Loading…

Competition among memes in a world with limited attention

The wide adoption of social media has increased the competition among ideas for our finite attention. We employ a parsimonious agent-based model to study whether such a competition may affect the popularity of different memes, the diversity of information we are exposed to and the fading of our coll...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2012-03, Vol.2 (1), p.335-335, Article 335
Main Authors: Weng, L., Flammini, A., Vespignani, A., Menczer, F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-c3bae8a02fb5006b370f39b01301e9d824cd0c133370559074fffd60e20eed893
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-c3bae8a02fb5006b370f39b01301e9d824cd0c133370559074fffd60e20eed893
container_end_page 335
container_issue 1
container_start_page 335
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 2
creator Weng, L.
Flammini, A.
Vespignani, A.
Menczer, F.
description The wide adoption of social media has increased the competition among ideas for our finite attention. We employ a parsimonious agent-based model to study whether such a competition may affect the popularity of different memes, the diversity of information we are exposed to and the fading of our collective interests for specific topics. Agents share messages on a social network but can only pay attention to a portion of the information they receive. In the emerging dynamics of information diffusion, a few memes go viral while most do not. The predictions of our model are consistent with empirical data from Twitter , a popular microblogging platform. Surprisingly, we can explain the massive heterogeneity in the popularity and persistence of memes as deriving from a combination of the competition for our limited attention and the structure of the social network, without the need to assume different intrinsic values among ideas.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/srep00335
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3315179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1897397290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-c3bae8a02fb5006b370f39b01301e9d824cd0c133370559074fffd60e20eed893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkU9LAzEQxYMoVmoPfgFZ8CAK1Ulmt7u5CFL8BwUveg7Z3dk2ZXdTk63Fb29Ka6maSzK8H29m8hg743DDAbNb72gBgJgcsBMBcTIUKMTh3rvHBt7PIZxEyJjLY9YTIh5xmfITJse2WVBnOmPbSDe2nUYNNeQjE8poZV1dRivTzaLaNKajMtJdR-2aPmVHla49DbZ3n70_PryNn4eT16eX8f1kWMSYdsMCc02ZBlHlCcAoxxQqlDlwBE6yzERclFBwxCAkiYQ0rqqqHAEJICoziX12t_FdLPOGyiJ0d7pWC2ca7b6U1Ub9VlozU1P7qRB5wtO1weXWwNmPJflONcYXVNe6Jbv0So4wzqRACOTFH3Jul64N2ymeyRRlKuSautpQhbM-_H61m4WDWkeidpEE9nx_-B35E0AArjeAD1I7JbfX8p_bN4ChlJ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1897397290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competition among memes in a world with limited attention</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Weng, L. ; Flammini, A. ; Vespignani, A. ; Menczer, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weng, L. ; Flammini, A. ; Vespignani, A. ; Menczer, F.</creatorcontrib><description>The wide adoption of social media has increased the competition among ideas for our finite attention. We employ a parsimonious agent-based model to study whether such a competition may affect the popularity of different memes, the diversity of information we are exposed to and the fading of our collective interests for specific topics. Agents share messages on a social network but can only pay attention to a portion of the information they receive. In the emerging dynamics of information diffusion, a few memes go viral while most do not. The predictions of our model are consistent with empirical data from Twitter , a popular microblogging platform. Surprisingly, we can explain the massive heterogeneity in the popularity and persistence of memes as deriving from a combination of the competition for our limited attention and the structure of the social network, without the need to assume different intrinsic values among ideas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/srep00335</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22461971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>639/705/259 ; 639/705/531 ; 639/766/530 ; Competition ; Heterogeneity ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; multidisciplinary ; Science ; Social networks ; Social organization</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2012-03, Vol.2 (1), p.335-335, Article 335</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Mar 2012</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012, Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-c3bae8a02fb5006b370f39b01301e9d824cd0c133370559074fffd60e20eed893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-c3bae8a02fb5006b370f39b01301e9d824cd0c133370559074fffd60e20eed893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1897397290/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1897397290?