Loading…

Indices of risk assessment of fracture of the proximal humerus

Osteoporotic fractures are now a social problem for incidence and costs. Fractures of the proximal humerus events are frequent and constantly increasing. It is estimated that they are 20% of all osteoporotic fractures. Bone densitometry in most cases underestimates the real humeral bone density.Ther...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism 2012-01, Vol.9 (1), p.37-39
Main Authors: Giannotti, Stefano, Bottai, Vanna, Dell'osso, Giacomo, Donati, Daniela, Bugelli, Giulia, De Paola, Gaia, Guido, Giulio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 39
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism
container_volume 9
creator Giannotti, Stefano
Bottai, Vanna
Dell'osso, Giacomo
Donati, Daniela
Bugelli, Giulia
De Paola, Gaia
Guido, Giulio
description Osteoporotic fractures are now a social problem for incidence and costs. Fractures of the proximal humerus events are frequent and constantly increasing. It is estimated that they are 20% of all osteoporotic fractures. Bone densitometry in most cases underestimates the real humeral bone density.There is little information about osteoporotic changes in the proximal humerus and their association with the cortical thickness of the humeral shaft. The ratio between the thickness of the cortical and the total diameter of the humeral diaphysis is the cortical index. Fracture risk limit value is 0.231. Convinced of the need to quantify in a reproducible way the real local humerus bone density, we performed a comparative evaluation of bone density of the humerus and femur in patients admitted to our clinic for fractures of the humerus and femur.We evaluated 28 women treated surgically for a fragility fracture of the proximal humerus or femur neck in 2010. All cortical index obtained were lower than the limit for fracture risk set at 0.231, so the IC was more predictive of neck medial fractures of the femur than had DEXA and the U.S. The information about the cortical index may provide a simple way of determining the bone quality of the proximal humerus and of facilitating decision-making in the surgical treatment of patients with fractures of the humerus. So we want to emphasize the importance of therapy for osteoporosis even in patients with fractures of the proximal humerus, which often have not critical densitometric values of femur or column, but they are at risk of new fractures.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3392680</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1024642906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-d9044942b8a7082228e8ea6191ce39fa16eb16bdb4743e3421e773ff501e96e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3-C5Kjl8Duzrofl4IUtYWCFz0vm2Rio_lyJxH9702xip7mMW9478ccsblwRqQgtT6etJEqtU6oGTsjeuFcO9DulM2kNBYA1JwtN21R5UhJVyaxotckECFRg-2wX5Ux5MMYca-HHSZ97D6qJtTJbmwwjnTOTspQE14c5oI93d0-rtbp9uF-s7rZpv1EMqSF40o5JTMbDLdSSosWgxZO5AiuDEJjJnRWZMooQFBSoDFQltdcoNMoYcGW37n9mDVY5BNeDLXv4wQTP30XKv_faaudf-7ePYCT2vIp4OoQELu3EWnwTUU51nVosRvJCy6VVtJxPZ1e_u36Lfl5GnwBUTlp_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024642906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indices of risk assessment of fracture of the proximal humerus</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Giannotti, Stefano ; Bottai, Vanna ; Dell'osso, Giacomo ; Donati, Daniela ; Bugelli, Giulia ; De Paola, Gaia ; Guido, Giulio</creator><creatorcontrib>Giannotti, Stefano ; Bottai, Vanna ; Dell'osso, Giacomo ; Donati, Daniela ; Bugelli, Giulia ; De Paola, Gaia ; Guido, Giulio</creatorcontrib><description>Osteoporotic fractures are now a social problem for incidence and costs. Fractures of the proximal humerus events are frequent and constantly increasing. It is estimated that they are 20% of all osteoporotic fractures. Bone densitometry in most cases underestimates the real humeral bone density.There is little information about osteoporotic changes in the proximal humerus and their association with the cortical thickness of the humeral shaft. The ratio between the thickness of the cortical and the total diameter of the humeral diaphysis is the cortical index. Fracture risk limit value is 0.231. Convinced of the need to quantify in a reproducible way the real local humerus bone density, we performed a comparative evaluation of bone density of the humerus and femur in patients admitted to our clinic for fractures of the humerus and femur.We evaluated 28 women treated surgically for a fragility fracture of the proximal humerus or femur neck in 2010. All cortical index obtained were lower than the limit for fracture risk set at 0.231, so the IC was more predictive of neck medial fractures of the femur than had DEXA and the U.S. The information about the cortical index may provide a simple way of determining the bone quality of the proximal humerus and of facilitating decision-making in the surgical treatment of patients with fractures of the humerus. So we want to emphasize the importance of therapy for osteoporosis even in patients with fractures of the proximal humerus, which often have not critical densitometric values of femur or column, but they are at risk of new fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1724-8914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1971-3266</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22783334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: CIC Edizioni Internazionali</publisher><subject>Mini-Review</subject><ispartof>Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism, 2012-01, Vol.9 (1), p.37-39</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012, CIC Edizioni Internazionali 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3392680/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3392680/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22783334$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giannotti, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottai, Vanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dell'osso, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donati, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugelli, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Paola, Gaia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guido, Giulio</creatorcontrib><title>Indices of risk assessment of fracture of the proximal humerus</title><title>Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism</title><addtitle>Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab</addtitle><description>Osteoporotic