Loading…
Empirically Supported Treatment’s Impact on Organizational Culture and Climate
Objectives: With the continued push to implement empirically supported treatments (ESTs) into community-based organizations, it is important to investigate whether working condition disruptions occur during this process. While there are many studies investigating best practices and how to adopt them...
Saved in:
Published in: | Research on social work practice 2012-11, Vol.22 (6), p.665-671 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-eb89e40171a0461803501058a3271602dd197ba4298df92a763e397c572b1d8f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-eb89e40171a0461803501058a3271602dd197ba4298df92a763e397c572b1d8f3 |
container_end_page | 671 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 665 |
container_title | Research on social work practice |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver Dulmus, Catherine N. Maguin, Eugene |
description | Objectives: With the continued push to implement empirically supported treatments (ESTs) into community-based organizations, it is important to investigate whether working condition disruptions occur during this process. While there are many studies investigating best practices and how to adopt them, the literature lacks studies investigating the working conditions in programs that currently use ESTs. Method: This study compared the culture and climate scores of a large organization’s programs that use ESTs and those programs indicating no EST usage. Results: Of the total 55 different programs (1,273 frontline workers), 27 programs used ESTs. Results indicate that the programs offering an EST had significantly more rigid and resistant cultures, compared to those without any ESTs. In regard to climate, programs offering an EST were significantly less engaged, less functional, and more stressed. Conclusion: Outcomes indicate a significant disruption in organizational culture and climate for programs offering ESTs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1049731512448934 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3520434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ992698</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1049731512448934</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1494299130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-eb89e40171a0461803501058a3271602dd197ba4298df92a763e397c572b1d8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9qFTEUxoMotlb3LkQGunEzNSd_JslGkMu1thQqWNchdyb3OiUzGZOM0K58DV_PJ-kpt15qQXSVwPfLl3POdwh5CfQIQKm3QIVRHCQwIbTh4hHZBylZraSGx3hHub7V98iznC8pBc4a85TsMc4E58rsk0_LYepT37oQrqrP8zTFVHxXXSTvyuDH8uvHz1ydDJNrSxXH6jxt3Nhfu9LH0YVqMYcyJ1-5sasWoR9c8c_Jk7UL2b-4Ow_Ilw_Li8XH-uz8-GTx_qxupTCl9ittvKCgwFHRgKZcUqBSO84UNJR1HRi1coIZ3a0Nc6rhnhvVSsVW0Ok1PyDvtr7TvBp812KtyQU7JawiXdnoevunMvZf7SZ-t1wyKrhAgzd3Bil-m30uduhz60Nwo49ztqBZIxvR6P9AMQAwaKv-jQqDPRngFNHDB-hlnBOOFSmDcQI1DSBFt1SbYs7Jr3ctArW3S2AfLgE-eX1_NLsHv1NH4NUW8Jj8Tl6eGoProVGut3J2G3-vqL_9dwOrqcGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1948910961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Empirically Supported Treatment’s Impact on Organizational Culture and Climate</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver ; Dulmus, Catherine N. ; Maguin, Eugene</creator><creatorcontrib>Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver ; Dulmus, Catherine N. ; Maguin, Eugene</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: With the continued push to implement empirically supported treatments (ESTs) into community-based organizations, it is important to investigate whether working condition disruptions occur during this process. While there are many studies investigating best practices and how to adopt them, the literature lacks studies investigating the working conditions in programs that currently use ESTs. Method: This study compared the culture and climate scores of a large organization’s programs that use ESTs and those programs indicating no EST usage. Results: Of the total 55 different programs (1,273 frontline workers), 27 programs used ESTs. Results indicate that the programs offering an EST had significantly more rigid and resistant cultures, compared to those without any ESTs. In regard to climate, programs offering an EST were significantly less engaged, less functional, and more stressed. Conclusion: Outcomes indicate a significant disruption in organizational culture and climate for programs offering ESTs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-7315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7581</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1049731512448934</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23243379</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RSWPEW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Best Practices ; Child Psychology ; Community based ; Community Organizations ; Comparative Analysis ; Corporate culture ; Disruption ; Empirically supported treatment ; Evidence ; Intervention ; Organizational Climate ; Organizational Culture ; Social work ; Treatment Methods ; Work Environment ; Workers ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>Research on social work practice, 2012-11, Vol.22 (6), p.665-671</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2012 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-eb89e40171a0461803501058a3271602dd197ba4298df92a763e397c572b1d8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-eb89e40171a0461803501058a3271602dd197ba4298df92a763e397c572b1d8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,30978,30979,33753,33754,79111</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ992698$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23243379$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dulmus, Catherine N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguin, Eugene</creatorcontrib><title>Empirically Supported Treatment’s Impact on Organizational Culture and Climate</title><title>Research on social work practice</title><addtitle>Res Soc Work Pract</addtitle><description>Objectives: With the continued push to implement empirically supported treatments (ESTs) into community-based organizations, it is important to investigate whether working condition disruptions occur during this process. While there are many studies investigating best practices and how to adopt them, the literature lacks studies investigating the working conditions in programs that currently use ESTs. Method: This study compared the culture and climate scores of a large organization’s programs that use ESTs and those programs indicating no EST usage. Results: Of the total 55 different programs (1,273 frontline workers), 27 programs used ESTs. Results indicate that the programs offering an EST had significantly more rigid and resistant cultures, compared to those without any ESTs. In regard to climate, programs offering an EST were significantly less engaged, less functional, and more stressed. Conclusion: Outcomes indicate a significant disruption in organizational culture and climate for programs offering ESTs.