Loading…

Empirically Supported Treatment’s Impact on Organizational Culture and Climate

Objectives: With the continued push to implement empirically supported treatments (ESTs) into community-based organizations, it is important to investigate whether working condition disruptions occur during this process. While there are many studies investigating best practices and how to adopt them...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Research on social work practice 2012-11, Vol.22 (6), p.665-671
Main Authors: Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver, Dulmus, Catherine N., Maguin, Eugene
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-eb89e40171a0461803501058a3271602dd197ba4298df92a763e397c572b1d8f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-eb89e40171a0461803501058a3271602dd197ba4298df92a763e397c572b1d8f3
container_end_page 671
container_issue 6
container_start_page 665
container_title Research on social work practice
container_volume 22
creator Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver
Dulmus, Catherine N.
Maguin, Eugene
description Objectives: With the continued push to implement empirically supported treatments (ESTs) into community-based organizations, it is important to investigate whether working condition disruptions occur during this process. While there are many studies investigating best practices and how to adopt them, the literature lacks studies investigating the working conditions in programs that currently use ESTs. Method: This study compared the culture and climate scores of a large organization’s programs that use ESTs and those programs indicating no EST usage. Results: Of the total 55 different programs (1,273 frontline workers), 27 programs used ESTs. Results indicate that the programs offering an EST had significantly more rigid and resistant cultures, compared to those without any ESTs. In regard to climate, programs offering an EST were significantly less engaged, less functional, and more stressed. Conclusion: Outcomes indicate a significant disruption in organizational culture and climate for programs offering ESTs.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1049731512448934
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3520434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ992698</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1049731512448934</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1494299130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-eb89e40171a0461803501058a3271602dd197ba4298df92a763e397c572b1d8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9qFTEUxoMotlb3LkQGunEzNSd_JslGkMu1thQqWNchdyb3OiUzGZOM0K58DV_PJ-kpt15qQXSVwPfLl3POdwh5CfQIQKm3QIVRHCQwIbTh4hHZBylZraSGx3hHub7V98iznC8pBc4a85TsMc4E58rsk0_LYepT37oQrqrP8zTFVHxXXSTvyuDH8uvHz1ydDJNrSxXH6jxt3Nhfu9LH0YVqMYcyJ1-5sasWoR9c8c_Jk7UL2b-4Ow_Ilw_Li8XH-uz8-GTx_qxupTCl9ittvKCgwFHRgKZcUqBSO84UNJR1HRi1coIZ3a0Nc6rhnhvVSsVW0Ok1PyDvtr7TvBp812KtyQU7JawiXdnoevunMvZf7SZ-t1wyKrhAgzd3Bil-m30uduhz60Nwo49ztqBZIxvR6P9AMQAwaKv-jQqDPRngFNHDB-hlnBOOFSmDcQI1DSBFt1SbYs7Jr3ctArW3S2AfLgE-eX1_NLsHv1NH4NUW8Jj8Tl6eGoProVGut3J2G3-vqL_9dwOrqcGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1948910961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Empirically Supported Treatment’s Impact on Organizational Culture and Climate</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver ; Dulmus, Catherine N. ; Maguin, Eugene</creator><creatorcontrib>Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver ; Dulmus, Catherine N. ; Maguin, Eugene</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: With the continued push to implement empirically supported treatments (ESTs) into community-based organizations, it is important to investigate whether working condition disruptions occur during this process. While there are many studies investigating best practices and how to adopt them, the literature lacks studies investigating the working conditions in programs that currently use ESTs. Method: This study compared the culture and climate scores of a large organization’s programs that use ESTs and those programs indicating no EST usage. Results: Of the total 55 different programs (1,273 frontline workers), 27 programs used ESTs. Results indicate that the programs offering an EST had significantly more rigid and resistant cultures, compared to those without any ESTs. In regard to climate, programs offering an EST were significantly less engaged, less functional, and more stressed. Conclusion: Outcomes indicate a significant disruption in organizational culture and climate for programs offering ESTs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-7315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7581</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1049731512448934</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23243379</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RSWPEW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Best Practices ; Child Psychology ; Community based ; Community Organizations ; Comparative Analysis ; Corporate culture ; Disruption ; Empirically supported treatment ; Evidence ; Intervention ; Organizational Climate ; Organizational Culture ; Social work ; Treatment Methods ; Work Environment ; Workers ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>Research on social work practice, 2012-11, Vol.22 (6), p.665-671</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2012 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-eb89e40171a0461803501058a3271602dd197ba4298df92a763e397c572b1d8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-eb89e40171a0461803501058a3271602dd197ba4298df92a763e397c572b1d8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,30978,30979,33753,33754,79111</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ992698$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23243379$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dulmus, Catherine N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguin, Eugene</creatorcontrib><title>Empirically Supported Treatment’s Impact on Organizational Culture and Climate</title><title>Research on social work practice</title><addtitle>Res Soc Work Pract</addtitle><description>Objectives: With the continued push to implement empirically supported treatments (ESTs) into community-based organizations, it is important to investigate whether working condition disruptions occur during this process. While there are many studies investigating best practices and how to adopt them, the literature lacks studies investigating the working conditions in programs that currently use ESTs. Method: This study compared the culture and climate scores of a large organization’s programs that use ESTs and those programs indicating no EST usage. Results: Of the total 55 different programs (1,273 frontline workers), 27 programs used ESTs. Results indicate that the programs offering an EST had significantly more rigid and resistant cultures, compared to those without any ESTs. In regard to climate, programs offering an EST were significantly less engaged, less functional, and more stressed. Conclusion: Outcomes indicate a significant disruption in organizational culture and climate for programs offering ESTs.