Habituation and the reinforcing effectiveness of visual stimuli

• Published in: Behavioural processes 2012-10, Vol.91 (2), p.184-191
• Main Authors: Lloyd, David R., Gancarz, Amy M., Ashrafioun, Lisham, Kausch, Michael A., Richards, Jerry B.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis of Variance; Animal ethology; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Biological and medical sciences; Conditioning, Operant - physiology; Data Interpretation, Statistical; drinking water; foods; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Habituation, Psychophysiologic - physiology; Learning; Male; Mammalia; Novelty; Operant conditioning; Photic Stimulation; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Rat; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Reinforcement (Psychology); Reinforcement Schedule; sensory properties; Sensory reinforcement; Vertebrata; visual aids
• ISSN: 0376-6357; 1872-8308
• DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.07.007

► The reinforcing effectiveness of light onset rapidly habituates. ► Response rate was inversely related to rate of visual stimulus reinforcement. ► Sensory reinforcers habituate more rapidly than biologically important reinforcers. The term “sensory reinforcer” has been used to refer to sensory stimuli (e.g. light onset) that are primary reinforcers in order to differentiate them from other more biologically important primary reinforcers (e.g. food and water). Acquisition of snout poke responding for a visual stimulus (5s light onset) with fixed ratio 1 (FR 1), variable-interval 1min (VI 1min), or variable-interval 6min (VI 6min) schedules of reinforcement was tested in three groups of rats (n=8/group). The VI 6min schedule of reinforcement produced a higher response rate than the FR 1 or VI 1min schedules of visual stimulus reinforcement. One explanation for greater responding on the VI 6min schedule relative to the FR 1 and VI 1min schedules is that the reinforcing effectiveness of light onset habituated more rapidly in the FR 1 and VI 1min groups as compared to the VI 6min group. The inverse relationship between response rate and the rate of visual stimulus reinforcement is opposite to results from studies with biologically important reinforcers which indicate a positive relationship between response and reinforcement rate. Rapid habituation of reinforcing effectiveness may be a fundamental characteristic of sensory reinforcers that differentiates them from biologically important reinforcers, which are required to maintain homeostatic balance.