Comparison of Learning Styles of Pharmacy Students and Faculty Members

To compare dominant learning styles of pharmacy students and faculty members and between faculty members in different tracks. Gregorc Style Delineator (GSD) and Zubin’s Pharmacists’ Inventory of Learning Styles (PILS) were administered to students and faculty members at an urban, Midwestern college...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of pharmaceutical education 2012-12, Vol.76 (10), p.192-192, Article 192
Main Authors: Crawford, Stephanie Y., Alhreish, Suhail K., Popovich, Nicholas G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Curriculum
Education, Pharmacy
Faculty
Female
Humans
Learning
learning preferences
learning styles
Male
Personality Inventory
pharmacy students
Students, Pharmacy - psychology
teaching
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-fe70ac1fb9d39208d65adf0b140d5efadfd7225897d899858e80321b2c4eb32e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-fe70ac1fb9d39208d65adf0b140d5efadfd7225897d899858e80321b2c4eb32e3
container_end_page 192
container_issue 10
container_start_page 192
container_title American journal of pharmaceutical education
container_volume 76
creator Crawford, Stephanie Y.
Alhreish, Suhail K.
Popovich, Nicholas G.
description To compare dominant learning styles of pharmacy students and faculty members and between faculty members in different tracks. Gregorc Style Delineator (GSD) and Zubin’s Pharmacists’ Inventory of Learning Styles (PILS) were administered to students and faculty members at an urban, Midwestern college of pharmacy. Based on responses from 299 students (classes of 2008, 2009, and 2010) and 59 faculty members, GSD styles were concrete sequential (48%), abstract sequential (18%), abstract random (13%), concrete random (13%), and multimodal (8%). With PILS, dominant styles were assimilator (47%) and converger (30%). There were no significant differences between faculty members and student learning styles nor across pharmacy student class years (p>0.05). Learning styles differed between men and women across both instruments (p
doi_str_mv 10.5688/ajpe7610192
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3530054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A325092165</galeid><els_id>S0002945923034812</els_id><sourcerecordid>A325092165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-fe70ac1fb9d39208d65adf0b140d5efadfd7225897d899858e80321b2c4eb32e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkd1rFDEUxYModq0--S4DvhRkaj4nkxehLK4KKwrqc8gkN9uUmWRNZgr735tla2mh5CHh5HfPvclB6C3Bl6Lr-4_mZg-yI5go-gytiBCs7Xgnn6MVxpi2igt1hl6VcoMx4YLTl-iMMipFJ-QKbdZp2pscSopN8s0WTI4h7ppf82GEcpR-Xps8GXuo0uIgzqUx0TUbY5dxPjTfYRogl9fohTdjgTd3-zn6s_n8e_213f748m19tW2t6PjcepDYWOIH5ZiiuHedMM7jgXDsBPh6dpJS0SvpeqV60UOPGSUDtRwGRoGdo08n3_0yTOBsnSebUe9zmEw-6GSCfnwTw7XepVvNBMNY8GpwcWeQ098FyqynUCyMo4mQlqIJlYzw2llW9P0J3ZkRdIg-VUd7xPUVowIrSjpRqcsnqLocTMGmCD5U_VHBh1OBzamUDP5-eoL1MVD9INBKv3v44Hv2f4IVECcA6rffBsi62ADRggsZ7KxdCk8a_wPM6K2e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1273148587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Learning Styles of Pharmacy Students and Faculty Members</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Crawford, Stephanie Y. ; Alhreish, Suhail K. ; Popovich, Nicholas G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Stephanie Y. ; Alhreish, Suhail K. ; Popovich, Nicholas G.</creatorcontrib><description>To compare dominant learning styles of pharmacy students and faculty members and between faculty members in different tracks. Gregorc Style Delineator (GSD) and Zubin’s Pharmacists’ Inventory of Learning Styles (PILS) were administered to students and faculty members at an urban, Midwestern college of pharmacy. Based on responses from 299 students (classes of 2008, 2009, and 2010) and 59 faculty members, GSD styles were concrete sequential (48%), abstract sequential (18%), abstract random (13%), concrete random (13%), and multimodal (8%). With PILS, dominant styles were assimilator (47%) and converger (30%). There were no significant differences between faculty members and student learning styles nor across pharmacy student class years (p&gt;0.05). Learning styles differed between men and women across both instruments (p&lt;0.01), and between faculty members in tenure and clinical tracks for the GSD styles (p=0.01). Learning styles differed among respondents based on gender and faculty track.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-6467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7610192</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23275657</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Curriculum ; Education, Pharmacy ; Faculty ; Female ; Humans ; Learning ; learning preferences ; learning styles ; Male ; Personality Inventory ; pharmacy students ; Students, Pharmacy - psychology ; teaching</subject><ispartof>American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2012-12, Vol.76 (10), p.192-192, Article 192</ispartof><rights>2012 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy</rights><rights>2012 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-fe70ac1fb9d39208d65adf0b140d5efadfd7225897d899858e80321b2c4eb32e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-fe70ac1fb9d39208d65adf0b140d5efadfd7225897d899858e80321b2c4eb32e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3530054/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3530054/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,33612,33878,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23275657$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Stephanie Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alhreish, Suhail K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popovich, Nicholas G.