Remote preconditioning, perconditioning, and postconditioning: a comparative study of their cardioprotective properties in rat models

• Published in: Clinics (São Paulo, Brazil) Brazil), 2013, Vol.68 (2), p.263-268
• Main Authors: Zhu, Shui-Bo, Liu, Yong, Zhu, Yu, Yin, Gui-Lin, Wang, Rong-Ping, Zhang, Yu, Zhu, Jian, Jiang, Wei
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Basic Research; Cardioprotective Property; Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury
• ISSN: 1807-5932; 1980-5322
• DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2013(02)OA22

Ischemia reperfusion injury is partly responsible for the high mortality associated with induced myocardial injury and the reduction in the full benefit of myocardial reperfusion. Remote ischemic preconditioning, perconditioning, and postconditioning have all been shown to be cardioprotective. However, it is still unknown which one is the most beneficial. To examine this issue, we used adult male Wistar rat ischemia reperfusion models to compare the cardioprotective effect of these three approaches applied on double-sided hind limbs. The rats were randomly distributed to the following five groups: sham, ischemia reperfusion, remote preconditioning, remote perconditioning, and remote post-conditioning. The ischemia/reperfusion model was established by sternotomy followed by a 30-min ligation of the left coronary artery and a subsequent 3-h reperfusion. Remote conditioning was induced with three 5-min ischemia/5-min reperfusion cycles of the double-sided hind limbs using a tourniquet. A lower early reperfusion arrhythmia score (1.50±0.97) was found in the rats treated with remote perconditioning compared to those in the ischemia reperfusion group (2.33±0.71). Meanwhile, reduced infarct size was also observed (15.27±5.19% in remote perconditioning, 14.53±3.45% in remote preconditioning, and 19.84±5.85% in remote post-conditioning vs. 34.47±7.13% in ischemia reperfusion, p