Loading…
Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy Is Safe: A Prospective Trial of 347 Patients
Available evidence suggests that the use of CO2 insufflation in endoscopy is more comfortable for the patient. The safety of CO2 use in colonoscopy remains contentious, particularly in sedated patients. The objective of the present prospective trial was to assess the safety of CO2 colonoscopies. Met...
Saved in:
Published in: | Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy 2012, Vol.2012 (2012), p.162-165 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5862-faa701c5c726fb99696a85658ed877b977974f88edf613cbde39c7ab4090e70f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5862-faa701c5c726fb99696a85658ed877b977974f88edf613cbde39c7ab4090e70f3 |
container_end_page | 165 |
container_issue | 2012 |
container_start_page | 162 |
container_title | Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy |
container_volume | 2012 |
creator | Geyer, M. Guller, U. Beglinger, Ch |
description | Available evidence suggests that the use of CO2 insufflation in endoscopy is more comfortable for the patient. The safety of CO2 use in colonoscopy remains contentious, particularly in sedated patients. The objective of the present prospective trial was to assess the safety of CO2 colonoscopies. Methods. 109 patients from our previous randomized CO2 colonoscopy study and an additional 238 subsequent consecutive unselected patients who had a routine colonoscopy performed in a private practice were enrolled from April 2008 through September 2008. All but 2 patients were sedated. All patients were routinely monitored with transcutaneous CO2 measurement. Volumes of CO2 administered were correlated with capnographic measurements from transcutaneous monitoring. Results. Of the 347 patients examined, 57% were women; mean (SD) age of participants was of 60.2 years (12.8). Mean propofol dosage was 136 mg (64 mg). Mean CO2 values were 34.7 mm Hg (5.3) at baseline, 38.9 mm Hg (5.5) upon reaching the ileum, and 36.9 mm Hg (5.0) at examination's end. Mean maximum increase of CO2 was 4.5 mm Hg (3.6). No correlation was observed between volume of CO2 administered and increase in level of CO2 (correlation coefficient: 0.01; P value: 0.84). No complications were observed. Conclusions. The present prospective study, which was based on one of the largest sedated patient sample reported to date in this setting, provides compelling evidence that CO2 insufflation in colonoscopy is safe and unassociated with relevant increases in transcutaneously measured levels of CO2. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2012/692532 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3465970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A313346608</galeid><airiti_id>P20151216003_201212_201703090033_201703090033_162_165</airiti_id><sourcerecordid>A313346608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5862-faa701c5c726fb99696a85658ed877b977974f88edf613cbde39c7ab4090e70f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFktuL1DAUxoso7kWffFYCwiJKd5NmkjQ-CMN4GxhwwBUfQ5omO1kyydi0q_vfe2rXYQcEG0ou53e-tOd8RfGM4HNCGLuoMKkuuKwYrR4UxwRXssSM8IfjWuCSclwfFSc5X2OMKSbkcXFUUcwYZ-y4-L7QXZMieu_TL99atIx5cC7o3sOhj2iRQoopm7S7RcuMvmpn36I5Wncp76zp_Y1Fl53XASWH6EygNWTa2OcnxSOnQ7ZP7-bT4tvHD5eLz-Xqy6flYr4qNat5VTqtBSaGGVFx10jJJdc1fFlt21qIRgohxczVsHWcUNO0lkojdDPDEluBHT0t3k26u6HZ2tbA3Z0Oatf5re5uVdJeHUai36irdKPojDMpMAi8uhPo0o_B5l5tfTY2BB1tGrIi8NRM0loC-nJCr3SwykeXQNGMuJpTQkERSg3U-T8oGK3depOidR7ODxLO7iVsrA79JqcwjC3Ih-CbCTRQ_dxZt_9NgtVoBTVaQU1WAPrF_crs2b-9B-D1BGx8bPVP_x-15xNsAbFO7-GZJOApiK-muPad7726TkMXofFqDSqMVISD-f4ogiZMUHloIab0cEN4BS-jvwHdT9YF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1111859389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy Is Safe: A Prospective Trial of 347 Patients</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Geyer, M. ; Guller, U. ; Beglinger, Ch</creator><contributor>Dumonceau, Jean-Marc</contributor><creatorcontrib>Geyer, M. ; Guller, U. ; Beglinger, Ch ; Dumonceau, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><description>Available evidence suggests that the use of CO2 insufflation in endoscopy is more comfortable for the patient. The safety of CO2 use in colonoscopy remains contentious, particularly in sedated patients. The objective of the present prospective trial was to assess the safety of CO2 colonoscopies. Methods. 