Loading…

The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review

BACKGROUND The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in high-risk women is unclear, as several different diagnostic approaches have been applied to different groups of patients. This review aims to evaluate the prevalence of such anomalies in unselected populations and in women with infertility...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human reproduction update 2011-11, Vol.17 (6), p.761-771
Main Authors: Chan, Y.Y., Jayaprakasan, K., Zamora, J., Thornton, J.G., Raine-Fenning, N., Coomarasamy, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-638c736f8057582a31a670ce1619529dda2d88752b1a63915dbd470a2564794a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-638c736f8057582a31a670ce1619529dda2d88752b1a63915dbd470a2564794a3
container_end_page 771
container_issue 6
container_start_page 761
container_title Human reproduction update
container_volume 17
creator Chan, Y.Y.
Jayaprakasan, K.
Zamora, J.
Thornton, J.G.
Raine-Fenning, N.
Coomarasamy, A.
description BACKGROUND The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in high-risk women is unclear, as several different diagnostic approaches have been applied to different groups of patients. This review aims to evaluate the prevalence of such anomalies in unselected populations and in women with infertility, including those undergoing IVF treatment, women with a history of miscarriage, women with infertility and recurrent miscarriage combined, and women with a history of preterm delivery. METHODS Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane register were performed. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Studies were grouped into those that used 'optimal' and 'suboptimal' tests for uterine anomalies. Meta-analyses were performed to establish the prevalence of uterine anomalies and their subtypes within the various populations. RESULTS We identified 94 observational studies comprising 89 861 women. The prevalence of uterine anomalies diagnosed by optimal tests was 5.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5-8.5] in the unselected population, 8.0% (95% CI, 5.3-12) in infertile women, 13.3% (95% CI, 8.9-20.0) in those with a history of miscarriage and 24.5% (95% CI, 18.3-32.8) in those with miscarriage and infertility. Arcuate uterus is most common in the unselected population (3.9%; 95% CI, 2.1-7.1), and its prevalence is not increased in high-risk groups. In contrast, septate uterus is the most common anomaly in high-risk populations. CONCLUSIONS Women with a history of miscarriage or miscarriage and infertility have higher prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies compared with the unselected population.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/humupd/dmr028
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3191936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humupd/dmr028</oup_id><sourcerecordid>898506150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-638c736f8057582a31a670ce1619529dda2d88752b1a63915dbd470a2564794a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtrFjEUhoNYbK0u3Up2uhmbTCaXcSGU4qVQcFPXIV9yvm9iM8mYTCr9941MLbrqKpfz8JwXXoTeUPKBkpGdTXWuiztzcya9eoZO6CBI1zMxPm93xnk3SCWO0ctSfhJCBVXyBTruqSRcSnKCbq4nwEuGWxMgWsBpj22KB4h-NQHXFbKPgE1MswkeCvYR11gggF3BtX-HJ3-YuuzLDV7SUoNZfYrlIza43JUV5va2uPk9_H6FjvYmFHj9cJ6iH18-X198666-f728OL_q7KD42gmmrGRir1pErnrDqBGSWGjhR96PzpneKSV5v2sDNlLudm6QxPRcDHIcDDtFnzbvUnczOAtxzSboJfvZ5DudjNf_T6Kf9CHdakZHOjLRBO8eBDn9qlBWPftiIQQTIdWi1ag4EZSTRnYbaXMqJcP-cQsl-k8_eutHb_00_u2_0R7pv4U04P0GpLo84boHN4SeLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>898506150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Chan, Y.Y. ; Jayaprakasan, K. ; Zamora, J. ; Thornton, J.G. ; Raine-Fenning, N. ; Coomarasamy, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Y.Y. ; Jayaprakasan, K. ; Zamora, J. ; Thornton, J.G. ; Raine-Fenning, N. ; Coomarasamy, A.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in high-risk women is unclear, as several different diagnostic approaches have been applied to different groups of patients. This review aims to evaluate the prevalence of such anomalies in unselected populations and in women with infertility, including those undergoing IVF treatment, women with a history of miscarriage, women with infertility and recurrent miscarriage combined, and women with a history of preterm delivery. METHODS Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane register were performed. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Studies were grouped into those that used 'optimal' and 'suboptimal' tests for uterine anomalies. Meta-analyses were performed to establish the prevalence of uterine anomalies and their subtypes within the various populations. RESULTS We identified 94 observational studies comprising 89 861 women. The prevalence of uterine anomalies diagnosed by optimal tests was 5.