Loading…

Alternative Diets for Chrysomya putoria, an Old World Screwworm Fly

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the post—embryonic development of Chrysomya putoria (Wiedemann 1818) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) reared on a diet of gizzard or gizzard/agar homogenate, with a diet of beef used as the control. Four replicates per treatment were performed (60 mL of each diet)....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.) Ariz.), 2012, Vol.12 (43), p.1-11
Main Authors: Ferraz, Adriana C.P., Dallavecchia, Daniele L., Silva, Débora Cardoso da, Carvalho, Rafaela Pereira de, Filho, Renato Geraldo da Silva, Aguiar-Coelho, Valéria M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b511t-9a9b00640f7f9fd359351e61064060074849485baf09059a442b207d43ddd6373
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b511t-9a9b00640f7f9fd359351e61064060074849485baf09059a442b207d43ddd6373
container_end_page 11
container_issue 43
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.)
container_volume 12
creator Ferraz, Adriana C.P.
Dallavecchia, Daniele L.
Silva, Débora Cardoso da
Carvalho, Rafaela Pereira de
Filho, Renato Geraldo da Silva
Aguiar-Coelho, Valéria M.
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the post—embryonic development of Chrysomya putoria (Wiedemann 1818) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) reared on a diet of gizzard or gizzard/agar homogenate, with a diet of beef used as the control. Four replicates per treatment were performed (60 mL of each diet). The gizzard (60%), distilled water, and agar homogenate were combined in a blender. Each replicate consisted of 40 newly hatched larvae of C. putoria (5th generation). Each glass beaker containing a diet was inserted into a larger flask containing sawdust, which was covered with a nylon cloth held in place by an elastic band. The larvae were weighed and stored in test tubes sealed with a nylon cloth and an elastic band. The average temperature, measured with a thermohygrograph, was 20.6 °C, and the average relative humidity was 67.7%. The variation in the mean weight of mature larvae and in the duration of the larval, pupal, and total stages (newly hatched larvae to imagoes) were analyzed by Student's t—test (α = 5%), while viability was compared by ANOVA. The sex ratio was evaluated by the chi—squared test. The average duration of the period from the larval to imago stage was 8.868 days on the beef diet, 8.676 on the gizzard diet, and 9.067 on the gizzard/agar homogenate diet. Larval survival rates on these diets were 98, 92, and 73%, respectively, while pupal viabilities were 98, 91, and 71%, respectively, and larva—to—imago viabilities were 93, 83, and 64%, respectively. The duration of the pupal period differed significantly between the blowflies reared on the beef and gizzard/agar homogenate diets. The two diets proved to be good alternatives for rearing C. putoria.
doi_str_mv 10.1673/031.012.4301
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3472966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A324757072</galeid><sourcerecordid>A324757072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b511t-9a9b00640f7f9fd359351e61064060074849485baf09059a442b207d43ddd6373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd9rFDEQxxdRbK2--az7qKV3ze9sXoTjtFooFHoWH0N2N7lGdjfXJNt6_71zbFt6LyKBJEw-M_OdfIviPUZzLCQ9RRTPESZzRhF-URxiTsWMMEZePrsfFG9S-o0QQaxSr4sDQhRntKoOi-WiyzYOJvs7W371NqfShVgub-I2hX5rys2YQ_TmpDRDedm15a8QYV810d7fh9iXZ932bfHKmS7Zdw_nUXF99u3n8sfs4vL7-XJxMas5xnmmjKoREgw56ZRrKVeUYyvwLiQQkqxiilW8Ng4pxJUB3TVBsmW0bVtBJT0qvkx1N2Pd27axQ46m05voexO3Ohiv918Gf6PX4U5TJokSAgp8eigQw-1oU9a9T43tOjPYMCYNUhRWggn1HyitQDTMA-h8Qtems9oPLkDzBlZre9-EwToP8QUlTHKJJIGEz3sJwGT7J6_NmJI-X13tsycT28SQUrTuaVyM9M5_Df5r8F_v_Af8w_MveoIfDQfg4wQ4E7RZR5_09YogvJuFEkk4EMcTUfsA4v_d7y9CCb0T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1038600006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alternative Diets for Chrysomya putoria, an Old World Screwworm Fly</title><source>Oxford University Press Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ferraz, Adriana C.P. ; Dallavecchia, Daniele L. ; Silva, Débora Cardoso da ; Carvalho, Rafaela Pereira de ; Filho, Renato Geraldo da Silva ; Aguiar-Coelho, Valéria M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferraz, Adriana C.P. ; Dallavecchia, Daniele L. ; Silva, Débora Cardoso da ; Carvalho, Rafaela Pereira de ; Filho, Renato Geraldo da Silva ; Aguiar-Coelho, Valéria M.