Loading…
The efficiency of a sedative or analgesic supplement to periprostatic nerve blockage for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy - a prospective, randomized, controlled, double blind study
The aim was to examine the effect of a sedative or analgesic supplement to periprostatic nerve blockage (PNB) on pain reduction during probe insertion and needle penetration in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. We also investigated the effects of this procedur...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of medical science 2010-10, Vol.6 (5), p.787-792 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-692a378a68ffb1de8368505b6652f7f199a6ce7fd2baa872f6de7e16b150f763 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 792 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 787 |
container_title | Archives of medical science |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Ozok, Hakki U Sagnak, Levent Ates, Mevlut A Karakoyunlu, Nihat Topaloglu, Hikmet Ersoy, Hamit |
description | The aim was to examine the effect of a sedative or analgesic supplement to periprostatic nerve blockage (PNB) on pain reduction during probe insertion and needle penetration in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. We also investigated the effects of this procedure on the positive response rate in re-biopsy.
One hundred TRUS-guided prostate biopsy patients due to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels higher than 2.5 ng/ml and/or abnormal rectal examination findings were evaluated. Group 1 (PNB) was given periprostatic lidocaine injection before the procedure. Group 2 (analgesic) was given tramadol and PNB. Group 3 (sedative) was given midazolam and PNB. Group 4 (control) was not given any anaesthesia or analgesics. Pain scores were assessed during probe insertion and needle penetration by a visual analogue scale.
During probe insertion, the mean pain score of the sedative group was lower than that of the control, analgesic and PNB groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.009, and p < 0.001, respectively). During needle penetration, the mean pain score of the control group was higher than that of the other groups (p < 0.001). The rate of positive response to re-biopsy was found to be 56% in the control group and between 92% and 100% in the other three groups (p < 0.001).
According to our results, it can be concluded that midazolam, given supplementary to PNB, contributes as an effective and safe alternative for pain control during both probe insertion and penetration of the biopsy needle into the prostate capsule; however, tramadol supplement does not provide any additional contributions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5114/aoms.2010.17096 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3298350</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>928905461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-692a378a68ffb1de8368505b6652f7f199a6ce7fd2baa872f6de7e16b150f763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUk1vFSEUnRiNrdW1O0PcuOm0wMwww8bENH4lTdy8PWHg8kplYOSjyfOH-ntk7GujrrhczjlcDqdpXhN8MRDSX8qwpAuK65aMmLMnzSmZOGs5GcjTWo9d3xJO6UnzIqVbjPvaIc-bE0p7wnmPT5tfuxtAYIxVFrw6oGCQRAm0zPYOUIhIeun2kKxCqayrgwV8RjmgFaJdY0i5IhXyECt8dkF9l3tAphJXaT1SwecYHNIlWr9HOUqfIqgsHSqu7lIoXrf7YjVodJSrOjas6YDaOsrWWyuhTnOOKluHxf4Eff6g7LZahzK77XrrNUq56MPL5pmRLsGr43rW7D593F19aa-_ff569eG6VX3f55ZxKrtxkmwyZiYapo5NAx5mxgZqRlM9kkzBaDSdpZxGapiGEQibyYDNyLqz5v297FrmBbSq3kTpxBrtIuNBBGnFvyfe3oh9uBMd5VM34Crw7igQw48CKYvFJgXOSQ-hJMHpxPHQM1KRb_9D3oYS6-dUEOGMdZxuoMt7kKq2VaPN4ygEiy0wYguM2AIj_gSmMt78_YJH_ENCut_YOMRO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>919663921</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The efficiency of a sedative or analgesic supplement to periprostatic nerve blockage for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy - a prospective, randomized, controlled, double blind study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ozok, Hakki U ; Sagnak, Levent ; Ates, Mevlut A ; Karakoyunlu, Nihat ; Topaloglu, Hikmet ; Ersoy, Hamit</creator><creatorcontrib>Ozok, Hakki U ; Sagnak, Levent ; Ates, Mevlut A ; Karakoyunlu, Nihat ; Topaloglu, Hikmet ; Ersoy, Hamit</creatorcontrib><description>The aim was to examine the effect of a sedative or analgesic supplement to periprostatic nerve blockage (PNB) on pain reduction during probe insertion and needle penetration in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. We also investigated the effects of this procedure on the positive response rate in re-biopsy.
