Loading…

Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy Is Safe: A Prospective Trial of 347 Patients

Available evidence suggests that the use of CO2 insufflation in endoscopy is more comfortable for the patient. The safety of CO2 use in colonoscopy remains contentious, particularly in sedated patients. The objective of the present prospective trial was to assess the safety of CO2 colonoscopies. Met...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy 2012, Vol.2012 (2012), p.162-165
Main Authors: Geyer, M., Guller, U., Beglinger, Ch
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5862-faa701c5c726fb99696a85658ed877b977974f88edf613cbde39c7ab4090e70f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5862-faa701c5c726fb99696a85658ed877b977974f88edf613cbde39c7ab4090e70f3
container_end_page 165
container_issue 2012
container_start_page 162
container_title Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy
container_volume 2012
creator Geyer, M.
Guller, U.
Beglinger, Ch
description Available evidence suggests that the use of CO2 insufflation in endoscopy is more comfortable for the patient. The safety of CO2 use in colonoscopy remains contentious, particularly in sedated patients. The objective of the present prospective trial was to assess the safety of CO2 colonoscopies. Methods. 109 patients from our previous randomized CO2 colonoscopy study and an additional 238 subsequent consecutive unselected patients who had a routine colonoscopy performed in a private practice were enrolled from April 2008 through September 2008. All but 2 patients were sedated. All patients were routinely monitored with transcutaneous CO2 measurement. Volumes of CO2 administered were correlated with capnographic measurements from transcutaneous monitoring. Results. Of the 347 patients examined, 57% were women; mean (SD) age of participants was of 60.2 years (12.8). Mean propofol dosage was 136 mg (64 mg). Mean CO2 values were 34.7 mm Hg (5.3) at baseline, 38.9 mm Hg (5.5) upon reaching the ileum, and 36.9 mm Hg (5.0) at examination's end. Mean maximum increase of CO2 was 4.5 mm Hg (3.6). No correlation was observed between volume of CO2 administered and increase in level of CO2 (correlation coefficient: 0.01; P value: 0.84). No complications were observed. Conclusions. The present prospective study, which was based on one of the largest sedated patient sample reported to date in this setting, provides compelling evidence that CO2 insufflation in colonoscopy is safe and unassociated with relevant increases in transcutaneously measured levels of CO2.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2012/692532
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3465970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A313346608</galeid><airiti_id>P20151216003_201212_201703090033_201703090033_162_165</airiti_id><sourcerecordid>A313346608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5862-faa701c5c726fb99696a85658ed877b977974f88edf613cbde39c7ab4090e70f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFktuL1DAUxoso7kWffFYCwiJKd5NmkjQ-CMN4GxhwwBUfQ5omO1kyydi0q_vfe2rXYQcEG0ou53e-tOd8RfGM4HNCGLuoMKkuuKwYrR4UxwRXssSM8IfjWuCSclwfFSc5X2OMKSbkcXFUUcwYZ-y4-L7QXZMieu_TL99atIx5cC7o3sOhj2iRQoopm7S7RcuMvmpn36I5Wncp76zp_Y1Fl53XASWH6EygNWTa2OcnxSOnQ7ZP7-bT4tvHD5eLz-Xqy6flYr4qNat5VTqtBSaGGVFx10jJJdc1fFlt21qIRgohxczVsHWcUNO0lkojdDPDEluBHT0t3k26u6HZ2tbA3Z0Oatf5re5uVdJeHUai36irdKPojDMpMAi8uhPo0o_B5l5tfTY2BB1tGrIi8NRM0loC-nJCr3SwykeXQNGMuJpTQkERSg3U-T8oGK3depOidR7ODxLO7iVsrA79JqcwjC3Ih-CbCTRQ_dxZt_9NgtVoBTVaQU1WAPrF_crs2b-9B-D1BGx8bPVP_x-15xNsAbFO7-GZJOApiK-muPad7726TkMXofFqDSqMVISD-f4ogiZMUHloIab0cEN4BS-jvwHdT9YF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1111859389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy Is Safe: A Prospective Trial of 347 Patients</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Geyer, M. ; Guller, U. ; Beglinger, Ch</creator><contributor>Dumonceau, Jean-Marc</contributor><creatorcontrib>Geyer, M. ; Guller, U. ; Beglinger, Ch ; Dumonceau, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><description>Available evidence suggests that the use of CO2 insufflation in endoscopy is more comfortable for the patient. The safety of CO2 use in colonoscopy remains contentious, particularly in sedated patients. The objective of the present prospective trial was to assess the safety of CO2 colonoscopies. Methods. 