Loading…

Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Critical Review of the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) and of Appropriate Methods to Address the Clinical Problem

The preventive treatment of unruptured aneurysms has been performed for decades despite the lack of evidence of a clinical benefit. Reports of observational studies such as the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) suggest that preventive treatments are rarely justified. A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Interventional neuroradiology 2008-03, Vol.14 (1), p.85-96
Main Authors: Raymond, J., Guillemin, F., Proust, F., Molyneux, A.J., Fox, A.J., Claiborne, J.S., Meder, J.-F., Rouleau, I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-df23ac76ec6383cfba330a8d6e59399cb19c2472527464cae6b1fe5c8bc449273
container_end_page 96
container_issue 1
container_start_page 85
container_title Interventional neuroradiology
container_volume 14
creator Raymond, J.
Guillemin, F.
Proust, F.
Molyneux, A.J.
Fox, A.J.
Claiborne, J.S.
Meder, J.-F.
Rouleau, I.
description The preventive treatment of unruptured aneurysms has been performed for decades despite the lack of evidence of a clinical benefit. Reports of observational studies such as the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) suggest that preventive treatments are rarely justified. Are these reports compelling enough to guide clinical practice? The ISUIA methods and data are reviewed and analysed in a more conventional manner. The design of the appropriate clinical research program is approached by steps, reviewing potential problems, from the formulation of the precise research question to the interpretation of subgroup analyses, including sample size, representativity, duration of observation period, blinding, definition of outcome events, analysis of cross-overs, losses to follow-up, and data reporting. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms observed in ISUIA ruptured at a minimal annual rate of 0.8% (0.5–1%), despite multiple methodological difficulties biased in favour of a benign natural history. Available registries do not have the power or the design capable of providing normative guidelines for clinical decisions. The appropriate method to solve the clinical dilemma is a multicentric trial comparing the incidence of a hard clinical outcome events in approximately 2000 patients randomly allocated to a treatment group and a deferred treatment group, all followed for ten years or more. Observational studies have failed to provide reliable evidence in favour or against the preventive treatment of unruptured aneurysms. A randomized trial is in order to clarify what is the role of prevention in this common clinical problem.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/159101990801400111
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3313710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_159101990801400111</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1037656204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-df23ac76ec6383cfba330a8d6e59399cb19c2472527464cae6b1fe5c8bc449273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRbKz-ARdSd25i584zsxFK8VEouLHrYTKZ1JQ86kwi9N-b0FoUwdXlcr9z7uEgdA34HkDKKXAFGJTCCQaGMQCcoIjQhMekX05RNADxQIzQRQgbjAWnCs7RiGDOpVQ4Qrer2nfbtvMumyzq1hvrTV2YcjKrXed3oQqX6Cw3ZXBXhzlGq6fHt_lLvHx9Xsxny9gSqdo4ywk1VgpnBU2ozVNDKTZJJhxXVCmbgrKEScKJZIJZ40QKueM2SS1jikg6Rg97322XVi6zbkhT6q0vKuN3ujGF_n2pi3e9bj41pUAl4N7g7mDgm4_OhVZXRbCuLE3tmi7oHpGCC4JZj5I9an0Tgnf58Q1gPXSr_3bbi25-BjxKvsvsgekeCGbt9KbpfN0X9p_lF3zMgW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1037656204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Critical Review of the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) and of Appropriate Methods to Address the Clinical Problem</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Raymond, J. ; Guillemin, F. ; Proust, F. ; Molyneux, A.J. ; Fox, A.J. ; Claiborne, J.S. ; Meder, J.-F. ; Rouleau, I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Raymond, J. ; Guillemin, F. ; Proust, F. ; Molyneux, A.J. ; Fox, A.J. ; Claiborne, J.S. ; Meder, J.-F. ; Rouleau, I. ; Trial ON Endovascular Aneurysm Management (TEAM) Collaborative Group ; The Trial On Endovascular Aneurysm Management (Team) Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><description>The preventive treatment of unruptured aneurysms has been performed for decades despite the lack of evidence of a clinical benefit. Reports of observational studies such as the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) suggest that preventive treatments are rarely justified. Are these reports compelling enough to guide clinical practice? The ISUIA methods and data are reviewed and analysed in a more conventional manner. The design of the appropriate clinical research program is approached by steps, reviewing potential problems, from the formulation of the precise research question to the interpretation of subgroup analyses, including sample size, representativity, duration of observation period, blinding, definition of outcome events, analysis of cross-overs, losses to follow-up, and data reporting. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms observed in ISUIA ruptured at a minimal annual rate of 0.8% (0.5–1%), despite multiple methodological difficulties biased in favour of a benign natural history. Available registries do not have the power or the design capable of providing normative guidelines for clinical decisions. The appropriate method to solve the clinical dilemma is a multicentric trial comparing the incidence of a hard clinical outcome events in approximately 2000 patients randomly allocated to a treatment group and a deferred treatment group, all followed for ten years or more. Observational studies have failed to provide reliable evidence in favour or against the preventive treatment of unruptured aneurysms. A randomized trial is in order to clarify what is the role of prevention in this common clinical problem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1591-0199</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2385-2011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/159101990801400111</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20557790</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Case Reports</subject><ispartof>Interventional neuroradiology, 2008-03, Vol.14 (1), p.85-96</ispartof><rights>2008 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>Copyright © 2008, Centauro S.r.l. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-df23ac76ec6383cfba330a8d6e59399cb19c2472527464cae6b1fe5c8bc449273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3313710/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3313710/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20557790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raymond, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillemin, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proust, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molyneux, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claiborne, J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meder, J.-F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouleau, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trial ON Endovascular Aneurysm Management (TEAM) Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Trial On Endovascular Aneurysm Management (Team) Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><title>Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Critical Review of the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) and of Appropriate Methods to Address the Clinical Problem</title><title>Interventional neuroradiology</title><addtitle>Interv Neuroradiol</addtitle><description>The preventive treatment of unruptured aneurysms has been performed for decades despite the lack of evidence of a clinical benefit. Reports of observational studies such as the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) suggest that preventive treatments are rarely justified. Are these reports compelling enough to guide clinical practice? The ISUIA methods and data are reviewed and analysed in a more conventional manner. The design of the appropriate clinical research program is approached by steps, reviewing potential problems, from the formulation of the precise research question to the interpretation of subgroup analyses, including sample size, representativity, duration of observation period, blinding, definition of outcome events, analysis of cross-overs, losses to follow-up, and data reporting. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms observed in ISUIA ruptured at a minimal annual rate of 0.8% (0.5–1%), despite multiple methodological difficulties biased in favour of a benign natural history. Available registries do not have the power or the design capable of providing normative guidelines for clinical decisions. The appropriate method to solve the clinical dilemma is a multicentric trial comparing the incidence of a hard clinical outcome events in approximately 2000 patients randomly allocated to a treatment group and a deferred treatment group, all followed for ten years or more. Observational studies have failed to provide reliable evidence in favour or against the preventive treatment of unruptured aneurysms. A randomized trial is in order to clarify what is the role of prevention in this common clinical problem.</description><subject>Case Reports</subject><issn>1591-0199</issn><issn>2385-2011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRbKz-ARdSd25i584zsxFK8VEouLHrYTKZ1JQ86kwi9N-b0FoUwdXlcr9z7uEgdA34HkDKKXAFGJTCCQaGMQCcoIjQhMekX05RNADxQIzQRQgbjAWnCs7RiGDOpVQ4Qrer2nfbtvMumyzq1hvrTV2YcjKrXed3oQqX6Cw3ZXBXhzlGq6fHt_lLvHx9Xsxny9gSqdo4ywk1VgpnBU2ozVNDKTZJJhxXVCmbgrKEScKJZIJZ40QKueM2SS1jikg6Rg97322XVi6zbkhT6q0vKuN3ujGF_n2pi3e9bj41pUAl4N7g7mDgm4_OhVZXRbCuLE3tmi7oHpGCC4JZj5I9an0Tgnf58Q1gPXSr_3bbi25-BjxKvsvsgekeCGbt9KbpfN0X9p_lF3zMgW0</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Raymond, J.</creator><creator>Guillemin, F.</creator><creator>Proust, F.</creator><creator>Molyneux, A.J.</creator><creator>Fox, A.J.</creator><creator>Claiborne, J.S.</creator><creator>Meder, J.-F.</creator><creator>Rouleau, I.