One hundred TRUS-guided prostate biopsy patients due to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels higher than 2.5 ng/ml and/or abnormal rectal examination findings were evaluated. Group 1 (PNB) was given periprostatic lidocaine injection before the procedure. Group 2 (analgesic) was given tramadol and PNB. Group 3 (sedative) was given midazolam and PNB. Group 4 (control) was not given any anaesthesia or analgesics. Pain scores were assessed during probe insertion and needle penetration by a visual analogue scale.
During probe insertion, the mean pain score of the sedative group was lower than that of the control, analgesic and PNB groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.009, and p < 0.001, respectively). During needle penetration, the mean pain score of the control group was higher than that of the other groups (p < 0.001). The rate of positive response to re-biopsy was found to be 56% in the control group and between 92% and 100% in the other three groups (p < 0.001).
According to our results, it can be concluded that midazolam, given supplementary to PNB, contributes as an effective and safe alternative for pain control during both probe insertion and penetration of the biopsy needle into the prostate capsule; however, tramadol supplement does not provide any additional contributions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1734-1922</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1896-9151</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2010.17096</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22419940</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: Termedia Publishing House</publisher><subject>Clinical Research</subject><ispartof>Archives of medical science, 2010-10, Vol.6 (5), p.787-792</ispartof><rights>Copyright Termedia Publishing House 2010</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Termedia & Banach 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-692a378a68ffb1de8368505b6652f7f199a6ce7fd2baa872f6de7e16b150f763</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/919663921/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/919663921?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22419940$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ozok, Hakki U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagnak, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ates, Mevlut A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakoyunlu, Nihat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topaloglu, Hikmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ersoy, Hamit</creatorcontrib><title>The efficiency of a sedative or analgesic supplement to periprostatic nerve blockage for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy - a prospective, randomized, controlled, double blind study</title><title>Archives of medical science</title><addtitle>Arch Med Sci</addtitle><description>The aim was to examine the effect of a sedative or analgesic supplement to periprostatic nerve blockage (PNB) on pain reduction during probe insertion and needle penetration in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. We also investigated the effects of this procedure on the positive response rate in re-biopsy.
One hundred TRUS-guided prostate biopsy patients due to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels higher than 2.5 ng/ml and/or abnormal rectal examination findings were evaluated. Group 1 (PNB) was given periprostatic lidocaine injection before the procedure. Group 2 (analgesic) was given tramadol and PNB. Group 3 (sedative) was given midazolam and PNB. Group 4 (control) was not given any anaesthesia or analgesics. Pain scores were assessed during probe insertion and needle penetration by a visual analogue scale.
During probe insertion, the mean pain score of the sedative group was lower than that of the control, analgesic and PNB groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.009, and p < 0.001, respectively). During needle penetration, the mean pain score of the control group was higher than that of the other groups (p < 0.001). The rate of positive response to re-biopsy was found to be 56% in the control group and between 92% and 100% in the other three groups (p < 0.001).
According to our results, it can be concluded that midazolam, given supplementary to PNB, contributes as an effective and safe alternative for pain control during both probe insertion and penetration of the biopsy needle into the prostate capsule; however, tramadol supplement does not provide any additional contributions.