Loading…

Cancer incidence risks to patients due to hysterosalpingography

Cancer incidence estimates and dosimetry of 120 patients undergoing hysterosalpingography (HSG) without screening at five rural hospitals and with screening using image intensifier-TV at an urban hospital have been studied. Free in air kerma measurements were taken for patient dosimetry. Using PCXMC...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of medical physics 2012-04, Vol.37 (2), p.112-116
Main Authors: Gyekye, Prince K, Emi-Reynolds, Geoffrey, Boadu, Mary, Darko, Emmanuel O, Yeboah, Johnson, Inkoom, Stephen, Mensah, Cynthia K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-17cabc7fc676d125fcf1e00d0f1cb5e4b59ed353c88cd46dbbc2beb93ec126243
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-17cabc7fc676d125fcf1e00d0f1cb5e4b59ed353c88cd46dbbc2beb93ec126243
container_end_page 116
container_issue 2
container_start_page 112
container_title Journal of medical physics
container_volume 37
creator Gyekye, Prince K
Emi-Reynolds, Geoffrey
Boadu, Mary
Darko, Emmanuel O
Yeboah, Johnson
Inkoom, Stephen
Mensah, Cynthia K
description Cancer incidence estimates and dosimetry of 120 patients undergoing hysterosalpingography (HSG) without screening at five rural hospitals and with screening using image intensifier-TV at an urban hospital have been studied. Free in air kerma measurements were taken for patient dosimetry. Using PCXMC version 1.5, organ and effective doses to patients were estimated. Incidence of cancer of the ovary, colon, bladder and uterus due to radiation exposure were estimated using biological effects of ionising radiation committee VII excess relative risk models. The effective dose to patients was estimated to be 0.20 ± 0.03 mSv and 0.06 ± 0.01 mSv for procedures with and without screening, respectively. The average number of exposures for both procedures, 2.5, and screening time of 48.1 s were recorded. Screening time contributed majority of the patient doses due to HSG; therefore, it should be optimised as much as possible. Of all the cancers considered, the incidence of cancer of the bladder for patients undergoing HSG procedures is more probable.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/0971-6203.94747
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3339143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A286075141</galeid><sourcerecordid>A286075141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-17cabc7fc676d125fcf1e00d0f1cb5e4b59ed353c88cd46dbbc2beb93ec126243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhzA1FcOklW38m8QVUrQpFqsSlPVuOPcm6ZO1gJ0j773HYsqLVygd_zDOvx-MXofcErznB7BLLmpQVxWwtec3rF2hFpGxKJgl7iVbH6Bl6k9IDxlxIzl-jM0qFqBtMV-jLRnsDsXDeOAt5WUSXfqZiCsWoJwd-SoWdYdlv92mCGJIeRuf70Ec9bvdv0atODwnePc7n6P7r9d3mprz98e375uq2NIKKqSS10a2pO1PVlSVUdKYjgLHFHTGtAN4KCZYJZprGWF7ZtjW0hVYyMIRWlLNz9PmgO87tDqzJhUU9qDG6nY57FbRTTyPebVUffivGcjM4ywIXjwIx_JohTWrnkoFh0B7CnBTBhBBZHdCPz9CHMEefn6ekZBVpKJcZ-nSAej2Acr4L-VqzaKor2lS4FoSTTJUnqB485BqDh87l4yf8-gSfh4WdMycTLg8JJv9MitAdW0KwWiyiFhOoxQTqr0Vyxof_O3nk_3mC_QENLrXr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>993618249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cancer incidence risks to patients due to hysterosalpingography</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gyekye, Prince K ; Emi-Reynolds, Geoffrey ; Boadu, Mary ; Darko, Emmanuel O ; Yeboah, Johnson ; Inkoom, Stephen ; Mensah, Cynthia K</creator><creatorcontrib>Gyekye, Prince K ; Emi-Reynolds, Geoffrey ; Boadu, Mary ; Darko, Emmanuel O ; Yeboah, Johnson ; Inkoom, Stephen ; Mensah, Cynthia K</creatorcontrib><description>Cancer incidence estimates and dosimetry of 120 patients undergoing hysterosalpingography (HSG) without screening at five rural hospitals and with screening using image intensifier-TV at an urban hospital have been studied. Free in air kerma measurements were taken for patient dosimetry. Using PCXMC version 1.5, organ and effective doses to patients were estimated. Incidence of cancer of the ovary, colon, bladder and uterus due to radiation exposure were estimated using biological effects of ionising radiation committee VII excess relative risk models. The effective dose to patients was estimated to be 0.20 ± 0.03 mSv and 0.06 ± 0.01 mSv for procedures with and without screening, respectively. The average number of exposures for both procedures, 2.5, and screening time of 48.1 s were recorded. Screening time contributed majority of the patient doses due to HSG; therefore, it should be optimised as much as possible. Of all the cancers considered, the incidence of cancer of the bladder for patients undergoing HSG procedures is more probable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0971-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.94747</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22557802</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Bladder ; Cancer ; Cancer patients ; Expected values ; Health aspects ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Nuclear radiation ; Radiation ; Risk assessment ; Risk factors ; Studies ; Technical Note</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical physics, 2012-04, Vol.37 (2), p.112-116</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd Apr 2012</rights><rights>Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-17cabc7fc676d125fcf1e00d0f1cb5e4b59ed353c88cd46dbbc2beb93ec126243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-17cabc7fc676d125fcf1e00d0f1cb5e4b59ed353c88cd46dbbc2beb93ec126243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3339143/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/993618249?