Loading…

Algorithms to estimate the beginning of pregnancy in administrative databases

ABSTRACT Purpose The role of administrative databases for research on drug safety during pregnancy can be limited by their inaccurate assessment of the timing of exposure, as the gestational age at birth is typically unavailable. Therefore, we sought to develop and validate algorithms to estimate th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety 2013-01, Vol.22 (1), p.16-24
Main Authors: Margulis, Andrea V., Setoguchi, Soko, Mittleman, Murray A., Glynn, Robert J., Dormuth, Colin R., Hernández-Díaz, Sonia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4764-f5600464c583171c17e19d0ed09f7d37dc54ca529bd6963cc19f4eda13889cf13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4764-f5600464c583171c17e19d0ed09f7d37dc54ca529bd6963cc19f4eda13889cf13
container_end_page 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 16
container_title Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
container_volume 22
creator Margulis, Andrea V.
Setoguchi, Soko
Mittleman, Murray A.
Glynn, Robert J.
Dormuth, Colin R.
Hernández-Díaz, Sonia
description ABSTRACT Purpose The role of administrative databases for research on drug safety during pregnancy can be limited by their inaccurate assessment of the timing of exposure, as the gestational age at birth is typically unavailable. Therefore, we sought to develop and validate algorithms to estimate the gestational age at birth using information available in these databases. Methods Using a population‐based cohort of 286,432 mother–child pairs in British Columbia (1998–2007), we validated an ICD‐9/10‐based preterm‐status indicator and developed algorithms to estimate the gestational age at birth on the basis of this indicator, maternal age, singleton/multiple status, and claims for routine prenatal care tests. We assessed the accuracy of the algorithm‐based estimates relative to the gold standard of the clinical gestational age at birth recorded in the delivery discharge record. Results The preterm‐status indicator had specificity and sensitivity of 98% and 91%, respectively. Estimates from an algorithm that assigned 35 weeks of gestational age at birth to deliveries with the preterm‐status indicator and 39 weeks to those without them were within 2 weeks of the clinical gestational age at birth in 75% of preterm and 99% of term deliveries. Conclusions Subtracting 35 weeks (245 days) from the date of birth in deliveries with codes for preterm birth and 39 weeks (273 days) in those without them provided the optimal estimate of the beginning of pregnancy among the algorithms studied. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pds.3284
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3437228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1273325017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4764-f5600464c583171c17e19d0ed09f7d37dc54ca529bd6963cc19f4eda13889cf13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhoMo9kPBXyAD3ngzNd-Z3Ail2iq0Kvh1GbLJmdnUmWRNZlv335ul6_oB5uYEzsPDe3gRekLwCcGYvlj5csJox--hQ4K1bokQ6v72L1jbCakP0FEp1xjXneYP0QGlQmDM8CG6Oh2HlMO8nEozpwbKHCY7QzMvoVnAEGIMcWhS36wyDNFGt2lCbKyfQgxlznYON9B4O9uFLVAeoQe9HQs83s1j9Pn89aezN-3l-4u3Z6eXreNK8rYXEmMuuRMdI4o4ooBoj8Fj3SvPlHeCOyuoXnipJXOO6J6Dt4R1nXY9Ycfo5Z13tV5M4B3EGmU0q1zD541JNpi_NzEszZBuDONMUdpVwfOdIKfv63q1mUJxMI42QloXQ6hijApMVEWf_YNep3WO9TxDOCf1dRT_FrqcSsnQ78MQbLYdmdqR2XZU0ad_ht-Dv0qpQHsH3IYRNv8VmQ-vPu6EO742Aj_2vM3fjFRMCfP13YU5l1-YvMLECPYTFoOqFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1441111820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Algorithms to estimate the beginning of pregnancy in administrative databases</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Margulis, Andrea V. ; Setoguchi, Soko ; Mittleman, Murray A. ; Glynn, Robert J. ; Dormuth, Colin R. ; Hernández-Díaz, Sonia</creator><creatorcontrib>Margulis, Andrea V. ; Setoguchi, Soko ; Mittleman, Murray A. ; Glynn, Robert J. ; Dormuth, Colin R. ; Hernández-Díaz, Sonia</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Purpose The role of administrative databases for research on drug safety during pregnancy can be limited by their inaccurate assessment of the timing of exposure, as the gestational age at birth is typically unavailable. Therefore, we sought to develop and validate algorithms to estimate the gestational age at birth using information available in these databases. Methods Using a population‐based cohort of 286,432 mother–child pairs in British Columbia (1998–2007), we validated an ICD‐9/10‐based preterm‐status indicator and developed algorithms to estimate the gestational age at birth on the basis of this indicator, maternal age, singleton/multiple status, and claims for routine prenatal care tests. We assessed the accuracy of the algorithm‐based estimates relative to the gold standard of the clinical gestational age at birth recorded in the delivery discharge record. Results The preterm‐status indicator had specificity and sensitivity of 98% and 91%, respectively. Estimates from an algorithm that assigned 35 weeks of gestational age at birth to deliveries with the preterm‐status indicator and 39 weeks to those without them were within 2 weeks of the clinical gestational age at birth in 75% of preterm and 99% of term deliveries. Conclusions Subtracting 35 weeks (245 days) from the date of birth in deliveries with codes for preterm birth and 39 weeks (273 days) in those without them provided the optimal estimate of the beginning of pregnancy among the algorithms studied. