Loading…
Resources That May Matter: The Impact of Local Health Department Expenditures on Health Status
Objectives. This study examines the association between changes in local health department (LHD) expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and changes in state-level measures of health, from 1993 to 2005. The literature on the impact of LHD resources on health status has been limited by crosssect...
Saved in:
Published in: | Public health reports (1974) 2012-01, Vol.127 (1), p.89-95 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-4922c14dba93cfcff175c0b913183b03ed0d862b7de0d04ed8071d48d7892f73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-4922c14dba93cfcff175c0b913183b03ed0d862b7de0d04ed8071d48d7892f73 |
container_end_page | 95 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | Public health reports (1974) |
container_volume | 127 |
creator | Erwin, Paul Campbell Mays, Glen P. Riley, William J. |
description | Objectives. This study examines the association between changes in local health department (LHD) expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and changes in state-level measures of health, from 1993 to 2005. The literature on the impact of LHD resources on health status has been limited by crosssectional designs. With repeated surveys of LHDs, it is now possible to use longitudinal designs to explore the association between LHD inputs and outcomes. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study. We used a fixed-effects regression model to assess the association between LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and seven separate health measures. We derived LHD expenditure data from the National Association of County and City Health Officials' surveys of LHDs in 1993, 1997, and 2005. We obtained secondary data on seven health measures—smoking and obesity prevalence, infectious disease morbidity, infant mortality, deaths due to cardiovascular disease and cancer, and overall premature death—through the America's Health Rankings® reports, 1990-2008. Usable data were available for 1,470 LHDs, representing 37 states. Results. An increase in LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, was associated with a statistically significant decline in state-level infectious disease morbidity (t= -3.28, p= 0.002) and in years of potential life lost (YPLL) (t= -2.73, p= 0.008). For every $10 increase in aggregated LHD expenditures per capita, infectious disease morbidity decreased by 7.4%, and YPLL decreased by 1.5%. Conclusion. LHD resources are associated with improvements in preventable causes of morbidity and mortality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/003335491212700110 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3234401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41639477</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_003335491212700110</sage_id><sourcerecordid>41639477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-4922c14dba93cfcff175c0b913183b03ed0d862b7de0d04ed8071d48d7892f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV-L1DAUxYMo7rj6BQSlCOJT3XuTtGl8EGRd3YURQefZkCbpTodOU5NU3G9vhpmd9Q8YCIHkd889N4eQpwivEYU4A2CMVVwiRSoAEOEeWSCvm5I2Qtwnix1Q7ogT8ijGDeRFkT0kJ5RS2UhaL8i3Ly76ORgXi9Vap-KTvsk7JRfe5AtXXG0nbVLhu2LpjR6KS6eHtC7eu0mHtHVjKi5-Tm60fZpD1vDjLfE16TTHx-RBp4fonhzOU7L6cLE6vyyXnz9enb9blqaikEouKTXIbaslM53pOhSVgVYiw4a1wJwF29S0FdaBBe5sAwItb6zIU3SCnZK3e9lpbrfOmuwr6EFNod_qcKO87tWfL2O_Vtf-h2KUcQ6YBV4dBIL_PruY1LaPxg2DHp2fo5IoZSVYXWXyxV_kJv_fmIdTsuI1R6hYhugeMsHHGFx3tIKgdtmpf7PLRc9_H-JYchtWBl4eAB1zFl3Qo-njHVdXNQi5s3i256K-dnf2_tv62b5iE5MPR0WONZNcCPYL1Wu3vA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>954641053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resources That May Matter: The Impact of Local Health Department Expenditures on Health Status</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Erwin, Paul Campbell ; Mays, Glen P. ; Riley, William J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Erwin, Paul Campbell ; Mays, Glen P. ; Riley, William J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. This study examines the association between changes in local health department (LHD) expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and changes in state-level measures of health, from 1993 to 2005. The literature on the impact of LHD resources on health status has been limited by crosssectional designs. With repeated surveys of LHDs, it is now possible to use longitudinal designs to explore the association between LHD inputs and outcomes. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study. We used a fixed-effects regression model to assess the association between LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and seven separate health measures. We derived LHD expenditure data from the National Association of County and City Health Officials' surveys of LHDs in 1993, 1997, and 2005. We obtained secondary data on seven health measures—smoking and obesity prevalence, infectious disease morbidity, infant mortality, deaths due to cardiovascular disease and cancer, and overall premature death—through the America's Health Rankings® reports, 1990-2008. Usable data were available for 1,470 LHDs, representing 37 states. Results. An increase in LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, was associated with a statistically significant decline in state-level infectious disease morbidity (t= -3.28, p= 0.002) and in years of potential life lost (YPLL) (t= -2.73, p= 0.008). For every $10 increase in aggregated LHD expenditures per capita, infectious disease morbidity decreased by 7.4%, and YPLL decreased by 