Loading…

Pericardiectomy vs Medical Management in Patients With Relapsing Pericarditis

Abstract Objective To determine whether surgical pericardiectomy is a safe and effective alternative to medical management for chronic relapsing pericarditis. Patients and Methods Retrospective review of 184 patients presenting to the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, from January 1, 1994, throug...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mayo Clinic proceedings 2012-11, Vol.87 (11), p.1062-1070
Main Authors: Khandaker, Masud H., MD, PhD, Schaff, Hartzell V., MD, Greason, Kevin L., MD, Anavekar, Nandan S., MD, Espinosa, Raul E., MD, Hayes, Sharonne N., MD, Nishimura, Rick A., MD, Oh, Jae K., MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective To determine whether surgical pericardiectomy is a safe and effective alternative to medical management for chronic relapsing pericarditis. Patients and Methods Retrospective review of 184 patients presenting to the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, from January 1, 1994, through December 31, 2005, with persistent relapsing pericarditis identified 58 patients who had a pericardiectomy after failed medical management and 126 patients who continued with medical treatment only. The primary outcome variables were in-hospital postoperative mortality or major morbidity, all-cause death, time to relapse, and medication use. Results Mean ± SD follow-up was 5.5±3.5 years in the surgical group and 5.4±4.4 years in the medical treatment group. At baseline, patients in the surgical group had higher mean relapses (6.9 vs 5.5; P =.01), were more likely to be taking colchicine (43.1% [n=25] vs 18.3% [n=23]; P =.002) and corticosteroids (70.7% [n=41] vs 42.1% [n=53]; P
ISSN:0025-6196
1942-5546
DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.05.024