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the post—embryonic development of Chrysomya putoria (Wiedemann 1818) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) reared on a diet of gizzard or gizzard/agar homogenate, with a diet of beef used as the control. Four replicates per treatment were performed (60 mL of each diet). The gizzard (60%), distilled water, and agar homogenate were combined in a blender. Each replicate consisted of 40 newly hatched larvae of C. putoria (5th generation). Each glass beaker containing a diet was inserted into a larger flask containing sawdust, which was covered with a nylon cloth held in place by an elastic band. The larvae were weighed and stored in test tubes sealed with a nylon cloth and an elastic band. The average temperature, measured with a thermohygrograph, was 20.6 °C, and the average relative humidity was 67.7%. The variation in the mean weight of mature larvae and in the duration of the larval, pupal, and total stages (newly hatched larvae to imagoes) were analyzed by Student's t—test (α = 5%), while viability was compared by ANOVA. The sex ratio was evaluated by the chi—squared test. The average duration of the period from the larval to imago stage was 8.868 days on the beef diet, 8.676 on the gizzard diet, and 9.067 on the gizzard/agar homogenate diet. Larval survival rates on these diets were 98, 92, and 73%, respectively, while pupal viabilities were 98, 91, and 71%, respectively, and larva—to—imago viabilities were 93, 83, and 64%, respectively. The duration of the pupal period differed significantly between the blowflies reared on the beef and gizzard/agar homogenate diets. The two diets proved to be good alternatives for rearing C. putoria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1536-2442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-2442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1673/031.012.4301</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22954388</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: University of Wisconsin Library</publisher><subject>Agar ; analysis of variance ; Animal Feed ; Animals ; Beef ; Blowflies ; Calliphoridae ; Cattle ; Chickens ; Chrysomya putoria ; Cochliomyia hominivorax ; Diet ; Diets ; Diptera ; Diptera - growth &amp; development ; Female ; fly breeding ; Food and nutrition ; Food consumption ; Gizzard ; glass ; imagos ; Larva - growth &amp; development ; larvae ; larval development ; maggots ; Male ; Nylon ; Physiological aspects ; protein ; Pupa - growth &amp; development ; pupae ; rearing ; Relative humidity ; Sawdust ; Sex ratio ; Survival ; survival rate ; t-test ; temperature ; Temperature effects ; viability</subject><ispartof>Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.), 2012, Vol.12 (43), p.1-11</ispartof><rights>This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>2012 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b511t-9a9b00640f7f9fd359351e61064060074849485baf09059a442b207d43ddd6373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b511t-9a9b00640f7f9fd359351e61064060074849485baf09059a442b207d43ddd6373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472966/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472966/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4023,27922,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22954388$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferraz, Adriana C.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dallavecchia, Daniele L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Débora Cardoso da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Rafaela Pereira de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filho, Renato Geraldo da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguiar-Coelho, Valéria M.</creatorcontrib><title>Alternative Diets for Chrysomya putoria, an Old World Screwworm Fly</title><title>Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.)</title><addtitle>J Insect Sci</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the post—embryonic development of Chrysomya putoria (Wiedemann 1818) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) reared on a diet of gizzard or gizzard/agar homogenate, with a diet of beef used as the control. Four replicates per treatment were performed (60 mL of each diet). The gizzard (60%), distilled water, and agar homogenate were combined in a blender. Each replicate consisted of 40 newly hatched larvae of C. putoria (5th generation). Each glass beaker containing a diet was inserted into a larger flask containing sawdust, which was covered with a nylon cloth held in place by an elastic band. The larvae were weighed and stored in test tubes sealed with a nylon cloth and an elastic band. The average temperature, measured with a thermohygrograph, was 20.6 °C, and the average relative humidity was 67.7%. The variation in