Loading…

Patient satisfaction in treatment for cervical pathology

This study aimed to analyse the satisfaction levels of patients treated for cervical dysplasia. At the Orbis Medical Center, all cases of abnormal cervical cytology are referred for colposcopy; however, there are three possible routings for patients: i) Patients are informed by the gynecologist abou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oncology letters 2011-05, Vol.2 (3), p.439-443
Main Authors: HENDRIKSEN, M.T.J, VAN DELFT, K.W.M, BREMER, G.L.H, MERTENS, H.J.M.M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-3dc56ecd496138b728fdf9a98035856c0823b59ca860aad88b40abdc5ac10b8e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-3dc56ecd496138b728fdf9a98035856c0823b59ca860aad88b40abdc5ac10b8e3
container_end_page 443
container_issue 3
container_start_page 439
container_title Oncology letters
container_volume 2
creator HENDRIKSEN, M.T.J
VAN DELFT, K.W.M
BREMER, G.L.H
MERTENS, H.J.M.M
description This study aimed to analyse the satisfaction levels of patients treated for cervical dysplasia. At the Orbis Medical Center, all cases of abnormal cervical cytology are referred for colposcopy; however, there are three possible routings for patients: i) Patients are informed by the gynecologist about the colposcopy in a visit to the outpatient clinic, and colposcopy is planned in a second visit; ii) patients are informed by the gynecologist immediately before the colposcopy (a single visit); or iii) patients are called by a nurse practitioner 1-2 weeks prior to the colposcopy. The nurse practitioner informs patients about their Pap smear result, the colposcopy procedure and the follow-up (single visit plus telephone conversation). Patient satisfaction was analysed in the diagnostic and occasionally in the therapeutic colposcopies, with regards to information, treatment, appeasement and number of visits. The issue of whether the introduction of nurse practitioners improved patient satisfaction was also assessed. Patient satisfaction questionnaires were sent to all 593 patients who underwent a colposcopic examination for the first time following an abnormal smear test result. Data were analysed using SPSS 14.0. For statistical analyses, χ2 tests and the Mann-Whitney U test were used. P
doi_str_mv 10.3892/ol.2011.273
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3410498</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1859676522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-3dc56ecd496138b728fdf9a98035856c0823b59ca860aad88b40abdc5ac10b8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1LAzEQxYMoVmpP3mVPIsjWfOxmk4sgxS8o6EHPYTabbSPppibbQv97U1qrzmUG5jdvHg-hC4LHTEh6692YYkLGtGJH6IxUkuYEC3p8mKtigEYxfuJUJSdC8FM0oFRwTjA5Q-INemu6PoupxxZ0b32X2S7rg4F-sd20PmTahLXV4LIl9HPv_Gxzjk5acNGM9n2IPh4f3ifP-fT16WVyP811QWifs0aX3OimkJwwUVdUtE0rQQrMSlFynbyyupQaBMcAjRB1gaFOR6AJroVhQ3S3012u6oVpdHIUwKllsAsIG-XBqv-bzs7VzK8VKwgupEgC13uB4L9WJvZqYaM2zkFn_CoqIkrJK15SmtCbHaqDjzGY9vCGYLWNW3mntnGrFHeiL_86O7A_4SbgagfEJXSNbXz8te1yTHPMclwwyb4BUdiIbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859676522</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient satisfaction in treatment for cervical pathology</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><creator>HENDRIKSEN, M.T.J ; VAN DELFT, K.W.M ; BREMER, G.L.H ; MERTENS, H.J.M.M</creator><creatorcontrib>HENDRIKSEN, M.T.J ; VAN DELFT, K.W.M ; BREMER, G.L.H ; MERTENS, H.J.M.M</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to analyse the satisfaction levels of patients treated for cervical dysplasia. At the Orbis Medical Center, all cases of abnormal cervical cytology are referred for colposcopy; however, there are three possible routings for patients: i) Patients are informed by the gynecologist about the colposcopy in a visit to the outpatient clinic, and colposcopy is planned in a second visit; ii) patients are informed by the gynecologist immediately before the colposcopy (a single visit); or iii) patients are called by a nurse practitioner 1-2 weeks prior to the colposcopy. The nurse practitioner informs patients about their Pap smear result, the colposcopy procedure and the follow-up (single visit plus telephone conversation). Patient satisfaction was analysed in the diagnostic and occasionally in the therapeutic colposcopies, with regards to information, treatment, appeasement and number of visits. The issue of whether the introduction of nurse practitioners improved patient satisfaction was also assessed. Patient satisfaction questionnaires were sent to all 593 patients who underwent a colposcopic examination for the first time following an abnormal smear test result. Data were analysed using SPSS 14.0. For statistical analyses, χ2 tests and the Mann-Whitney U test were used. P&lt;0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The response rates did not differ significantly among the three groups of patients. In general, patient satisfaction regarding care was high (96%). The role of the nurse practitioner was rated highly (8.0-8.4). Although there