epidemiology Uterus - abnormalities |
title | The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-04T04%3A37%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20prevalence%20of%20congenital%20uterine%20anomalies%20in%20unselected%20and%20high-risk%20populations:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20update&rft.au=Chan,%20Y.Y.&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=761&rft.epage=771&rft.pages=761-771&rft.issn=1355-4786&rft.eissn=1460-2369&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmr028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E898506150%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-638c736f8057582a31a670ce1619529dda2d88752b1a63915dbd470a2564794a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=898506150&rft_id=info:pmid/21705770&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humupd/dmr028&rfr_iscdi=true |