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22557802$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gyekye, Prince K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emi-Reynolds, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boadu, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darko, Emmanuel O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeboah, Johnson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inkoom, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mensah, Cynthia K</creatorcontrib><title>Cancer incidence risks to patients due to hysterosalpingography</title><title>Journal of medical physics</title><addtitle>J Med Phys</addtitle><description>Cancer incidence estimates and dosimetry of 120 patients undergoing hysterosalpingography (HSG) without screening at five rural hospitals and with screening using image intensifier-TV at an urban hospital have been studied. Free in air kerma measurements were taken for patient dosimetry. Using PCXMC version 1.5, organ and effective doses to patients were estimated. Incidence of cancer of the ovary, colon, bladder and uterus due to radiation exposure were estimated using biological effects of ionising radiation committee VII excess relative risk models. The effective dose to patients was estimated to be 0.20 ± 0.03 mSv and 0.06 ± 0.01 mSv for procedures with and without screening, respectively. The average number of exposures for both procedures, 2.5, and screening time of 48.1 s were recorded. Screening time contributed majority of the patient doses due to HSG; therefore, it should be optimised as much as possible. Of all the cancers considered, the incidence of cancer of the bladder for patients undergoing HSG procedures is more probable.</description><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Expected values</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Nuclear radiation</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technical Note</subject><issn>0971-6203</issn><issn>1998-3913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhzA1FcOklW38m8QVUrQpFqsSlPVuOPcm6ZO1gJ0j773HYsqLVygd_zDOvx-MXofcErznB7BLLmpQVxWwtec3rF2hFpGxKJgl7iVbH6Bl6k9IDxlxIzl-jM0qFqBtMV-jLRnsDsXDeOAt5WUSXfqZiCsWoJwd-SoWdYdlv92mCGJIeRuf70Ec9bvdv0atODwnePc7n6P7r9d3mprz98e375uq2NIKKqSS10a2pO1PVlSVUdKYjgLHFHTGtAN4KCZYJZprGWF7ZtjW0hVYyMIRWlLNz9PmgO87tDqzJhUU9qDG6nY57FbRTTyPebVUffivGcjM4ywIXjwIx_JohTWrnkoFh0B7CnBTBhBBZHdCPz9CHMEefn6ekZBVpKJcZ-nSAej2Acr4L-VqzaKor2lS4FoSTTJUnqB485BqDh87l4yf8-gSfh4WdMycTLg8JJv9MitAdW0KwWiyiFhOoxQTqr0Vyxof_O3nk_3mC_QENLrXr</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Gyekye, Prince K</creator><creator>Emi-Reynolds, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Boadu, Mary</creator><creator>Darko, Emmanuel O</creator><creator>Yeboah, Johnson</creator><creator>Inkoom, Stephen</creator><creator>Mensah, Cynthia K</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Cancer incidence risks to patients due to hysterosalpingography</title><author>Gyekye, Prince K ; Emi-Reynolds, Geoffrey ; Boadu, Mary ; Darko, Emmanuel O ; Yeboah, Johnson ; Inkoom, Stephen ; Mensah, Cynthia K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-17cabc7fc676d125fcf1e00d0f1cb5e4b59ed353c88cd46dbbc2beb93ec126243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Expected values</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Nuclear radiation</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technical Note</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gyekye, Prince K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emi-Reynolds, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boadu, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darko, Emmanuel O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeboah, Johnson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inkoom, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mensah, Cynthia K</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gyekye, Prince K</au><au>Emi-Reynolds, Geoffrey</au><au>Boadu, Mary</au><au>Darko, Emmanuel O</au><au>Yeboah, Johnson</au><au>Inkoom, Stephen</au><au>Mensah, Cynthia K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cancer incidence risks to patients due to hysterosalpingography</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Phys</addtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>112</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>112-116</pages><issn>0971-6203</issn><eissn>1998-3913</eissn><abstract>Cancer incidence estimates and dosimetry of 120 patients undergoing hysterosalpingography (HSG) without screening at five rural hospitals and with screening using image intensifier-TV at an urban hospital have been studied. Free in air kerma measurements were taken for patient dosimetry. Using PCXMC version 1.5, organ and effective doses to patients were estimated. Incidence of cancer of the ovary, colon, bladder and uterus due to radiation exposure were estimated using biological effects of ionising radiation committee VII excess relative risk models. The effective dose to patients was estimated to be 0.20 ± 0.03 mSv and 0.06 ± 0.01 mSv for procedures with and without screening, respectively. The average number of exposures for both procedures, 2.5, and screening time of 48.1 s were recorded. Screening time contributed majority of the patient doses due to HSG; therefore, it should be optimised as much as possible. Of all the cancers considered, the incidence of cancer of the bladder for patients undergoing HSG procedures is more probable.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>22557802</pmid><doi>10.4103/0971-6203.94747</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0971-6203
ispartof Journal of medical physics, 2012-04, Vol.37 (2), p.112-116
issn 0971-6203
1998-3913
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3339143
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess); Publicly Available Content Database; IngentaConnect Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Bladder
Cancer
Cancer patients
Expected values
Health aspects
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Nuclear radiation
Radiation
Risk assessment
Risk factors
Studies
Technical Note
title Cancer incidence risks to patients due to hysterosalpingography
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T23%3A00%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cancer%20incidence%20risks%20to%20patients%20due%20to%20hysterosalpingography&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Gyekye,%20Prince%20K&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=112&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=112-116&rft.issn=0971-6203&rft.eissn=1998-3913&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/0971-6203.94747&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA286075141%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-17cabc7fc676d125fcf1e00d0f1cb5e4b59ed353c88cd46dbbc2beb93ec126243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=993618249&rft_id=info:pmid/22557802&rft_galeid=A286075141&rfr_iscdi=true