Loading…

Tuberculosis spine: Therapeutically refractory disease

India ranks second amongst the high-burden multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) countries, with an estimated incidence of 2.3% MDR-TB cases amongst the new cases and 17.2% amongst the previously treated cases. The diagnosis and treatment protocol for MDR-TB of the spine are not clearly establi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indian journal of orthopaedics 2012-03, Vol.46 (2), p.171-178
Main Authors: Jain, Anil K, Dhammi, Ish K, Modi, Prashant, Kumar, Jaswant, Sreenivasan, Ravi, Saini, Namita Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-a1503879e98f61093465ec4e8576f40a896f192fe681e8fa654c003a279ce8343
cites
container_end_page 178
container_issue 2
container_start_page 171
container_title Indian journal of orthopaedics
container_volume 46
creator Jain, Anil K
Dhammi, Ish K
Modi, Prashant
Kumar, Jaswant
Sreenivasan, Ravi
Saini, Namita Singh
description India ranks second amongst the high-burden multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) countries, with an estimated incidence of 2.3% MDR-TB cases amongst the new cases and 17.2% amongst the previously treated cases. The diagnosis and treatment protocol for MDR-TB of the spine are not clearly established. We report outcome of a series of 15 cases of TB spine who were suspected to be therapeutically refractory cases (MDR-TB) on the basis of clinicoradiological failures of initial treatment. Fifteen cases of TB spine from C2 to L5 spine were suspected to be the cases of MDR-TB (therapeutically refractory cases) on the basis of failures of adequate clinicoradiological healing response at 5 months or more on antitubercular treatment (ATT). None of the patient was immunocompromised. Thirteen out of 15 patients had tissue samples sent for histopathology, culture and sensitivity, smear, BACTEC, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All patients were put on second line ATT and followed up fortnightly with regular liver and kidney function tests, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and plain X-ray. Healing was documented as subjective improvement of symptoms, reduction in ESR, and observations on contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) such as resolution of marrow edema, fatty replacement of bone marrow and resolution of abscesses. Ambiguous MRI observations in a few patients were resolved on positron emission tomography (PET) scan. Patients were monitored continuously for 2 years after stopping ATT. We could demonstrate a positive culture in three cases. Two of them had multi drug resistance. We could achieve healing status in 13 out of 14 patients after starting second line drugs, one patient is still on treatment while other patient with no drug resistance is responding well on ATT. The suspicion of therapeutically refractory case is of paramount importance. Once suspected, surgery to procure tissue for diagnosis and culture is to be undertaken. The demonstration of drug resistance on culture may not be achieved in all TB spine cases and empiric drug regimen for MDR-TB is to be started. We have achieved the healed status with immunomodulation and second line ATT. The length of treatment needs to be monitored with MRI and PET scan.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/0019-5413.93685
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3308658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A283780071</galeid><sourcerecordid>A283780071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-a1503879e98f61093465ec4e8576f40a896f192fe681e8fa654c003a279ce8343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks1rVDEUxYNY7Fhdu5NBQVdvmu-PLoRS1BYKbsZ1SDM3nZTMy5i8J8x_b55Th46ULAK5v3Muueci9I7gBSeYnWNMTCc4YQvDpBYv0IwYozumqHqJZofqKXpd6wPGgioqX6FTSjnXWIgZksvxDoofU66xzus29nAxX66huC2MQ_Qupd28QCjOD7ns5qtYwVV4g06CSxXePt5n6Oe3r8ur6-72x_ebq8vbzguihs4RgZlWBowOkmDDuBTgOWihZODYaSMDMTSA1AR0cFJwjzFzVBkPmnF2hr7sfbfj3QZWHvqhuGS3JW5c2dnsoj2u9HFt7_NvyxjWUuhm8PnRoORfI9TBbmL1kJLrIY_VGq4NZURP5If_yIc8lr79rkHNTGMjG_RxD927BDb2IbeufrK0l1QzpTFWpFGLZ6h2VrCJPvcQYns_Enx6IliDS8O65tQCyH09Bs_3oC-51pbLYRQE22kj7JS5nTK3fzeiKd4_neCB_7cC7A_ppq2m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>940868096</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tuberculosis spine: Therapeutically refractory disease</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Jain, Anil K ; Dhammi, Ish K ; Modi, Prashant ; Kumar, Jaswant ; Sreenivasan, Ravi ; Saini, Namita Singh</creator><creatorcontrib>Jain, Anil K ; Dhammi, Ish K ; Modi, Prashant ; Kumar, Jaswant ; Sreenivasan, Ravi ; Saini, Namita Singh</creatorcontrib><description>India ranks second amongst the high-burden multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) countries, with an estimated incidence of 2.3% MDR-TB cases amongst the new cases and 17.2% amongst the previously treated cases. The diagnosis and treatment protocol for MDR-TB of the spine are not clearly established. We report outcome of a series of 15 cases of TB spine who were suspected to be therapeutically refractory cases (MDR-TB) on the basis of clinicoradiological failures of initial treatment. Fifteen cases of TB spine from C2 to L5 spine were suspected to be the cases of MDR-TB (therapeutically refractory cases) on the basis of failures of adequate clinicoradiological healing response at 5 months or more on antitubercular treatment (ATT). None of the patient was immunocompromised. Thirteen