the mean weight of mature larvae and in the duration of the larval, pupal, and total stages (newly hatched larvae to imagoes) were analyzed by Student's t—test (α = 5%), while viability was compared by ANOVA. The sex ratio was evaluated by the chi—squared test. The average duration of the period from the larval to imago stage was 8.868 days on the beef diet, 8.676 on the gizzard diet, and 9.067 on the gizzard/agar homogenate diet. Larval survival rates on these diets were 98, 92, and 73%, respectively, while pupal viabilities were 98, 91, and 71%, respectively, and larva—to—imago viabilities were 93, 83, and 64%, respectively. The duration of the pupal period differed significantly between the blowflies reared on the beef and gizzard/agar homogenate diets. The two diets proved to be good alternatives for rearing C. putoria.</description><subject>Agar</subject><subject>analysis of variance</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Blowflies</subject><subject>Calliphoridae</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Chrysomya putoria</subject><subject>Cochliomyia hominivorax</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diets</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>Diptera - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fly breeding</subject><subject>Food and nutrition</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Gizzard</subject><subject>glass</subject><subject>imagos</subject><subject>Larva - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>larvae</subject><subject>larval development</subject><subject>maggots</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nylon</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>protein</subject><subject>Pupa - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>pupae</subject><subject>rearing</subject><subject>Relative humidity</subject><subject>Sawdust</subject><subject>Sex ratio</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>survival rate</subject><subject>t-test</subject><subject>temperature</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>viability</subject><issn>1536-2442</issn><issn>1536-2442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkd9rFDEQxxdRbK2--az7qKV3ze9sXoTjtFooFHoWH0N2N7lGdjfXJNt6_71zbFt6LyKBJEw-M_OdfIviPUZzLCQ9RRTPESZzRhF-URxiTsWMMEZePrsfFG9S-o0QQaxSr4sDQhRntKoOi-WiyzYOJvs7W371NqfShVgub-I2hX5rys2YQ_TmpDRDedm15a8QYV810d7fh9iXZ932bfHKmS7Zdw_nUXF99u3n8sfs4vL7-XJxMas5xnmmjKoREgw56ZRrKVeUYyvwLiQQkqxiilW8Ng4pxJUB3TVBsmW0bVtBJT0qvkx1N2Pd27axQ46m05voexO3Ohiv918Gf6PX4U5TJokSAgp8eigQw-1oU9a9T43tOjPYMCYNUhRWggn1HyitQDTMA-h8Qtems9oPLkDzBlZre9-EwToP8QUlTHKJJIGEz3sJwGT7J6_NmJI-X13tsycT28SQUrTuaVyM9M5_Df5r8F_v_Af8w_MveoIfDQfg4wQ4E7RZR5_09YogvJuFEkk4EMcTUfsA4v_d7y9CCb0T</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Ferraz, Adriana C.P.</creator><creator>Dallavecchia, Daniele L.</creator><creator>Silva, Débora Cardoso da</creator><creator>Carvalho, Rafaela Pereira de</creator><creator>Filho, Renato Geraldo da Silva</creator><creator>Aguiar-Coelho, Valéria M.</creator><general>University of Wisconsin Library</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Alternative Diets for Chrysomya putoria, an Old World Screwworm Fly</title><author>Ferraz, Adriana C.P. ; Dallavecchia, Daniele L. ; Silva, Débora Cardoso da ; Carvalho, Rafaela Pereira de ; Filho, Renato Geraldo da Silva ; Aguiar-Coelho, Valéria M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b511t-9a9b00640f7f9fd359351e61064060074849485baf09059a442b207d43ddd6373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agar</topic><topic>analysis of variance</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Blowflies</topic><topic>Calliphoridae</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Chrysomya putoria</topic><topic>Cochliomyia hominivorax</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diets</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>Diptera - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fly breeding</topic><topic>Food and nutrition</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Gizzard</topic><topic>glass</topic><topic>imagos</topic><topic>Larva - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>larvae</topic><topic>larval development</topic><topic>maggots</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nylon</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>protein</topic><topic>Pupa - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>pupae</topic><topic>rearing</topic><topic>Relative humidity</topic><topic>Sawdust</topic><topic>Sex ratio</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>survival rate</topic><topic>t-test</topic><topic>temperature</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>viability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferraz, Adriana C.