Loading…
Bone density, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking alendronate participating in different physical activity programs
Background: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of different physical activity (PA) programs on bone density, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking concomitant alendronate. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 35 volunteers divided into four groups:...
Saved in:
Published in: | Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease 2010-08, Vol.2 (4), p.175-185 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-e394f8b76ff9638cf30ee1091f679089b9440b98f4e1720d47a441fced2fe47a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-e394f8b76ff9638cf30ee1091f679089b9440b98f4e1720d47a441fced2fe47a3 |
container_end_page | 185 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 175 |
container_title | Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Borba-Pinheiro, Cláudio Joaquim de Alencar Carvalho, Mauro César Gurgel Lima da Silva, Nádia Souza Janotta Drigo, Alexandre Pereira Bezerra, Jani Cléria Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin |
description | Background: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of different physical activity (PA) programs on bone density, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking concomitant alendronate. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 35 volunteers divided into four groups: practitioners of resistance training (RTG, n = 9, 49.8±4.2 years), judo (JUG, n = 11, 52.2±5.3 years), water aerobics (WAG, n = 8, 57.1±7.4 years) and the control group (CG, n = 7, 53.8±4.4 years).
Methods: The following assessment tools were used: bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry of the spine and proximal femur, the ‘Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire’ (OPAQ) and the ‘Static Balance Test with Visual Control’. The physical activities were planned for 12 months in cycles with different intensities. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for analysis between groups, and a Scheffé post-hoc test was used for multiple comparisons.
Results: The multiple comparisons results showed that the RTG and JUG groups were significantly more efficient in the variables studied, including: lumbar BMD (Δ% = 6.8%, p = 0.001), balance (Δ% = 21.4%, p = 0.01), OPAQ (Δ% = 9.1%, p = 0.005) and lumbar BMD (Δ% = 6.4%, p = 0.003), balance (Δ% = 14%, p = 0.02) and OPAQ (Δ% = 16.8%, p = 0.000) compared with the CG. Furthermore, the RTG (Δ% = 4.8%, p = 0.02) was significantly better than the WAG for the neck of femur BMD, and the JUG (Δ% = 16.8, p = 0.0003) also demonstrated superiority to the WAG in the OPAQ.
Conclusions: The physical activities studied appear to improve BMD, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking a bisphosphonate. In this small sample, the RTG and the JUG groups were superior to the other groups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1759720X10374677 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3383516</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1759720X10374677</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1034799252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-e394f8b76ff9638cf30ee1091f679089b9440b98f4e1720d47a441fced2fe47a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1vFSEUhonR2FrduzIkLnThKAzcATYm2viVNHGjSXeEYQ631BmYAlNz_4K_Wia3XrWJruCc85wXzgdCjyl5SakQr6jYKNGSc0qY4J0Qd9Dx6mpES-Xdw52cH6EHOV8S0imi6H101LZSEM67Y_TjbQyABwjZl90L3JvRBAvYhAFfLWasThwdHr2D9ZxjLhOEOJslmxF_j9XAxXzzYYvNCGFIMZgCeDapeOtnU9aID3jwzkGCUPB8scve1mRji79e9ecUt8lM-SG658yY4dHNeYK-vn_35fRjc_b5w6fTN2eN3XS8NMAUd7IXnXOqY9I6RgBorct1QhGpesU56ZV0HGitfeDCcE6dhaF1UA12gl7vdeeln2Cw9VfJjHpOfjJpp6Px-u9I8Bd6G681Y5JtaFcFnt0IpHi1QC568tnCWFsHcclaUUq5kHIln_-XrHPjQql201b06S30Mi4p1EbolnFGmKzTqxTZUzbFnBO4w7cp0etK6NsrUVOe_FnuIeHXDlSg2QPZbOH3q_8U_Am-h8Hn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2343038069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bone density, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking alendronate participating in different physical activity programs</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><creator>Borba-Pinheiro, Cláudio Joaquim ; de Alencar Carvalho, Mauro César Gurgel ; Lima da Silva, Nádia Souza ; Janotta Drigo, Alexandre ; Pereira Bezerra, Jani Cléria ; Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Borba-Pinheiro, Cláudio Joaquim ; de Alencar Carvalho, Mauro César Gurgel ; Lima da Silva, Nádia Souza ; Janotta Drigo, Alexandre ; Pereira Bezerra, Jani Cléria ; Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of different physical activity (PA) programs on bone density, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking concomitant alendronate. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 35 volunteers divided into four groups: practitioners of resistance training (RTG, n = 9, 49.8±4.2 years), judo (JUG, n = 11, 52.2±5.3 years), water aerobics (WAG, n = 8, 57.1±7.4 years) and the control group (CG, n = 7, 53.8±4.4 years).