were differences in the number of visits and satisfaction regarding the information provided, patient satisfaction did not differ significantly between groups 1 and 3. Patients in group 2 were significantly less satisfied with regard to almost all analysed data. In conclusion, the single visit procedure is extremely efficient. Patient satisfaction did not differ significantly between groups 1 and 3, but group 2 patients were significantly less satisfied. The introduction of nurse practitioners improves patients' knowledge, comfort and satisfaction. Furthermore, it reduces the number of visits required. Efficient treatment strategies were introduced and patient satisfaction was increased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1792-1074</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1792-1082</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3892/ol.2011.273</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22866101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greece: D.A. Spandidos</publisher><subject>cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia ; colposcopy ; dysplasia ; satisfaction</subject><ispartof>Oncology letters, 2011-05, Vol.2 (3), p.439-443</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011, Spandidos Publications</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011, Spandidos Publications 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-3dc56ecd496138b728fdf9a98035856c0823b59ca860aad88b40abdc5ac10b8e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-3dc56ecd496138b728fdf9a98035856c0823b59ca860aad88b40abdc5ac10b8e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3410498/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3410498/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22866101$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HENDRIKSEN, M.T.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN DELFT, K.W.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREMER, G.L.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MERTENS, H.J.M.M</creatorcontrib><title>Patient satisfaction in treatment for cervical pathology</title><title>Oncology letters</title><addtitle>Oncol Lett</addtitle><description>This study aimed to analyse the satisfaction levels of patients treated for cervical dysplasia. At the Orbis Medical Center, all cases of abnormal cervical cytology are referred for colposcopy; however, there are three possible routings for patients: i) Patients are informed by the gynecologist about the colposcopy in a visit to the outpatient clinic, and colposcopy is planned in a second visit; ii) patients are informed by the gynecologist immediately before the colposcopy (a single visit); or iii) patients are called by a nurse practitioner 1-2 weeks prior to the colposcopy. The nurse practitioner informs patients about their Pap smear result, the colposcopy procedure and the follow-up (single visit plus telephone conversation). Patient satisfaction was analysed in the diagnostic and occasionally in the therapeutic colposcopies, with regards to information, treatment, appeasement and number of visits. The issue of whether the introduction of nurse practitioners improved patient satisfaction was also assessed. Patient satisfaction questionnaires were sent to all 593 patients who underwent a colposcopic examination for the first time following an abnormal smear test result. Data were analysed using SPSS 14.0. For statistical analyses, χ2 tests and the Mann-Whitney U test were used. P&lt;0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The response rates did not differ significantly among the three groups of patients. In general, patient satisfaction regarding care was high (96%). The role of the nurse practitioner was rated highly (8.0-8.4). Although there were differences in the number of visits and satisfaction regarding the information provided, patient satisfaction did not differ significantly between groups 1 and 3. Patients in group 2 were significantly less satisfied with regard to almost all analysed data. In conclusion, the single visit procedure is extremely efficient. Patient satisfaction did not differ significantly between groups 1 and 3, but group 2 patients were significantly less satisfied. The introduction of nurse practitioners improves patients' knowledge, comfort and satisfaction. Furthermore, it reduces the number of visits required. Efficient treatment strategies were introduced and patient satisfaction was increased.</description><subject>cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia</subject><subject>colposcopy</subject><subject>dysplasia</subject><subject>satisfaction</subject><issn>1792-1074</issn><issn>1792-1082</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM1LAzEQxYMoVmpP3mVPIsjWfOxmk4sgxS8o6EHPYTabbSPppibbQv97U1qrzmUG5jdvHg-hC4LHTEh6692YYkLGtGJH6IxUkuYEC3p8mKtigEYxfuJUJSdC8FM0oFRwTjA5Q-INemu6PoupxxZ0b32X2S7rg4F-sd20PmTahLXV4LIl9HPv_Gxzjk5acNGM9n2IPh4f3ifP-fT16WVyP811QWifs0aX3OimkJwwUVdUtE0rQQrMSlFynbyyupQaBMcAjRB1gaFOR6AJroVhQ3S3012u6oVpdHIUwKllsAsIG-XBqv-bzs7VzK8VKwgupEgC13uB4L9WJvZqYaM2zkFn_CoqIkrJK15SmtCbHaqDjzGY9vCGYLWNW3mntnGrFHeiL_86O7A_4SbgagfEJXSNbXz8te1yTHPMclwwyb4BUdiIbQ</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>HENDRIKSEN, M.T.J</creator><creator>VAN DELFT, K.W.M</creator><creator>BREMER, G.L.H</creator><creator>MERTENS, H.J.M.M</creator><general>D.A. Spandidos</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Patient satisfaction in treatment for cervical pathology</title><author>HENDRIKSEN, M.T.J ; VAN DELFT, K.W.M ; BREMER, G.L.H ; MERTENS, H.J.M.