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dallavecchia, Daniele L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Débora Cardoso da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Rafaela Pereira de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filho, Renato Geraldo da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguiar-Coelho, Valéria M.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferraz, Adriana C.P.</au><au>Dallavecchia, Daniele L.</au><au>Silva, Débora Cardoso da</au><au>Carvalho, Rafaela Pereira de</au><au>Filho, Renato Geraldo da Silva</au><au>Aguiar-Coelho, Valéria M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alternative Diets for Chrysomya putoria, an Old World Screwworm Fly</atitle><jtitle>Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Insect Sci</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>43</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><issn>1536-2442</issn><eissn>1536-2442</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the post—embryonic development of Chrysomya putoria (Wiedemann 1818) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) reared on a diet of gizzard or gizzard/agar homogenate, with a diet of beef used as the control. Four replicates per treatment were performed (60 mL of each diet). The gizzard (60%), distilled water, and agar homogenate were combined in a blender. Each replicate consisted of 40 newly hatched larvae of C. putoria (5th generation). Each glass beaker containing a diet was inserted into a larger flask containing sawdust, which was covered with a nylon cloth held in place by an elastic band. The larvae were weighed and stored in test tubes sealed with a nylon cloth and an elastic band. The average temperature, measured with a thermohygrograph, was 20.6 °C, and the average relative humidity was 67.7%. The variation in the mean weight of mature larvae and in the duration of the larval, pupal, and total stages (newly hatched larvae to imagoes) were analyzed by Student's t—test (α = 5%), while viability was compared by ANOVA. The sex ratio was evaluated by the chi—squared test. The average duration of the period from the larval to imago stage was 8.868 days on the beef diet, 8.676 on the gizzard diet, and 9.067 on the gizzard/agar homogenate diet. Larval survival rates on these diets were 98, 92, and 73%, respectively, while pupal viabilities were 98, 91, and 71%, respectively, and larva—to—imago viabilities were 93, 83, and 64%, respectively. The duration of the pupal period differed significantly between the blowflies reared on the beef and gizzard/agar homogenate diets. The two diets proved to be good alternatives for rearing C. putoria.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>University of Wisconsin Library</pub><pmid>22954388</pmid><doi>10.1673/031.012.4301</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1536-2442
ispartof Journal of insect science (Tucson, Ariz.), 2012, Vol.12 (43), p.1-11
issn 1536-2442
1536-2442
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3472966
source Oxford University Press Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Agar
analysis of variance
Animal Feed
Animals
Beef
Blowflies
Calliphoridae
Cattle
Chickens
Chrysomya putoria
Cochliomyia hominivorax
Diet
Diets
Diptera
Diptera - growth & development
Female
fly breeding
Food and nutrition
Food consumption
Gizzard
glass
imagos
Larva - growth & development
larvae
larval development
maggots
Male
Nylon
Physiological aspects
protein
Pupa - growth & development
pupae
rearing
Relative humidity
Sawdust
Sex ratio
Survival
survival rate
t-test
temperature
Temperature effects
viability
title Alternative Diets for Chrysomya putoria, an Old World Screwworm Fly
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A54%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alternative%20Diets%20for%20Chrysomya%20putoria,%20an%20Old%20World%20Screwworm%20Fly&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20insect%20science%20(Tucson,%20Ariz.)&rft.au=Ferraz,%20Adriana%20C.P.&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=43&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.issn=1536-2442&rft.eissn=1536-2442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1673/031.012.4301&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA324757072%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b511t-9a9b00640f7f9fd359351e61064060074849485baf09059a442b207d43ddd6373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038600006&rft_id=info:pmid/22954388&rft_galeid=A324757072&rfr_iscdi=true