out of 15 patients had tissue samples sent for histopathology, culture and sensitivity, smear, BACTEC, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All patients were put on second line ATT and followed up fortnightly with regular liver and kidney function tests, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and plain X-ray. Healing was documented as subjective improvement of symptoms, reduction in ESR, and observations on contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) such as resolution of marrow edema, fatty replacement of bone marrow and resolution of abscesses. Ambiguous MRI observations in a few patients were resolved on positron emission tomography (PET) scan. Patients were monitored continuously for 2 years after stopping ATT. We could demonstrate a positive culture in three cases. Two of them had multi drug resistance. We could achieve healing status in 13 out of 14 patients after starting second line drugs, one patient is still on treatment while other patient with no drug resistance is responding well on ATT. The suspicion of therapeutically refractory case is of paramount importance. Once suspected, surgery to procure tissue for diagnosis and culture is to be undertaken. The demonstration of drug resistance on culture may not be achieved in all TB spine cases and empiric drug regimen for MDR-TB is to be started. We have achieved the healed status with immunomodulation and second line ATT. The length of treatment needs to be monitored with MRI and PET scan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-5413</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.93685</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22448055</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Drug resistance ; Medical research ; Original ; Tuberculosis</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2012-03, Vol.46 (2), p.171-178</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd Mar 2012</rights><rights>Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-a1503879e98f61093465ec4e8576f40a896f192fe681e8fa654c003a279ce8343</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308658/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/940868096?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22448055$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jain, Anil K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhammi, Ish K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modi, Prashant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Jaswant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sreenivasan, Ravi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saini, Namita Singh</creatorcontrib><title>Tuberculosis spine: Therapeutically refractory disease</title><title>Indian journal of orthopaedics</title><addtitle>Indian J Orthop</addtitle><description>India ranks second amongst the high-burden multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) countries, with an estimated incidence of 2.3% MDR-TB cases amongst the new cases and 17.2% amongst the previously treated cases. The diagnosis and treatment protocol for MDR-TB of the spine are not clearly established. We report outcome of a series of 15 cases of TB spine who were suspected to be therapeutically refractory cases (MDR-TB) on the basis of clinicoradiological failures of initial treatment. Fifteen cases of TB spine from C2 to L5 spine were suspected to be the cases of MDR-TB (therapeutically refractory cases) on the basis of failures of adequate clinicoradiological healing response at 5 months or more on antitubercular treatment (ATT). None of the patient was immunocompromised. Thirteen out of 15 patients had tissue samples sent for histopathology, culture and sensitivity, smear, BACTEC, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All patients were put on second line ATT and followed up fortnightly with regular liver and kidney function tests, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and plain X-ray. Healing was documented as subjective improvement of symptoms, reduction in ESR, and observations on contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) such as resolution of marrow edema, fatty replacement of bone marrow and resolution of abscesses. Ambiguous MRI observations in a few patients were resolved on positron emission tomography (PET) scan. Patients were monitored continuously for 2 years after stopping ATT. We could demonstrate a positive culture in three cases. Two of them had multi drug resistance. We could achieve healing status in 13 out of 14 patients after starting second line drugs, one patient is still on treatment while other patient with no drug resistance is responding well on ATT. The suspicion of therapeutically refractory case is of paramount importance. Once suspected, surgery to procure tissue for diagnosis and culture is to be undertaken. The demonstration of drug resistance on culture may not be achieved in all TB spine cases and empiric drug regimen for MDR-TB is to be started. We have achieved the healed status with immunomodulation and second line ATT. The length of treatment needs to be monitored with MRI and PET scan.