Loading…
Effect of prosthesis endplate lordosis angles on L5-S1 kinematics after disc arthroplasty
Objective We hypothesized that L5-S1 kinematics will not be affected by the lordosis distribution between the prosthesis endplates. Materials and methods Twelve cadaveric lumbosacral spines (51.3 ± 9.8 years) were implanted with 6° or 11° prostheses (ProDisc-L) with four combinations of superior/inf...
Saved in:
Published in: | European spine journal 2012-06, Vol.21 (Suppl 5), p.585-591 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
We hypothesized that L5-S1 kinematics will not be affected by the lordosis distribution between the prosthesis endplates.
Materials and methods
Twelve cadaveric lumbosacral spines (51.3 ± 9.8 years) were implanted with 6° or 11° prostheses (ProDisc-L) with four combinations of superior/inferior lordosis (6°/0°, 3°/3°, 11°/0°, 3°/8°). Specimens were tested intact and after prostheses implantation with different lordosis distributions. Center of rotation (COR) and range of motion (ROM) were quantified.
Results
Six-degree lordosis prostheses (
n
= 7) showed no difference in flexion–extension ROM, regardless of design (6°/0° or 3°/3°) (
p
> 0.05). In lateral bending (LB), both designs reduced ROM (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0940-6719 1432-0932 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00586-012-2271-6 |