109 patients from our previous randomized CO2 colonoscopy study and an additional 238 subsequent consecutive unselected patients who had a routine colonoscopy performed in a private practice were enrolled from April 2008 through September 2008. All but 2 patients were sedated. All patients were routinely monitored with transcutaneous CO2 measurement. Volumes of CO2 administered were correlated with capnographic measurements from transcutaneous monitoring. Results. Of the 347 patients examined, 57% were women; mean (SD) age of participants was of 60.2 years (12.8). Mean propofol dosage was 136 mg (64 mg). Mean CO2 values were 34.7 mm Hg (5.3) at baseline, 38.9 mm Hg (5.5) upon reaching the ileum, and 36.9 mm Hg (5.0) at examination's end. Mean maximum increase of CO2 was 4.5 mm Hg (3.6). No correlation was observed between volume of CO2 administered and increase in level of CO2 (correlation coefficient: 0.01; P value: 0.84). No complications were observed. Conclusions. The present prospective study, which was based on one of the largest sedated patient sample reported to date in this setting, provides compelling evidence that CO2 insufflation in colonoscopy is safe and unassociated with relevant increases in transcutaneously measured levels of CO2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-3608</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1029-0516</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2012/692532</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23055655</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Limiteds</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Clinical Study ; Colonoscopy</subject><ispartof>Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, 2012, Vol.2012 (2012), p.162-165</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 M. Geyer et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 M. Geyer et al. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5862-faa701c5c726fb99696a85658ed877b977974f88edf613cbde39c7ab4090e70f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5862-faa701c5c726fb99696a85658ed877b977974f88edf613cbde39c7ab4090e70f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3465970/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3465970/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23055655$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Dumonceau, Jean-Marc</contributor><creatorcontrib>Geyer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guller, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beglinger, Ch</creatorcontrib><title>Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy Is Safe: A Prospective Trial of 347 Patients</title><title>Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy</title><addtitle>Diagn Ther Endosc</addtitle><description>Available evidence suggests that the use of CO2 insufflation in endoscopy is more comfortable for the patient. The safety of CO2 use in colonoscopy remains contentious, particularly in sedated patients. The objective of the present prospective trial was to assess the safety of CO2 colonoscopies. Methods. 109 patients from our previous randomized CO2 colonoscopy study and an additional 238 subsequent consecutive unselected patients who had a routine colonoscopy performed in a private practice were enrolled from April 2008 through September 2008. All but 2 patients were sedated. All patients were routinely monitored with transcutaneous CO2 measurement. Volumes of CO2 administered were correlated with capnographic measurements from transcutaneous monitoring. Results. Of the 347 patients examined, 57% were women; mean (SD) age of participants was of 60.2 years (12.8). Mean propofol dosage was 136 mg (64 mg). Mean CO2 values were 34.7 mm Hg (5.3) at baseline, 38.9 mm Hg (5.5) upon reaching the ileum, and 36.9 mm Hg (5.0) at examination's end. Mean maximum increase of CO2 was 4.5 mm Hg (3.6). No correlation was observed between volume of CO2 administered and increase in level of CO2 (correlation coefficient: 0.01; P value: 0.84). No complications were observed. Conclusions. The present prospective study, which was based on one of the largest sedated patient sample reported to date in this setting, provides compelling evidence that CO2 insufflation in colonoscopy is safe and unassociated with relevant increases in transcutaneously measured levels of CO2.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Clinical Study</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><issn>1070-3608</issn><issn>1029-0516</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFktuL1DAUxoso7kWffFYCwiJKd5NmkjQ-CMN4GxhwwBUfQ5omO1kyydi0q_vfe2rXYQcEG0ou53e-tOd8RfGM4HNCGLuoMKkuuKwYrR4UxwRXssSM8IfjWuCSclwfFSc5X2OMKSbkcXFUUcwYZ-y4-L7QXZMieu_TL99atIx5cC7o3sOhj2iRQoopm7S7RcuMvmpn36I5Wncp76zp_Y1Fl53XASWH6EygNWTa2OcnxSOnQ7ZP7-bT4tvHD5eLz-Xqy6flYr4qNat5VTqtBSaGGVFx10jJJdc1fFlt21qIRgohxczVsHWcUNO0lkojdDPDEluBHT0t3k26u6HZ2tbA3Z0Oatf5re5uVdJeHUai36irdKPojDMpMAi8uhPo0o_B5l5tfTY2BB1tGrIi8NRM0loC-nJCr3SwykeXQNGMuJpTQkERSg3U-T8oGK3depOidR7ODxLO7iVsrA79JqcwjC3Ih-CbCTRQ_dxZt_9NgtVoBTVaQU1WAPrF_crs2b-9B-D1BGx8bPVP_x-15xNsAbFO7-GZJOApiK-muPad7726TkMXofFqDSqMVISD-f4ogiZMUHloIab0cEN4BS-jvwHdT9YF</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Geyer, M.