Loading…

Effect of prosthesis endplate lordosis angles on L5-S1 kinematics after disc arthroplasty

Objective We hypothesized that L5-S1 kinematics will not be affected by the lordosis distribution between the prosthesis endplates. Materials and methods Twelve cadaveric lumbosacral spines (51.3 ± 9.8 years) were implanted with 6° or 11° prostheses (ProDisc-L) with four combinations of superior/inf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European spine journal 2012-06, Vol.21 (Suppl 5), p.585-591
Main Authors: Tsitsopoulos, Parmenion P., Wojewnik, Bartosz, Voronov, Leonard I., Havey, Robert M., Renner, Susan M., Zelenakova, Julia, McIntosh, Braden, Carandang, Gerard, Abjornson, Celeste, Patwardhan, Avinash G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective We hypothesized that L5-S1 kinematics will not be affected by the lordosis distribution between the prosthesis endplates. Materials and methods Twelve cadaveric lumbosacral spines (51.3 ± 9.8 years) were implanted with 6° or 11° prostheses (ProDisc-L) with four combinations of superior/inferior lordosis (6°/0°, 3°/3°, 11°/0°, 3°/8°). Specimens were tested intact and after prostheses implantation with different lordosis distributions. Center of rotation (COR) and range of motion (ROM) were quantified. Results Six-degree lordosis prostheses ( n  = 7) showed no difference in flexion–extension ROM, regardless of design (6°/0° or 3°/3°) ( p  > 0.05). In lateral bending (LB), both designs reduced ROM ( p  
ISSN:0940-6719
1432-0932
DOI:10.1007/s00586-012-2271-6