</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Child Psychology</subject><subject>Community based</subject><subject>Community Organizations</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Disruption</subject><subject>Empirically supported treatment</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Organizational Climate</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Social work</subject><subject>Treatment Methods</subject><subject>Work Environment</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>1049-7315</issn><issn>1552-7581</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9qFTEUxoMotlb3LkQGunEzNSd_JslGkMu1thQqWNchdyb3OiUzGZOM0K58DV_PJ-kpt15qQXSVwPfLl3POdwh5CfQIQKm3QIVRHCQwIbTh4hHZBylZraSGx3hHub7V98iznC8pBc4a85TsMc4E58rsk0_LYepT37oQrqrP8zTFVHxXXSTvyuDH8uvHz1ydDJNrSxXH6jxt3Nhfu9LH0YVqMYcyJ1-5sasWoR9c8c_Jk7UL2b-4Ow_Ilw_Li8XH-uz8-GTx_qxupTCl9ittvKCgwFHRgKZcUqBSO84UNJR1HRi1coIZ3a0Nc6rhnhvVSsVW0Ok1PyDvtr7TvBp812KtyQU7JawiXdnoevunMvZf7SZ-t1wyKrhAgzd3Bil-m30uduhz60Nwo49ztqBZIxvR6P9AMQAwaKv-jQqDPRngFNHDB-hlnBOOFSmDcQI1DSBFt1SbYs7Jr3ctArW3S2AfLgE-eX1_NLsHv1NH4NUW8Jj8Tl6eGoProVGut3J2G3-vqL_9dwOrqcGQ</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver</creator><creator>Dulmus, Catherine N.</creator><creator>Maguin, Eugene</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>Empirically Supported Treatment’s Impact on Organizational Culture and Climate</title><author>Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver ; Dulmus, Catherine N. ; Maguin, Eugene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-eb89e40171a0461803501058a3271602dd197ba4298df92a763e397c572b1d8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Child Psychology</topic><topic>Community based</topic><topic>Community Organizations</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Disruption</topic><topic>Empirically supported treatment</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Organizational Climate</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Social work</topic><topic>Treatment Methods</topic><topic>Work Environment</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dulmus, Catherine N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguin, Eugene</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wolf, David A. Patterson-Silver</au><au>Dulmus, Catherine N.</au><au>Maguin, Eugene</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ992698</ericid><atitle>Empirically Supported Treatment’s Impact on Organizational Culture and Climate</atitle><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle><addtitle>Res Soc Work Pract</addtitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>665</spage><epage>671</epage><pages>665-671</pages><issn>1049-7315</issn><eissn>1552-7581</eissn><coden>RSWPEW</coden><abstract>Objectives: With the continued push to implement empirically supported treatments (ESTs) into community-based organizations, it is important to investigate whether working condition disruptions occur during this process. While there are many studies investigating best practices and how to adopt them, the literature lacks studies investigating the working conditions in programs that currently use ESTs. Method: This study compared the culture and climate scores of a large organization’s programs that use ESTs and those programs indicating no EST usage. Results: Of the total 55 different programs (1,273 frontline workers), 27 programs used ESTs. Results indicate that the programs offering an EST had significantly more rigid and resistant cultures, compared to those without any ESTs. In regard to climate, programs offering an EST were significantly less engaged, less functional, and more stressed. Conclusion: Outcomes indicate a significant disruption in organizational culture and climate for programs offering ESTs.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23243379</pmid><doi>10.1177/1049731512448934</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-7315
ispartof Research on social work practice, 2012-11, Vol.22 (6), p.665-671
issn 1049-7315
1552-7581
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3520434
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ERIC; Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Best practice
Best Practices
Child Psychology
Community based
Community Organizations
Comparative Analysis
Corporate culture
Disruption
Empirically supported treatment
Evidence
Intervention
Organizational Climate
Organizational Culture
Social work
Treatment Methods
Work Environment
Workers
Working conditions
title Empirically Supported Treatment’s Impact on Organizational Culture and Climate
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T01%3A06%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Empirically%20Supported%20Treatment%E2%80%99s%20Impact%20on%20Organizational%20Culture%20and%20Climate&rft.jtitle=Research%20on%20social%20work%20practice&rft.au=Wolf,%20David%20A.%20Patterson-Silver&rft.date=2012-11&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=665&rft.epage=671&rft.pages=665-671&rft.issn=1049-7315&rft.eissn=1552-7581&rft.coden=RSWPEW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1049731512448934&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1494299130%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-eb89e40171a0461803501058a3271602dd197ba4298df92a763e397c572b1d8f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1948910961&rft_id=info:pmid/23243379&rft_ericid=EJ992698&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1049731512448934&rfr_iscdi=true