</creator><creator>Guller, U.</creator><creator>Beglinger, Ch</creator><general>Hindawi Limiteds</general><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>188</scope><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy Is Safe: A Prospective Trial of 347 Patients</title><author>Geyer, M. ; Guller, U. ; Beglinger, Ch</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5862-faa701c5c726fb99696a85658ed877b977974f88edf613cbde39c7ab4090e70f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Clinical Study</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geyer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guller, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beglinger, Ch</creatorcontrib><collection>華藝線上圖書館</collection><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geyer, M.</au><au>Guller, U.</au><au>Beglinger, Ch</au><au>Dumonceau, Jean-Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy Is Safe: A Prospective Trial of 347 Patients</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Diagn Ther Endosc</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2012</volume><issue>2012</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>162-165</pages><issn>1070-3608</issn><eissn>1029-0516</eissn><abstract>Available evidence suggests that the use of CO2 insufflation in endoscopy is more comfortable for the patient. The safety of CO2 use in colonoscopy remains contentious, particularly in sedated patients. The objective of the present prospective trial was to assess the safety of CO2 colonoscopies. Methods. 109 patients from our previous randomized CO2 colonoscopy study and an additional 238 subsequent consecutive unselected patients who had a routine colonoscopy performed in a private practice were enrolled from April 2008 through September 2008. All but 2 patients were sedated. All patients were routinely monitored with transcutaneous CO2 measurement. Volumes of CO2 administered were correlated with capnographic measurements from transcutaneous monitoring. Results. Of the 347 patients examined, 57% were women; mean (SD) age of participants was of 60.2 years (12.8). Mean propofol dosage was 136 mg (64 mg). Mean CO2 values were 34.7 mm Hg (5.3) at baseline, 38.9 mm Hg (5.5) upon reaching the ileum, and 36.9 mm Hg (5.0) at examination's end. Mean maximum increase of CO2 was 4.5 mm Hg (3.6). No correlation was observed between volume of CO2 administered and increase in level of CO2 (correlation coefficient: 0.01; P value: 0.84). No complications were observed. Conclusions. The present prospective study, which was based on one of the largest sedated patient sample reported to date in this setting, provides compelling evidence that CO2 insufflation in colonoscopy is safe and unassociated with relevant increases in transcutaneously measured levels of CO2.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Limiteds</pub><pmid>23055655</pmid><doi>10.1155/2012/692532</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1070-3608 |
ispartof | Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, 2012, Vol.2012 (2012), p.162-165 |
issn | 1070-3608 1029-0516 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3465970 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Wiley Online Library Open Access |
subjects | Carbon dioxide Clinical Study Colonoscopy |
title | Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy Is Safe: A Prospective Trial of 347 Patients |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A11%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carbon%20Dioxide%20Insufflation%20in%20Colonoscopy%20Is%20Safe:%20A%20Prospective%20Trial%20of%20347%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Diagnostic%20and%20Therapeutic%20Endoscopy&rft.au=Geyer,%20M.&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=2012&rft.issue=2012&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=162-165&rft.issn=1070-3608&rft.eissn=1029-0516&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2012/692532&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA313346608%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5862-faa701c5c726fb99696a85658ed877b977974f88edf613cbde39c7ab4090e70f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1111859389&rft_id=info:pmid/23055655&rft_galeid=A313346608&rft_airiti_id=P20151216003_201212_201703090033_201703090033_162_165&rfr_iscdi=true |