Loading…

Correlation between liver histology and novel magnetic resonance imaging in adult patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - MRI accurately quantifies hepatic steatosis in NAFLD

Summary Background Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques that measure hepatic steatosis are limited by T1 bias, T2* decay and multi‐frequency signal‐interference effects of protons in fat. Newer MR techniques such as the proton density‐fat fraction (PDFF) that correct for these fa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2012-07, Vol.36 (1), p.22-29
Main Authors: Permutt, Z., Le, T.-A., Peterson, M. R., Seki, E., Brenner, D. A., Sirlin, C., Loomba, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Background Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques that measure hepatic steatosis are limited by T1 bias, T2* decay and multi‐frequency signal‐interference effects of protons in fat. Newer MR techniques such as the proton density‐fat fraction (PDFF) that correct for these factors have not been specifically compared to liver biopsy in adult patients with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Aim To examine the association between MRI‐determined PDFF and histology‐determined steatosis grade, and their association with fibrosis. Methods A total of 51 adult patients with biopsy‐confirmed NAFLD underwent metabolic‐biochemical profiling, MRI‐determined PDFF measurement of hepatic steatosis and liver biopsy assessment according to NASH‐CRN histological scoring system. Results The average MRI‐determined PDFF increased significantly with increasing histology‐determined steatosis grade: 8.9% at grade‐1, 16.3% at grade‐2, and 25.0% at grade‐3 with P ≤ 0.0001 (correlation: r2 = 0.56, P 
ISSN:0269-2813
1365-2036
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05121.x