Loading…

Comparison of the myocardial clearance of endothelial progenitor cells injected early versus late into reperfused or sustained occlusion myocardial infarction

Stem cell transplantation following AMI has shown promise for the repair or reduction of the amount of myocardial injury. There is some evidence that these treatment effects appear to be directly correlated to cell residence time. This study aims to assess the effects of (a) the timing of stem cell...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2013-02, Vol.29 (2), p.497-504
Main Authors: Mitchell, Andrea J., Sabondjian, Eric, Blackwood, Kimberley J., Sykes, Jane, Deans, Lela, Feng, Qingping, Stodilka, Robert Z., Prato, Frank S., Wisenberg, Gerald
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b021fbb4e4a799cfb1fa8848e7fa0cd3e33c9866e0b4bc5a05c357ffc82550b23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b021fbb4e4a799cfb1fa8848e7fa0cd3e33c9866e0b4bc5a05c357ffc82550b23
container_end_page 504
container_issue 2
container_start_page 497
container_title The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
container_volume 29
creator Mitchell, Andrea J.
Sabondjian, Eric
Blackwood, Kimberley J.
Sykes, Jane
Deans, Lela
Feng, Qingping
Stodilka, Robert Z.
Prato, Frank S.
Wisenberg, Gerald
description Stem cell transplantation following AMI has shown promise for the repair or reduction of the amount of myocardial injury. There is some evidence that these treatment effects appear to be directly correlated to cell residence time. This study aims to assess the effects of (a) the timing of stem cell injection following myocardial infarction, and (b) flow milieu, on cell residence times at the site of transplantation by comparing three time points (day of infarction, week 1 and week 4–5), and two models of acute myocardial infarction (sustained occlusion or reperfusion). Twenty-one dogs received 2 injections of 30 million endothelial progenitor cells. The first injections were administered by epicardial (n = 8) or endocardial injection (n = 13) either on the day of infarction (n = 15) or at 1 week (n = 6). The second injections were administered by only endocardial injection (n = 18) 4 weeks following the first injection. Cell clearance half-lives were comparable between early and late injections. However, transplants into sustained occlusion infarcts resulted in slower cell clearance 77.1 ± 6.1 (n = 18) versus reperfused 59.4 ± 2.9 h (n = 21) p  = 0.009. Sustained occlusion infarcts had longer cell retention in comparison to reperfusion whereas the timing of injection did not affect clearance rates. If the potential for myocardial regeneration associated with cell transplantation is, at least in part, linked to cell residence times, then greater benefit may be observed with transplants into infarcts associated with persistent coronary artery occlusion.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10554-012-0086-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3560956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2879694951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b021fbb4e4a799cfb1fa8848e7fa0cd3e33c9866e0b4bc5a05c357ffc82550b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uc1u1DAQjhCIlsIDcEGRuHAJjO04Ti5IaMWfVIkLnC3HGW-9cuxgO5X2ZfqsOGypFiROtuf7mRl_VfWSwFsCIN4lApy3DRDaAPRdwx9Vl4QL1oBo2ePt3g0NF0N7UT1L6QAAFCh7Wl1QKljX0uGyutuFeVHRpuDrYOp8g_V8DFrFySpXa4cqKq9xw9BPoeBuA5YY9uhtDrHW6FyqrT-gzjjVReCO9S3GtKbaqYwFyqGOuGA0ayqMoilYVtZvD63dmmzpftbWeqOizqX6vHpilEv44v68qn58-vh996W5_vb56-7DdaNbAbkZgRIzji22SgyDNiMxqu_bHoVRoCeGjOmh7zqEsR01V8A148IY3VPOYaTsqnp_8l3WccZJo89ROblEO6t4lEFZ-Tfi7Y3ch1vJeAcD74rBm3uDGH6umLKcbdq-RnkMa5KE9kzQnjBWqK__oR7CGn1Z7zeLsIH120TkxNIxpBTRPAxDQG7py1P6sqQvt_QlL5pX51s8KP7EXQj0REgF8nuMZ63_6_oLi43AXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1283139382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the myocardial clearance of endothelial progenitor cells injected early versus late into reperfused or sustained occlusion myocardial infarction</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Mitchell, Andrea J. ; Sabondjian, Eric ; Blackwood, Kimberley J. ; Sykes, Jane ; Deans, Lela ; Feng, Qingping ; Stodilka, Robert Z. ; Prato, Frank S. ; Wisenberg, Gerald</creator><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Andrea J. ; Sabondjian, Eric ; Blackwood, Kimberley J. ; Sykes, Jane ; Deans, Lela ; Feng, Qingping ; Stodilka, Robert Z. ; Prato, Frank S. ; Wisenberg, Gerald</creatorcontrib><description>Stem cell transplantation following