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Learning Styles of Pharmacy Students and Faculty Members</title><title>American journal of pharmaceutical education</title><addtitle>Am J Pharm Educ</addtitle><description>To compare dominant learning styles of pharmacy students and faculty members and between faculty members in different tracks. Gregorc Style Delineator (GSD) and Zubin’s Pharmacists’ Inventory of Learning Styles (PILS) were administered to students and faculty members at an urban, Midwestern college of pharmacy. Based on responses from 299 students (classes of 2008, 2009, and 2010) and 59 faculty members, GSD styles were concrete sequential (48%), abstract sequential (18%), abstract random (13%), concrete random (13%), and multimodal (8%). With PILS, dominant styles were assimilator (47%) and converger (30%). There were no significant differences between faculty members and student learning styles nor across pharmacy student class years (p&gt;0.05). Learning styles differed between men and women across both instruments (p&lt;0.01), and between faculty members in tenure and clinical tracks for the GSD styles (p=0.01). Learning styles differed among respondents based on gender and faculty track.</description><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Education, Pharmacy</subject><subject>Faculty</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>learning preferences</subject><subject>learning styles</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Personality Inventory</subject><subject>pharmacy students</subject><subject>Students, Pharmacy - psychology</subject><subject>teaching</subject><issn>0002-9459</issn><issn>1553-6467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkd1rFDEUxYModq0--S4DvhRkaj4nkxehLK4KKwrqc8gkN9uUmWRNZgr735tla2mh5CHh5HfPvclB6C3Bl6Lr-4_mZg-yI5go-gytiBCs7Xgnn6MVxpi2igt1hl6VcoMx4YLTl-iMMipFJ-QKbdZp2pscSopN8s0WTI4h7ppf82GEcpR-Xps8GXuo0uIgzqUx0TUbY5dxPjTfYRogl9fohTdjgTd3-zn6s_n8e_213f748m19tW2t6PjcepDYWOIH5ZiiuHedMM7jgXDsBPh6dpJS0SvpeqV60UOPGSUDtRwGRoGdo08n3_0yTOBsnSebUe9zmEw-6GSCfnwTw7XepVvNBMNY8GpwcWeQ098FyqynUCyMo4mQlqIJlYzw2llW9P0J3ZkRdIg-VUd7xPUVowIrSjpRqcsnqLocTMGmCD5U_VHBh1OBzamUDP5-eoL1MVD9INBKv3v44Hv2f4IVECcA6rffBsi62ADRggsZ7KxdCk8a_wPM6K2e</recordid><startdate>20121212</startdate><enddate>20121212</enddate><creator>Crawford, Stephanie Y.</creator><creator>Alhreish, Suhail K.</creator><creator>Popovich, Nicholas G.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy</general><general>American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121212</creationdate><title>Comparison of Learning Styles of Pharmacy Students and Faculty Members</title><author>Crawford, Stephanie Y. ; Alhreish, Suhail K. ; Popovich, Nicholas G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-fe70ac1fb9d39208d65adf0b140d5efadfd7225897d899858e80321b2c4eb32e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Education, Pharmacy</topic><topic>Faculty</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>learning preferences</topic><topic>learning styles</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Personality Inventory</topic><topic>pharmacy students</topic><topic>Students, Pharmacy - psychology</topic><topic>teaching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Stephanie Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alhreish, Suhail K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popovich, Nicholas G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of pharmaceutical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crawford, Stephanie Y.</au><au>Alhreish, Suhail K.</au><au>Popovich, Nicholas G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Learning Styles of Pharmacy Students and Faculty Members</atitle><jtitle>American journal of pharmaceutical education</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Pharm Educ</addtitle><date>2012-12-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>192</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>192-192</pages><artnum>192</artnum><issn>0002-9459</issn><eissn>1553-6467</eissn><abstract>To compare dominant learning styles of pharmacy students and faculty members and between faculty members in different tracks. Gregorc Style Delineator (GSD) and Zubin’s Pharmacists’ Inventory of Learning Styles (PILS) were administered to students and faculty members at an urban, Midwestern college of pharmacy. Based on responses from 299 students (classes of 2008, 2009, and 2010) and 59 faculty members, GSD styles were concrete sequential (48%), abstract sequential (18%), abstract random (13%), concrete random (13%), and multimodal (8%). With PILS, dominant styles were assimilator (47%) and converger (30%). There were no significant differences between faculty members and student learning styles nor across pharmacy student class years (p&gt;0.05). Learning styles differed between men and women across both instruments (p&lt;0.01), and between faculty members in tenure and clinical tracks for the GSD styles (p=0.01). Learning styles differed among respondents based on gender and faculty track.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23275657</pmid><doi>10.5688/ajpe7610192</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9459
ispartof American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2012-12, Vol.76 (10), p.192-192, Article 192
issn 0002-9459
1553-6467
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3530054
source Social Science Premium Collection; PubMed Central; Education Collection
subjects Curriculum
Education, Pharmacy
Faculty
Female
Humans
Learning
learning preferences
learning styles
Male
Personality Inventory
pharmacy students
Students, Pharmacy - psychology
teaching
title Comparison of Learning Styles of Pharmacy Students and Faculty Members
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A41%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Learning%20Styles%20of%20Pharmacy%20Students%20and%20Faculty%20Members&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20pharmaceutical%20education&rft.au=Crawford,%20Stephanie%20Y.&rft.date=2012-12-12&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=192&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=192-192&rft.artnum=192&rft.issn=0002-9459&rft.eissn=1553-6467&rft_id=info:doi/10.5688/ajpe7610192&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA325092165%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-fe70ac1fb9d39208d65adf0b140d5efadfd7225897d899858e80321b2c4eb32e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1273148587&rft_id=info:pmid/23275657&rft_galeid=A325092165&rfr_iscdi=true