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22461971$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weng, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flammini, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vespignani, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menczer, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Competition among memes in a world with limited attention</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>The wide adoption of social media has increased the competition among ideas for our finite attention. We employ a parsimonious agent-based model to study whether such a competition may affect the popularity of different memes, the diversity of information we are exposed to and the fading of our collective interests for specific topics. Agents share messages on a social network but can only pay attention to a portion of the information they receive. In the emerging dynamics of information diffusion, a few memes go viral while most do not. The predictions of our model are consistent with empirical data from Twitter , a popular microblogging platform. Surprisingly, we can explain the massive heterogeneity in the popularity and persistence of memes as deriving from a combination of the competition for our limited attention and the structure of the social network, without the need to assume different intrinsic values among ideas.</description><subject>639/705/259</subject><subject>639/705/531</subject><subject>639/766/530</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social organization</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNplkU9LAzEQxYMoVmoPfgFZ8CAK1Ulmt7u5CFL8BwUveg7Z3dk2ZXdTk63Fb29Ka6maSzK8H29m8hg743DDAbNb72gBgJgcsBMBcTIUKMTh3rvHBt7PIZxEyJjLY9YTIh5xmfITJse2WVBnOmPbSDe2nUYNNeQjE8poZV1dRivTzaLaNKajMtJdR-2aPmVHla49DbZ3n70_PryNn4eT16eX8f1kWMSYdsMCc02ZBlHlCcAoxxQqlDlwBE6yzERclFBwxCAkiYQ0rqqqHAEJICoziX12t_FdLPOGyiJ0d7pWC2ca7b6U1Ub9VlozU1P7qRB5wtO1weXWwNmPJflONcYXVNe6Jbv0So4wzqRACOTFH3Jul64N2ymeyRRlKuSautpQhbM-_H61m4WDWkeidpEE9nx_-B35E0AArjeAD1I7JbfX8p_bN4ChlJ0</recordid><startdate>20120329</startdate><enddate>20120329</enddate><creator>Weng, L.</creator><creator>Flammini, A.</creator><creator>Vespignani, A.</creator><creator>Menczer, F.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120329</creationdate><title>Competition among memes in a world with limited attention</title><author>Weng, L. ; Flammini, A. ; Vespignani, A. ; Menczer, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-c3bae8a02fb5006b370f39b01301e9d824cd0c133370559074fffd60e20eed893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>639/705/259</topic><topic>639/705/531</topic><topic>639/766/530</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weng, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flammini, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vespignani, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menczer, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weng, L.</au><au>Flammini, A.</au><au>Vespignani, A.</au><au>Menczer, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competition among memes in a world with limited attention</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2012-03-29</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>335</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>335-335</pages><artnum>335</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>The wide adoption of social media has increased the competition among ideas for our finite attention. We employ a parsimonious agent-based model to study whether such a competition may affect the popularity of different memes, the diversity of information we are exposed to and the fading of our collective interests for specific topics. Agents share messages on a social network but can only pay attention to a portion of the information they receive. In the emerging dynamics of information diffusion, a few memes go viral while most do not. The predictions of our model are consistent with empirical data from Twitter , a popular microblogging platform. Surprisingly, we can explain the massive heterogeneity in the popularity and persistence of memes as deriving from a combination of the competition for our limited attention and the structure of the social network, without the need to assume different intrinsic values among ideas.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>22461971</pmid><doi>10.1038/srep00335</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2012-03, Vol.2 (1), p.335-335, Article 335
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3315179
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects 639/705/259
639/705/531
639/766/530
Competition
Heterogeneity
Humanities and Social Sciences
multidisciplinary
Science
Social networks
Social organization
title Competition among memes in a world with limited attention
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T02%3A57%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competition%20among%20memes%20in%20a%20world%20with%20limited%20attention&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Weng,%20L.&rft.date=2012-03-29&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=335&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=335-335&rft.artnum=335&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/srep00335&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1897397290%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-c3bae8a02fb5006b370f39b01301e9d824cd0c133370559074fffd60e20eed893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1897397290&rft_id=info:pmid/22461971&rfr_iscdi=true