AMI has shown promise for the repair or reduction of the amount of myocardial injury. There is some evidence that these treatment effects appear to be directly correlated to cell residence time. This study aims to assess the effects of (a) the timing of stem cell injection following myocardial infarction, and (b) flow milieu, on cell residence times at the site of transplantation by comparing three time points (day of infarction, week 1 and week 4–5), and two models of acute myocardial infarction (sustained occlusion or reperfusion). Twenty-one dogs received 2 injections of 30 million endothelial progenitor cells. The first injections were administered by epicardial (n = 8) or endocardial injection (n = 13) either on the day of infarction (n = 15) or at 1 week (n = 6). The second injections were administered by only endocardial injection (n = 18) 4 weeks following the first injection. Cell clearance half-lives were comparable between early and late injections. However, transplants into sustained occlusion infarcts resulted in slower cell clearance 77.1 ± 6.1 (n = 18) versus reperfused 59.4 ± 2.9 h (n = 21) p  = 0.009. Sustained occlusion infarcts had longer cell retention in comparison to reperfusion whereas the timing of injection did not affect clearance rates. If the potential for myocardial regeneration associated with cell transplantation is, at least in part, linked to cell residence times, then greater benefit may be observed with transplants into infarcts associated with persistent coronary artery occlusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1569-5794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0743</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-8312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0086-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22736429</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJCIBI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cardiac Imaging ; Cardiology ; Cell Survival ; Cell Tracking ; Disease Models, Animal ; Dogs ; Endothelial Cells - pathology ; Endothelial Cells - transplantation ; Female ; Imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Multimodal Imaging ; Myocardial Infarction - diagnostic imaging ; Myocardial Infarction - pathology ; Myocardial Infarction - surgery ; Myocardial Reperfusion Injury - diagnostic imaging ; Myocardial Reperfusion Injury - pathology ; Myocardial Reperfusion Injury - surgery ; Myocardium - pathology ; Original Paper ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Radiology ; Stem Cell Transplantation ; Time Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2013-02, Vol.29 (2), p.497-504</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b021fbb4e4a799cfb1fa8848e7fa0cd3e33c9866e0b4bc5a05c357ffc82550b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b021fbb4e4a799cfb1fa8848e7fa0cd3e33c9866e0b4bc5a05c357ffc82550b23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22736429$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Andrea J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabondjian, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackwood, Kimberley J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deans, Lela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Qingping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stodilka, Robert Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prato, Frank S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisenberg, Gerald</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the myocardial clearance of endothelial progenitor cells injected early versus late into reperfused or sustained occlusion myocardial infarction</title><title>The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging</title><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><description>Stem cell transplantation following AMI has shown promise for the repair or reduction of the amount of myocardial injury. There is some evidence that these treatment effects appear to be directly correlated to cell residence time. This study aims to assess the effects of (a) the timing of stem cell injection following myocardial infarction, and (b) flow milieu, on cell residence times at the site of transplantation by comparing three time points (day of infarction, week 1 and week 4–5), and two models of acute myocardial infarction (sustained occlusion or reperfusion). Twenty-one dogs received 2 injections of 30 million endothelial progenitor cells. The first injections were administered