1.5%. Conclusion. LHD resources are associated with improvements in preventable causes of morbidity and mortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2877</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/003335491212700110</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22298926</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHRPA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Association of Schools of Public Health</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiovascular Diseases - mortality ; Cohort Studies ; Communicable Diseases - epidemiology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Death ; Funding ; Health care expenditures ; Health Expenditures - statistics & numerical data ; Health Expenditures - trends ; Health outcomes ; Health Resources ; Health services ; Health Status ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant Mortality ; Infant, Newborn ; Infectious diseases ; Life Expectancy - trends ; Local Government ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Neoplasms - mortality ; Obesity ; Obesity - epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Public health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Retrospective Studies ; Smoking - epidemiology ; United States</subject><ispartof>Public health reports (1974), 2012-01, Vol.127 (1), p.89-95</ispartof><rights>Copyright ©2012 Association of Schools of Public Health</rights><rights>2012 US Surgeon General's Office</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Jan/Feb 2012</rights><rights>2012 Association of Schools of Public Health 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-4922c14dba93cfcff175c0b913183b03ed0d862b7de0d04ed8071d48d7892f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-4922c14dba93cfcff175c0b913183b03ed0d862b7de0d04ed8071d48d7892f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41639477$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41639477$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,4009,27845,27902,27903,27904,53769,53771,58216,58449,79110</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26560795$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22298926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erwin, Paul Campbell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mays, Glen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, William J.</creatorcontrib><title>Resources That May Matter: The Impact of Local Health Department Expenditures on Health Status</title><title>Public health reports (1974)</title><addtitle>Public Health Rep</addtitle><description>Objectives. This study examines the association between changes in local health department (LHD) expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and changes in state-level measures of health, from 1993 to 2005. The literature on the impact of LHD resources on health status has been limited by crosssectional designs. With repeated surveys of LHDs, it is now possible to use longitudinal designs to explore the association between LHD inputs and outcomes. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study. We used a fixed-effects regression model to assess the association between LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and seven separate health measures. We derived LHD expenditure data from the National Association of County and City Health Officials' surveys of LHDs in 1993, 1997, and 2005. We obtained secondary data on seven health measures—smoking and obesity prevalence, infectious disease morbidity, infant mortality, deaths due to cardiovascular disease and cancer, and overall premature death—through the America's Health Rankings® reports, 1990-2008. Usable data were available for 1,470 LHDs, representing 37 states. Results. An increase in LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, was associated with a statistically significant decline in state-level infectious disease morbidity (t= -3.28, p= 0.002) and in years of potential life lost (YPLL) (t= -2.73, p= 0.008). For every $10 increase in aggregated LHD expenditures per capita, infectious disease morbidity decreased by 7.4%, and YPLL decreased by 1.5%. Conclusion. LHD resources are associated with improvements in preventable causes of morbidity and mortality.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - mortality</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Communicable Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health Expenditures - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Health Expenditures - trends</subject><subject>Health outcomes</subject><subject>Health Resources</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant Mortality</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Life Expectancy - trends</subject><subject>Local Government</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Smoking - epidemiology</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0033-3549</issn><issn>1468-2877</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV-L1DAUxYMo7rj6BQSlCOJT3XuTtGl8EGRd3YURQefZkCbpTodOU5NU3G9vhpmd9Q8YCIHkd889N4eQpwivEYU4A2CMVVwiRSoAEOEeWSCvm5I2Qtwnix1Q7ogT8ijGDeRFkT0kJ5RS2UhaL8i3Ly76ORgXi9Vap-KTvsk7JRfe5AtXXG0nbVLhu2LpjR6KS6eHtC7eu0mHtHVjKi5-Tm60fZpD1vDjLfE16TTHx-RBp4fonhzOU7L6cLE6vyyXnz9enb9blqaikEouKTXIbaslM53pOhSVgVYiw4a1wJwF29S0FdaBBe5sAwItb6zIU3SCnZK3e9lpbrfOmuwr6EFNod_qcKO87tWfL2O_Vtf-h2KUcQ6YBV4dBIL_PruY1LaPxg2DHp2fo5IoZSVYXWXyxV_kJv_fmIdTsuI1R6hYhugeMsHHGFx3tIKgdtmpf7PLRc9_H-JYchtWBl4eAB1zFl3Qo-njHVdXNQi5s3i256K-dnf2_tv62b5iE5MPR0WONZNcCPYL1Wu3vA</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Erwin, Paul Campbell</creator><creator>Mays, Glen P.