Loading…

Resources That May Matter: The Impact of Local Health Department Expenditures on Health Status

Objectives. This study examines the association between changes in local health department (LHD) expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and changes in state-level measures of health, from 1993 to 2005. The literature on the impact of LHD resources on health status has been limited by crosssect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public health reports (1974) 2012-01, Vol.127 (1), p.89-95
Main Authors: Erwin, Paul Campbell, Mays, Glen P., Riley, William J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-4922c14dba93cfcff175c0b913183b03ed0d862b7de0d04ed8071d48d7892f73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-4922c14dba93cfcff175c0b913183b03ed0d862b7de0d04ed8071d48d7892f73
container_end_page 95
container_issue 1
container_start_page 89
container_title Public health reports (1974)
container_volume 127
creator Erwin, Paul Campbell
Mays, Glen P.
Riley, William J.
description Objectives. This study examines the association between changes in local health department (LHD) expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and changes in state-level measures of health, from 1993 to 2005. The literature on the impact of LHD resources on health status has been limited by crosssectional designs. With repeated surveys of LHDs, it is now possible to use longitudinal designs to explore the association between LHD inputs and outcomes. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study. We used a fixed-effects regression model to assess the association between LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and seven separate health measures. We derived LHD expenditure data from the National Association of County and City Health Officials' surveys of LHDs in 1993, 1997, and 2005. We obtained secondary data on seven health measures—smoking and obesity prevalence, infectious disease morbidity, infant mortality, deaths due to cardiovascular disease and cancer, and overall premature death—through the America's Health Rankings® reports, 1990-2008. Usable data were available for 1,470 LHDs, representing 37 states. Results. An increase in LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, was associated with a statistically significant decline in state-level infectious disease morbidity (t= -3.28, p= 0.002) and in years of potential life lost (YPLL) (t= -2.73, p= 0.008). For every $10 increase in aggregated LHD expenditures per capita, infectious disease morbidity decreased by 7.4%, and YPLL decreased by 1.5%. Conclusion. LHD resources are associated with improvements in preventable causes of morbidity and mortality.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/003335491212700110
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3234401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41639477</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_003335491212700110</sage_id><sourcerecordid>41639477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-4922c14dba93cfcff175c0b913183b03ed0d862b7de0d04ed8071d48d7892f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV-L1DAUxYMo7rj6BQSlCOJT3XuTtGl8EGRd3YURQefZkCbpTodOU5NU3G9vhpmd9Q8YCIHkd889N4eQpwivEYU4A2CMVVwiRSoAEOEeWSCvm5I2Qtwnix1Q7ogT8ijGDeRFkT0kJ5RS2UhaL8i3Ly76ORgXi9Vap-KTvsk7JRfe5AtXXG0nbVLhu2LpjR6KS6eHtC7eu0mHtHVjKi5-Tm60fZpD1vDjLfE16TTHx-RBp4fonhzOU7L6cLE6vyyXnz9enb9blqaikEouKTXIbaslM53pOhSVgVYiw4a1wJwF29S0FdaBBe5sAwItb6zIU3SCnZK3e9lpbrfOmuwr6EFNod_qcKO87tWfL2O_Vtf-h2KUcQ6YBV4dBIL_PruY1LaPxg2DHp2fo5IoZSVYXWXyxV_kJv_fmIdTsuI1R6hYhugeMsHHGFx3tIKgdtmpf7PLRc9_H-JYchtWBl4eAB1zFl3Qo-njHVdXNQi5s3i256K-dnf2_tv62b5iE5MPR0WONZNcCPYL1Wu3vA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>954641053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resources That May Matter: The Impact of Local Health Department Expenditures on Health Status</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Erwin, Paul Campbell ; Mays, Glen P. ; Riley, William J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Erwin, Paul Campbell ; Mays, Glen P. ; Riley, William J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. This study examines the association between changes in local health department (LHD) expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and changes in state-level measures of health, from 1993 to 2005. The literature on the impact of LHD resources on health status has been limited by crosssectional designs. With repeated surveys of LHDs, it is now possible to use longitudinal designs to explore the association between LHD inputs and outcomes. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study. We used a fixed-effects regression model to assess the association between LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and seven separate health measures. We derived LHD expenditure data from the National Association of County and City Health Officials' surveys of LHDs in 1993, 1997, and 2005. We obtained secondary data on seven health measures—smoking and obesity prevalence, infectious disease morbidity, infant mortality, deaths due to cardiovascular disease and cancer, and overall premature death—through the America's Health Rankings® reports, 1990-2008. Usable data were available for 1,470 LHDs, representing 37 states. Results. An increase in LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, was associated with a statistically significant decline in state-level infectious disease morbidity (t= -3.28, p= 0.002) and in years of potential life lost (YPLL) (t= -2.73, p= 0.008). For every $10 increase in aggregated LHD expenditures per capita, infectious disease morbidity decreased by 