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8569</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1557</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pds.3284</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22550030</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; British Columbia ; claims databases ; Databases, Factual - statistics &amp; numerical data ; duration of pregnancy ; Female ; Gestational Age ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; last menstrual period ; Obstetrics ; pharmacoepidemiology ; Pregnancy ; premature birth ; Premature Birth - epidemiology ; Prenatal development ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; term birth</subject><ispartof>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2013-01, Vol.22 (1), p.16-24</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4764-f5600464c583171c17e19d0ed09f7d37dc54ca529bd6963cc19f4eda13889cf13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4764-f5600464c583171c17e19d0ed09f7d37dc54ca529bd6963cc19f4eda13889cf13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22550030$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Margulis, Andrea V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setoguchi, Soko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittleman, Murray A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glynn, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dormuth, Colin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Díaz, Sonia</creatorcontrib><title>Algorithms to estimate the beginning of pregnancy in administrative databases</title><title>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety</title><addtitle>Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Purpose The role of administrative databases for research on drug safety during pregnancy can be limited by their inaccurate assessment of the timing of exposure, as the gestational age at birth is typically unavailable. Therefore, we sought to develop and validate algorithms to estimate the gestational age at birth using information available in these databases. Methods Using a population‐based cohort of 286,432 mother–child pairs in British Columbia (1998–2007), we validated an ICD‐9/10‐based preterm‐status indicator and developed algorithms to estimate the gestational age at birth on the basis of this indicator, maternal age, singleton/multiple status, and claims for routine prenatal care tests. We assessed the accuracy of the algorithm‐based estimates relative to the gold standard of the clinical gestational age at birth recorded in the delivery discharge record. Results The preterm‐status indicator had specificity and sensitivity of 98% and 91%, respectively. Estimates from an algorithm that assigned 35 weeks of gestational age at birth to deliveries with the preterm‐status indicator and 39 weeks to those without them were within 2 weeks of the clinical gestational age at birth in 75% of preterm and 99% of term deliveries. Conclusions Subtracting 35 weeks (245 days) from the date of birth in deliveries with codes for preterm birth and 39 weeks (273 days) in those without them provided the optimal estimate of the beginning of pregnancy among the algorithms studied. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>British Columbia</subject><subject>claims databases</subject><subject>Databases, Factual - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>duration of pregnancy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>last menstrual period</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>pharmacoepidemiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>premature birth</subject><subject>Premature Birth - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prenatal development</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>term birth</subject><issn>1053-8569</issn><issn>1099-1557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhoMo9kPBXyAD3ngzNd-Z3Ail2iq0Kvh1GbLJmdnUmWRNZlv335ul6_oB5uYEzsPDe3gRekLwCcGYvlj5csJox--hQ4K1bokQ6v72L1jbCakP0FEp1xjXneYP0QGlQmDM8CG6Oh2HlMO8nEozpwbKHCY7QzMvoVnAEGIMcWhS36wyDNFGt2lCbKyfQgxlznYON9B4O9uFLVAeoQe9HQs83s1j9Pn89aezN-3l-4u3Z6eXreNK8rYXEmMuuRMdI4o4ooBoj8Fj3SvPlHeCOyuoXnipJXOO6J6Dt4R1nXY9Ycfo5Z13tV5M4B3EGmU0q1zD541JNpi_NzEszZBuDONMUdpVwfOdIKfv63q1mUJxMI42QloXQ6hijApMVEWf_YNep3WO9TxDOCf1dRT_FrqcSsnQ78MQbLYdmdqR2XZU0ad_ht-Dv0qpQHsH3IYRNv8VmQ-vPu6EO742Aj_2vM3fjFRMCfP13YU5l1-YvMLECPYTFoOqFg</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Margulis, Andrea V.</creator><creator>Setoguchi, Soko</creator><creator>Mittleman, Murray A.</creator><creator>Glynn, Robert J.</creator><creator>Dormuth, Colin R.