</creator><creator>Riley, William J.</creator><general>Association of Schools of Public Health</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Resources That May Matter: The Impact of Local Health Department Expenditures on Health Status</title><author>Erwin, Paul Campbell ; Mays, Glen P. ; Riley, William J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-4922c14dba93cfcff175c0b913183b03ed0d862b7de0d04ed8071d48d7892f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - mortality</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Communicable Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health Expenditures - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Health Expenditures - trends</topic><topic>Health outcomes</topic><topic>Health Resources</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant Mortality</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Life Expectancy - trends</topic><topic>Local Government</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Smoking - epidemiology</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erwin, Paul Campbell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mays, Glen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, William J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Public health reports (1974)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erwin, Paul Campbell</au><au>Mays, Glen P.</au><au>Riley, William J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resources That May Matter: The Impact of Local Health Department Expenditures on Health Status</atitle><jtitle>Public health reports (1974)</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Rep</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>89-95</pages><issn>0033-3549</issn><eissn>1468-2877</eissn><coden>PHRPA6</coden><abstract>Objectives. This study examines the association between changes in local health department (LHD) expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and changes in state-level measures of health, from 1993 to 2005. The literature on the impact of LHD resources on health status has been limited by crosssectional designs. With repeated surveys of LHDs, it is now possible to use longitudinal designs to explore the association between LHD inputs and outcomes. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study. We used a fixed-effects regression model to assess the association between LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, and seven separate health measures. We derived LHD expenditure data from the National Association of County and City Health Officials' surveys of LHDs in 1993, 1997, and 2005. We obtained secondary data on seven health measures—smoking and obesity prevalence, infectious disease morbidity, infant mortality, deaths due to cardiovascular disease and cancer, and overall premature death—through the America's Health Rankings® reports, 1990-2008. Usable data were available for 1,470 LHDs, representing 37 states. Results. An increase in LHD expenditures, aggregated to the state level, was associated with a statistically significant decline in state-level infectious disease morbidity (t= -3.28, p= 0.002) and in years of potential life lost (YPLL) (t= -2.73, p= 0.008). For every $10 increase in aggregated LHD expenditures per capita, infectious disease morbidity decreased by 7.4%, and YPLL decreased by 1.5%. Conclusion. LHD resources are associated with improvements in preventable causes of morbidity and mortality.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Association of Schools of Public Health</pub><pmid>22298926</pmid><doi>10.1177/003335491212700110</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-3549 |
ispartof | Public health reports (1974), 2012-01, Vol.127 (1), p.89-95 |
issn | 0033-3549 1468-2877 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3234401 |
source | PubMed (Medline); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; PAIS Index; Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Cardiovascular Diseases - mortality Cohort Studies Communicable Diseases - epidemiology Cross-Sectional Studies Death Funding Health care expenditures Health Expenditures - statistics & numerical data Health Expenditures - trends Health outcomes Health Resources Health services Health Status Humans Infant Infant Mortality Infant, Newborn Infectious diseases Life Expectancy - trends Local Government Medical sciences Miscellaneous Morbidity Mortality Neoplasms - mortality Obesity Obesity - epidemiology Prevalence Public health Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Retrospective Studies Smoking - epidemiology United States |
title | Resources That May Matter: The Impact of Local Health Department Expenditures on Health Status |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T23%3A06%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resources%20That%20May%20Matter:%20The%20Impact%20of%20Local%20Health%20Department%20Expenditures%20on%20Health%20Status&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20reports%20(1974)&rft.au=Erwin,%20Paul%20Campbell&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=89-95&rft.issn=0033-3549&rft.eissn=1468-2877&rft.coden=PHRPA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/003335491212700110&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E41639477%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-4922c14dba93cfcff175c0b913183b03ed0d862b7de0d04ed8071d48d7892f73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=954641053&rft_id=info:pmid/22298926&rft_jstor_id=41639477&rft_sage_id=10.1177_003335491212700110&rfr_iscdi=true |