</description><subject>Clinical Research</subject><issn>1734-1922</issn><issn>1896-9151</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUk1vFSEUnRiNrdW1O0PcuOm0wMwww8bENH4lTdy8PWHg8kplYOSjyfOH-ntk7GujrrhczjlcDqdpXhN8MRDSX8qwpAuK65aMmLMnzSmZOGs5GcjTWo9d3xJO6UnzIqVbjPvaIc-bE0p7wnmPT5tfuxtAYIxVFrw6oGCQRAm0zPYOUIhIeun2kKxCqayrgwV8RjmgFaJdY0i5IhXyECt8dkF9l3tAphJXaT1SwecYHNIlWr9HOUqfIqgsHSqu7lIoXrf7YjVodJSrOjas6YDaOsrWWyuhTnOOKluHxf4Eff6g7LZahzK77XrrNUq56MPL5pmRLsGr43rW7D593F19aa-_ff569eG6VX3f55ZxKrtxkmwyZiYapo5NAx5mxgZqRlM9kkzBaDSdpZxGapiGEQibyYDNyLqz5v297FrmBbSq3kTpxBrtIuNBBGnFvyfe3oh9uBMd5VM34Crw7igQw48CKYvFJgXOSQ-hJMHpxPHQM1KRb_9D3oYS6-dUEOGMdZxuoMt7kKq2VaPN4ygEiy0wYguM2AIj_gSmMt78_YJH_ENCut_YOMRO</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Ozok, Hakki U</creator><creator>Sagnak, Levent</creator><creator>Ates, Mevlut A</creator><creator>Karakoyunlu, Nihat</creator><creator>Topaloglu, Hikmet</creator><creator>Ersoy, Hamit</creator><general>Termedia Publishing House</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>The efficiency of a sedative or analgesic supplement to periprostatic nerve blockage for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy - a prospective, randomized, controlled, double blind study</title><author>Ozok, Hakki U ; Sagnak, Levent ; Ates, Mevlut A ; Karakoyunlu, Nihat ; Topaloglu, Hikmet ; Ersoy, Hamit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-692a378a68ffb1de8368505b6652f7f199a6ce7fd2baa872f6de7e16b150f763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Clinical Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ozok, Hakki U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagnak, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ates, Mevlut A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakoyunlu, Nihat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topaloglu, Hikmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ersoy, Hamit</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Archives of medical science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ozok, Hakki U</au><au>Sagnak, Levent</au><au>Ates, Mevlut A</au><au>Karakoyunlu, Nihat</au><au>Topaloglu, Hikmet</au><au>Ersoy, Hamit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The efficiency of a sedative or analgesic supplement to periprostatic nerve blockage for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy - a prospective, randomized, controlled, double blind study</atitle><jtitle>Archives of medical science</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Med Sci</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>787</spage><epage>792</epage><pages>787-792</pages><issn>1734-1922</issn><eissn>1896-9151</eissn><abstract>The aim was to examine the effect of a sedative or analgesic supplement to periprostatic nerve blockage (PNB) on pain reduction during probe insertion and needle penetration in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. We also investigated the effects of this procedure on the positive response rate in re-biopsy.
One hundred TRUS-guided prostate biopsy patients due to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels higher than 2.5 ng/ml and/or abnormal rectal examination findings were evaluated. Group 1 (PNB) was given periprostatic lidocaine injection before the procedure. Group 2 (analgesic) was given tramadol and PNB. Group 3 (sedative) was given midazolam and PNB. Group 4 (control) was not given any anaesthesia or analgesics. Pain scores were assessed during probe insertion and needle penetration by a visual analogue scale.
During probe insertion, the mean pain score of the sedative group was lower than that of the control, analgesic and PNB groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.009, and p < 0.001, respectively). During needle penetration, the mean pain score of the control group was higher than that of the other groups (p < 0.001). The rate of positive response to re-biopsy was found to be 56% in the control group and between 92% and 100% in the other three groups (p < 0.001).
According to our results, it can be concluded that midazolam, given supplementary to PNB, contributes as an effective and safe alternative for pain control during both probe insertion and penetration of the biopsy needle into the prostate capsule; however, tramadol supplement does not provide any additional contributions.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Termedia Publishing House</pub><pmid>22419940</pmid><doi>10.5114/aoms.2010.17096</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1734-1922 |
ispartof | Archives of medical science, 2010-10, Vol.6 (5), p.787-792 |
issn | 1734-1922 1896-9151 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3298350 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Clinical Research |
title | The efficiency of a sedative or analgesic supplement to periprostatic nerve blockage for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy - a prospective, randomized, controlled, double blind study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T03%3A05%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20efficiency%20of%20a%20sedative%20or%20analgesic%20supplement%20to%20periprostatic%20nerve%20blockage%20for%20pain%20control%20during%20transrectal%20ultrasound-guided%20prostate%20biopsy%20-%20a%20prospective,%20randomized,%20controlled,%20double%20blind%20study&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20medical%20science&rft.au=Ozok,%20Hakki%20U&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=787&rft.epage=792&rft.pages=787-792&rft.issn=1734-1922&rft.eissn=1896-9151&rft_id=info:doi/10.5114/aoms.2010.17096&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E928905461%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-692a378a68ffb1de8368505b6652f7f199a6ce7fd2baa872f6de7e16b150f763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=919663921&rft_id=info:pmid/22419940&rfr_iscdi=true |