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><issn>0019-5413</issn><issn>1998-3727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptks1rVDEUxYNY7Fhdu5NBQVdvmu-PLoRS1BYKbsZ1SDM3nZTMy5i8J8x_b55Th46ULAK5v3Muueci9I7gBSeYnWNMTCc4YQvDpBYv0IwYozumqHqJZofqKXpd6wPGgioqX6FTSjnXWIgZksvxDoofU66xzus29nAxX66huC2MQ_Qupd28QCjOD7ns5qtYwVV4g06CSxXePt5n6Oe3r8ur6-72x_ebq8vbzguihs4RgZlWBowOkmDDuBTgOWihZODYaSMDMTSA1AR0cFJwjzFzVBkPmnF2hr7sfbfj3QZWHvqhuGS3JW5c2dnsoj2u9HFt7_NvyxjWUuhm8PnRoORfI9TBbmL1kJLrIY_VGq4NZURP5If_yIc8lr79rkHNTGMjG_RxD927BDb2IbeufrK0l1QzpTFWpFGLZ6h2VrCJPvcQYns_Enx6IliDS8O65tQCyH09Bs_3oC-51pbLYRQE22kj7JS5nTK3fzeiKd4_neCB_7cC7A_ppq2m</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Jain, Anil K</creator><creator>Dhammi, Ish K</creator><creator>Modi, Prashant</creator><creator>Kumar, Jaswant</creator><creator>Sreenivasan, Ravi</creator><creator>Saini, Namita Singh</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Tuberculosis spine: Therapeutically refractory disease</title><author>Jain, Anil K ; Dhammi, Ish K ; Modi, Prashant ; Kumar, Jaswant ; Sreenivasan, Ravi ; Saini, Namita Singh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-a1503879e98f61093465ec4e8576f40a896f192fe681e8fa654c003a279ce8343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jain, Anil K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhammi, Ish K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modi, Prashant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Jaswant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sreenivasan, Ravi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saini, Namita Singh</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jain, Anil K</au><au>Dhammi, Ish K</au><au>Modi, Prashant</au><au>Kumar, Jaswant</au><au>Sreenivasan, Ravi</au><au>Saini, Namita Singh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tuberculosis spine: Therapeutically refractory disease</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of orthopaedics</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Orthop</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>171-178</pages><issn>0019-5413</issn><eissn>1998-3727</eissn><abstract>India ranks second amongst the high-burden multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) countries, with an estimated incidence of 2.3% MDR-TB cases amongst the new cases and 17.2% amongst the previously treated cases. The diagnosis and treatment protocol for MDR-TB of the spine are not clearly established. We report outcome of a series of 15 cases of TB spine who were suspected to be therapeutically refractory cases (MDR-TB) on the basis of clinicoradiological failures of initial treatment. Fifteen cases of TB spine from C2 to L5 spine were suspected to be the cases of MDR-TB (therapeutically refractory cases) on the basis of failures of adequate clinicoradiological healing response at 5 months or more on antitubercular treatment (ATT). None of the patient was immunocompromised. Thirteen out of 15 patients had tissue samples sent for histopathology, culture and sensitivity, smear, BACTEC, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All patients were put on second line ATT and followed up fortnightly with regular liver and kidney function tests, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and plain X-ray. Healing was documented as subjective improvement of symptoms, reduction in ESR, and observations on contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) such as resolution of marrow edema, fatty replacement of bone marrow and resolution of abscesses. Ambiguous MRI observations in a few patients were resolved on positron emission tomography (PET) scan. Patients were monitored continuously for 2 years after stopping ATT. We could demonstrate a positive culture in three cases. Two of them had multi drug resistance. We could achieve healing status in 13 out of 14 patients after starting second line drugs, one patient is still on treatment while other patient with no drug resistance is responding well on ATT. The suspicion of therapeutically refractory case is of paramount importance. Once suspected, surgery to procure tissue for diagnosis and culture is to be undertaken. The demonstration of drug resistance on culture may not be achieved in all TB spine cases and empiric drug regimen for MDR-TB is to be started. We have achieved the healed status with immunomodulation and second line ATT. The length of treatment needs to be monitored with MRI and PET scan.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>22448055</pmid><doi>10.4103/0019-5413.93685</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0019-5413
ispartof Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2012-03, Vol.46 (2), p.171-178
issn 0019-5413
1998-3727
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3308658
source PubMed Central Free; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Springer Link
subjects Care and treatment
Drug resistance
Medical research
Original
Tuberculosis
title Tuberculosis spine: Therapeutically refractory disease
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T23%3A00%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tuberculosis%20spine:%20Therapeutically%20refractory%20disease&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Jain,%20Anil%20K&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=171-178&rft.issn=0019-5413&rft.eissn=1998-3727&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/0019-5413.93685&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA283780071%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-a1503879e98f61093465ec4e8576f40a896f192fe681e8fa654c003a279ce8343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=940868096&rft_id=info:pmid/22448055&rft_galeid=A283780071&rfr_iscdi=true