109 patients from our previous randomized CO2 colonoscopy study and an additional 238 subsequent consecutive unselected patients who had a routine colonoscopy performed in a private practice were enrolled from April 2008 through September 2008. All but 2 patients were sedated. All patients were routinely monitored with transcutaneous CO2 measurement. Volumes of CO2 administered were correlated with capnographic measurements from transcutaneous monitoring. Results. Of the 347 patients examined, 57% were women; mean (SD) age of participants was of 60.2 years (12.8). Mean propofol dosage was 136 mg (64 mg). Mean CO2 values were 34.7 mm Hg (5.3) at baseline, 38.9 mm Hg (5.5) upon reaching the ileum, and 36.9 mm Hg (5.0) at examination's end. Mean maximum increase of CO2 was 4.5 mm Hg (3.6). No correlation was observed between volume of CO2 administered and increase in level of CO2 (correlation coefficient: 0.01; P value: 0.84). No complications were observed. Conclusions. The present prospective study, which was based on one of the largest sedated patient sample reported to date in this setting, provides compelling evidence that CO2 insufflation in colonoscopy is safe and unassociated with relevant increases in transcutaneously measured levels of CO2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-3608</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1029-0516</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2012/692532</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23055655</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Limiteds</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Clinical Study ; Colonoscopy</subject><ispartof>Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, 2012, Vol.2012 (2012), p.162-165</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 M. Geyer et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 M. Geyer et al. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5862-faa701c5c726fb99696a85658ed877b977974f88edf613cbde39c7ab4090e70f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5862-faa701c5c726fb99696a85658ed877b977974f88edf613cbde39c7ab4090e70f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3465970/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3465970/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23055655$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Dumonceau, Jean-Marc</contributor><creatorcontrib>Geyer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guller, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beglinger, Ch</creatorcontrib><title>Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy Is Safe: A Prospective Trial of 347 Patients</title><title>Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy</title><addtitle>Diagn Ther Endosc</addtitle><description>Available evidence suggests that the use of CO2 insufflation in endoscopy is more comfortable for the patient. The safety of CO2 use in colonoscopy remains contentious, particularly in sedated patients. The objective of the present prospective trial was to assess the safety of CO2 colonoscopies. Methods. 109 patients from our previous randomized CO2 colonoscopy study and an additional 238 subsequent consecutive unselected patients who had a routine colonoscopy performed in a private practice were enrolled from April 2008 through September 2008. All but 2 patients were sedated. All patients were routinely monitored with transcutaneous CO2 measurement. Volumes of CO2 administered were correlated with capnographic measurements from transcutaneous monitoring. Results. Of the 347 patients examined, 57% were women; mean (SD) age of participants was of 60.2 years (12.8). Mean propofol dosage was 136 mg (64 mg). Mean CO2 values were 34.7 mm Hg (5.3) at baseline, 38.9 mm Hg (5.5) upon reaching the ileum, and 36.9 mm Hg (5.0) at examination's end. Mean maximum increase of CO2 was 4.5 mm Hg (3.6). No correlation was observed between volume of CO2 administered and increase in level of CO2 (correlation coefficient: 0.01; P value: 0.84). No complications were observed. Conclusions. The present prospective study, which was based on one of the largest sedated patient sample reported to date in this setting, provides compelling evidence that CO2 insufflation in colonoscopy is safe and unassociated with relevant increases in transcutaneously measured levels of CO2.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Clinical Study</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><issn>1070-3608</issn><issn>1029-0516</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFktuL1DAUxoso7kWffFYCwiJKd5NmkjQ-CMN4GxhwwBUfQ5omO1kyydi0q_vfe2rXYQcEG0ou53e-tOd8RfGM4HNCGLuoMKkuuKwYrR4UxwRXssSM8IfjWuCSclwfFSc5X2OMKSbkcXFUUcwYZ-y4-L7QXZMieu_TL99atIx5cC7o3sOhj2iRQoopm7S7RcuMvmpn36I5Wncp76zp_Y1Fl53XASWH6EygNWTa2OcnxSOnQ7ZP7-bT4tvHD5eLz-Xqy6flYr4qNat5VTqtBSaGGVFx10jJJdc1fFlt21qIRgohxczVsHWcUNO0lkojdDPDEluBHT0t3k26u6HZ2tbA3Z0Oatf5re5uVdJeHUai36irdKPojDMpMAi8uhPo0o_B5l5tfTY2BB1tGrIi8NRM0loC-nJCr3SwykeXQNGMuJpTQkERSg3U-T8oGK3depOidR7ODxLO7iVsrA79JqcwjC3Ih-CbCTRQ_dxZt_9NgtVoBTVaQU1WAPrF_crs2b-9B-D1BGx8bPVP_x-15xNsAbFO7-GZJOApiK-muPad7726TkMXofFqDSqMVISD-f4ogiZMUHloIab0cEN4BS-jvwHdT9YF</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Geyer, M.