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-3dc56ecd496138b728fdf9a98035856c0823b59ca860aad88b40abdc5ac10b8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia</topic><topic>colposcopy</topic><topic>dysplasia</topic><topic>satisfaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HENDRIKSEN, M.T.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN DELFT, K.W.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREMER, G.L.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MERTENS, H.J.M.M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Oncology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HENDRIKSEN, M.T.J</au><au>VAN DELFT, K.W.M</au><au>BREMER, G.L.H</au><au>MERTENS, H.J.M.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient satisfaction in treatment for cervical pathology</atitle><jtitle>Oncology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Oncol Lett</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>439</spage><epage>443</epage><pages>439-443</pages><issn>1792-1074</issn><eissn>1792-1082</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to analyse the satisfaction levels of patients treated for cervical dysplasia. At the Orbis Medical Center, all cases of abnormal cervical cytology are referred for colposcopy; however, there are three possible routings for patients: i) Patients are informed by the gynecologist about the colposcopy in a visit to the outpatient clinic, and colposcopy is planned in a second visit; ii) patients are informed by the gynecologist immediately before the colposcopy (a single visit); or iii) patients are called by a nurse practitioner 1-2 weeks prior to the colposcopy. The nurse practitioner informs patients about their Pap smear result, the colposcopy procedure and the follow-up (single visit plus telephone conversation). Patient satisfaction was analysed in the diagnostic and occasionally in the therapeutic colposcopies, with regards to information, treatment, appeasement and number of visits. The issue of whether the introduction of nurse practitioners improved patient satisfaction was also assessed. Patient satisfaction questionnaires were sent to all 593 patients who underwent a colposcopic examination for the first time following an abnormal smear test result. Data were analysed using SPSS 14.0. For statistical analyses, χ2 tests and the Mann-Whitney U test were used. P&lt;0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The response rates did not differ significantly among the three groups of patients. In general, patient satisfaction regarding care was high (96%). The role of the nurse practitioner was rated highly (8.0-8.4). Although there were differences in the number of visits and satisfaction regarding the information provided, patient satisfaction did not differ significantly between groups 1 and 3. Patients in group 2 were significantly less satisfied with regard to almost all analysed data. In conclusion, the single visit procedure is extremely efficient. Patient satisfaction did not differ significantly between groups 1 and 3, but group 2 patients were significantly less satisfied. The introduction of nurse practitioners improves patients' knowledge, comfort and satisfaction. Furthermore, it reduces the number of visits required. Efficient treatment strategies were introduced and patient satisfaction was increased.</abstract><cop>Greece</cop><pub>D.A. Spandidos</pub><pmid>22866101</pmid><doi>10.3892/ol.2011.273</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1792-1074
ispartof Oncology letters, 2011-05, Vol.2 (3), p.439-443
issn 1792-1074
1792-1082
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3410498
source PubMed (Medline)
subjects cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia
colposcopy
dysplasia
satisfaction
title Patient satisfaction in treatment for cervical pathology
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A03%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20satisfaction%20in%20treatment%20for%20cervical%20pathology&rft.jtitle=Oncology%20letters&rft.au=HENDRIKSEN,%20M.T.J&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=439&rft.epage=443&rft.pages=439-443&rft.issn=1792-1074&rft.eissn=1792-1082&rft_id=info:doi/10.3892/ol.2011.273&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1859676522%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-3dc56ecd496138b728fdf9a98035856c0823b59ca860aad88b40abdc5ac10b8e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859676522&rft_id=info:pmid/22866101&rfr_iscdi=true