Methods: The following assessment tools were used: bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry of the spine and proximal femur, the ‘Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire’ (OPAQ) and the ‘Static Balance Test with Visual Control’. The physical activities were planned for 12 months in cycles with different intensities. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for analysis between groups, and a Scheffé post-hoc test was used for multiple comparisons.
Results: The multiple comparisons results showed that the RTG and JUG groups were significantly more efficient in the variables studied, including: lumbar BMD (Δ% = 6.8%, p = 0.001), balance (Δ% = 21.4%, p = 0.01), OPAQ (Δ% = 9.1%, p = 0.005) and lumbar BMD (Δ% = 6.4%, p = 0.003), balance (Δ% = 14%, p = 0.02) and OPAQ (Δ% = 16.8%, p = 0.000) compared with the CG. Furthermore, the RTG (Δ% = 4.8%, p = 0.02) was significantly better than the WAG for the neck of femur BMD, and the JUG (Δ% = 16.8, p = 0.0003) also demonstrated superiority to the WAG in the OPAQ.
Conclusions: The physical activities studied appear to improve BMD, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking a bisphosphonate. In this small sample, the RTG and the JUG groups were superior to the other groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1759-720X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-7218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1759720X10374677</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22870446</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bone density ; Exercise ; Hormone replacement therapy ; Original Research ; Quality of life ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2010-08, Vol.2 (4), p.175-185</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2010.</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2010.. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/reusing-open-access-and-sage-choice-content</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2010 2010 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-e394f8b76ff9638cf30ee1091f679089b9440b98f4e1720d47a441fced2fe47a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-e394f8b76ff9638cf30ee1091f679089b9440b98f4e1720d47a441fced2fe47a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3383516/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2343038069?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,25753,27853,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1759720X10374677?utm_source=summon&utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22870446$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borba-Pinheiro, Cláudio Joaquim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Alencar Carvalho, Mauro César Gurgel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima da Silva, Nádia Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janotta Drigo, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira Bezerra, Jani Cléria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Bone density, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking alendronate participating in different physical activity programs</title><title>Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease</title><addtitle>Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis</addtitle><description>Background: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of different physical activity (PA) programs on bone density, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking concomitant alendronate. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 35 volunteers divided into four groups: practitioners of resistance training (RTG, n = 9, 49.8±4.2 years), judo (JUG, n = 11, 52.2±5.3 years), water aerobics (WAG, n = 8, 57.1±7.4 years) and the control group (CG, n = 7, 53.8±4.4 years).
Methods: The following assessment tools were used: bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry of the spine and proximal femur, the ‘Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire’ (OPAQ) and the ‘Static Balance Test with Visual Control’. The physical activities were planned for 12 months in cycles with different intensities. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for analysis between groups, and a Scheffé post-hoc test was used for multiple comparisons.
Results: The multiple comparisons results showed that the RTG and JUG groups were significantly more efficient in the variables studied, including: lumbar BMD (Δ% = 6.8%, p = 0.001), balance (Δ% = 21.4%, p = 0.01), OPAQ (Δ% = 9.1%, p = 0.005) and lumbar BMD (Δ% = 6.4%, p = 0.003), balance (Δ% = 14%, p = 0.02) and OPAQ (Δ% = 16.8%, p = 0.000) compared with the CG. Furthermore, the RTG (Δ% = 4.8%, p = 0.02) was significantly better than the WAG for the neck of femur BMD, and the JUG (Δ% = 16.8, p = 0.0003) also demonstrated superiority to the WAG in the OPAQ.