7.4%, and YPLL decreased by 1.5%. Conclusion. LHD resources are associated with improvements in preventable causes of morbidity and mortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2877</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/003335491212700110</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22298926</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHRPA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Association of Schools of Public Health</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiovascular Diseases - mortality ; Cohort Studies ; Communicable Diseases - epidemiology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Death ; Funding ; Health care expenditures ; Health Expenditures - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Health Expenditures - trends ; Health outcomes ; Health Resources ; Health services ; Health Status ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant Mortality ; Infant, Newborn ; Infectious diseases ; Life Expectancy - trends ; Local Government ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Neoplasms - mortality ; Obesity ; Obesity - epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Public health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Retrospective Studies ; Smoking - epidemiology ; United States</subject><ispartof>Public health reports (1974), 2012-01, Vol.127 (1), p.89-95</ispartof><rights>Copyright ©2012 Association of Schools of Public Health</rights><rights>2012 US Surgeon General's Office</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Jan/Feb 2012</rights><rights>2012 Association of Schools of Public Health 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-4922c14dba93cfcff175c0b913183b03ed0d862b7de0d04ed8071d48d7892f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-4922c14dba93cfcff175c0b913183b03ed0d862b7de0d04ed8071d48d7892f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41639477$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41639477$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,4009,27845,27902,27903,27904,53769,53771,58216,58449,79110</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26560795$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22298926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erwin, Paul Campbell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mays, Glen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, William J.</creatorcontrib><title>Resources That May Matter: The Impact of Local Health Department Expenditures on Health Status</title><title>Public health reports (1974)</title><addtitle>Public Health Rep</addtitle><description>Objectives. This study examines the association between changes in local health department (LHD) expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and changes in state-level measures of health, from 1993 to 2005. The literature on the impact of LHD resources on health status has been limited by crosssectional designs. With repeated surveys of LHDs, it is now possible to use longitudinal designs to explore the association between LHD inputs and outcomes. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study. We used a fixed-effects regression model to assess the association between LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and seven separate health measures. We derived LHD expenditure data from the National Association of County and City Health Officials' surveys of LHDs in 1993, 1997, and 2005. We obtained secondary data on seven health measures—smoking and obesity prevalence, infectious disease morbidity, infant mortality, deaths due to cardiovascular disease and cancer, and overall premature death—through the America's Health Rankings® reports, 1990-2008. Usable data were available for 1,470 LHDs, representing 37 states. Results. An increase in LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, was associated with a statistically significant decline in state-level infectious disease morbidity (t= -3.28, p= 0.002) and in years of potential life lost (YPLL) (t= -2.73, p= 0.008). For every $10 increase in aggregated LHD expenditures per capita, infectious disease morbidity decreased by 7.4%, and YPLL decreased by 1.5%. Conclusion. LHD resources are associated with improvements in preventable causes of morbidity and mortality.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - mortality</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Communicable Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health Expenditures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Health Expenditures - trends</subject><subject>Health outcomes</subject><subject>Health Resources</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant Mortality</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Life Expectancy - trends</subject><subject>Local Government</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Smoking - epidemiology</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0033-3549</issn><issn>1468-2877</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV-L1DAUxYMo7rj6BQSlCOJT3XuTtGl8EGRd3YURQefZkCbpTodOU5NU3G9vhpmd9Q8YCIHkd889N4eQpwivEYU4A2CMVVwiRSoAEOEeWSCvm5I2Qtwnix1Q7ogT8ijGDeRFkT0kJ5RS2UhaL8i3Ly76ORgXi9Vap-KTvsk7JRfe5AtXXG0nbVLhu2LpjR6KS6eHtC7eu0mHtHVjKi5-Tm60fZpD1vDjLfE16TTHx-RBp4fonhzOU7L6cLE6vyyXnz9enb9blqaikEouKTXIbaslM53pOhSVgVYiw4a1wJwF29S0FdaBBe5sAwItb6zIU3SCnZK3e9lpbrfOmuwr6EFNod_qcKO87tWfL2O_Vtf-h2KUcQ6YBV4dBIL_PruY1LaPxg2DHp2fo5IoZSVYXWXyxV_kJv_fmIdTsuI1R6hYhugeMsHHGFx3tIKgdtmpf7PLRc9_H-JYchtWBl4eAB1zFl3Qo-njHVdXNQi5s3i256K-dnf2_tv62b5iE5MPR0WONZNcCPYL1Wu3vA</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Erwin, Paul Campbell</creator><creator>Mays, Glen P.