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5-8.5] in the unselected population, 8.0% (95% CI, 5.3-12) in infertile women, 13.3% (95% CI, 8.9-20.0) in those with a history of miscarriage and 24.5% (95% CI, 18.3-32.8) in those with miscarriage and infertility. Arcuate uterus is most common in the unselected population (3.9%; 95% CI, 2.1-7.1), and its prevalence is not increased in high-risk groups. In contrast, septate uterus is the most common anomaly in high-risk populations. CONCLUSIONS Women with a history of miscarriage or miscarriage and infertility have higher prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies compared with the unselected population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-4786</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2369</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21705770</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infertility, Female - epidemiology ; Infertility, Female - etiology ; Pregnancy ; Premature Birth - etiology ; Prevalence ; Reviews ; Risk Factors ; Urogenital Abnormalities - complications ; Urogenital Abnormalities - diagnosis ; Urogenital Abnormalities - epidemiology ; Uterus - abnormalities</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction update, 2011-11, Vol.17 (6), p.761-771</ispartof><rights>The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-638c736f8057582a31a670ce1619529dda2d88752b1a63915dbd470a2564794a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-638c736f8057582a31a670ce1619529dda2d88752b1a63915dbd470a2564794a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27898,27899</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21705770$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Y.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayaprakasan, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamora, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raine-Fenning, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coomarasamy, A.</creatorcontrib><title>The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review</title><title>Human reproduction update</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod Update</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in high-risk women is unclear, as several different diagnostic approaches have been applied to different groups of patients. This review aims to evaluate the prevalence of such anomalies in unselected populations and in women with infertility, including those undergoing IVF treatment, women with a history of miscarriage, women with infertility and recurrent miscarriage combined, and women with a history of preterm delivery. METHODS Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane register were performed. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Studies were grouped into those that used 'optimal' and 'suboptimal' tests for uterine anomalies. Meta-analyses were performed to establish the prevalence of uterine anomalies and their subtypes within the various populations. RESULTS We identified 94 observational studies comprising 89 861 women. The prevalence of uterine anomalies diagnosed by optimal tests was 5.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5-8.5] in the unselected population, 8.0% (95% CI, 5.3-12) in infertile women, 13.3% (95% CI, 8.9-20.0) in those with a history of miscarriage and 24.5% (95% CI, 18.3-32.8) in those with miscarriage and infertility. Arcuate uterus is most common in the unselected population (3.9%; 95% CI, 2.1-7.1), and its prevalence is not increased in high-risk groups. In contrast, septate uterus is the most common anomaly in high-risk populations. CONCLUSIONS Women with a history of miscarriage or miscarriage and infertility have higher prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies compared with the unselected population.</description><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - etiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Premature Birth - etiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Urogenital Abnormalities - complications</subject><subject>Urogenital Abnormalities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urogenital Abnormalities - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterus - abnormalities</subject><issn>1355-4786</issn><issn>1460-2369</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtrFjEUhoNYbK0u3Up2uhmbTCaXcSGU4qVQcFPXIV9yvm9iM8mYTCr9941MLbrqKpfz8JwXXoTeUPKBkpGdTXWuiztzcya9eoZO6CBI1zMxPm93xnk3SCWO0ctSfhJCBVXyBTruqSRcSnKCbq4nwEuGWxMgWsBpj22KB4h-NQHXFbKPgE1MswkeCvYR11gggF3BtX-HJ3-YuuzLDV7SUoNZfYrlIza43JUV5va2uPk9_H6FjvYmFHj9cJ6iH18-X198666-f728OL_q7KD42gmmrGRir1pErnrDqBGSWGjhR96PzpneKSV5v2sDNlLudm6QxPRcDHIcDDtFnzbvUnczOAtxzSboJfvZ5DudjNf_T6Kf9CHdakZHOjLRBO8eBDn9qlBWPftiIQQTIdWi1ag4EZSTRnYbaXMqJcP-cQsl-k8_eutHb_00_u2_0R7pv4U04P0GpLo84boHN4SeLw</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Chan, Y.Y.