</creator><creator>Hernández-Díaz, Sonia</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>Algorithms to estimate the beginning of pregnancy in administrative databases</title><author>Margulis, Andrea V. ; Setoguchi, Soko ; Mittleman, Murray A. ; Glynn, Robert J. ; Dormuth, Colin R. ; Hernández-Díaz, Sonia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4764-f5600464c583171c17e19d0ed09f7d37dc54ca529bd6963cc19f4eda13889cf13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>British Columbia</topic><topic>claims databases</topic><topic>Databases, Factual - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>duration of pregnancy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>last menstrual period</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>pharmacoepidemiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>premature birth</topic><topic>Premature Birth - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prenatal development</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>term birth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Margulis, Andrea V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setoguchi, Soko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittleman, Murray A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glynn, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dormuth, Colin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Díaz, Sonia</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Margulis, Andrea V.</au><au>Setoguchi, Soko</au><au>Mittleman, Murray A.</au><au>Glynn, Robert J.</au><au>Dormuth, Colin R.</au><au>Hernández-Díaz, Sonia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Algorithms to estimate the beginning of pregnancy in administrative databases</atitle><jtitle>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety</jtitle><addtitle>Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf</addtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>16-24</pages><issn>1053-8569</issn><eissn>1099-1557</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Purpose The role of administrative databases for research on drug safety during pregnancy can be limited by their inaccurate assessment of the timing of exposure, as the gestational age at birth is typically unavailable. Therefore, we sought to develop and validate algorithms to estimate the gestational age at birth using information available in these databases. Methods Using a population‐based cohort of 286,432 mother–child pairs in British Columbia (1998–2007), we validated an ICD‐9/10‐based preterm‐status indicator and developed algorithms to estimate the gestational age at birth on the basis of this indicator, maternal age, singleton/multiple status, and claims for routine prenatal care tests. We assessed the accuracy of the algorithm‐based estimates relative to the gold standard of the clinical gestational age at birth recorded in the delivery discharge record. Results The preterm‐status indicator had specificity and sensitivity of 98% and 91%, respectively. Estimates from an algorithm that assigned 35 weeks of gestational age at birth to deliveries with the preterm‐status indicator and 39 weeks to those without them were within 2 weeks of the clinical gestational age at birth in 75% of preterm and 99% of term deliveries. Conclusions Subtracting 35 weeks (245 days) from the date of birth in deliveries with codes for preterm birth and 39 weeks (273 days) in those without them provided the optimal estimate of the beginning of pregnancy among the algorithms studied. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22550030</pmid><doi>10.1002/pds.3284</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8569
ispartof Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2013-01, Vol.22 (1), p.16-24
issn 1053-8569
1099-1557
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3437228
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Algorithms
British Columbia
claims databases
Databases, Factual - statistics & numerical data
duration of pregnancy
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Infant, Newborn
last menstrual period
Obstetrics
pharmacoepidemiology
Pregnancy
premature birth
Premature Birth - epidemiology
Prenatal development
Sensitivity and Specificity
term birth
title Algorithms to estimate the beginning of pregnancy in administrative databases
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A44%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Algorithms%20to%20estimate%20the%20beginning%20of%20pregnancy%20in%20administrative%20databases&rft.jtitle=Pharmacoepidemiology%20and%20drug%20safety&rft.au=Margulis,%20Andrea%20V.&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=16-24&rft.issn=1053-8569&rft.eissn=1099-1557&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pds.3284&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1273325017%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4764-f5600464c583171c17e19d0ed09f7d37dc54ca529bd6963cc19f4eda13889cf13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1441111820&rft_id=info:pmid/22550030&rfr_iscdi=true