</creator><creator>Guller, U.</creator><creator>Beglinger, Ch</creator><general>Hindawi Limiteds</general><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>188</scope><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy Is Safe: A Prospective Trial of 347 Patients</title><author>Geyer, M. ; Guller, U. ; Beglinger, Ch</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5862-faa701c5c726fb99696a85658ed877b977974f88edf613cbde39c7ab4090e70f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Clinical Study</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geyer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guller, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beglinger, Ch</creatorcontrib><collection>華藝線上圖書館</collection><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geyer, M.</au><au>Guller, U.</au><au>Beglinger, Ch</au><au>Dumonceau, Jean-Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy Is Safe: A Prospective Trial of 347 Patients</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Diagn Ther Endosc</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2012</volume><issue>2012</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>162-165</pages><issn>1070-3608</issn><eissn>1029-0516</eissn><abstract>Available evidence suggests that the use of CO2 insufflation in endoscopy is more comfortable for the patient. The safety of CO2 use in colonoscopy remains contentious, particularly in sedated patients. The objective of the present prospective trial was to assess the safety of CO2 colonoscopies. Methods. 109 patients from our previous randomized CO2 colonoscopy study and an additional 238 subsequent consecutive unselected patients who had a routine colonoscopy performed in a private practice were enrolled from April 2008 through September 2008. All but 2 patients were sedated. All patients were routinely monitored with transcutaneous CO2 measurement. Volumes of CO2 administered were correlated with capnographic measurements from transcutaneous monitoring. Results. Of the 347 patients examined, 57% were women; mean (SD) age of participants was of 60.2 years (12.8). Mean propofol dosage was 136 mg (64 mg). Mean CO2 values were 34.7 mm Hg (5.3) at baseline, 38.9 mm Hg (5.5) upon reaching the ileum, and 36.9 mm Hg (5.0) at examination's end. Mean maximum increase of CO2 was 4.5 mm Hg (3.6). No correlation was observed between volume of CO2 administered and increase in level of CO2 (correlation coefficient: 0.01; P value: 0.84). No complications were observed. Conclusions. The present prospective study, which was based on one of the largest sedated patient sample reported to date in this setting, provides compelling evidence that CO2 insufflation in colonoscopy is safe and unassociated with relevant increases in transcutaneously measured levels of CO2.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Limiteds</pub><pmid>23055655</pmid><doi>10.1155/2012/692532</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1070-3608
ispartof Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, 2012, Vol.2012 (2012), p.162-165
issn 1070-3608
1029-0516
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3465970
source PubMed (Medline); Wiley Online Library Open Access
subjects Carbon dioxide
Clinical Study
Colonoscopy
title Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy Is Safe: A Prospective Trial of 347 Patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A11%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carbon%20Dioxide%20Insufflation%20in%20Colonoscopy%20Is%20Safe:%20A%20Prospective%20Trial%20of%20347%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Diagnostic%20and%20Therapeutic%20Endoscopy&rft.au=Geyer,%20M.&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=2012&rft.issue=2012&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=162-165&rft.issn=1070-3608&rft.eissn=1029-0516&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2012/692532&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA313346608%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5862-faa701c5c726fb99696a85658ed877b977974f88edf613cbde39c7ab4090e70f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1111859389&rft_id=info:pmid/23055655&rft_galeid=A313346608&rft_airiti_id=P20151216003_201212_201703090033_201703090033_162_165&rfr_iscdi=true