</creator><creator>Jayaprakasan, K.</creator><creator>Zamora, J.</creator><creator>Thornton, J.G.</creator><creator>Raine-Fenning, N.</creator><creator>Coomarasamy, A.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review</title><author>Chan, Y.Y. ; Jayaprakasan, K. ; Zamora, J. ; Thornton, J.G. ; Raine-Fenning, N. ; Coomarasamy, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-638c736f8057582a31a670ce1619529dda2d88752b1a63915dbd470a2564794a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - etiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Premature Birth - etiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Urogenital Abnormalities - complications</topic><topic>Urogenital Abnormalities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urogenital Abnormalities - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterus - abnormalities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Y.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayaprakasan, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamora, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raine-Fenning, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coomarasamy, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction update</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Y.Y.</au><au>Jayaprakasan, K.</au><au>Zamora, J.</au><au>Thornton, J.G.</au><au>Raine-Fenning, N.</au><au>Coomarasamy, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction update</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod Update</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>761</spage><epage>771</epage><pages>761-771</pages><issn>1355-4786</issn><eissn>1460-2369</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in high-risk women is unclear, as several different diagnostic approaches have been applied to different groups of patients. This review aims to evaluate the prevalence of such anomalies in unselected populations and in women with infertility, including those undergoing IVF treatment, women with a history of miscarriage, women with infertility and recurrent miscarriage combined, and women with a history of preterm delivery. METHODS Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane register were performed. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Studies were grouped into those that used 'optimal' and 'suboptimal' tests for uterine anomalies. Meta-analyses were performed to establish the prevalence of uterine anomalies and their subtypes within the various populations. RESULTS We identified 94 observational studies comprising 89 861 women. The prevalence of uterine anomalies diagnosed by optimal tests was 5.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5-8.5] in the unselected population, 8.0% (95% CI, 5.3-12) in infertile women, 13.3% (95% CI, 8.9-20.0) in those with a history of miscarriage and 24.5% (95% CI, 18.3-32.8) in those with miscarriage and infertility. Arcuate uterus is most common in the unselected population (3.9%; 95% CI, 2.1-7.1), and its prevalence is not increased in high-risk groups. In contrast, septate uterus is the most common anomaly in high-risk populations. CONCLUSIONS Women with a history of miscarriage or miscarriage and infertility have higher prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies compared with the unselected population.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>21705770</pmid><doi>10.1093/humupd/dmr028</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1355-4786
ispartof Human reproduction update, 2011-11, Vol.17 (6), p.761-771
issn 1355-4786
1460-2369
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3191936
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology
Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infertility, Female - epidemiology
Infertility, Female - etiology
Pregnancy
Premature Birth - etiology
Prevalence
Reviews
Risk Factors
Urogenital Abnormalities - complications
Urogenital Abnormalities - diagnosis
Urogenital Abnormalities - epidemiology
Uterus - abnormalities
title The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-04T04%3A37%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20prevalence%20of%20congenital%20uterine%20anomalies%20in%20unselected%20and%20high-risk%20populations:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20update&rft.au=Chan,%20Y.Y.&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=761&rft.epage=771&rft.pages=761-771&rft.issn=1355-4786&rft.eissn=1460-2369&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmr028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E898506150%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-638c736f8057582a31a670ce1619529dda2d88752b1a63915dbd470a2564794a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=898506150&rft_id=info:pmid/21705770&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humupd/dmr028&rfr_iscdi=true