Conclusions: The physical activities studied appear to improve BMD, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking a bisphosphonate. In this small sample, the RTG and the JUG groups were superior to the other groups.</description><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Hormone replacement therapy</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1759-720X</issn><issn>1759-7218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1vFSEUhonR2FrduzIkLnThKAzcATYm2viVNHGjSXeEYQ631BmYAlNz_4K_Wia3XrWJruCc85wXzgdCjyl5SakQr6jYKNGSc0qY4J0Qd9Dx6mpES-Xdw52cH6EHOV8S0imi6H101LZSEM67Y_TjbQyABwjZl90L3JvRBAvYhAFfLWasThwdHr2D9ZxjLhOEOJslmxF_j9XAxXzzYYvNCGFIMZgCeDapeOtnU9aID3jwzkGCUPB8scve1mRji79e9ecUt8lM-SG658yY4dHNeYK-vn_35fRjc_b5w6fTN2eN3XS8NMAUd7IXnXOqY9I6RgBorct1QhGpesU56ZV0HGitfeDCcE6dhaF1UA12gl7vdeeln2Cw9VfJjHpOfjJpp6Px-u9I8Bd6G681Y5JtaFcFnt0IpHi1QC568tnCWFsHcclaUUq5kHIln_-XrHPjQql201b06S30Mi4p1EbolnFGmKzTqxTZUzbFnBO4w7cp0etK6NsrUVOe_FnuIeHXDlSg2QPZbOH3q_8U_Am-h8Hn</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Borba-Pinheiro, Cláudio Joaquim</creator><creator>de Alencar Carvalho, Mauro César Gurgel</creator><creator>Lima da Silva, Nádia Souza</creator><creator>Janotta Drigo, Alexandre</creator><creator>Pereira Bezerra, Jani Cléria</creator><creator>Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Bone density, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking alendronate participating in different physical activity programs</title><author>Borba-Pinheiro, Cláudio Joaquim ; de Alencar Carvalho, Mauro César Gurgel ; Lima da Silva, Nádia Souza ; Janotta Drigo, Alexandre ; Pereira Bezerra, Jani Cléria ; Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-e394f8b76ff9638cf30ee1091f679089b9440b98f4e1720d47a441fced2fe47a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Hormone replacement therapy</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borba-Pinheiro, Cláudio Joaquim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Alencar Carvalho, Mauro César Gurgel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima da Silva, Nádia Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janotta Drigo, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira Bezerra, Jani Cléria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borba-Pinheiro, Cláudio Joaquim</au><au>de Alencar Carvalho, Mauro César Gurgel</au><au>Lima da Silva, Nádia Souza</au><au>Janotta Drigo, Alexandre</au><au>Pereira Bezerra, Jani Cléria</au><au>Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bone density, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking alendronate participating in different physical activity programs</atitle><jtitle>Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease</jtitle><addtitle>Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis</addtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>175-185</pages><issn>1759-720X</issn><eissn>1759-7218</eissn><abstract>Background: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of different physical activity (PA) programs on bone density, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking concomitant alendronate. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 35 volunteers divided into four groups: practitioners of resistance training (RTG, n = 9, 49.8±4.2 years), judo (JUG, n = 11, 52.2±5.3 years), water aerobics (WAG, n = 8, 57.1±7.4 years) and the control group (CG, n = 7, 53.8±4.4 years).
Methods: The following assessment tools were used: bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry of the spine and proximal femur, the ‘Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire’ (OPAQ) and the ‘Static Balance Test with Visual Control’. The physical activities were planned for 12 months in cycles with different intensities. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for analysis between groups, and a Scheffé post-hoc test was used for multiple comparisons.
Results: The multiple comparisons results showed that the RTG and JUG groups were significantly more efficient in the variables studied, including: lumbar BMD (Δ% = 6.8%, p = 0.001), balance (Δ% = 21.4%, p = 0.01), OPAQ (Δ% = 9.1%, p = 0.005) and lumbar BMD (Δ% = 6.4%, p = 0.003), balance (Δ% = 14%, p = 0.02) and OPAQ (Δ% = 16.8%, p = 0.000) compared with the CG. Furthermore, the RTG (Δ% = 4.8%, p = 0.02) was significantly better than the WAG for the neck of femur BMD, and the JUG (Δ% = 16.8, p = 0.0003) also demonstrated superiority to the WAG in the OPAQ.
Conclusions: The physical activities studied appear to improve BMD, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking a bisphosphonate. In this small sample, the RTG and the JUG groups were superior to the other groups.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>22870446</pmid><doi>10.1177/1759720X10374677</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1759-720X |
ispartof | Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2010-08, Vol.2 (4), p.175-185 |
issn | 1759-720X 1759-7218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3383516 |
source | SAGE Open Access |
subjects | Bone density Exercise Hormone replacement therapy Original Research Quality of life Variance analysis |
title | Bone density, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking alendronate participating in different physical activity programs |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A11%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bone%20density,%20balance%20and%20quality%20of%20life%20of%20postmenopausal%20women%20taking%20alendronate%20participating%20in%20different%20physical%20activity%20programs&rft.jtitle=Therapeutic%20advances%20in%20musculoskeletal%20disease&rft.au=Borba-Pinheiro,%20Cl%C3%A1udio%20Joaquim&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=175-185&rft.issn=1759-720X&rft.eissn=1759-7218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1759720X10374677&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AFRWT%3E1034799252%3C/proquest_AFRWT%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-e394f8b76ff9638cf30ee1091f679089b9440b98f4e1720d47a441fced2fe47a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2343038069&rft_id=info:pmid/22870446&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1759720X10374677&rfr_iscdi=true |