Loading…
How Comparative Effectiveness Research Can Help Advance ‘Personalized Medicine’ In Cancer Treatment
The use of biomarkers to "personalize" cancer treatment-identifying discrete genes, proteins, or other indicators that can differentiate one type of cancer from another and enable the use of highly tailored therapies-offers tremendous potential for improved outcomes and lower treatment cos...
Saved in:
Published in: | Health Affairs 2011-12, Vol.30 (12), p.2259-2268 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The use of biomarkers to "personalize" cancer treatment-identifying discrete genes, proteins, or other indicators that can differentiate one type of cancer from another and enable the use of highly tailored therapies-offers tremendous potential for improved outcomes and lower treatment costs. However, the rapid development of cancer biomarker, or genomic, tests-combined with a paucity of evidence to support the effectiveness of the tests-presents a challenge for patients, clinicians, and other stakeholders. In this article we propose that comparative effectiveness research be used to strengthen what is now a haphazard process for developing and marketing cancer biomarker tests. We suggest novel funding approaches and a systematic process for moving from regulatory approval to the generation of evidence that meets the needs of stakeholders and, ultimately, patients. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0278-2715 1544-5208 |
DOI: | 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0637 |