fractures are now a social problem for incidence and costs. Fractures of the proximal humerus events are frequent and constantly increasing. It is estimated that they are 20% of all osteoporotic fractures. Bone densitometry in most cases underestimates the real humeral bone density.There is little information about osteoporotic changes in the proximal humerus and their association with the cortical thickness of the humeral shaft. The ratio between the thickness of the cortical and the total diameter of the humeral diaphysis is the cortical index. Fracture risk limit value is 0.231. Convinced of the need to quantify in a reproducible way the real local humerus bone density, we performed a comparative evaluation of bone density of the humerus and femur in patients admitted to our clinic for fractures of the humerus and femur.We evaluated 28 women treated surgically for a fragility fracture of the proximal humerus or femur neck in 2010. All cortical index obtained were lower than the limit for fracture risk set at 0.231, so the IC was more predictive of neck medial fractures of the femur than had DEXA and the U.S. The information about the cortical index may provide a simple way of determining the bone quality of the proximal humerus and of facilitating decision-making in the surgical treatment of patients with fractures of the humerus. So we want to emphasize the importance of therapy for osteoporosis even in patients with fractures of the proximal humerus, which often have not critical densitometric values of femur or column, but they are at risk of new fractures.</description><subject>Mini-Review</subject><issn>1724-8914</issn><issn>1971-3266</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3-C5Kjl8Duzrofl4IUtYWCFz0vm2Rio_lyJxH9702xip7mMW9478ccsblwRqQgtT6etJEqtU6oGTsjeuFcO9DulM2kNBYA1JwtN21R5UhJVyaxotckECFRg-2wX5Ux5MMYca-HHSZ97D6qJtTJbmwwjnTOTspQE14c5oI93d0-rtbp9uF-s7rZpv1EMqSF40o5JTMbDLdSSosWgxZO5AiuDEJjJnRWZMooQFBSoDFQltdcoNMoYcGW37n9mDVY5BNeDLXv4wQTP30XKv_faaudf-7ePYCT2vIp4OoQELu3EWnwTUU51nVosRvJCy6VVtJxPZ1e_u36Lfl5GnwBUTlp_g</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Giannotti, Stefano</creator><creator>Bottai, Vanna</creator><creator>Dell'osso, Giacomo</creator><creator>Donati, Daniela</creator><creator>Bugelli, Giulia</creator><creator>De Paola, Gaia</creator><creator>Guido, Giulio</creator><general>CIC Edizioni Internazionali</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Indices of risk assessment of fracture of the proximal humerus</title><author>Giannotti, Stefano ; Bottai, Vanna ; Dell'osso, Giacomo ; Donati, Daniela ; Bugelli, Giulia ; De Paola, Gaia ; Guido, Giulio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-d9044942b8a7082228e8ea6191ce39fa16eb16bdb4743e3421e773ff501e96e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Mini-Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giannotti, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottai, Vanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dell'osso, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donati, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugelli, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Paola, Gaia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guido, Giulio</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giannotti, Stefano</au><au>Bottai, Vanna</au><au>Dell'osso, Giacomo</au><au>Donati, Daniela</au><au>Bugelli, Giulia</au><au>De Paola, Gaia</au><au>Guido, Giulio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Indices of risk assessment of fracture of the proximal humerus</atitle><jtitle>Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>37-39</pages><issn>1724-8914</issn><eissn>1971-3266</eissn><abstract>Osteoporotic fractures are now a social problem for incidence and costs. Fractures of the proximal humerus events are frequent and constantly increasing. It is estimated that they are 20% of all osteoporotic fractures. Bone densitometry in most cases underestimates the real humeral bone density.There is little information about osteoporotic changes in the proximal humerus and their association with the cortical thickness of the humeral shaft. The ratio between the thickness of the cortical and the total diameter of the humeral diaphysis is the cortical index. Fracture risk limit value is 0.231. Convinced of the need to quantify in a reproducible way the real local humerus bone density, we performed a comparative evaluation of bone density of the humerus and femur in patients admitted to our clinic for fractures of the humerus and femur.We evaluated 28 women treated surgically for a fragility fracture of the proximal humerus or femur neck in 2010. All cortical index obtained were lower than the limit for fracture risk set at 0.231, so the IC was more predictive of neck medial fractures of the femur than had DEXA and the U.S. The information about the cortical index may provide a simple way of determining the bone quality of the proximal humerus and of facilitating decision-making in the surgical treatment of patients with fractures of the humerus. So we want to emphasize the importance of therapy for osteoporosis even in patients with fractures of the proximal humerus, which often have not critical densitometric values of femur or column, but they are at risk of new fractures.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>CIC Edizioni Internazionali</pub><pmid>22783334</pmid><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1724-8914
ispartof Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism, 2012-01, Vol.9 (1), p.37-39
issn 1724-8914
1971-3266
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3392680
source Open Access: PubMed Central
subjects Mini-Review
title Indices of risk assessment of fracture of the proximal humerus
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T21%3A28%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indices%20of%20risk%20assessment%20of%20fracture%20of%20the%20proximal%20humerus&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20cases%20in%20mineral%20and%20bone%20metabolism&rft.au=Giannotti,%20Stefano&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=37-39&rft.issn=1724-8914&rft.eissn=1971-3266&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1024642906%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-d9044942b8a7082228e8ea6191ce39fa16eb16bdb4743e3421e773ff501e96e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024642906&rft_id=info:pmid/22783334&rfr_iscdi=true