Loading…

How Comparative Effectiveness Research Can Help Advance ‘Personalized Medicine’ In Cancer Treatment

The use of biomarkers to "personalize" cancer treatment-identifying discrete genes, proteins, or other indicators that can differentiate one type of cancer from another and enable the use of highly tailored therapies-offers tremendous potential for improved outcomes and lower treatment cos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health Affairs 2011-12, Vol.30 (12), p.2259-2268
Main Authors: Ramsey, Scott D., Veenstra, David, Tunis, Sean R., Garrison, Louis, Crowley, John J., Baker, Laurence H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The use of biomarkers to "personalize" cancer treatment-identifying discrete genes, proteins, or other indicators that can differentiate one type of cancer from another and enable the use of highly tailored therapies-offers tremendous potential for improved outcomes and lower treatment costs. However, the rapid development of cancer biomarker, or genomic, tests-combined with a paucity of evidence to support the effectiveness of the tests-presents a challenge for patients, clinicians, and other stakeholders. In this article we propose that comparative effectiveness research be used to strengthen what is now a haphazard process for developing and marketing cancer biomarker tests. We suggest novel funding approaches and a systematic process for moving from regulatory approval to the generation of evidence that meets the needs of stakeholders and, ultimately, patients. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0278-2715
1544-5208
DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0637