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Centauro S.r.l</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms</title><author>Raymond, J. ; Guillemin, F. ; Proust, F. ; Molyneux, A.J. ; Fox, A.J. ; Claiborne, J.S. ; Meder, J.-F. ; Rouleau, I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-df23ac76ec6383cfba330a8d6e59399cb19c2472527464cae6b1fe5c8bc449273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Case Reports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raymond, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillemin, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proust, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molyneux, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claiborne, J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meder, J.-F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouleau, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trial ON Endovascular Aneurysm Management (TEAM) Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Trial On Endovascular Aneurysm Management (Team) Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Interventional neuroradiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raymond, J.</au><au>Guillemin, F.</au><au>Proust, F.</au><au>Molyneux, A.J.</au><au>Fox, A.J.</au><au>Claiborne, J.S.</au><au>Meder, J.-F.</au><au>Rouleau, I.</au><aucorp>Trial ON Endovascular Aneurysm Management (TEAM) Collaborative Group</aucorp><aucorp>The Trial On Endovascular Aneurysm Management (Team) Collaborative Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Critical Review of the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) and of Appropriate Methods to Address the Clinical Problem</atitle><jtitle>Interventional neuroradiology</jtitle><addtitle>Interv Neuroradiol</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>85-96</pages><issn>1591-0199</issn><eissn>2385-2011</eissn><abstract>The preventive treatment of unruptured aneurysms has been performed for decades despite the lack of evidence of a clinical benefit. Reports of observational studies such as the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) suggest that preventive treatments are rarely justified. Are these reports compelling enough to guide clinical practice? The ISUIA methods and data are reviewed and analysed in a more conventional manner. The design of the appropriate clinical research program is approached by steps, reviewing potential problems, from the formulation of the precise research question to the interpretation of subgroup analyses, including sample size, representativity, duration of observation period, blinding, definition of outcome events, analysis of cross-overs, losses to follow-up, and data reporting. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms observed in ISUIA ruptured at a minimal annual rate of 0.8% (0.5–1%), despite multiple methodological difficulties biased in favour of a benign natural history. Available registries do not have the power or the design capable of providing normative guidelines for clinical decisions. The appropriate method to solve the clinical dilemma is a multicentric trial comparing the incidence of a hard clinical outcome events in approximately 2000 patients randomly allocated to a treatment group and a deferred treatment group, all followed for ten years or more. Observational studies have failed to provide reliable evidence in favour or against the preventive treatment of unruptured aneurysms. A randomized trial is in order to clarify what is the role of prevention in this common clinical problem.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>20557790</pmid><doi>10.1177/159101990801400111</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1591-0199
ispartof Interventional neuroradiology, 2008-03, Vol.14 (1), p.85-96
issn 1591-0199
2385-2011
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3313710
source Sage Journals Online; PubMed Central
subjects Case Reports
title Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Critical Review of the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) and of Appropriate Methods to Address the Clinical Problem
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A35%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unruptured%20Intracranial%20Aneurysms:%20A%20Critical%20Review%20of%20the%20International%20Study%20of%20Unruptured%20Intracranial%20Aneurysms%20(ISUIA)%20and%20of%20Appropriate%20Methods%20to%20Address%20the%20Clinical%20Problem&rft.jtitle=Interventional%20neuroradiology&rft.au=Raymond,%20J.&rft.aucorp=Trial%20ON%20Endovascular%20Aneurysm%20Management%20(TEAM)%20Collaborative%20Group&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=85-96&rft.issn=1591-0199&rft.eissn=2385-2011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/159101990801400111&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1037656204%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-df23ac76ec6383cfba330a8d6e59399cb19c2472527464cae6b1fe5c8bc449273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1037656204&rft_id=info:pmid/20557790&rft_sage_id=10.1177_159101990801400111&rfr_iscdi=true