by epicardial (n = 8) or endocardial injection (n = 13) either on the day of infarction (n = 15) or at 1 week (n = 6). The second injections were administered by only endocardial injection (n = 18) 4 weeks following the first injection. Cell clearance half-lives were comparable between early and late injections. However, transplants into sustained occlusion infarcts resulted in slower cell clearance 77.1 ± 6.1 (n = 18) versus reperfused 59.4 ± 2.9 h (n = 21) p  = 0.009. Sustained occlusion infarcts had longer cell retention in comparison to reperfusion whereas the timing of injection did not affect clearance rates. If the potential for myocardial regeneration associated with cell transplantation is, at least in part, linked to cell residence times, then greater benefit may be observed with transplants into infarcts associated with persistent coronary artery occlusion.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cardiac Imaging</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>Cell Tracking</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Endothelial Cells - pathology</subject><subject>Endothelial Cells - transplantation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Multimodal Imaging</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - pathology</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - surgery</subject><subject>Myocardial Reperfusion Injury - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Myocardial Reperfusion Injury - pathology</subject><subject>Myocardial Reperfusion Injury - surgery</subject><subject>Myocardium - pathology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Stem Cell Transplantation</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>1569-5794</issn><issn>1573-0743</issn><issn>1875-8312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1Uc1u1DAQjhCIlsIDcEGRuHAJjO04Ti5IaMWfVIkLnC3HGW-9cuxgO5X2ZfqsOGypFiROtuf7mRl_VfWSwFsCIN4lApy3DRDaAPRdwx9Vl4QL1oBo2ePt3g0NF0N7UT1L6QAAFCh7Wl1QKljX0uGyutuFeVHRpuDrYOp8g_V8DFrFySpXa4cqKq9xw9BPoeBuA5YY9uhtDrHW6FyqrT-gzjjVReCO9S3GtKbaqYwFyqGOuGA0ayqMoilYVtZvD63dmmzpftbWeqOizqX6vHpilEv44v68qn58-vh996W5_vb56-7DdaNbAbkZgRIzji22SgyDNiMxqu_bHoVRoCeGjOmh7zqEsR01V8A148IY3VPOYaTsqnp_8l3WccZJo89ROblEO6t4lEFZ-Tfi7Y3ch1vJeAcD74rBm3uDGH6umLKcbdq-RnkMa5KE9kzQnjBWqK__oR7CGn1Z7zeLsIH120TkxNIxpBTRPAxDQG7py1P6sqQvt_QlL5pX51s8KP7EXQj0REgF8nuMZ63_6_oLi43AXQ</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Mitchell, Andrea J.</creator><creator>Sabondjian, Eric</creator><creator>Blackwood, Kimberley J.</creator><creator>Sykes, Jane</creator><creator>Deans, Lela</creator><creator>Feng, Qingping</creator><creator>Stodilka, Robert Z.</creator><creator>Prato, Frank S.</creator><creator>Wisenberg, Gerald</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>Comparison of the myocardial clearance of endothelial progenitor cells injected early versus late into reperfused or sustained occlusion myocardial infarction</title><author>Mitchell, Andrea J. ; Sabondjian, Eric ; Blackwood, Kimberley J. ; Sykes, Jane ; Deans, Lela ; Feng, Qingping ; Stodilka, Robert Z. ; Prato, Frank S. ; Wisenberg, Gerald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b021fbb4e4a799cfb1fa8848e7fa0cd3e33c9866e0b4bc5a05c357ffc82550b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cardiac Imaging</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>Cell Tracking</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Endothelial Cells - pathology</topic><topic>Endothelial Cells - transplantation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Multimodal Imaging</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - pathology</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - surgery</topic><topic>Myocardial Reperfusion Injury - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Myocardial Reperfusion Injury - pathology</topic><topic>Myocardial Reperfusion Injury - surgery</topic><topic>Myocardium - pathology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Stem Cell Transplantation</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Andrea J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabondjian, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackwood, Kimberley J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deans, Lela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Qingping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stodilka, Robert Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prato, Frank S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisenberg, Gerald</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mitchell, Andrea J.