</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Child Psychology</subject><subject>Community based</subject><subject>Community Organizations</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Disruption</subject><subject>Empirically supported treatment</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Organizational Climate</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Social work</subject><subject>Treatment Methods</subject><subject>Work Environment</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>1049-7315</issn><issn>1552-7581</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9qFTEUxoMotlb3LkQGunEzNSd_JslGkMu1thQqWNchdyb3OiUzGZOM0K58DV_PJ-kpt15qQXSVwPfLl3POdwh5CfQIQKm3QIVRHCQwIbTh4hHZBylZraSGx3hHub7V98iznC8pBc4a85TsMc4E58rsk0_LYepT37oQrqrP8zTFVHxXXSTvyuDH8uvHz1ydDJNrSxXH6jxt3Nhfu9LH0YVqMYcyJ1-5sasWoR9c8c_Jk7UL2b-4Ow_Ilw_Li8XH-uz8-GTx_qxupTCl9ittvKCgwFHRgKZcUqBSO84UNJR1HRi1coIZ3a0Nc6rhnhvVSsVW0Ok1PyDvtr7TvBp812KtyQU7JawiXdnoevunMvZf7SZ-t1wyKrhAgzd3Bil-m30uduhz60Nwo49ztqBZIxvR6P9AMQAwaKv-jQqDPRngFNHDB-hlnBOOFSmDcQI1DSBFt1SbYs7Jr3ctArW3S2AfLgE-eX1_NLsHv1NH4NUW8Jj8Tl6eGoProVGut3J2G3-vqL_9dwOrqcGQ</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver</creator><creator>Dulmus, Catherine N.</creator><creator>Maguin, Eugene</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>Empirically Supported Treatment’s Impact on Organizational Culture and Climate</title><author>Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver ; Dulmus, Catherine N. ; Maguin, Eugene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-eb89e40171a0461803501058a3271602dd197ba4298df92a763e397c572b1d8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Child Psychology</topic><topic>Community based</topic><topic>Community Organizations</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Disruption</topic><topic>Empirically supported treatment</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Organizational Climate</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Social work</topic><topic>Treatment Methods</topic><topic>Work Environment</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dulmus, Catherine N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguin, Eugene</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver</au><au>Dulmus, Catherine N.</au><au>Maguin, Eugene</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ992698</ericid><atitle>Empirically Supported Treatment’s Impact on Organizational Culture and Climate</atitle><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle><addtitle>Res Soc Work Pract</addtitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>665</spage><epage>671</epage><pages>665-671</pages><issn>1049-7315</issn><eissn>1552-7581</eissn><coden>RSWPEW</coden><abstract>Objectives: With the continued push to implement empirically supported treatments (ESTs) into community-based organizations, it is important to investigate whether working condition disruptions occur during this process. While there are many studies investigating best practices and how to adopt them, the literature lacks studies investigating the working conditions in programs that currently use ESTs. Method: This study compared the culture and climate scores of a large organization’s programs that use ESTs and those programs indicating no EST usage. Results: Of the total 55 different programs (1,273 frontline workers), 27 programs used ESTs. Results indicate that the programs offering an EST had significantly more rigid and resistant cultures, compared to those without any ESTs. In regard to climate, programs offering an EST were significantly less engaged, less functional, and more stressed. Conclusion: Outcomes indicate a significant disruption in organizational culture and climate for programs offering ESTs.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23243379</pmid><doi>10.1177/1049731512448934</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-7315 |
ispartof | Research on social work practice, 2012-11, Vol.22 (6), p.665-671 |
issn | 1049-7315 1552-7581 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3520434 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ERIC; Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Best practice Best Practices Child Psychology Community based Community Organizations Comparative Analysis Corporate culture Disruption Empirically supported treatment Evidence Intervention Organizational Climate Organizational Culture Social work Treatment Methods Work Environment Workers Working conditions |
title | Empirically Supported Treatment’s Impact on Organizational Culture and Climate |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T01%3A06%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Empirically%20Supported%20Treatment%E2%80%99s%20Impact%20on%20Organizational%20Culture%20and%20Climate&rft.jtitle=Research%20on%20social%20work%20practice&rft.au=Wolf,%20David%20A.%20Patterson-Silver&rft.date=2012-11&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=665&rft.epage=671&rft.pages=665-671&rft.issn=1049-7315&rft.eissn=1552-7581&rft.coden=RSWPEW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1049731512448934&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1494299130%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-eb89e40171a0461803501058a3271602dd197ba4298df92a763e397c572b1d8f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1948910961&rft_id=info:pmid/23243379&rft_ericid=EJ992698&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1049731512448934&rfr_iscdi=true |