</creator><creator>Riley, William J.</creator><general>Association of Schools of Public Health</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Resources That May Matter: The Impact of Local Health Department Expenditures on Health Status</title><author>Erwin, Paul Campbell ; Mays, Glen P. ; Riley, William J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-4922c14dba93cfcff175c0b913183b03ed0d862b7de0d04ed8071d48d7892f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - mortality</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Communicable Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health Expenditures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Health Expenditures - trends</topic><topic>Health outcomes</topic><topic>Health Resources</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant Mortality</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Life Expectancy - trends</topic><topic>Local Government</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Smoking - epidemiology</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erwin, Paul Campbell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mays, Glen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, William J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Public health reports (1974)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erwin, Paul Campbell</au><au>Mays, Glen P.</au><au>Riley, William J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resources That May Matter: The Impact of Local Health Department Expenditures on Health Status</atitle><jtitle>Public health reports (1974)</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Rep</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>89-95</pages><issn>0033-3549</issn><eissn>1468-2877</eissn><coden>PHRPA6</coden><abstract>Objectives. This study examines the association between changes in local health department (LHD) expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and changes in state-level measures of health, from 1993 to 2005. The literature on the impact of LHD resources on health status has been limited by crosssectional designs. With repeated surveys of LHDs, it is now possible to use longitudinal designs to explore the association between LHD inputs and outcomes. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study. We used a fixed-effects regression model to assess the association between LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and seven separate health measures. We derived LHD expenditure data from the National Association of County and City Health Officials' surveys of LHDs in 1993, 1997, and 2005. We obtained secondary data on seven health measures—smoking and obesity prevalence, infectious disease morbidity, infant mortality, deaths due to cardiovascular disease and cancer, and overall premature death—through the America's Health Rankings® reports, 1990-2008. Usable data were available for 1,470 LHDs, representing 37 states. Results. An increase in LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, was associated with a statistically significant decline in state-level infectious disease morbidity (t= -3.28, p= 0.002) and in years of potential life lost (YPLL) (t= -2.73, p= 0.008). For every $10 increase in aggregated LHD expenditures per capita, infectious disease morbidity decreased by 7.4%, and YPLL decreased by 1.5%. Conclusion. LHD resources are associated with improvements in preventable causes of morbidity and mortality.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Association of Schools of Public Health</pub><pmid>22298926</pmid><doi>10.1177/003335491212700110</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3549
ispartof Public health reports (1974), 2012-01, Vol.127 (1), p.89-95
issn 0033-3549
1468-2877
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3234401
source PubMed (Medline); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; PAIS Index; Sage Journals Online
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiovascular Diseases - mortality
Cohort Studies
Communicable Diseases - epidemiology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Death
Funding
Health care expenditures
Health Expenditures - statistics & numerical data
Health Expenditures - trends
Health outcomes
Health Resources
Health services
Health Status
Humans
Infant
Infant Mortality
Infant, Newborn
Infectious diseases
Life Expectancy - trends
Local Government
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
Morbidity
Mortality
Neoplasms - mortality
Obesity
Obesity - epidemiology
Prevalence
Public health
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Retrospective Studies
Smoking - epidemiology
United States
title Resources That May Matter: The Impact of Local Health Department Expenditures on Health Status
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T23%3A06%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resources%20That%20May%20Matter:%20The%20Impact%20of%20Local%20Health%20Department%20Expenditures%20on%20Health%20Status&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20reports%20(1974)&rft.au=Erwin,%20Paul%20Campbell&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=89-95&rft.issn=0033-3549&rft.eissn=1468-2877&rft.coden=PHRPA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/003335491212700110&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E41639477%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-4922c14dba93cfcff175c0b913183b03ed0d862b7de0d04ed8071d48d7892f73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=954641053&rft_id=info:pmid/22298926&rft_jstor_id=41639477&rft_sage_id=10.1177_003335491212700110&rfr_iscdi=true