</au><au>Sabondjian, Eric</au><au>Blackwood, Kimberley J.</au><au>Sykes, Jane</au><au>Deans, Lela</au><au>Feng, Qingping</au><au>Stodilka, Robert Z.</au><au>Prato, Frank S.</au><au>Wisenberg, Gerald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the myocardial clearance of endothelial progenitor cells injected early versus late into reperfused or sustained occlusion myocardial infarction</atitle><jtitle>The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging</jtitle><stitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</stitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>497</spage><epage>504</epage><pages>497-504</pages><issn>1569-5794</issn><eissn>1573-0743</eissn><eissn>1875-8312</eissn><coden>IJCIBI</coden><abstract>Stem cell transplantation following AMI has shown promise for the repair or reduction of the amount of myocardial injury. There is some evidence that these treatment effects appear to be directly correlated to cell residence time. This study aims to assess the effects of (a) the timing of stem cell injection following myocardial infarction, and (b) flow milieu, on cell residence times at the site of transplantation by comparing three time points (day of infarction, week 1 and week 4–5), and two models of acute myocardial infarction (sustained occlusion or reperfusion). Twenty-one dogs received 2 injections of 30 million endothelial progenitor cells. The first injections were administered by epicardial (n = 8) or endocardial injection (n = 13) either on the day of infarction (n = 15) or at 1 week (n = 6). The second injections were administered by only endocardial injection (n = 18) 4 weeks following the first injection. Cell clearance half-lives were comparable between early and late injections. However, transplants into sustained occlusion infarcts resulted in slower cell clearance 77.1 ± 6.1 (n = 18) versus reperfused 59.4 ± 2.9 h (n = 21) p  = 0.009. Sustained occlusion infarcts had longer cell retention in comparison to reperfusion whereas the timing of injection did not affect clearance rates. If the potential for myocardial regeneration associated with cell transplantation is, at least in part, linked to cell residence times, then greater benefit may be observed with transplants into infarcts associated with persistent coronary artery occlusion.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>22736429</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10554-012-0086-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1569-5794
ispartof The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2013-02, Vol.29 (2), p.497-504
issn 1569-5794
1573-0743
1875-8312
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3560956
source Springer Link
subjects Animals
Cardiac Imaging
Cardiology
Cell Survival
Cell Tracking
Disease Models, Animal
Dogs
Endothelial Cells - pathology
Endothelial Cells - transplantation
Female
Imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Multimodal Imaging
Myocardial Infarction - diagnostic imaging
Myocardial Infarction - pathology
Myocardial Infarction - surgery
Myocardial Reperfusion Injury - diagnostic imaging
Myocardial Reperfusion Injury - pathology
Myocardial Reperfusion Injury - surgery
Myocardium - pathology
Original Paper
Positron-Emission Tomography
Radiology
Stem Cell Transplantation
Time Factors
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Comparison of the myocardial clearance of endothelial progenitor cells injected early versus late into reperfused or sustained occlusion myocardial infarction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A03%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20myocardial%20clearance%20of%20endothelial%20progenitor%20cells%20injected%20early%20versus%20late%20into%20reperfused%20or%20sustained%20occlusion%20myocardial%20infarction&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20Journal%20of%20Cardiovascular%20Imaging&rft.au=Mitchell,%20Andrea%20J.&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=497&rft.epage=504&rft.pages=497-504&rft.issn=1569-5794&rft.eissn=1573-0743&rft.coden=IJCIBI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10554-012-0086-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2879694951%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b021fbb4e4a799cfb1fa8848e7fa0cd3e33c9866e0b4bc5a05c357ffc82550b23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1283139382&rft_id=info:pmid/22736429&rfr_iscdi=true